Media Bias
It doesn't take a rocket science to comprehend that the mainstream media is consumed with bias. It isn't just toward one side or ideology. Media bias existed in America among many political perspectives spanning numerous decades. This is nothing new as the Bible says. The CIA created Operation Mockingbird in order to infiltrate the media. Back in that time (during the late 1940's and the early 1950's), the media had paranoia about Communism. The truth is that the international bankers (as admitted by Carroll Quigley's book entitled "The Tragedy of Hope") funded high level Communists in the Soviet Union, so these globalists can monopolize their economies (and control the world more. Quigley actually agreed with the new world order, but believed it should be more publicly. Carroll Quigley also admitted that a plan for a Pan-American Union existed). Quigley was the mentor and professor to Bill Clinton in the Jesuit Georgetown University. Bill Clinton was once apart of Demolay as a child. Bill Clinton was a famous puppet President who shown the horned Il Canuto horned handsign, he meet into a Bilderberg Group, he was involved in the Waco genocide, and committed other evil policies (in his Presidency from 1993-2001). Carroll Quigley spoke of the goal of some elites such as international bankers as:
"[The aim of the international bankers was] nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was
to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." ( Professor Carroll Quigley, 'Tragedy & Hope', p. 324. Can the Pilgrims, which Quigley never mentioned, verify his story of an Anglo-American Establishment?)
Propaganda is common on many avenues and I won't just expose bias in one network. Multiple networks have inherit bias. Let's be real here. The mainstream media isn't true free. The media that's global is controlled by a select few of corporations who are funded by the international elite in league with globalism. For example, the 5 major media conglomerates of AOL/Time Warner, News Corporation, Walt Disney, Vivendi Universal, and Bertelsmann control the vast majority of the mainstream media in the world. It's a monopoly and not a true free market of ideas. They control most of messages sent in the mainstream media. The good news is that the alternative media is growing in leaps and bounds. Anderson Cooper is an heir to one of Astor family and is related to the Vanderbilt family. Even Tucker Carlson is an heir of one of the big families. Of course, you can't write about the mainstream media without outlining words about FOX News. FOX News is a popular and controversial news network. Many liberals and musicians like Nas hates its guts because of perceived bias. Are they biased? Yes, and that's the case for other networks. All networks are biased in fact, because human beings are fallible people. On many occasion, media hosts and commentators daily carry out their emotions plus their political views on their selves. It's greater today, because the media has become more like popular culture with certain segments (that don't deal with real issues, but trivial points like celebrities and the like). FOX News is controlled by Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is one of the most powerful media figures in the world. He is a Papal Knight of St. Gregory, so the Vatican holds great influence on the man plus FOX News. One of the easiest examples of FOX News's bias is dealing with the Iraq War. Dale Stienreich wrote an article entitled "Fibbing It Up at Fox" which is located in LewRockwell.com. He said that FOX News tried to legitimize the war ever since it commenced in March 20, 2003. Shepard Smith (a FOX News commentator) said that Saddam is using flood water as a weapon (in March 14) and the Iraqis were planning to use large stores of napalm to kill coalition forces (in March 19). Even on March 24, Colonel Dave Hunt from FOX said why don't coalition forces blow up Al Jazeera TV. The media typically didn't take enough time to analyze and display the drawbacks of the war which are evident today. FOX have many fake conservatives like Ann Coulter considering supporting Hillary Clinton. Some ex-FOX employees believe certain memos exist to exhibit bias.
Former Fox News producer Charlie Reina explained, "The roots of Fox News Channel's day-to-day on-air bias are actual and direct. They come in the form of an executive memo distributed electronically each morning, addressing what stories will be covered and, often, suggesting how they should be covered. To the newsroom personnel responsible for the channel's daytime programming, The Memo is the Bible. If, on any given day, you notice that the Fox anchors seem to be trying to drive a particular point home, you can bet The Memo is behind it."
The most famous and controversial FOX News host is Bill O'Reilly. O'Reilly claims to be "Fair and Balanced" but that's impossible because our human nature. Now, on many times, he raises his voice for no reason at all to cut down a guest. There is nothing wrong with being emotional, but not to impede the ideas of another guest. Now, it's much easier to figure out bias dealing with him because Bill O'Reilly has a whole stack of quotations outlining his views. Here's one of Bill's famous quotes:
"Reverend, you can go back to Africa if you want to. I mean, you could go and repatriate back to the continent or anywhere. Not any country will take U.S. citizens, but African countries will."
--Bill O'Reilly, to slavery reparations advocate Rev. Al Dixon (The O'Reilly Factor, 3/6/01) Regardless if you agree with reparations or not, that comments was degatory.
For example, Bill O'Reilly called Hispanic people the "W" word with no apologies. He told blacks who strongly disagree with him that you can go back to Africa. One April 15, 2003, Bill O'Reilly said to African American students jokingly not to steal his hood caps of his car. O'Reilly called anyone who sincerely questions the official story of 9/11 are nuts, which is a lie. He agrees with the Iraq War and neo-conservative policy. There is nothing wrong with being biased if you want to. Yet, since Bill claims to have none so he must be called on it for his hypocrisy. People should be up front about their views and not sugarcoat it like FOX News is achieving time after time again. It's even been found out that Katie Couric from CBS was at a NOW gathering. Recently in late July 2008, ex-White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan accused some FOX News commentators like O'Reilly and Hannity of recieving talking points from the White House so to speak. Scott made a distinction between journalists (he said many of the journalists didn't recieve talking points from the Bush administration) and pundits. It is true that Hannity (along with other neo con talk radio hosts) has meet in the White House with Bush not too long ago to discuss policies and political strategies. Bill O'Reilly strongly denies the charge. O'Reilly called McClellan a liar and he has lost all respect for him. The truth will come out. The truth is that despite Scott telling the truth or not, FOX News does have very favorable coverage of the White House. The ultra-liberal National Organization for Women honored Couric at their annual Intrepid Awards Gala last week in Washington, DC. She quipped to her hosts that "[i]f everyone in the country was like you, CBS News would be number one." NOW is right that women should be treated with respect without unfair discrimination. Yet, NOW is wrong in supporting abortion on demand. Katie Couric calls herself a feminist. Katie is the host of CBS Evening News. When she was still on the Today Show in 1997, a guest named Whoopi Goldberg outed Couric's "pro-abortion" position ..ion when the comedienne revealed the two had attended a "pro-abortion" march together. Before her, liberal Dan Rather was its host on CBS Evening News. He's suing CBS presently for money problems. In October 2006, after the father of a victim of the Columbine shootings declared his pro-life position in a "freeSpeech" segment on CBS Evening News, Couric wrote on her blog that his view might be seen as "repugnant." Those views weren't repugnant but honorable. The disrespectful of human life and moral relativism does have a huge influence on the mindset on why school shooter enact their rampage of murder plus destruction. Hence, if you deny many liberal media leaders executing bias, you're wrong or falsely mistaken.
CNN is another famous network. It has been accused of bias mostly by conservatives. CNN has been caught with bais on many times just like FOX News has. One easy example is how once CNN head Ted Turner blatantly called Christians "losers" in a hateful manner. Turner wants the depopulation of most of the world's population. CNN Presents: God's Warriors was a three-part CNN Presents documentary produced by Christiane Amanpour. God's Warriors is the most bias religious documentary in the 21st century. It's a shame. It lied and compared conservative Christians to Muslim jihadists who have killed folks that disagreed with their religious beliefs. Christiane Amanpour was the narrator of the documentary. Amanpour lied and said that some Christians are playing the victim card. No, we're not playing the victim card when Christians are arrested in Canada, the UK, and the USA for just peacefully expressing their religious beliefs. We're not playing the victim card when Christians in America are ashamed and fearful to express their views publicly. We're not playing the victim card when the IRS' 401 (c)3 law stifles free speech of Christians and many other religious people from expressing their deeply held convictions inside of the pulpit. That's not a playing a card. That's presenting the facts. There's a big and monumental difference. Christiane also described how women with a dress code in a Christian school is equivalent to the sexist sharia law where folks force women to wear a dress across their whole bodies. Also, the documentary used falsehoods against Jewish believers and Muslim believers since the majority of Muslims reject the extremist Wahabbi Islamic bad tenets. The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), outlined criticisms against God's Warriors. Now, Christaine Amanpour wants to present a documentary called Buddhist Warriors which the commercial says they want peace. Amanpour is a hypocrite because she never takes the time outlining how certain religions in God's Warriors are seeking peace in the world. Now, she wants to praise the Buddists. Mormon Glen Beck is another case of bias. He presents himself as an authentic conservative, but he agrees with the war on terror and the Patriot Act. Also, he said degatory comments on air before. He once compared 9/11 Truthers to terrorists and classified the victims of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans as "scumbags." The innocent victims who died from Katrina were never scumbags at all. That's disrespectful obviously. Soledad O'Brian is narrated a new CNN documentary entitled "Being Black in America." This documentary ranges from discussing the family, the Black Man, the Black Women, and other issues. From seeing some of it, it's not as bias as God's Warrior. O'Brian herself has a black mother, so she wanted to take special time in giving as much an accurate portray as possible to outline some clarity about Black America. Some criticism against the documentary subscibe to the notion that it focuses too much on the negative aspects of black society in America. Despite that, the negative and the positive protraits of black Americans ought to accurately presented in the media and society.
MSNBC is another well known cable TV network. They have a whole list of personalities. Their major hosts include Dan Abrams, Joe Scarborough, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, David Gregory, and others. They classify themselves as the nation's fastest growing cable news network. Recently, they've taken an anti-Iraq War stance. For example, almost daily, Olbermann, Matthews, and even David Shuster criciticized the President's policy about that the war in Iraq. Each blatantly call for a withdraw from Iraq. Even President George W. Bush said he's willing to have a time "horizon" to eventually get rid of some of the American troops from Iraq. Even MSNBC news leaders admit to the liberal bent of their coverage. I have no problem with this as long as they admit it. I havemore respect for a network to admit to bias than sugarcoat it or put it under the rug. Even MSNBC isn't immune from extremism. Members of Morning Joe called for peaceful 911 Truthers to be tasers and sent ininto concentration camps. Joe Scraborough supported that and mocked 9/11 Truthers. Chris Matthews is a known Papal anti-gun, pro-abortion proponent. He even tries to intimidate people who even project legitimate dissent with the Roman Catholic Church. Keith Olbermann is right on many civil liberty issues and our freedom. Yet, Keith projects his information into the lenses of a Republican vs. Democratic battleline. The truth is that these issues are bigger than Democrat or Republican. It's about freedom, our civil liberties, and the opposition to tyranny plus oppression in society.
*What's the lesson here. The lesson is that you can't trust the media 100% of the time. The Internet and the alternative media harbor more Real News than the mainstream media ever had. Deception and lies ought to exposed and relinquished from our thoughts about the truth. The truth is absolute and the truth isn't always manifests in various mediums. It's the responsibility of us to figure out the truth and help our citizens to research plus recieve it. It's the 21st century and the manifestation of facts are more abundant. I wouldn't let spinmeisters like Bill O'Reilly, Glen Beck, Amampour, Bill Maher, and other intimidate me or get me down. I have joy, inspiration, intelligence, and a constant fighting mindset to pursuit my dreams and aspirations.
Symbolism Globally
Symbolism and architecture is one of the persistant emblems of civilizations. They encorporate numerous meanings. They harbor various emotions. These images inspire archaelogists and researchers to discover including researching its consists. It is also utilized by the evil global elite (and Secret Societies) for political or esoteric purposes. These are various symbols existing in the world now. Crests harbor sometimes a smorgasbord of occult symbolism. The image above is the shield of Prince Charles. Prince Charles is real related to the Windsor family. The Windsors are related to the Merovingian bloodline. The Merovingians are a family related to Presidents, prominent Kings, prominent Queens, and the real rulers of this world. Prince Charles and his son Prince William each have a strange history together. Each put a microchip on each other. William's mother was of course Princess Diana. Princess Diana is related to the Stuart kings (like Charles II and James II). The Stuarts historically were kicked out of England because of their policies and some of them were pro-Papacy. Prince Charles and Prince Williams are members of the elitist Order of the Garter organization. Tim Cohen is an authors who believes that the Order of the Garter is more powerful than the Order of Freemasonry. Prince Charles isn't a Freemason, but is one of the biggest Ecumenicals in the world with unity among the Muslim leadership. The seal above has lions and an unicorn. Lions from ancient Babylon/ancient Egypt all the way today means royalty and authority. The lion is an old logo for the land of Britian. One lion is standing up. There is a motto under the seal reading Dieu et mon droit, which is French for God and My Right. That phrase is embraced by Freemasonry and the occult. Morals and Dogma has the Latin version of God and My Right entitled Deus Meumque Jus. The phrase means that they depend on God to determine their Right or Justice. Doc Marquis claims that this phrase is common in Satanism. Another motto has the other French phrase of Honi soit qui mal y pense or Shame on him who thinks evil of it. There is a harp representing Ireland. The crest attempts to portray itself as Biblical, but even the Bible make no mention of such occult symbolism in this crest at all. Also, there are some in the British-Israelism heresy community that just love this seal, because they try to equate Britain with Israel. That's false because Jewish people are Semitic and even British people are related to Celts, Saxons, Jutes, Phoenicians, etc. The British people are made up of many ethnic groups and backgrounds spanning thousands of years. There are crowns representing Kingship. There is a Red Dragon in the Seal. The Dragon is in reference to Satan. The crest is very common on British Kings and nobility.
Ironically Prince Charles' seal looks very similar to the TBN logo. Trinity Broadcasting Network is a group promoting apostasy, globalism, and restricting numerous Christians from witnessing more of the truth. For example, TBN leader Paul Crouch unbiblically calls himself a god, Kenneth Copeland called God a loser, and Benny Hinn made numerous false prophecies. TBN are totally in league with the Left Behind dogma when the Scriptures call us to endure to the end plus Jesus Christ will come to the Earth immediately after the Tribulation. Then, the Bible says the Lord will send his angels for his elect. TBN is heavily influenced by the Vatican (with Paul Crouch praising the Pope) and Freemasonry (Freemasonry is Ecumenical and merges occultism like the Cabala and Sirius into theism). The TBN emblem has the crown, a lion, and an unicorn. There is a descending dove with roots from the occult. This dove is also found in the Fourth Degree of the Knight of Columbus. The K of C has 4 degrees and many of its members are policy officers. Jeb Bush is probably the most well known Knight of Columbus in America. There is a Celtic cross looking similar to the Knight of Malta logo. The Bible says that the Holy Sprit came upon the Earth like a dove (as found in Matt. 3:16, also Mk. 1:10, Jn. 1:32). Yet, we are not to make the Godhead into a graven image. The Holy Spirit still isn't a literal dove. According to New Ager Elizabeth van Buren's "The Sign of the Dove," the Dove as a white bird is sacred to Venus, Astarte, and Isis. The cross in the TBN logo looks similar to an old sun symbol. The banners read Rex regum et fidelum, which literally translates: "The king rule and faithful."
Dubai is a new place of resident and business of the elite (made up of the Pilgrims, the City of London, the Vatican/Jesuits, Bilderbergers, etc.) in the 21st century. Even Halliburton has decided to move into Dubai. Dubai is becoming the resort capital of the Middle East. Dubai is one of the major cities in the United Arab Emirates (or the UAE). It works in a federal framework. Dubai has the largest population in the region. Abu Dhabi is bigger than Dubai in its size in terms of the emirates in the Saudi Arabia Peninsula. Its' revenues are increasing to about 37 billion dollars as of 2005 (in terms of US money). Oil, natural gas, and other resources play a huge role in the development of Dubai's economy. Dubai like America is a multicultural society. It has Iranians, Pakistanis, Arabic people, Indians, Americans, etc. living there. From 1990 to 2008, Dubai has recieved tons of building construction in a rapid pace. The huge building is a planned Obelisk like resemblance Tower. An obelisk is a 4 sided pillar that was famously utilized by the ancient Egyptians. In Dr. Cathy Burns' "Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated" book on pg. 340, the obelisk was worshipped as the sun god. The Masonic writer Rollin Blackmer cites the pillar as representing the masculine part of the generation process in the occult. Dr. Burns cites a source saying that the obelisk is called also Baal's shaft or the shaft of Baal. The Washington Monument (including the huge 83 feet tall and weighing 320 ton obelisk in St. Peter's Square in the Vatican. It's 132 feet with its foundation) are one of the numerous modern obelisk images that still exist to this day. The Dubai skyscraper is huge being 2,725 feet tall. That's about a half mile high. They plan on completing it by September 2009. If it's done, it will be the tallest man-made structure on Earth. The skyscraper is called Burj Dubai. The Samsung Corporation is building it. There are more plans of even taller buildings on the drawing boards. For example, one in Jedda, Saudi Arabia could be about a mile tall in 5,520 feet (It's the brainchild of Saudi billionare Prince al-Walid bin Talal). Another, skyscraper is proposed to be 10,500 feet in the United Arab Emirates. That's huge and almost 2 miles tall! Also, there an artifical island in Dubai looking like a palm tree with a circular image on top of it.
The image on the left is an old painting of the Tower of Babel. This painting was completed in 1563 by Peter Bruegel. The Tower of Babel is mentioned in Genesis 11:1-4 as about Nimrod seeking to create a tower to reach unto the Heaven. Yet, God Almighty stopped it, cofounded their language in order to spread humanity across the globe. Now, New Agers and Secret orders still to this day lust after building structures into the Heaven. They promote this in order to promote their vain, false vision of merging heaven and Earth (as above, so below reflecting the Universe as related to the plain of the Earth). Freemasons even praise the Tower of babel. For example, Freemason Arthur Edward Waite classified Babel as a Masonic enterprise (Nimrod is praised as a founder of Freemasonry in some literature). A rebel like Nimrod shouldn't be a real Bible-believer's heroes at all. The image on the right is the headquarters of the European Union. Notice how the EU building in Brussels, Belgium looks similar to the old Tower of Babel painting. This European Parliament Bulding is new and reserved its 666 seat. Why would they do that? 666 in the book of Revelations from the Bible is the number of the Beast. The Beast is a code name for the Antichrist that according to Bible prophecy temporarily rules the world and presecutes the real Christians. Christians are beheaded for their faith as cited in the book of Revelations as well. The EU is known to have aspirations to be a global force not only in Europe but of the whole world.
This is a known and famous Masonic image. It's a picture of a winged man holding a woman's hair. The man carries a scythe. Also, a column is broken. There are many interpretations for the image of the broken column. One meaning is the broken column means early. Yet, according to Joseph Fort Newtown's book entitled "The Builders: A Story and Study of Masonry" (from, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, at The Torch Press, from 1914, on p. 9) describe the logo as signifying false gods. Edmond Ronayne wrote that: "... Egyptian Mythology, Isis is sometimes pictured weeping over the broken column, which conceals the body of her husband, Osiris, while behind her stands Horus, or Time, pouring ambrosia over her hair." (Short Talk Bulletin, "The Broken Column", Feb, 1956, p. 6-7; also Edmond Ronayne, The Master's Carpet (Mah-Hah-Bone), 1879, p. 387-88, and several other Masonic authors). Therefore, the column represents the phallus of Osiris. The woman Isis is crying over the death of Osiris. Horus or Time is standing behind the female. In other images, the broken column lands on the 3rd step of the base of the structure. The weeping virgin holds a spring of acacia and an urn. The book is a copy of the Book of Constitutions with Masonic imagery as well. The Old Father Time man is trying to disentangle the ringlets of her hair. The old Osiris story relates to the Masonic story of the death of Hiram Abiff.
That image is apart of Manly P. Hall's book entitled "The Lost Keys of Freemasonry." Now, Manly P. Hall is praised by Freemasons. In fact, the Scottish Rite's New Age Magazine classified Hall as Masonry's Greatest Philosopher in the 20th century. He once headed the research school of the Rosicricians at San Jose, California. Manly P. Hall's other book described occultism and the essential meaning of Freemasonry. He should know of course, because he was a 33rd Degree Freemason. In his literature, he admitted that Freemasonry was the merging of Theism and the Mystery Religions' concepts applied to their lives. That is evident because you can simply join Freemasonry by being 21 years old and above, sane, a male, being invited, and subscribe to a belief in one God (they don't prescribe which god it is). That is why many Masons like Manly P. Hall worshipped Lucifer. Lucifer in the Bible comes from Isaiah. It described Lucifer as falling to the Earth as said by God so Lucifer isn't God. Christians called Lucifer Satan because of this description. This is Hall's own words of him praising Lucifer:
'Illustrious' Manley Palmer Hall 33°
The Secret Teachings of All Ages
"I hereby promise the Great Spirit Lucifer, Prince of Demons, that each year I will bring unto him a human soul to do with as as it may please him, and in return Lucifer promises to bestow upon me the treasures of the earth and fulfil my every desire for the length of my natural life. If I fail to bring him each year the offering specified above, then my own soul shall be forfeit to him. Signed..... { Invocant signs pact with his own blood } " page CIV
'Illustrious' Manley Palmer Hall 33°
The Lost Keys Of Freemasonry
"When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy." page 48
What more proof do you need of many Masons worshipping Lucifer or Satan. Now, the image above have much symbolism. There is a man with Egyptian dress. His arms are lefted up and he hold an ankh symbol. The ankh is an ancient Egyptian symbol representing life. It's also known as the crux ansata. It was frequently accepted by the ancient Egyptian kings and queens. It is also in reference to the masculine and feminine qualities of nature (that's similar to the definition of generation). The ankh have been defined as an emblem of fertility, immortality, and used in the occult. Regardless to this day, worshippers of Ra, New Agers, and other utilize the ankh symbol. Now, the man is standing an altar. The man is also upon a capless pyramid. He has a triangle on his clothes. There are 2 All Seeing Eye. One one sideo the altar, there is an dot in a circle image. The point in the circle is yet another emblem of generation. The dot is the phallic symbol and the circle is the female symbol. Some have called it the great sex act. This isn't just me writing this. Masonic have admitted that the dot in the circle is in reference to sun worship: "...The point within the circle is an...important symbol in Freemasonry, but it has been debased in the lectures (given in lodges) that the sooner that the interpretation is forgotten by the Masonic student, the better will it be. The symbol is really a beautiful but somewhat abstruse allusion to the OLD SUN-WORSHIP, and introduces us for the first time to the modification of it, known among the ANCIENTS AS THE WORSHIP OF THE PHALLUS. (Albert Mackey, The Manual of the Lodge, Clark Maynard Co., New York, 1870, p. 156). Another source says: "The Indian interpretation makes the point the male principle, the circle the female; the point became the sun and the circle the solar system which anicent peoples thought was the universe because the sun is the vivifying, the life-giving principle, for all that lives." (the Masonic Short Talk Bulletin, "Point Within A Circle", August, 1931, Vol. 9, No 8, Reprinted July, 1990, p. 4). Now, people like William Morgan died, so we can have the oppurtunity to expose the Masons, the Jesuits, the Rosicurcians, the Skulls and Bones, the Bohemian Grove, and other occult groups. Well, we don't have to yield to secrecy and death oaths as found in Freemasonry. There is real hope in God. John 3:16 fulfilled explained how we can experience real salvation: "...16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life...."
By Timothy
July 28, 2008
15 comments:
Copy of Email:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J-MC Patriot Alert Task Force (jmc.pa.tf*gmail.com)
Martin Lindstet (mlindste*mo-net.com)
Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:08 PM
Missouri Militia, Patrich Henry Online, et al
Mr. Lindstedt,
CC: Timothy James McVeigh
Hi. This is just a courtesy transparency email, should you wish to voice any objections to my actions, as stated.
1. Just wanted to inform you I setup a copy of some of the excerpts from some of the Missouri Libertarian Party's info from it's Newsletters, at: Patrick Henry: Right to Revolution: June 15, 1995 Senate Judiciary Hearing on Militia Grievances of Gov's Long Train of Abuses... It also includes video links to some Youtube excerpts of James Johnson's Unofficial Militia testimony before the Senate Judiciary Hearing on June 15, 1995, etc.
and
2. I attempted to follow the link to Historical Novel: The Stallion and The Dragon, and Mad Dog 4 Grubbernaturd of Missery -- 2004 both of which sounded like they may be very interesting reading; and came across a classified for Russian Brides/Wives. What an interesting synchronicity!
Kind Regards,
Lara Braveheart Zhivago
www.exponential-yewgenics.co.nr
'S.Q. WORM SOCIETY:
"What good fortune for overnments,
that 'the people' do not think."
~ Führer Adolf Hitler, Wolfsschanze Huskylord, Third Reich ~
'S.Q. SOIL SOLDIER FAMILY:
"Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We don't allow our enemies to have guns, why should we allow them to have ideas?" ~ Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin ~
"This is Hall's own words of him praising Lucifer: ..."
This is a lie, Mr 'Truthseeker'.
Those words were an extract from a different book that Hall was using in his book as an example of a possible black magic contract.
Hall was not praising Lucifer, nor advocating black magic, and if you hadn't cut the paragraph out of it's context your readers would see this for themselves.
It isn't a lie. Hall written his own words in own book praising Lucifer as a means to get power. If Hall wasn't advocating black magic, why has he written places on how to do it. Also, he wrote more words in praise of Lucifer like Eliphas Levi and others. THis is Hall's direct quote:
'The Lost Keys Of Freemasonry' by Manly Palmer Hall 33° "When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy." page 48.
That's praising Lucifer as a means of Masons to get power plainly. YOu might be a Freemason. Freemasonry for years have been exposed for teaching deception, swearing death oaths, and doing other things. So, your words can't never intimidate me. Masonry is exposed, you're the liar, and the truth will prevail.
Wow lots of angst and mis direction in your posts... I would never try and change your opinion for i fear it would be a waste of my time.. if you are convinced of some grand conspiracy there is little i can say to change that...the reasons for the mis conceptions of what freemasonry is or is not is the very fact that we hold our fraternity up as an example while keeping some of our traditions a secret from the outside world.. there are a multitude of reasons for this not the least of which is to preserve traditions and guard against those that would seek to dismantle our institutions. There is no grand conspiracy.. all of our so called secret work is available on the internet... there is no central body of control and there never has been.. the truth is.. we can't even agree on what to have for dinner at our stated meetings let alone figure out how to create some NWO that everyone is afraid of.. there have been alot of books written on the subject .. and since they don't give them away for free, i would venture to guess that they are making a profit on them...so before swallowing every tidbit out there.. use some logic and take what some author says with a grain of salt... As for Satan worshiping.. that is the biggest lie told... NO MASON CAN BE A SATINIC WORSHIPER not in lagitimate masonic lodges. it is true that masonry does not tell you whom to believe in.. that is the point exactly.. freedom to believe your way...that is why the catholic church looks down on freemasonry.. because we question the authority of the church. that is all it is...freemasonry is not concerned with your imortal soul but rather your interactions here on this planet...
I knew you would respond in that fashion.
Here's my response:
I don't have angst or misdirection in my posts. My posts are very accurate and quite interesting. YOu can never change my direction anyway since world leaders for decades have called for a new world order. I have a right to expose this. You have a right to deny this flood of evidence if you want to. I realize you hold secrets. Conversely, Jesus Christ condemn such actions of holding secrets in mysterious rituals.
There is a grand conspiracy. Conspiracies exist all of the Bible and even is mention in the Bible. There is a big conspiracy in trying to make more global economies and governments to form global governance or global government. Even a financial times author recently admitted that a plan for global government exists and David Rockefeller have called for global governance on plenty of occasions. Freemasonry like many groups intentionally decieve their lower level members, while the higher ups know exactly what Masonry is all about. Masonry is about merging theism with occultism under the viel of "Brotherhood." There has been central bodies such as the Bilderbergers, the World Bank, etc. handling world financies, political groups, etc. for years. So, you are in error in deying that there is no planning for globalism. Conspiracies don't necessary exist on the basis on all parties agreeing on every detail. It has to do with parties agreeing with the fundamental goals of an agenda. You realize this logic.
Many books dealing with this subject are for free. There is nothing wrong with earning a profit as long as it is legitimately earned. I have tons of logic and I don't believe everything I realize. It's nice to outline false stereotypes about me. Many Satan worshippers are in logic. That isn't lie since one requirement in being a Mason is to believe in one God. If a Mason believe that Satan is their god, then theoretically they can join the Lodge. There is nothing wrong with questioning the Catholic Church since they are one of the leaders historically of suppressing religious freedom, political freedom, etc. On the otherhand, this is no excuse to justify the deception, the Kabbala embrace, and some Masons praising Lucifer as have been documented in this blog (plus other places throughout the Internet). Freemasonry shouldn't be concerned with anything I do. They should be concerned with God Almighty's proclomations against many of the tenets of Freemasonry. You have a right to believe in what you want. Likewise, I have right to disagree with it.
Tons of world leaders have called for the new world order or global government. Mainstream news articles have mentioned this for years. Therefore, all of these people can't be a bunch of liars.
I meant to say that Many Satan worshippers could logically be Masons. Satanists reject the true logic of God. This was my typo.
Right on dude. I'm not familiar with the Freemason stuff, but it doesn't really bother me cause there's enough evidence for a one-world-government without even touching on the Freemasons.
Can't remember if I saw it somewhere in your blog Tim, but do you mention the book of Ezekiel talking about Gog, Persia, Libya etc. rising up against Israel? Gog = Russia, Persia = Iran, by the way, and both are planning to wipe Israel from the face of the earth.
This is my current working hypothesis, response to some of the issues you raise in your posts on symbolism, esoteric secret societies reliance on Gnostic symbolism as their existential source of meaning, and its consequences on inter and intra gender and human-natural world relations, as detailed in the posts: Subliminal messages in TRON: Legacy; Remembering the Past and Learning in the Present and The Truth will Come out Part 2.
Brief Summary: All civilized religions -- from Christianity, to Gnosticism, etc -- were 'created' in the minds of man to comprehend the concept of 'evil' (aka organized violence), subsequent to man's invention of agriculture, approximately 10,000 years ago; and where such agriculture created food surpluses, resulting in population surpluses, and expansion of their territory resulting in clashes with other tribes territories, resource war conflict.
They were a consequence of psychic existential conflict to attempt to understand so-called 'evil'; or put more simply: the conflict resulting from population pressures and escalating relations with fellow humans based upon the absence of consent, i.e. extended periods of psychic and physical violence and coercion.
Evil is defined as profoundly immoral and wicked, with synonyms: bad, wrong, morally wrong, wrongful, immoral, sinful, ungodly, unholy, foul, vile, base, ignoble, dishonourable, corrupt, iniquitous, depraved, degenerate, villainous, nefarious, sinister, vicious, malicious, malevolent, demonic, devilish, diabolic, diabolical, fiendish, dark, black-hearted.
A more simplistic subjective definition of evil I would say is: evil is that which someone capable of reason and logic does to me without my fully informed consent.
If there are two or ten people living on an island with enough food and other resources and space, for one hundred people; there is no need to coerce another for food or resources freely and abundantly available. In the absence of a resource scarcity conflict mindset, and plenty of space, tribal relations are more conductive to cooperation and sharing. Living in the moment. There is need for an external God in the sky to explain 'evil'; there is only a consciousness to appreciate the source of resource abundance, as the 'source of life'; and to live in harmony with such source: nature. Violence is limited to hunting, or being hunted by a natural predator, for immediate food.
If the tribe introduces agriculture, which results in an agricultural surplus and uses such agricultural surplus to justify greater population; then as the population increases, so the populaton pressures increase. There is less space to run away from someone who may be temporarily angry, or wanting something another is not willing to provide in that moment.
The existence of 'evil' (absence of fully informed consenting agreements) is plausibly directly proportional to the resource war conflict, resulting from the tribe's violation of carrying capacity limits; and/or coming into contact with another tribe's territorial expansion as a result of their violation of carrying capacity limits.
In attempting to understand the existential meaning of this symptom of 'evil' resulting from violation of carrying capacity limits resource war conflict, man created religions.
In Running on Emptiness: The Failure of Symbolic Thought (See also: Running on Emptiness: The Pathology of Civilization, John Zerzan explains his perspective of the relationship between 'civilization' and 'symbolic thought'; how "culture emerged as time, language, art, number, and then agriculture."
"The word culture derives from the Latin cultura, referring to cultivation of the soil; that is, to the domestication of plants and animals—and of ourselves in the bargain. A restless spirit of innovation and anxiety has largely been with us ever since, as continually changing symbolic modes seek to fix what cannot be redressed without rejecting the symbolic and its estranged world."
"Eli Sagan (1985) spoke for countless others in declaring that the need to symbolize and live in a symbolic world is, like aggression, a human need so basic that "it can be denied only at the cost of severe psychic disorder." The need for symbols — and violence - did not always obtain, however. Rather, they have their origins in the thwarting and fragmenting of an earlier wholeness, in the process of domestication from which civilization issued."
"Out of a sense of being trapped and limited by symbols comes the thesis that the extent to which thought and emotion are tied to symbolism is the measure by which absence fills the inner world and destroys the outer world."
"We seem to have experienced a fall into representation, whose depths and consequences are only now being fully plumbed. In a fundamental sort of falsification, symbols at first mediated reality and then replaced it. At present we live within symbols to a greater degree than we do within our bodily selves or directly with each other."
"The more involved this internal representational system is, the more distanced we are from the reality around us. Other connections, other cognitive perspectives are inhibited, to say the least, as symbolic communication and its myriad representational devices have accomplished an alienation from and betrayal of reality."
"Closer yet is Cohen (1974), who observed that "symbols are essential for the development and maintenance of social order." The ensemble of symbols represents the social order and the individual's place in it, a formulation that always leaves the genesis of this arrangement unquestioned. How did our behavior come to be aligned by symbolization?
"Culture arose and flourished via domination of nature, its growth a measure of that progressive mastery that unfolded with ever greater division of labor. Malinowski (1962) understood symbolism as the soul of civilization, chiefly in the form of language as a means of coordinating action or of standardizing technique, and providing rules for social, ritual, and industrial behavior."
"It is our fall from a simplicity and fullness of life directly experienced, from the sensuous moment of knowing, which leaves a gap that the symbolic can never bridge. This is what is always being covered over by layers of cultural consolations, civilized detouring that never recovers lost wholeness. In a very deep sense, only what is repressed is symbolized, because only what is repressed needs to be symbolized. The magnitude of symbolization testifies to how much has been repressed; buried, but possibly still recoverable."
The invention of agriculture and agricultural surplusses, and subsequent organized violence of civilization are the story of Adam and Eve's loss of living in carrying capacity harmony with the natural world resource abundant paradise, and Cain's choice to be a farmer.
Symbolically, perhaps the Tower of Babel plausibly represents the attempt to reach out and escape the evil of totalitarian agriculture organized violence, to a 'God' in the heaven, to ask 'why do you allow this 'evil' to occur'?
Others saw opportunities for socio-political status benefits from exploiting the reality of organized violence (evil), and suppressed this conscious reality of their intentions by invoking various phallic 'right' justifications for their 'right' to engage in organized violence (evil).
For example, my interpretation of your Manly Palmer Hall quote in Illustrious: the Lost Keys of Freemasonry, the 'seething energies of lucifer' are the psychological warfare art of manipulating and coercing men and women to overbreed and overconsume, to thereby aggravate resource war conflict, and the ability to divide and conquer people's, for the profit of the 'warrior', to 'step onward and upward'; as he 'proves his ability' to apply this breeding war and consumption war energies.
"When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy." page 48
Put differently, the 'seething energies of lucifer' are no less than the phallic justification for profiting from aggravating and perpetuating deliberate organized violence, without the consent of the recipients of the violence.
Another good Zerzan quote on this issue is:
"Civilization, very fundamentally, is the history of the domination of nature and of women. Patriarchy means rule over women and nature... “Civilized Man says: I am Self, I am Master, all the rest is other — outside, below, underneath, subservient. I own, I use, I explore, I exploit, I control. What I do is what matters. What I want is what matter is for. I am that I am, and the rest is women and wilderness, to be used as I see fit.” - John Zerzan, Patriarchy, Civilization and the Origins of Gender.
Post a Comment