Big Brother actions in the United Kingdom keep on ascending into new nefarious heights. Jason Lewis from the UK Daily Mail on Sunday, on August 17, 2008 described on how about 600,000 people had their information stored in the Labour's DNA database. These people haven't been convicted of any crime at all. More than 400,000 of those ca. 600,000 were added into the database in the past 2 years. That's fuelling the belief that the government is attempting to construct a genetic record of the entire population of the UK via stealth. The figure of 573,639 people in the database were never convicted, cautioned, formally warned, or reprimanded. The total number in the datbase now is about 4.2 million people. Not to mention that a database of DNA should never be invented unless permission is granted by the owner of the DNA. In the past 2 years alone, about 1 million new people had their DNA added (Nearly half of them or 434,176 – have not been convicted of any crime). Police in the UK even take DNA fingerprints from anybody arrested on suspicion of a "recordable offence." Even DNA taken from victims and witnesses can be done, while those samples are seperated from the suspects' samples at crime scenes. The information is stored permanently even if the person is innocent. This is worse than America on some levels. Civil rights campaigners and MPs have been calling on the Government to change the law in order to force the police to destroy the DNA records of anyone without a criminal record. A government funded inquiry last month wanted new laws to limit who can retrieve the database (like the police being restricted into seeking matches from a crime scene). They also want to restrict on how the police can get innocent people's DNA at will. Home Office Minister Meg Hillier commented that innocent children are readily included in the database. It's insanely immoral to get innocent's people DNA into a database without their permission or consent at all.
Yugoslavia and Genocide is a real history that gets neglected in our histories. Back decades ago, the Catholic Ustashis murdered the Serbian people, Jewish people, Gypsies and others. More than 600,000 people died from that real Holocaust. It was just as evil as Hitler's Holocaust that murdered almost 20 million people total. Assaults against the patriotic Serbians didn't end in the 1940's. The genocide against Serbians occured onward today in the 1990's and even now in the early 21st century. John Pilger from August 16, 2008 wrote about how we need to never forget the Yugoslavia region experiencing genocide. The former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia in The Hague, whose name is Carla Del Ponte, this year published her memoir entitled, "The Hunt: Me and War Criminals." That book revealed secrets that's being ignored by even the mainstream media. The book outlined the West's intervention in Kosovo which is similar to what's going in the Caucasus area. Del Ponte investigated the crimes in Yugoslavia. We know war crimes existed among both sides (Albanians were murdered). Yet, the establishment ignores the crimes against the Serbs by the West and NATO. For example, NATO bombed civilian infrastructure for 78 days (under CFR member and Rhodes Scholar Wesley Clark. He's an ally of President Bill Clinton) and Kosovo in 1999. Hospitals, churches, parks, schools, television studios, were bombed in that occurence. Washington and London prevented these crimes from seeing the light of day for the most part. David Scheffer, who is an US ambassador-at-large for war crimes, announced that as many as “225,000 ethnic Albanian men aged between 14 and 59″ may have been murdered. The West allied with the the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). The KLA were corrupt, murdered Serbs, and the KLA allied with CIA-funded Muslim radicals like Al-Qaeda. They kidnapped Serbs in the hundreds to harvest organs (according to Del Ponte's book, Ponte wrote that the Serbs were shipped into Albania for sick organ harvesting to occur). Blair, the war leader, was on a triumphant tour of “liberated” Kosovo. The KLA was ethnically cleansing more than 200,000 Serbs and Roma from the province. Yugoslavia was stripped of its right to handle its own affairs with NATO oppression, EU involvement, and the forced creation of the Kosovo state. In Georgia, both Georgia and Russia committed excessive strikes against eah other.
Teachers and Guns have always been in the news. Some believe that with the rash of school shootings, there is an increased call for concealed weapon laws. Reuters from Sunday, on August 17, 2008 discovered a news story about a Texas school district. This district will allow teahers to bring guns into class this fall. The district superintendent announced this on last Friday. This appeared to be the first time such a rule is being instituted in America for a public school district. The board is located at a small rural Harrold Independent School District. The Board unanimously approved the plan. Parents have not objected, according to the district’s superintendent, David Thweatt. The Harrold system has about 110 students which is about 150 miles northwest of Fort Worth. Thweatt believes that allowing teachers to have guns is a safety issue. Thweatt said that cameras placed in schools can only do so far in helping stop criminal activities in a school. He said that it's common sense to allow teachers to have guns into school. He wants them to carry a concealed carry handgun in Texas along with recieving crisis training (including permission from school officials). Recent school shootings have increased the call for concealed carry weapons to be accessed by teachers and students. For example, the VA Tech campus banned concealed weapons on their campus. The shooting occured for many reasons, but restricting of the Second Amendment there might be one reason for the high volume of innocent people dying there. The U.S. Congress once barred guns at schools nationwide, but the U.S. Supreme Court struck the law down. Although state and local communities could adopt their own laws. Texas bars guns at schools without the school’s permission. My opinion is that teachers should have concealed carry weapons in school as long as they aren't criminals.
The City of Denver sickeningly defends the camp. Kyle Clark from 9news Colorado on Sunday, at August 17, 2008 reported on this story. This has been a civil liberty issue. Activists maintain that this converted warehouse poses a threat to civil liberties. Denver authorities justify it as a means to facilitate mass arrest during the DNC. Although the reality is that innocent people don't deserve to be placed in the camp. Also, when criminals are arrested, this is done via a warrant or by probable cause (not to be placed in some concentration camp). The holding center is entitled "Gitmo on the Platte" by activists. It's located on the city owned property near Steele Street and 38th Avenue. There are newly installed security cameras guarding the exterior, chain link fences, and barbed wire forming cells inside of the camp. Some protestors accused Denver of hiding the camp from the public. Undersheriff Bill Lovingier, who is the city’s director of corrections, denies these allegations. He said that the facility can process 60 arrestees an hour. The activists accuse the camp of increasing police control of the people. They accuse Denver of wanting to detain people for an inordinate period of time. You don't treat America as Nazi Germany. Although, America is becoming more Nazi like. Examples of our rights going down include the tasering of innocent people by the police, the pre crime gun grabbing in Connecticut, the oppression of our rights in warrantless checkpoints, the militarization of the people, a mandatory curfew in an Arkansas town, and other evil deeds. The DNC camp is a representation of an anti-liberty mindset and a violation of our rights. That's the truth, because it occured before in 2004 during the NYC RNC.
There are accusations of the Pentagon of utilizing a vaccine for a nefarious purpose. F. William Engdahl from Global Research on August 15, 2008 outlined the possibility of the Pentagon possibly creating a weaponized form of the Avian flu virus. The old 1918 Spanish flu epidemic murdered about 30 million people worldwide before it died out. Now, the Pentagon has the frozen state of the 1918 virus in its possession. There has been Pentagon and NIH experiments dealing with the virus, so a weaponized form of it isn't out of the question. Some believe that the Pentagon or the Big Pharma cartel might over exaggerate the H2N1 virus in order to have more control in the world. Rima E. Laibow, MD, who is the head of the Natural Solutions Foundation, (a citizen watchdog group monitoring the pharmaceutical industry) states that the government could be creating the pandemic Avian Flu (by fusing the deadly genome of the 1918 Pandemic, misnamed the ‘Spanish Flu’, with the DNA of the innocuous H5N1 virus in a growth medium of human kidney cells, according to the National Institutes of Health and the vaccine’s manufacturer). Rima says its man-made quality is defined by it's impossible to make a vaccine against a virus that doesn't exist yet. The Spanish flu was actually created in the US as an early bioweapons program being injected in healthy men like soldiers. The "Spanish Flu"originated in Kansas on US Military bases. There are only 385 human cases of Avian Flu. Poisons exist like aspartame (who Rumsfeld used to head a company that promoted like called GD Searle). Donald Rumsfeld went on to become chairman and principal stockholder of a California pharmaceutical company named Gilead Sciences Inc., which developed and patented Tamiflu in 1996. It was first developed as a drug for AIDS and later as a vaccine for H5N1 Avian Flu. Even Tyson was caught using corrupt methods in processing their chicken. The Pentagon have done biological weapons tests in the past decades. The Pentagon swiftly funded vaccines against H5N1 since 2004. The Pentagon revived the 1918 Spanish flu virus when experts says it has little need to revive because it's very unstable (plus constagious). The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WHO, etc. promote the influenza vaccine when the pandemic isn't worldwide. Obviously, these groups are known for the promotion of population control.
Platform controversies isn't just a Democratic issue. It's also a Republican issue. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on August 15, 2008 wrote about this very topic. Republicans claim to be mostly Pro-Life. Tons of Republicans are sincerely Pro-Life (including Democrats and Third party members) and I respect that. Although, the Democratic and the Republican leadership have done little to reduce abortion radically nationwide. There has been some authentic laws with results. The only way to solve this problem is probably a mutlifaceted approach. You have to ban immoral pro-abortion laws, build up communities, promote adoption, build up child care, peacefully protest globally not only in America, and go out and peacefully be active in helping women suffering. Multiple solutions and tactics will get the best specific type of real results in eliminating abortions in America plus globally. Now, a pro-abortion Republican group wants changes in the Republican platform. This group is called Republicans for Choice. That's a deceptive title, because abortion has nothing to do with real choices at all. Abortion eliminates real choices that the unborn human being has to live for. Abortion is murder plainly. Ann Stone, who is the head of Republicans for Choice, wants to acknowledge that a small percentage of Republian agree with Barack Obama that abortion should be legalized and abortion ought to be nearly unlimited. Stone feels that a platform could add the new words since this 2008 Election year is so close. Republicans expect to maintain their pro-life platform. Kevin McCarthy, a freshman California lawmaker who is pro-life and heads up the Republican platform committee.
Feds trying to illegally have lave enforcement powers in state and local areas is nothing new. In fact, for years, the military have conducted exercises of confiscating guns and acting like the police in urban (plus rural) centers from across the country. I've seen a documentary having the military doing this in America during the late 1990's. Spencer S. Hsu and Carrie Johnson from the Washington Post on August 16, 2008 outline the sad reality of how the U.S. may ease police spy rules. There are more federal intelligence changes planned. The Justice Department in essence proposed a new domestic measure that would make it easier for state and local police to collect intelligence about Americans (also to share the sensitive data with federal agencies and retain it for at least 10 years). These proposed changes would change the government's rules for police intelligence gathering. This is being done for the first time since 1993. It would apply to any of the nations' 18,000 state and local police agenies that recieve about $1.6 billion each year in federal grants. The Bush administration typically claim that these measures don't violate our civil liberties. Yet, tons of other policies like the FISA law (which encourages warrantless wiretapping of innocent citizens) and the Patriot Act (it has sneak and peak provisions and it has an ambigious definition of terrorism) violate our civil liberties on many levels. The feds want to recieve local and state information on suspected "terrorism." However, Michael German, policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the proposed rule may be misunderstood as permitting police to collect intelligence even when no underlying crime is suspected, (such as when a person gives money to a charity that independently gives money to a group later designated a terrorist organization). This proposed centralizing of information leads into questions on wo will be targeted, how the information will be used when it's retrieved or who will oversee the activities. Also, preemptive law enforcement without a crime being committed is a violation of the Constitution. There has NY Police infiltrating the RNC in 2004 and California state agents eavesdropped on peace, animal rights and labor activists. The Denver police was caught spying on Amnesty International and others before being discovered. It's another federal government plan in trying to centralizing power plus infringing on the state (and local) government's right to conduct their own affairs.
Daryl Bradford Smith and Hal Turner are big time shills. First, it's time to expose Daryl Bradford Smith a bit. Now easy proof to prove that Smith is a shill is that he promotes the Vatican and Pinay's literature (on his website). Anyone with intellect knows that the Vatican was a creation of man-made tradition and unscriptural beliefs. For example, the Pope being the Holy Father, Mary being the Queen of Heaven or an Ever Virgin, the wafer being God, the Rosary and Scuplar acceptance, and the veneration of idols (which are key Catholic teachings) are not in the Bible or in the early church at all. Even the Book of Jeremiah forbids the praise of the Queen of Heaven and the NT only calls God the Holy Father. If you want to witness the truth on the Catholic, read Richard Bennett's book called "Catholicism: East of Eden." It's blasphemy to call a mere man like the Pope Holy Father or the Vicar of Christ. Vicar means representation, but Jesus Christ has no replacement whatsoever. The Vatican has a wicked history from opposition to the Magna Carta, the Inquisition, the Ustashis, the massacres of Jews and Arabs, the involvement in the Ratlines, the suppression of translations of the Bible into different languages, and other errors. Smith supports this disinformation. Even Popes then and now are calling for a new world order. Then, Daryl Bradford Smith obsesses with demonizing Jewish people. There are evil Jewish people in Labor Zionist and Likud circles (who are pro-neo conservative). That is true, but many Jewish people are patriotic, God-fearing, and want the best for the world. Daryl sympthatizes with Henry Ford (because he wrote an anti-Semitic book) when Ford was a 33rd Degree Freemason. He was also a founder of the Nazis (he accepted an award from the Nazis) and the Soviet Union. See, the Knights of Malta, high level Freemasonry, and the Pilgrim Society ruling the real international bankers funded both sides during WWII (including WWI and the Russian Revolution. These groups are stronger than the Fortune 100) and both sides today in this fake war on terror. Hal Turner has been exposed recently as possibly having FBI ties. He regularly promotes violence against non-white people. Although, we are in it together and racial hatred is never needed in trying to solve our problems. No real man ought to advance the idea of enacting indiscriminate violence against innocent people at all. There is nothing wrong with not being ashamed of your ethnic heritage (or embracing deeply held religious convictions). On the other hand, it is wrong to personally hate another human being unjustly because of his or her race, religion, ethnic group, sexual orientation, gender, or skin color. I won't do that. I will disagree with certain lifestyles, but I won't express hatred of another human being. Even the Bible says we are to love our neighbors as we love ourselves. Therefore, Daryl Bradford Smith and especially the coward Hal Turner refuse to expose the Vatican, the Jesuits, the SMOMs, etc. Now, what can you expect from them. They are disinformation artists. I will expose the Bilderbergers, the CFR, and all other evil secret societies or nefarious political cliques
Doctors and Sterilization have occured before. It existed in New Orleans during the Hurricane Katrina aftermath where doctors killed the sick and elderly. In Nazi Germany that occured in an unheard level with the acts of enuthanasia and sterilization. It's still going on across the world even in America. Now, this story revolves around a woman living in Berryville, Arkansas. Now, this women came into the hospital in order to deliver her baby. She wanted to deliver her baby by a Cesarean section. She didn't request or authorize her doctor to also perform a tubal ligation. Yet, these details didn't stop Dr. Shirolyn Ruth Moffett from doing that ligation procedure. Dr. Moffett did it without the woman's permission at all. Dr. Moffett laims that she surgically ensued that ths woman would never have another children. She justified this by saying that she feared that the patient's uterus would burst if she ever got pregnant again. That's not the point, because you still should tell her about it and that can be done with her permission. That even puts into risk criminal acts to be done unto innocent people during surgery. The doctor failed to tell the woman of what she done on her medical chart. This sterilization was uncalled for. Now, Dr. Moffett is being reprimanded for her actions. The Medical Board at Arkansas State saidthat she will keep her medical license. This is wild. That situation is all the more reason to be cautious when approaching any form of surgery. St. Johns released a statement that expressed suprise over the decision. It's shocking, but this sterilization is one of the means to be apart of eugenics.
The Saddleback Forum was an explosure of Barack Obama's and John McCain's ideas. It was hosted by Rick Warren. Warren is a CFR member and wants to merge government with religion in solving problems (which I don't agree with). Christians legitimately disagree with some of Rick's theology. It was an interesting debate. It's ironic that no third parties were there when Third parties historically describe better ideas and solutions than the 2 party duopoly (of the Republicans and the Democrats). Now, Obama was interviewed by Warren first. Barack Obama's response was better at the end of the discussion than at the beginning. For example, in my opinion he gave cop out answers on abortion. Obama said that it's above his pay grade to decipher when life begins. That's an easy question to answer. Life begins at conception, because at conception a zygote is formed (it's neither an egg or a sperm. It has 46 chromosomes, it's alive, and it grow. Therefore, it's human life. Now, scientists in a consensus have outlined that life begins in conception, so you don't have to take my word for it). Later, Barack Obama said that he's in favor of civil unions (not homosexual marriage), and he claims that abortion is choice (it isn't choice, but the destruction of human life). Obama commented that he wouldn't vote for someone like Clarence Thomas because he feels that his legal mind wasn't ready to handle complex Supreme Court responsibilities (i.e. he questioned Thomas' intelligence during the early 1990's when he was confirmed). Barack Obama was better of his commentaries of foreign policy affairs. The reason is that he told Warren that the war in Iraq shouldn't of have existed, we have to work with other nations, and we fight against evil via using wise solutions (i.e. You don't fight against evil with more evil. You fight against evil in the world by doing more good). Barack Obama was treated well and applause came his way on many times. John McCain has a more positive reception from the Saddleback audience. He said that life begins at conception. Even McCain has abortion issues like his support for babykilling for rape and incest plus his support of embryonic stem cell research (when new IPCs eliminate the need to have embryonic stem cells since IPCs can create almost every cell of the human body. This technology is only getting better). John McCain said that he would vote for judges for the Supreme Court in the mold of Roberts or Alito. I disagree with McCain the most on foreign policy matters. He supports the Iraq War, wants excessive, aggressive talk toward Russia (even though Russia isn't a saint. Putin is an authoritarian figure. Although with Russia's decreasing population and economic problems, they are no threat to America at all), and wants the war on terrorism to continue. Both Barack Obama and John McCain agreed that something ought to be done in Darfur, the sex trade should be fought against, adoption is good to promote, and the improvement of our morality is needed. I agree with them on those points. The winner of the discussion according to many was John McCain, but I believe both were near even in terms of the responses. Both Presidental candidates want value voters, because even a slight percentage of them going to either man to make them President of the United States easily. It's as simple as that. I reject stereotypes. Roland Martin is wrong that conservative Christians mostly focus on 2 issues. The truth is that conservative Christians for centuries have focused on forced abortion, GM foods, civil liberties, sex trafficking, the environment, religious liberty rights, genocide, AIDS, poverty, and other issues. Tony Perkins is wrong is that conservative Christians ought to suck up to the Republican Party. All American should be independent and not be ruled by any party. Musharraf has resigned as the President of Pakistan. That's interesting holding Pakistan to have a more controversial future. Also, I reject isolationism. Non-interventionalism has nothing to do with isolationalism because non-interventionalism just mean that you don't interfere with another nation's sovereignity (either in military means or other forms of oppression). Therefore, being a jack of all trades is fine, but core values are important to maintain.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment