The Truth Will Come Out

 

 

 

The Truth Will Come Out

 

Life is a continuous event. Among us, it's temporary since all humans will die. We ought to make the best of it. One way for me to make the best of my life is researching information, exposing the new world order, and solving the mysteries of life. To me, sincerely that's one of reasons God put me here on this Earth. By the year 2001, I investigated these specific issues on a higher plan and I'm not going back. It's been a wild journey for me. Although, I'm young since I'm 24 now. Hopefully, I can live a long life. I want to, but if that isn't the case, I just want the world to know to witness my views on a wide variety of subjects. It's perfect reasonable for folks to glance at my points of view as well. Barack Obama, John McCain, and Third Parties (like Constitution Party member Chuck Baldwin, Green Party Cynthia McKinney, and Libertarian Party candidate Bob Barr. There are other candidates as well) are vying for the White House. It's an emotional and historical race to a great degree. Some are overly sensitive about any criticism against John McCain as unpatriotic. Some are conversely over sensitive about any legitimate dissent against Barack Obama as being racist. There is nothing inappropriate about being sensitive about real issues. Although, you have to allow vigorous debate in a free society. If you don't, this isn't a real free society in America. For me, John McCain and Barack Obama are fallible and they aren't Gods nor Messiahs to me. God is God period. The deal is that we should investigate all of the Presidential candidates to decipher a wise decision on who to vote for. Typically, the mainstream media won't delve into the real agenda of Barack Obama and John McCain. Cutting Edge Ministries just wrote an article on how Obama and McCain are 22nd cousins who descended from King Edward I of England. Hence, many Presidents and Presidential candidates from major parties are related to each other (including the Merovingians, the Saxe-Coburg Gothas, and other elite bloodlines. These bloodlines have some of the most powerful people existing in the world now plus centuries ago). I just found out something about Obama. His wife Michele isn't just a CFR member, his foreign policy advisor is Zbigniew Brzezinski (he wasn't just the co-founder of the globalist Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski is the member of the Bilderberg Group, which has ties to the EU. Brzezinski wrote a book called the Grand Chessboard about planning a war in Central Asia to get resources). The book also described a police state system domestically at home. This is similar to what we see presently in 2008. He funded Osama bin Laden to fight in Afghanistan in the late 1970's. Brzeziski wrote about wanting a technocratic revolution. The essence of Brzezinski's goal is to allow countries play against each other rather than preemptive wars.Bilderberger and North American Director of the Trilateral Commission Joseph Nye is another ally of Barack Obama. Bonesman Austin Goolbsee is an economic advisor to Obama. He is a professor of economics at the University of Chicago. He (according to Webster Tarpley) told Canadians that Obama agrees with the obscene trade deal called NAFTA. World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah said that Obama called for a civilian national security force. This is ignored by the corporate media. Others believe that Obama was just calling for volunteers to just praticipate in groups like the Peace Corps. If Farah is correct, that is surprising since this is one of the most overt, anti-liberty proposals that Obama promoted in public. Youtube recorded Obama saying: "...We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." WND reported on this story that the mainstream media isn't touching on. He wants to add this to the military. The problem is that a civilian security force (even if Obama didn't literally mean a Stasi unit) is that it is not mentioned in the Constitution. Definitely, such a group shouldn't be as big as the military. It's strange and Barack offers no specifics on what this group will do. Historically, the canned TIPS programs promoted such a snitch squad. Some may say that he's talking about the economy plus the Peacorps, but a national civilian police is still wrong. That is a troubling statement because no where in the Constitution even remotely calls for a national security force to supplement to the U.S. military. Obama talked about youth service, but this new group is very expensive. Some view this proposal as similar to spy programs like the Highway Watch program. That program is a $19 billion dollar Homeland Security-run project which trains truckers to watch for suspicious activity on America's highways. More recently, ABC News reported that "The FBI is taking cues from the CIA to recruit thousands of covert informants in the United States as part of a sprawling effort…..to aid with criminal investigations." Is this the change we want? Regardless of what Obama meant, I don't want a National Stasi like spying operation monitoring my life or anyone else's lives at all.

John McCain is also similar to Barack Obama. John McCain says that killing unborn babies for rape and incest is fine. He wants a war with Iran if necessary. McCain spoke in mocking terms to Iran as being bombed and such. He even desired to be in Iraq for as long as 100 years. That's pretty extreme, because the Iraq War is having a serious cost physically and economically to the American people. McCain called for a new clique of democracies to help ferment his foreign policy agenda. Therefore it isn't surprising that Henry Kissinger is one of John McCain's biggest supporters. CBS News from December 19, 2007 had an article written by Dante Higgins describing how Henry Kissinger have even stumped for John McCain. This occurred in Boston's Faneuil Hall. Kissinger classified McCain a  man who can bring the country together. John McCain claims that his aggresive, neo-conservative foreign policy approach is necessary to develop a more safe atmosphere in America. Yet, the war on terrorism has only decreased our liberties and contributed to our eonomic downturn (because of the devalued dollar currency and the high war debt that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have accumulated over the past almost 7 years). These outcomes aren't making us more safe. It's manfacturing a more harsh Big Brother control grid society. McCain is more of a puppet compared to the high level neo-conservatives like CFR member Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz. Paul Wolfowitz recently made some comments. He is the former Deputy Secretary of Defense. He said that America's leadership in post-Bush world would depend on how threatening the world appears. He even hints that a "compelling crisis"may help America's stature in the world. That's sick of course because the death of innocent people or formulating a crisis is never worth our exploitation or to use that for political advantage in terms of foreign policy affairs. Here's his own words:

"America's future leadership role may depend even more on how threatening the world appears. Historically, that leadership role has often emerged out of a compelling crisis: Pearl Harbour, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran hostage crisis, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, or the attacks of 9/11."

This Wolfowitz Doctrine implies for US troops to be sent globally and there is a concrete promotion of preemptive war. Fellow neo-con Kagan said that they want multilateralism as a means to complete their agenda because of the unpopularity of the Iraq War. That is why they and John McCain promote the League of Democracies when America was never instituted as a democracy. We were established as a Republic. This plan runs contrary to the orginal intent of the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers weren't perfect, but they weren't wrong on this issue. Founding Fathers like George Washington adhered the philosophy of encouraging no entagling alliances and rejecting unwarranted, extensive involvement in foreign countries' affairs. We should exist as a nation and not an Empire as some neo cons proclaim. The difference now from the PNAC days is that men like Wolfowtiz want to use multilateralism as means to promote preemptive tactics while submerging our national sovereignity into internatonal bodies. John McCain is far from a real conservative despite what the Huffington Post says. The Huffington Post promotes the left/right paradigm.

 

 

Chicago is known for its extreme laws and nefarious proposals. WMAQ TV from July 16, 2008 reported that the Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich seeks a radical answer to the crime epidemic in Chicago. He wants the National Guard and the state Police to patrol the streets of Chicago. Blagojevich said that a child has been shot nearly every day since June 26. The governor wants to plan National Guard helicopters to get into high crime areas. He said that he desires this to put less burden on the Chicago police. It's a known fact that the Chicago police were and are caught in brutality. One easy example to justify that assumption is how they've assaulted even innocent people in 1968. This was during the National Democratic Convention. In December 1969, some Chicago police officers shot Fred Hampton dozens of time. Fred Hampton was a famous Black Panther leader who was articulate with his message when Fred was in his early 20's. This action was so immoral that Hampton's relatives sued the city of Chicago and won the lawsuit. Later, the Chicago police have done brutality to this day in their own city. The mayor of Chicago Daley said that he seeks to achieve all that he can do in order to stop the violence in Chicago. Yet, fascism and martial law are never solutions in stopping crime. The National Guard has no right nor role in law enforcement in Chicago or any other city. That city has never been declared a state of emergency at all. Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. Sadly, Chicago is probably the gun control capital of America. Hence, that is one reason why crime is so high there. Criminals roam free with guns, while law abiding citizens are limited in their right to own a gun. Now, Blagojevich has signed a tougher gun bill. This bill bans an adult from selling a gun to a minor. Now, adults (if they sold a gun to a minor) are eligible for the same sentence as minors convicted of violent crimes. That despicable because it doesn't punish crime. This law will only punish those innocent folks selling something to minors. Minors used guns for centuries. An adult teaching a child about guns isn't immoral nor foreign to a legitimate society. The real bigger picture is the National Guard being proposed to be utilized in illegal means.

Barack Obama gave another speech in Berlin, Germany in July 24th, 2008. A crowd of over 200,000 people congregated to visualize Barack Obama speaking. The crowd was very receptive to Barack's views because he was in Europe. Polls consistently present how Europeans give a low regard for the Bush administration. Barack Obama is a gifted, great orator. Some portions of the speech I agreed with and other parts of the speech I disagree with. Now, in the beginning of his speech, Obama gave a story about his father bascially giving him the inspiration to carry forward the rise of his political career. The tone of his speech was to connect the links and relationships among America, Germany, and the world. For example, Barack Obama said that walls among religions, immigration, etc. ought to be broken down in order to develop the stability of a society. Obama said that America made crucial errors in its history. Although, he pointed out that he still loves America still. Barack Obama outlined a description of America being made up of a whole list of backgrounds and cultures in order to represent the true essence of the compositon of the USA. The tone of the speech was humble, yet firm. The audience cheered him. Even with all of this, Barack Obama isn't perfect just like John McCain isn't perfect. Both of them like a carbon credit system when that's impossible to enforce. The reason is that carbon is natural chemical vital for humans and other organisms to survive. Recent scientific studies refute the claims of man-made global warming (when the solar system is warming via the sun, there are record cold winters globally, etc). Obama in the Berlin speech said that he was a world citizen, and that he sees the world as one. Obama wanted to extrude an appeal to build up the view that he is capable of handling complex foreign policy matters. Now, this is a globalist, international view which is very similar to Brzezinski's view. See, Zbigniew Brzezinski called for a transnational approach for decades and he's the foreign policy advisor to Barack Obama. Brzezinski (the man who inflamed Afghanistan by supporting Osama bin Laden in the late 1970's) is a heavyweight in geopolitics since he's a member of the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. Barack Obama met with French President Sarkozy in France. Subsequently, Obama went into London, England to met with Gordon Brown. So, McCain and Obama are stirred by the global elite. I respect other nations, but I'm no citizen of the world. I'm a citizen of America. I part company with Barack on that issue. I believe in working with other nations, but not at the expense of forming a global citizenship or wanting an "one world." Obama promotes globalism by his own words: "...That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down..." Daniel Taylor wrote that Obama's speech mirror the goals of the Council on Foreign Relations of breakingdown walls of nations and religions (Obama said this). That's true because the President of the CFR Richard Haas said that: "... "The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy." and "..."The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy."  I don't agree with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Each nation even have nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11. The cost of many innocent deaths among civilians and military individuals isn't worth the neo con strategy of nation building plus preemptive warfare at all. Both John McCain (with his promotion of his proposed League of Democracies) and Barack Obama seek globalism in paranoia about climate change and terrorism. Like in numerous Presidential election, the major candidates are related to European Royalty. In fact, Obama and McCain Are 22nd Cousins Descended From King Edward I of England! Obama and Cheney are related as cousins. Even Obama and Bush are related in their genealogy. So, the Presidential Election of 2008 is a show, votes are regularly violated all of the time, and we ought to help out first in our own communities (because at least we realize tangible benefits).

Civil liberty and economic problems still consume society. John Hughes from Bloomberg at July 18, 2008 made known that the TSA Triples airport body scanners. This includes the purchase of 80 Passegner Imager machines. That total will be up to 120 machines in 21 airports according to Christopher White (he's a spokesman). The imagers are produced by L-3 Communications Holdings Inc., OSI Systems Inc.'s Rapiscan unit and American Science & Engineering Inc. These devices use X-Rays in order to outine a traveler's bodies of electromagnetic waves create a fuzzy image. TSA are using it now as a replacment for TSA scanners using handheld detectors. Today, TSA will buy 300 advanced technology X Ray scanners to check bags. They want to include the scanners to 900. The TSA caims that they want to prevent the carry of plastic explosives in airplanes. Although, Big Brother is increasing and some of these X Rays have been used to monitor people's whole bodies. Shaun Waterman from  the United Press International on July 18, 2008 exposed on how protesters in Maryland were spied upon by state police and were added to federal list of terrorist suspects. Undercover Maryand state troopers infiltrated three groups that advocate peace. There is a 46 page document (which was obtained by the Maryland chapter of the ACLU via the FOIA lawsuit) describing  the account of an activist's name placed into  a federally funded database. This is done to share information among state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies on terrorists and drug trafficking suspects. ACLU attorney David Rocah said state police violated federal laws prohibiting departments that receive federal funds from maintaining databases with information about political activities and affiliations.he activist's name is Max Obuszewski. This is of course wrong, because the federal government has no right monitor innocent protestors who are anti-war. This is nothing new because the government has been caught spying on innoent people like Protestors and even Quakers.

 

 

 

Zeitgeist

The movie "Zeitgeist" is becoming very popular in the alternative media. The atheists and anti-religious crowd especially love the film since the film hates the views of religious belief. Frankly, religious people made more contributions (Just look to William Tyndale, William Wilberforce, George Washington Carver, and others) to society than any atheist did at all. Also, there is nothing wrong with believing in God or a Supreme Being who created the Universe. I think it's a disgrace to the real patriot movement. The reason is that many real Patriots believe in God. This film using divisive tactics (the same tactics the new world order crowd does) in intimidating people who sincerely believe in God. Additionally, it's a movie using half truths and lies to get their points across. Lies will never be effective in waking up individuals about the new world order and the problems in our society. Zeitgeist is accurate on some topics. The film is right that the Federal Reserve is a private banking system that devalues our currency and control our economic system. Zeitgeist is correct to point out the nefarious history of the Vatican. The Vatican has been complicit in the Crusades, the Inquistion, the murder of the saints, the murder of innocent Jewish people, the invention of the modern slave trade, and other degenerate events. Today, The Vatican/Jesuit network has huge power via the Knights of Malta (who were caught in the Ratline which allowed Nazis to escape justice), Opus Dei, the Knights of Columbus, the Constantnian Order, etc. Romanism has 1.1 billion members making it the most powerful religious group in the world. Paganism is easily found in Romanism from Halloween, Easter, to the holiday of Christmas. Some even in the alternative media refuse to discuss these issues for some reason. The film is right that world leaders have called for a new world order and an one world government (like David Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Walter Cronkite, and Henry Kissinger). They rightfully expose the SPP or the Security and Prosperity Partnership which is apart of a North American Union agenda. Even ex-President Vicente Fox endorsed a North American union and a single North American currency in a long term goal to be similar to the European Union. I saw him on TV and on Youtube admitting to this. Therefore, many leaders seek this wicked globalization in the world. Many leaders have promoted global government for a long time.

Here's examples of the inaccuracies in Zeitgeist. The film is notorious assault against Christianity. Beit Shalom Ministries outlined a popular film exposing "Zeitgeist called Zeitgeist: Spirit of the Age Refuted." The film was narrated by Michael Worsley. Zeitgeist believes that Christianity was created for social control. Is this true? The answer is no. The reason is that Christianity was not created by political elites. In the book of John, the Bible calls Satan as the temporary ruler of this world. Also, Peter said to Obey God rather than man. Early Christians were harshly persecuted in the times of the ancient Roman Empire and throughout the history of the past 2,000 years. Also, the Bible forbids taking the Mark of the Beast in the Book of Revelations. This mark is part of social control instituted by the Last Day Antichrist government system. This mark looks similar to the Verichip microchip. Therefore, real Christianity isn't about unlimited government submission or social control. Real Christians follow God not man or his social control mechanisms. The Bible has been exploited by political elites before though like the FEMA plan to use pastors to submit to the government (i.e. to be pacified) in times of martial law. FEMA wants the pastors to do what FEMA wants. Some sources are promoted in Zeitgeist Part 1 that are either biased (or false) or blatantly pro-new world order. Many of these sources are used more than once. DM Murdock is a source and this is a code name for Acharya S (a woman who is a known Christ hater). Achraya S believes that the story of Jesus Christ is a rehash of stories about solar deities in Ancient Egypt especially. Druid and Egyptologist Gerald Massey is another source there as well. Atheist John Allegro wrote a book about the Mushroom that suggests similar ideas about early Christians using illicit drugs. Historical scholars criticized him as his views based on false theology. The creators of Zeitgeist use the source of Theosophist HP Blavatsky. Blavatsky blatantly promote ideas about the new age and the new world order. Her book the Secret Doctrine influenced the Nazis. "The Secret Doctrine" is her book where she praised Lucifer and Satan. HP Blavatsky is quoted as writing that: "...And now it stands proven that Satan or the Red Fiery Dragon, the Lord of Phosphorus..and Lucifer or Light Bearer is in us...it is our mind [our] Redeemer, our intelligent liberator and Saviour form pure animalism..." ( HP Blavatsky, "The Secret Doctrine," Vol. 2, The Theosophical University Edition, pg. 513). Gerald Massey wrote for the Theosophical magazine entitled "Lucifer." Also, Theosophist Alice Bailey wrote in favor of the endgame of some Secret Societies in desiring a world government plus a world economy. Why would this movie give credence to a Theosophist when they are league with globalism? It could only be that Zeitgeist embrace disinformation.

It's interesting to note that the 3 sources of Goodfrey Higgins, Manly P. Hall (a proponet of the plot of exploiting America to form a New Atlantis then world democracies in an utopia), and Albert Churchward are all Freemasons. Notice how Zeitgeist doesn't expose Freemasonry as a tool of the new world order at all. Usually the film refuses to offer other points of view on religion but one anti-religion mindset. Usually, unbaised films show many views not just one on an issue. They even cite George Carlin to mock religion and God, but a using a comedian to ridicule religion as an argument is a fallacious attempt to make sense of their arguments. Zeitgeist teaches that the Gospels are based on astrology. The truth is that Virgo is not similar to Mary in its cosmology at all. Also, the existence of Bethlehem is real and is documented by Josephus. JB Hennessy writes of Bethlehem being inhabited since the Iron Age period and before that time. Achraya S believes that the 12 disciples were based on the 12 characters of the Zodiac. The truth is that Moses is never identified as a Ram. Achraya S claims that Jesus will bring in the Age of Aquarius, but that age will never come until the year of 2150. She claims that Jesus is the Lamb and the Ram, but Jesus was never identified as a Ram. Also, A Ram is never a Shepherd at all. The pattern of these liars is that they use animals symbols to attempt to connect with Christianity, but in essence they outline non-sequitors. In other words, skeptics just connect items without evidence of astrological links. Not to mention, that the prophet Isaiah in the Bible condemns astrology and using the stars for mystical purposes in Isaiah 47:13-14. God condemns the worship of the sun, stars, and planets.  The biggest claim of the film Zeitgeist is that it believes that Jesus Christ is a pagan myth. The Apostle Paul in Colossians 2:8 condemned the traditions of men. The film claims that Horus was born in December 25th, it was from a virgin, 3 Kings saw him, he was a teacher at 12, he was baptized, Horus performed miracles, called the Son of God, resurrected after 3 days. The truth is that no original ancient Egyptian sources promote these claims of Horus. In the Egyptian myth, Osiris was murdered by his jealous brother named Seth. The Horus is a complex character and many gods were known as Horus. Once, Horus was viewed as bird. Later, he was seen as a child in the arms of Isis, her mother. Isis wasn't a virgin and Osiris wasn't resurrected since he was relegated to the world of the Dead.  Horus avenged the death of her father Osiris' death. Horus was called the son of Ra as well. Horus' birth wasn't accompanied by a star in the east, Horus didn't have 12 disciples, and Horus wan't even crucified. Also, no biblical reference exists of Jesus Christ being born in December 25th at all. The film Zeitgeist talks about the 3 wise men meeting esus Christ as a baby, but the Bible don't cite 3 wise men at all. The Bible only cites a group of wise men. These pagan myths change constantly, but God in Malachi 3:6 says that: "....I am the Lord, I change not..." Hebrews 13:8 show the same thing about Jesus Christ.  According to Charlie Campbell the story of Attis rising from the death wasn't mentioned until after 150 A.D., which was long after the time of Jesus. Even Attis was reborn from a tree and not resurrected from a tomb at all. The film clams that Krishna is similar to Jesus Christ being of a virgin birth, having a star in the east, etc. The truth is that Krishna wasn't birth of a virgin birth. Krishna had no star in the East, but Krishna fought monsters. Krishna was murdered at his heel by an arrow according to Dr Edwin Bryant (he's a scholar of Hinduism,  Ph.D. in Indic languages and cultures, and  Professor of Hinduism at Rutgers University).  Dr. Bryant denies Krishna was crucified at all. Some view Jesus as a rehash of Mithras but that is false as well. Mithras was born from a rock, he didn't experience the Virgin Birth, he never performed miracle, he wasn't crucified, and Mithras wasn't resurrected from the dead at all. Therefore, Jesus Christ isnt Mithras or a rehash of it. Then there was Mithras and Sunday. Yet, Jewish people and even Jesus celebrated the Sabbath on Saturday. Christians celebrated God in worship daily (which includes Saturday and Sunday. There is nothing wrong with worshipping God on any day of the week). (Acs 2:46-47). Claims of Christianity being a rehash of the ancient Mysteries are opposed by many experts.  The narrator of Zeitgiest says that Achraya S is right to point that an inscription in Luxor, Egypt outlines the birth and life similar to Jesus. The Luxor inscription oulines the Queen of Egypt and sex not necessary Isis. It has state officials and not Kings. An Atheist Richard Carrier disputes the Luxor claim made by Zeitgeist.

Tacticus from 112 A.D. describe Jesus Christ as murdered under the procurator Pontius Pilate. He called Jesus' doctrines as spreading as far as Rome. Lucian who was a Greek satirist outline Christians and outline Jesus as crucified. The Roman Historian Suetonius (who lived from 69 to 122 A.D.) wrote that: "He banished the Jews from Rome who were continually making disturbances, Chrestus being their leader," This statement confirms the exile of Jews from Israel in the 40's A.D. from the Book of Acts. Thallus in 52 A.D. wrote an eclipse of the sun which some view as the season of the Paschal full moon when Jesus Christ was crucified. Dr. Ronald Nash from his book "The Gospel and the Greeks: Did the New Testament Borrow from Pagan Thoughts?" writes that: "...The conception that the god dies and is resurrected in order to lead his faithful to eternal life is represented in no Hellenistic mystery religion." Hence, Christianity being a rehash of the Mystery Religions are refuted. Zeitgeist is hiding their hatred of not only Christainity but any belief in God. 1 John 2:22 and 1 Timothy 4:1-3 are Bible verses about this issues as well.

*In essence, the film Zeitgeist promote the interests of the new world order.  The reason is that they want to bash religion when real religious freedom is a threat to the Elite. They believe in wanting to destroy religion to form a new society. They even accept Greenpeace when many Greens are co-opted by the Club of Rome and the WWF (Both controlled or related to the Bilderberg Group and internationalists). They approve of occultist Helena Blavatsky when she embraced extremists views on races, etc. It's a disinformation film that won't even expose Secet Societies like the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Skulls and Bones. The destruction of mainstream religion to promote a new order in the world is exactly what numerous elitists want. Zeitgeist follows the exact goals and plans of the people they supposedly condemn. Zeitgiest II's trailer (the 2nd edition comes in October of 2008) admitted that they want to change human conscienceness. They refuse to expose the New Age Movement being apart of the new world order agenda (as promoted by the elite), because their views are blatantly pro-New Age.

By Timothy

July 29, 2008