http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2008/08/explosive_alarm.php
http://obamawantsyou.com/mainpage.html
_____________
This is a wonderful reminder that on judgment day, we won't be able to shout the Lord down and start yelling "how dare you accuse me of killing babies; you outta be ashamed of yourself!" We won't scoot around the issue by equivocating and spewing emotionally charged rhetoric. God will speak and we will listen. Then he will judge, and we see that his judgment is absolutely just. Posted by: Bobby Bambino at August 21, 2008 7:35 AM
____________
Robert,Why is pointing out Obama's record a smear? The facts speak for themselves.
Obama's claim that BAIPA would erode Roe v Wade was totally false. The neutrality clause had been inserted (by him) to make sure that this didn't happen. This bill was strictly about giving reasonable medical care to babies born alive when something went "wrong" with the abortion. Obama may not endorse infanticide, but he certainly willing to turn a blind eye to it, all on the altar of abortion. For him, nothing matters as much as his opinion that women should be able to kill their unborn children. Period. He stood against all of his colleagues on this. Claimed he was smarter. Heck, even NARAL went neutral. His arrogance on this issue is beyond belief and his judgement, considering his political ambitions sorely lacking...but then, looking at his closest friends and mentors, it always has been.And his morality and ethics? Beyond zero! How can you possibly smear someone who has CHOSEN to be the lowest of the low?
Posted by: DeeL at August 21, 2008 10:56 AM
http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/08/stanek_on_hanni_2.html
___________
One other point that you need to clarify. Alan Colmes and others defend Obama with the new argument that there was already a law on the books in Illinois which protects these infants, and then he read from the law last night.That is a gross misrepresentation of the truth.There is such a 1975 law. However, there was a condent decree entered into in 1993 called that "Herbst-O'Malley" consent decree which retrained and prevented the enforcement of that very law. After Colmes made that argument, no one responded to it. We must respond to it.Here is a link:
http://www.aclu-il.org/legal/courtdocuments/herbstconsentdecree.pdf
Posted by: Efrem Fischer at August 21, 2008 10:14 AM
_______________
No comments:
Post a Comment