I Reject False Demands

Political news are going on. Both Barack Obama and John McCain are preparing for their final debate. The pundits have mostly John McCain losing the election because of many factors. Even during the debates, most pundits have McCain tying or losing to Obama in their previous debates. Yet, the election isn't over yet. The McCain campaign had been disorganized with his tactics though (examples include shifting positions and John McCain speaking in anger to non-confrontation in his words). Barack Obama and John McCain proclaimed additional economic proposals to the public. Obama wants to send tax credit to companies that stay their jobs here, a 90 day moratorium on foreclosures by any financial institution being bailed out by the government, and penalty free withdrawals from retirement accounts. He wants a 13 week extension of unemployment benefits along with sending $50 billion to retool domestic auto plants. Some of these proposals are legitimate indeed. McCain said that he wants to spend billions to help people retool their mortgages as well. His other proposals include to cut capital gain taxes, other taxes, and offer assistance to senior citizens. Both of them supported the bailout for Wall Street. The main problem with making any long term economic plan (among anyone) is how to get the money to do it. The reason is that we have record debt. One way to get more money is cutting the bloated military budget, expand economic freedom, have fair trade deals (unfair trade deals like NAFTA have allowed multinational corporations to violate national sovereignity), and develop investments (like domestic energy production) rolling along. John McCain and Barack Obama are seriously invoking populist themes to gain votes of course. Both men criticize each other of being bad for America. Each man are right on some issues and both men are dead wrong on other issues (In major Presidential election, 3 party candidates are suppressed while 2 pro-elite people are promoted). That's the total truth. Keating Five, ACORN, and Ayers have a right to be discussed, but they shouldn't predominate the most important issues in our country. Most of the mainstream media (like Keith Olbemann, Campbell Brown, Chris Matthews, Jeffrey Toobin, Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer, Rachel Maddow, and I could go on and on) of course desire that Barack Obama would win the election. Even Wall Street is sending more money to Obama than McCain. Barack Obama spoke to individuals in the Midwest, while John McCain is currently speaking in Virginia (where I'm from in Virginia Beach and Richmond) and North Carolina. This election, regardless who wins, will be controversial and historic.




Not all plastics are holy. Byron J. Richards, CCN from October 8, 2008 at NewsWithViews.com wrote about this issue. Some pro-health and consumer protection groups (like the Environmental Working Group) are listing the health risks of some plastics toward infants and children in America. The October 2008 issue of Environmental Research has published six articles on the serious risk of plastic toxicity to human health, describing what it calls “A Plastic World.” One of them many plastic based dangerous chemicals is called Bisphenol A, or BPA for short. The EPA sets the "safe" level of this toxin. Some EPA scientists left the EPA, because they voiced concerns about the BPA. BPA is a perchlorate debacle that injuried millions of infants across the U.S., because it can disrupt their thyroids. Last month, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study of 1400 adults and found something. The report described that those with mostly BPA in their urine had nearly three times the risk of heart disease, more than twice the risk of diabetes, as well as signs of liver damage. Unfortunately, the levels of BPA that were associated with disease are within the EPA’s industry-friendly levels of “safety.” Other studies have found that BPA can damage the liver and have pancreatic problems. FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach is in a tight spot to try to handle the BPA siutation. The FDA have been plagued with drug frauds and dangers for years. One solution to handle this problem is safety of course and a recourse for people to use the legal system to handle any legitimate problems from dangerous substances. Some believe that the FDA is taking a lax stance because of profit risks. Even Monsanto has been caught using dangerous PCBs, which had contaminated foods. Bayer was caught red-handed knowingly killing thousands of Americans with its heart by-pass drug Trasylol. Now, BPA is a neruotoxin that is fat soluble. It can cause nerve damage as well. The lesson is that plastics should be reformed just like any other substance.




Brain fingerprinting is real now. KOMO Staff outlined this information. Science is increasing in its advancement. A Seattle neuroscientist is leading with technology based on the assumption that the brain can't lie. The brain fingerprinting device includes a headband, flashing words on a computer screen, and a couple of clicks of a mouse. According to some, this is what is needed to put a murderer behind bars. Dr. Larry Farwell, who is the Chairman of Brain Fingerprinting Labs, said that this device is a game charger in the field of global security. He developed "brain fingerprinting." This is called by some as the lie detector test for the 21st century. While, typical polygraph tests rely on emotional responses, brain fingerprinting records how the brain reacts to words and images related to a crimes. Dr. Farwell beleives these are are only ones that a killer would understand. He believes that certain brainwaves can't be covered up by any human being. The doctor worked with CIA, FBI, and law enforcement agencies around the country. He claimed that this technology is fullproof. Some resistance from law enforcement agencies exist about using such an instrument. Dr. Farwell even offered $100,000 to anyone who can fool the system, and so far nobody has. The lesson is that technology can be utilized for good and evil purposes. Caution is differently a necessity in dealing with any form of technological advancements occuring in the 21st century.





The CNP and Eugenics have connections. Now, the CNP is short for the Council on National Policy. The CNP is a group trying to infiltrate real, sincere conservatives in order to promote globalism in a religious venere or garb. The CNP has huge power in the Republican Party. They are definitely using Sarah Palin (according to Max Blumenthal's article for the Nation, CNP members were the hidden hand in McCain picking Palin for his VP nominee) as a puppet to carry forth their agenda. The CNP even met with Sarah Palin. The CNP are linked to the Vatican and the Ecumencial Movement as well. Famous CNP members include James Dobson, Tim LaHaye, even Alan Keyes, and others. Some CNP members like the late Senator 33rd Degree Freemason Jesse Helms had ties to eugenics. Some believe that Helms united with the Pioneer Fund to be a political machine. Ellis' Coalition for Freedom, which is apart of Helms' political clique was getting grants from the Pioneer Fund. The Pioneer Fund was created by Wickliffe Draper. The Pioneer Fund is an eugenics group wanting to use research to promote the lie that non-white people (usually black people) are inferior genetically to the white race. Draper promoted eugenics publicly. Draper's allies supported segregation and tried to prevent the Civil Rights Act from passing for racist reasons. The Pioneer Fund was aided by the power elite. Their Eugenics Record Office was on land donated by Mary A. Harriman, who was E.H. Harriman's widow. The Harriman family were the most powerful family in the Democratic party back in the day. These groups have the same agenda of oligrachical control and eugenics then and now. They are connected to the Skulls and Bones, the neocons, the Dominionists, etc. It isn't just one group or one side either. CFR member George Soros (who is a Bilderberger, which is made up of some of the most powerful people on Earth. Although, Pilgrims are more stronger than the Bilderberg Group) is another notorious anti-gun, pro-abortion, and anti-life extremist. Soros has connections to the Georgian dictator, plus other Establishment Leftist organizations (from Global Exchange to even Code Pink. Leslie Cagan's Pacifica Foundation is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation). Soros is a member of the arms dealing Carlyle Group since 1995. These left gatekeepers obsess with exposing the puppet George W. Bush, but refuse to challenge the official story on 9/11. So, the political paradigm is a means where globalists try to stifle real issues from being discussed. These real issues are about abortion, the North American Union, illegal immigration, occult Secret Societies, GM foods, aspartame, sodium flouride, the evils of forced vaccinations, globalization, the testing of poisons in the atmosphere, 9/11 truth, and so much more. These things have a right to be compeletely discussed publicly.




It doesn't take a rocket scientist to decipher that abortion is bad for women in causing depression, reproductive problems, and other issues. Now, more are figuring out that abortion can develop economic problems as well. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on October 13, 2008 outlined research that abortions cost the economy $35 trillion since 1970 (in the lost of productvitiy). This researcher said that about 50.5 million abortions in the U.S. since 1970 have cost the American economy $35 trillion. Steven writes that this is evident in the lost productivity by having fewer workers contributing to society. Those contributions also come in the form of taxpayers contributing to state, federal and local governments that would have had more funds to pay teachers, offer health care benefits or put more police on the streets. The other costs include lost support for the social security system, which has an uncertain future among young Americans. Dennis Howard, who is the president of the pro-life group Movement for a Better America, has researched the economic impact of abortion since 1995. Howard said that the costs to the economy climbs to 70 trillion dollars when you include all abortifacients, etc. (they are IUDs, RU-486, sterilization, etc.). Howard believes that overaggressive population control made a huge price in economic growth. A typical ESL (or the Estimated Statistical Life) averages about $7.8 million per human life. Howard says using that as a standard shows the cost for all abortions to date would be more than 11 times his estimate, or an excess of $390 trillion. Steven Mosher, who is the president of the Population Research Institute, said that 0.9% population growth in America isn't enough to handling economic issues (plus Social Security risking bankruptcy). Mosher wants more sensible immigration to create an economic development trend in America. Howard said the Russia's underpopulation (Howard said that Russia has 300 abortions for every 100 live birth and Russia are expected to lose another 40 million people between now and 2050) and high abortion rates contributed to the wreck of its economy. Therefore, population growth is needed to help our humanity and our economic state. Mosher believes that higher birth rates and more population can assist the economic crisis we reside in. He's right because the functional basis for any hope of economic stability is the influx of people to develop the economy.

J. Edgar Hoover is a controversial figure. The Associated Press from October 13, 2008 focused on something. Internal FBI memos have FBI then director J. Edgar Hoover calling prominent Jack Anderson with undisguised contempt. He called him a "jackal." This memo is dated on April 30, 1951. Hoover said that Anderson and his ilk have minds lower than the regurgitated filth of vultures. Anderson was a known Hoover critic who wanted the director to resign a decade before. J. Edgar Hoover was the FBI Director into his 80's. Anderson was one of the biggest critics of the FBI during the time of Hoover's reign. These documents were released under the FOIA or the Freedom of Information Act. It was retrieved 3 years after Anderson's death. Copies of his columns were found critical of the FBI. He movements were under surviellance. Jack Anderson was famous for exposing Watergate and the arms for hostage deal known as Iran Contra. J. Edgar Hoover called Anderson a liar. The feud between Anderson and Hoover continued after Anderson's death. After Anderson's funeral, FBI agents called Anderson's widow to try to search his papers. At the time, the FBI confirmed it wanted to remove any classified materials from Anderson's archives, located at George Washington University, before they are made available to the public. The government backed off. J. Edgar Hoover have used programs to violate civil liberties of innocent Americans for decades. Hoover is a famous 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemason. Hoover was an ally of Cardinal Cushing as well. The FBI is made up of many people of a wide spectrum of backgrounds. Some of them have committed good actions and some haven't. There is a distinction among low level FBI members sincerely wanting to fight crime, and the higher level members involved in extreme acts of corruption.






Sharia law is a big issue. It's a form of theocracy in the radical Muslim world. Ex-Muslims want changes to the legal challenges about Islamic law (or sharia law) in the United Kingdoms. The ex-Muslims making the recommendations are named the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britian. It held its first international conference in London. They consisted of several speakers criticizing the "political Islam" across Europe. The deal is that in Britian, Muslims are increasingly have turned to religious courts to handle civil matters under religious law. The Islamic Sharia Council in east London since 2006 have handled mostly divorce cases. This Council is the largest of such of a body. While most shari’a courts have no binding legal authority, a growing network of arbitration panels applying Islamic law have been set up around Britain since 2007. Subsequently, their decisions can be enforced by regular British courts. That's the main controversy. Supporters of the sharia courts believe that they help to preserve the Muslim identity in the UK in order to bring a protective environment for people. Its supporters comment additionally that these court deal with divorce. Head of the Church of England, whose name is Archbishop Rowan Williams, said that sharia in Britian was unavoidable. He was criticized for his words sharply. Maryam Namazie, who is the head of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, told Friday’s audience of several hundred that shari’a courts were part of the growing influence felt by politically motivated Islamists. Namazie is a feminist and communist. To be fair, many of these anti-Muslim critics are anti-religious although I don't believe that sharia should have control over British government. The truth is in between the two extremism of having sharia law rule the government and ban any form of religious expression in Britian. Not all Muslims embrace terrorism, but a theocracy should be opposed regardless of who promotes it. Most Muslims endorse peace and aren't radical at all. I want to make that clear.







David Montero from the Christian Science Monitor on October 13, 2008 outlined about how journalists were targeted in the latest Mexico drug violence. David wrote that the drug related violence has worsen across the border. Journalists are being targeted increasingly. This year, over 3,000 lives have been lost in this widening war with drugs. Even on Sunday, assailants opened fire on the US consulate in the northern Mexican city of Monterrey, reports the Associated Press. No one was injured from the attack. Yet, a gunman killed 6 young men at a family party in the gang-plagued Mexican city of Ciudad Juarez as reported by the AP (on Saturday). This was the second mass shooting in the border state of Chihuhua in less than a week. These new shootings are effecting journalists. A Michoacan police spokesman said that Miguel Angel Villagomez (the editor of La Noticia de Michoacan newspaper) was kidnapped in late Thursday after leaving the newsroom. David Garcia Monroy were among the 11 people killed by a gunman in a bar at Chihuahua. He was a columnist at El Diario de Chihuahua newspaper. One reason they might be murdered is because of the journalist coverage of narcotics cartels involved in the harsh drug war. Drugs into America is increasingly being imported into America via Mexico not just by Columbian distribution channels. The bloodshed has decreased tourism in Mexico. This crisis isn't caused by the majority of the Mexican people. It's caused by a minority of extremists and criminals who use drugs as a means to dominate along with oppressing innocent human beings. Also, it's been established that the CIA shipped much of the drugs into America. That's been documented by Gary Webb, ex-officials, and a recent CIA plane found with cocaine in it. One solution is to end the Drug War. You can strickly enforce laws against violent criminals irrespective if they use drugs or not. Those who are addicts, yet are non-violent, deserve treatment by professionals not extended jail sentences. Borders ought to be protected as well.


Some have accused of some of manipulating gold prices because of their high value rates. Gold prices have dropped from 930 an ounce to today's low of 830 dollar an ounce. Conversley, the sale of physical gold continues to trade for anything up to $300 over spot price. Some believe this inconsistency of prices are a product of market mainpulation. European banks are fearful of buying physical gold because of the instability of the markets over there. Over the weekend, when gold was around £500 an ounce, a Krugerrand went for £645.75. An one ounce bullion bar, with nearly 3 days of the auction still to run, has already attracted a bid of £670 - a whopping $336 above current spot price, despite the fact that bars are usually subject to lower premiums than gold coins. Some believe that central banks are using manipulating to prevent people from fleeing paper currencies into gold. Although, other experts believe that competing currencies is one solution (out of many) to help develop our economy. The usage of central banks and the government to create money out of thin air never work. Some instead want good liquidity to be based on savings and capital not decree. Jörg Guido Hülsmann believes that the decontrol of money (i.e. People should be free to use any money they want to despite of Gordon Brown saying he wants a new financial order) along with currency competition are needed to jump start the economy. The Bush administration said that pouring money into banks have cause the uptick in the stock market (over 900 points on Monday. Bush's bailout law was to buy up bad mortgages. The market went down in over 70 points on Tuesday). The stock rebounding is fine, but a comprehensive approach to fix the economy is crucial as well. We need to address building up manufacturing jobs, decrease our debt, and handle the derivatives problems. Monopolies brought us into this mess and rejecting monopolies is one way out of many to get us out of this situation.



Sean Poulter from the Daily Mail on October 9, 2008 described that consumers said that cloned animals should not be farmed for food. An EU study reported that most people believed that cloned animals and their offspring shouldn't be farmed for food. Most Britons would reject such clone farming. The European Commission study found 87 per cent of people in the UK - 84 per cent in Europe - believe we don't know enough about the long-term health and safety effects of eating food from these animals. The Daily Mail revealed that eight cattle, the offspring of a prize winning clone milking cow in the USA had been born on UK farms. In the UK, there aren't laws to prevent meat and milk from these animals going into food chain. There isn't even a legal requirement to label food from clone offspring. The EU and Britain's Food Standards Agency (FSA) are in the throes of deciding how clone farming should be policed. These questions on cloned food have called for demands from animal welfare groups for the EU to impose a ban on clone farming and the imports of clone animal food from the USA plus beyond. These groups say that cloned animals die in the womb or soon after from painful organ failure (and deformities). The vast majority of people in the UK - 75 per cent - said it was important to take ethics into account when deciding whether to proceed with clone farming. Some 62per cent of Britons said it was unacceptable to use cloning for food production as it treats animals as commodities rather than living beings. 63% of those in the EU and 55% of folks in the UK wouldn't want to eat meat or milk from cloned animals at all. The FDA is about give the green light to promote cloned farm meat and milk in shops and restaurants. Many want to label foods having GM ingredients as well. Sonja Van Tichelen said that cloned food is unnecessary. It's legitimate to oppose cloned food, because its side effects unto people aren't really known yet. Also, time after time again proved that natural foods are better than cloned foods (especially GM substances). I reject false demands that we must be Republicans or Democrats. We ought to be independent human beings. We ought to worship the one true God and follow his commandments as found in the Scriptures. I appreciate those who visit my blog from Virginia, Arkansas, Illinois, the United Kingdom, Washington state, Washington D.C, South Carolina, North Dakota, Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Michigan, Mississippi, Massachusetts, Colorado, all of the Provinces in Canada, South Africa, Oregon, Pennslyvania, and from around the world.



By Timothy