The Presidential Debate Part 2

The Debate was over among Barack Obama and John McCain. It was narrated by Tom Brokaw. This debate was more specific than the other debate. It was more emotional as well, because the economic times are really bad right now. Obama believed that John McCain would give tax break to corporations that send their jobs overseas. John McCain responded that he would use tax cuts among all Americans without unfair tax plans. Each said that something must be done to our fragile economy. Both supported the bailout. McCain called for bipartisanship in order to help out the economy with even folks re-negiotating their mortgages. Obama said that McCain subscribed to deregulation, which is in his mind was one of the crucial factors about why the economic instability transpired. The economic mess was caused by many factors (and both Republicans and Democrats have firm responsibility on why this crisis occured in the first place). Obama believes that middle class tax cuts is needed with increased taxes on citizens making $250,000 or more (Obama said that those in this income bracket owns a small amount of businesses in America). On health care, Obama said having health care was a right, while John McCain said it was a responsibility for people to acquire. I believe health care should be avaliable for all Americans, yet I believe in health choice (without the government controlling all of it and without requiring insurance coverage for abortions). John McCain said that Obama wants to have mandates and fine people who don't want to be apart of his health care program. Barack Obama said that his program wasn't a mandate except for children and people could keep their present health care if they want to. Barack Obama commented that he wants to have funding for prevention and target insurance companies who act in corruption with prices (along with information technology). John McCain said that he wants his health care plan to have a tax credit of $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families. Also, McCain said he wants health choice and individuals to cross state lines to get a better health care service if they wish. On foreign policy, I don't agree with neither of them the most. Both agreed on the war on terror, both wanted Iran to have no nuclear weapons (even if they don't threaten America or Israel), and both supported Georgia's aggression against Russian peacekeepers. Obama said that he wants to work with America's allies, have funding for the ex-Eastern bloc, and have American involvement in countries where hardcore genocide is taking place. McCain wanted intervention in genocide with caution, agitation toward Iran, and calling Russia maybe an Evil Empire (although, McCain said that we won't relive the Cold War at all). Obama said that we shouldn't of been in Iraq in the first place, which is correct. Although, Barack Obama wants more warfare in Afghanistan when Afghanistan is even more destabilized in some cases than Iraq is. I disagree with McCain the most on foreign policy about Iran. John McCain is naive to assume that we need to have further wars when we have a deficit along with our military stretched too thin already. I disagree most with Obama on foreign policy about him threatening to go into Pakistan if they found out that bin Laden was there (when Osama bin Laden is probably dead. Pakistan isn't perfect, but we shouldn't violate their sovereignity as we're doing now via bombing them). The debate in my opinion was another tie like the last one. Both made better performances than their first debate together. Each of them are aligned with the new world order agenda. Both agree with abortion, war, global warming hysteria, embryonic stem cell research, the pro-Wall Street bailout, NAFTA, and the list goes on an on.



Germany is allowing itself to have domestic military deployment. DAVID RISING from Associated Press on October 6, 2008 wrote about it. Germany's governing coalition partners want to change the Constitution to allow for military deployment within their country if needed to combat terorism. The proposal would allow the use of the military if only when the police are overwhelmed (and can't respond to a situation themselves). “It is not to be used generally, but only in very specific cases,” Interior Ministry spokeswoman Daniela-Alexandra Pietsch said. The center-left Social Democratic Party — which makes up half of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition — had opposed the proposal but agreed late Sunday after working out an agreement that includes strict guidelines for domestic deployment. Typically, those in support of this policy believe that they want to deal with emergencies. One supporter is Social Democrat parliamentary leader Peter Struck. The proposal will go to Merkel's Cabinet and then to the parliament for approval. Opposition Left Party lawmaker Petra Pau accused the government of seeking to violate a constitutionally dictated division “between army, police and secret services.” Petra is right to say that this plan will allow the military to illegally act more domestically in a wide spectrum of circumstances. "The military has no role domestically for historic, political, legal and professional reasons," Pau said. Merkel has been an ally of the Bush administration, promotes banning homeschooling, and worked toward political intergration among the West. That is why both George W. Bush, Merkel, and others agreed to make a Transatlantic integration agreement. So, these policies are representative of more militarization of a nation inside of Germany. Militarization threats aren't only in the Third World, but they exist in the West as well including America.




The Dow's points had dropped alot in a few days. It fell as much as 800 points on Monday. The Stock Market is below 10,000 now. This is after the bailout law was passed. Therefore, the bailout law was a fraud. It was a total lie. The mainstream media for the most part (except for Lou Dobbs, Glen Beck, and others) accepted this. The law allowed the IRS to act as a spy force against taxpayers. It steals wealth from taxpayers to fund the criminal activities of Wall Street. It offers no real investigation, accountability, and jail time for any person responsible for this crisis. It has provisions in it that gives the Treasury to deem any asset "troubled" to be stolen by the Treasury. There is also no judicial review of the Treasury's action in some Sections of the law as well. Conflicts of interests exist in the economic crisis on many levels. The head of the FED Hank Paulson was once the Chairman of Goldman Sachs. Now, Paulson is appointing Neel Kashkari to handle the bailout to people (many of whom don't deserve it). Neel is an ex-Goldman Sachs executive.

. Not to mention it has millions of pork barrel projects are in the bill (they include $6 million in tax breaks for wooden arrow manufacturers in Oregon, $128 million in tax breaks for the manufacturers of car racing tracks, $223 million in tax breaks for Alaskan fisherman, and others). H.R. 1424 – Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 is the name of the new law. It's a disgrace of a law and it will do little to solve our economic problems. You don't do these things when you have over 10 trillion dollars in national debt, spending over 1 trillion dollars in the war on terrorism, and a trade deficit inbalance. Some blame Hoover or FDR for our economic problems. Really, both made errors. Hoover raised taxes, regulated against short selling, tried to expand liquidity, and extended loans via the government. FDR tried to use alphabet soup agenda to stop the Great Depression. Some of his policies went overboard like people being arrested for not working overtime or a tailor named Jack Magid in New Jersey was arrested and jailed for charging 35 cents instead of 40 cents to press a pair of pants. The Supreme Court ruled that some of the New Deal's schemes were unconstitutional. The solutions to this problem is a return to basics. There should be massive cuts in the billions of dollars spent in the war on terror (we need to end the war on the terror period, which is causing deficit and debt by us borrowing money from foreign nations), and other unnecessary spending projects. There needs to be an ending of the Federal Reserve to allow decentralization of our banking system with standards. There should be ways to get revenues (like cutting the unnecessary spending from the GWOT, saving money, etc.) to build up our infrastructure, schools, health, and other components of our society. There needs to fair trade deals (with tariffs on all foreign imports if necessary. Also, we need to not make multinational corporations to have governmental powers if they exist here), make economic freedom more real and accesible to Americans, middle class tax cuts and a fair tax system (along with having sound money that is based on something other than nothing), try to get a balanced budget, the Treasury should have judicial review and be prevented from arbitraily stealing assets, and other solutions. This problem stems from a few oligarchs trying to control the vast majority of the economies in the world to form a feudal system. This isn't me writing this down. Carrol Quigley (Bill Clinton's mentor and a professor from Jesuits' Georgetown University) admits that this is one of the main agendas of the elite Round Table organizations. You can freeze or get rid of 1 quadrillion dollars worth of derivatives since they are sucking the economy up ruining it (especially among inexperienced investors). A permament debt-based monetary system never works long term as we realize. We need to protect our civil liberties as well with no warrantless wiretapping, etc.








Macy's new clothing have occult themes on it. It has nothing to do with Goth culture. It has to do with throwing Illuminati propaganda in our faces. It's a blatant promotion of the new world order and trying to make the youth accept the wicked ideas of the new world. It isn't just one shirt, but many of them. Macy is a famous retail store. These shirt advertise the agenda of the new world order. There is the Council of Nine shirt (with a skeleton, an All Seeing Eye, a candle, a moon, etc.). In legends, the Council of Nine relates to the Mystery Religions. They are claimed to the the Ennead of or the major false gods of ancient Egypt. Ancient Greece had them as well. Researchers Picknett and Clive Prince believe that a modern Council of Nine exists with disciples include cutting edge scientists, multi-millionaire industrialists and leading politicians. Andrija Puharich (also known as Henry K. Puharich) is said to be a member of the Council. The Order of the Rose is short for the Rosicurcians (a group that teaches that mental development can improve man. They have many occult principles and influenced Sir Francis Bacon and modern Freemasonry. They teach spiritual alchemy and teachings on Creation. They believe that using methods can unify the masculine and feminine principles of Nature). One shirt has the words the Illuminati Knight and the Bohemian Grove (where politicans have sex with prostitues and plan events. They perform rituals like the Cremation of Care where a human effigy is burned to the owl statue. The owl refers to wisdom or Minerva). This shirt had the eye in the hand symbol (meaning the hamsa to guard against the evil eye. This is used in pre-Columbian America and the ancient Middle East). The Illuminati Knight could be a refernece to the Illuminati degree of the Scotch Knight. Those who think they are "illuminated ones" want to rule the world. Yet another shirt has the Cult of the Serpent with an All Seeing Eye on it (an a moon and sun). Now, the serpent is praised by the Gnostics and other Secret Societies. Even Albert Pike wrote that the Serpent was of Divine Wisdom, but the Bible classified the Serpent in negative terms as plainly Satan or the Devil. Pike wrote about Gnosticism and he believed in using deception unto the Blue Lodge members, so the higher ups in Masonry can retain the real secrets of Masonry. The secrets of Masonry is the merging of Theism with the occult, belief in the immortality of man's soul, and the creation of a new order on planet Earth (as admitted by 33rd Degree Freemason C. William Smith back in 1950). The people who created these shirts didn't randomnly create some symbols. Those in Macy studied this stuff and are either in league or puppets of the new world order agenda.




Life News are here. There was the Life Chain. This is about thousands of people showing their pro-life message. It occured annually at Sunday afternoon in over 1,300 cities across America and Canada. There are those in western New York at an abortion center in Buffalo at the way to Niagara Falls. There were people in Helena, Montana, Wilmington, North Carolina, Colorado, and other locations. It's kind of wild, but the Pro-Life Movement is here to stay. It existed for thousands of years and it will exist long after I leave this Earth when I pass away. Some good news is the Supreme Court let stand a federal appeals court ruling saying that Arizona pro-life advocates would their First Amendment rights abrogated by state officials preventing motorists from purchasing Choose Life license plates. The high court denied a writ of certiorari in the case of Arizona Life Coalition v. Stanton after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously overturned the September 2005 decision of U.S. District Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt. Rosenblatt upheld the ruling of the Arizona License Plate Commission, which denied the application for the speciality plate from a coalition of pro-life groups including Arizona Right to Life, the Center for Arizona Policy, and several crisis pregnancy centers. We have a little freedom of speech with the pro-life plates being shown. Proceeds from the sale of the Choose Life plates would benefit pregnancy centers that help women find abortion alternatives. Some have discussed about the Supreme Court and Roe. We would all wish that Roe would be gone, because Roe was a federal takeover of the abortion issue. It federalized child killing as "privacy" when it ruins the privacy and the lives of millions of unborn babies. Abortion is murder as we realize. Now, both McCain and Obama aren't perfect on this issue. With Republicans and Democrats as Presidents, Roe is here and abortion rates have been very high. The deal is to never trust a political party, but align with the truth. If you want to get things done, use multifaceted means from education, allowing our legal policies to improve, protesting, and other actions. That is why I agree with the Mexico City Policy, I reject funding organizations agreeing with coercive abortions, and I reject forcing taxpayers to fund Planned Parenthood, which funds abortions.













EU Laws are still oppressing those living in Europe. Philip Johnston from the London Telegraph on October 6, 2008 made this known. Now, Britian signed up for the EAW or the European Arrest Warrants. It was passed in 2002. Critics legitimately said that this law will make an individual to be extradited to another EU state to face prosecution for something (even if that is not a crime in Britian or that crime isn't committed in the requesting country). Some ministers have dismissed these allegations. Although, it's true now. An Australian teacher is in jail in London. He was arrested at Heathrow Airport by British police acting on a warrant issued by the German authorities. Gerald Töben, 64, is wanted in Germany for the offence of “Holocaust denial”. It used to be a fundamental protection in British law that no one would be sent for trial in another jurisdiction for something that is not an offence here. It was called the principle of dual criminality. Gerald Töben, 64, is wanted in Germany for the offence of “Holocaust denial”. It used to be a fundamental protection in British law that no one would be sent for trial in another jurisdiction for something that is not an offence here. It was called the principle of dual criminality. These offences have no equivalent in this country; but it is now clear that denying the Holocaust, or “defaming the dead”, falls into the category. Toben didn't do the alleged offences in Germany or even within the EU. He showed literature of Holocast denial in Australia. I don't agree with Holocaust denial, but many European countries are wrong to deny people's right of free speech. The EAW's problem is that it doesn't have safeguards to protect against unlawful arrests and don't reflect the shared cultural priorities. Some European nations don't even have habaes corpus and can be jail for days without evidence given unto them at all. I don't believe in jailing people to the exclusion of prima facie evidence at all. You have to have law and order to stabilize a society. So, the EAW is another anti-liberty tool to centralize power in the world.





CNN reported on the deployment of the 1st Bridage combat team in the U.S. Larry Shaughnessy from CNN on October 5, 2008 made known about this. The United States military's Northern Command (which was created immediately after the 9/11 terrorist attacks) is having a combat infantry team to deal with catastrophes in the U.S. (including terrorist attacks and natural disasters). The 1st Bridage Combat Team of the 3rd Infantry which was first into Baghdad, Iraq in 2003 started its controversial assignment on Wednesday. The First Raiders will spend 2009 as the first active-duty military unit attached to the U.S. Northern Command since it was created. They will be based in Fort Stewart, Georgia, and focus primarily on logistics and support for local police and rescue personnel, the Army says. Some skeptics are here who believe that unit has been trained using tools generally utilized for law enforcement (from beanbag bullets, tasers, spike strips, and roadblocks). This training is related to Norther Command's CCMRF (or Sea Smurf) or CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force. CBRNE stands for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and high-yield explosive incidents. CBRNE is a team with about 4,700 personnel from the different military branches that would deploy as the Department of Defense's initial response force. The Army claims that these unit will deal only with emergency incidents. Some respond to that saying that the troops have been trained for years during law enforcement tactics. Even the Cato Institute says that troops shouldn't train in domestic situations at all. Critics also point to a General Accounting Office study in 2003 that found that domestic security missions put a strain on a military stretched thin by two simultaneous wars, and that a unit's readiness for combat is reduced if the members have to take time out to respond to an emergency at home. The deal is that the military have specific roles as defined in the Constitution. NORTHCOM shouldn't expand these roles, because the military have not right to have entrenched policy judgments made in the domestic realm. Now, the seperation of the police and the military is important to perserve.





There is a Delta force officer who said that U.S. officials stopped plans to kill bin Laden. David Edwards and Muriel Kane from the Raw Story on Tuesday, on October 7, 2008 outlined this story. Now, after September 11, 2001, the media reported on the team of elite Delta Force commandos being sent into Afghanistan. They were given an assignment to find and kill Osama bin Laden at Tora Bora. As we understand, this mission failed. The commander of the Delta Force team has written a new book about the whole situation. This book tells what he says is the true story of what went wrong. He appeared anonymously on CBS's 60 minutes on Sunday to summarize that story. Bin Laden according to the author was to be holed up in Tora Bora on a ridge. It had an elevation of about 14,000 feet (which almost 3 miles high). The Delta Force wanted to climb over the mountains at the back, but that plan wasn't approved by the higher ups. This would attack him where he least expect it. Their second idea was to drop hundreds of landmines along the mountain passes to Pakistan to impede bin Laden's retreat and then bring on helicopters. This was also turned down. This was strange since plans were rarely disapproved by the Delta Force's higher ups. They finally agreed to have a frontal assault made by 50 U.S. Delta Force members. The author said that the Afghan fighters moved every night. They were constricted in fighting and he said that an al-Qaeda agreement was made. He said these strange occurences seemed like it was an agreement that both sides had in their fighting with each other. We do know that al-Qaeda was assisted in its invention by the CIA and the ISI. Osama bin Laden is a notorious CIA asset. The war in Afghanistan is a reflection of that because thousands of Taliban and al-Qaeda members fled out of Afghanistan on U.S. planes (Seymour Hersh wrote about this). Also, Afghanistan wasn't the right war just like Iraq wasn't the right one either. For example, cluster bombs were displayed in Afghanistan, record nacro-traffic exists in Afghanistan, innocent civilians have been killed, and this war have been an excuse among some politicans to strike Pakistan (even if it's against Pakistan's permission or national sovereignity). That's like Mexico or Canada saying we're going to bomb us Americans to find "terrorists" whether you like it or not. It's immoral. This is evil is in our faces.


Skeptics are all around. Some of them are trying to intimidate people who are even showing legitimate information to dissent with Romanism. What can you expect from these skeptics. They don't offer nothing lies and profanity. The reality is that Knights of Malta from King Juan Carlos of Spain (who owns the international Cintra company) to former Pentagon Inspector General Joseph Edward Schmitz, who is Blackwater’s operations chief, have a huge role in world affairs. There is nothing wrong with exposing evil Jewish people, but if you do that alone, you are apart of disinformation. The reason is that evil exist in many forms not just one clique. Also, these liars Ognir and Joe blow (whom utilized profanity at Unhived Mind Forum in a childish way) seem not to research the information remotely related to the Vatican/Jesuit connection to the new world order. They refuse to refute me (along with others) on how we show the truth that the Constantianian Order, the Pilgrims, the Vatican, and other real elite organizations (numbering in over 1 billion people) are much more powerful than the Labor Zionists (numbering in the thousands at a minimum). This shows how desperate both of them are. Not to mention that the Vatican is in the nexus of the promotion of illegal immigration (Vatican bishops and other agents endorse amnesty for illegal immigrants on a constant basis), the Ecumencial Movement, Homeland Security (its components were a product of Jesuit Georgetown University with pro-Jesuit John Gannon), globalism, the United Nations, global warming paranoia, international intelligence agencies (many leaders of the DHS, the CIA, the FBI, etc. are Papal agents like SMOM Emilio T. González. Emilio is the Under Secretary of Department of Homeland Security Director for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services), and the UFO movement. Sorry, we have more facts than nothing. The skeptics can't bring it to us. We will bring it all of the time since the skeptics can't cream anyone.

Torture is evil of course. Now, a reality TV show wants to deal with torture. Liz Thomas from the UK Daily Mail on Monday, on October 6, 2008 described on how TV contestants face water torture in the most sickening reality show yet. Many are criticizing that reality television show as being accused of crossing the line form entertainment to sadism. In Channel 5’s "Unbreakable" show, the contestants are buried alive, trapped in a tent full of CS gas, and must wade through piranha-infested water. This isn't all if that's not bad enough. Some of the contestants were inflicted with waterboarding. That is a torture technique that is readily achieved by the CIA on terror suspects. They tie people down on a board, they are titled back and having water poured on their face. This recreates the experience of drowning. One of the volunteers of this sick procedure had convlusions on the first day of filming. Another ran away into the African bush and had to be found with tracker dogs. Of course, these actions are unacceptable. John Whittingdale, who is theTory chairman of the media select committee, said: ‘You have to ask, where is it going to end? Torture done upon anyone (especially innocent citizens) shouldn't be exploited for entertainment purposes. No human being deserves that treatment regardless if they've signed a contract or not. The presenter is named Benedict Allen. Even he admitted that he had concerns about the contestants' safety. Some view this show as a violation of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code banning offensive material to be shown. This shows that times are changing. Now, we witness extreme amounts of torture inflicted on people across a multitude of reality television shows globally. Now, the lesson is that torture is to be opposed completely.



By Timothy