The Streams of History

Guns are a serious issue to contemplate. Citizens have a right to own them in America. Now, some want to restrict that right. Norberto Santana Jr. from Orange County Register on October 10, 2008 wrote about how a sheriff begins to take away concealed weapons permits. This is occuring in Orange County by Sheriff Sandra Hutchens. She is revoking hundreds of concealed weapons permits in the areas. This is gun grabbing of course and a complete violate of the Second Amendment. 146 letters have already been sent to license holders that their CCWs in public are being revoked. They did this under the guise of them being an identified risk and not meeting a threshold under Orange County's new CCW policy (based on the information they've provided). The letter, sent out under the signature of Captain Dave Nighswonger, advises current holders that if they feel that additional information should be considered, they have roughly one month to provide additional good cause information for the department to consider before the revocation becomes final. During last week, county supervisors grilled Sheriff Sandra Hutchens during her 120-day update on the reorganization of the agency. This grilling revolved around the status of the concealed weapons review. Hutchnes admitted that she tightened requirements for permits, but that no current license had yet been revoked. Nighswonger said that some revocations listed reasons like an "avid shooter," which is very innocent. Orange County have increased their concealed weapons to citizens in recent years. Sandra made more restrictions because some officer named Mike Carona was indicted for corruption charges. That's no reason to punish innocent people from owning CCWs at all. "There's a lot of business owners and a lot of gun owners that have had CCWs that have never met Mike Carona or contributed," said Greg Block, a Huntington Beach-based firearms instructor and activist. It's another example of our rights being violated. If it can occur in Orange County, it can exist anywhere. You don't arbritarily ban people's rights for the actions of one person.



The Economy is in dire straights for many reasons. Jim Rogers from CNBC criticized the policy of the White House and others. With this crisis, the world banks are trying to merge their economics into one is a basic view of what's happening. They (the elite families controlling the major private, central banks worldwide. That's why the FED is made up of private central banks) are using this crisis as an excuse to have a monopoly and buy up all of our assets (as stated by the Club of Rome, CFR, and other globalist documents). For example, global banks are cutting interest rates globally. Also, there is the $700 billion bailout for Wall Street doing little to our economy. Some blame not only interest rate cuts constantly as the problem with the economy. It's also the derivatives that increase risks causing negative economic consequences as well. Jim Rogers criticized global banks doing constant overprinting of paper currency when they have little value (along with this process devaluing the dollar currency). Rogers believes that the only solution to the market crisis is to allow failing banks and speculators to go bankrupt along with starting over again. Spending endless amounts of liquidity into the system is unnecessary since it has not worked for thousands of years. It's simple to understand that overprinting of currency with little value causes hyperinflation. As for derivatives, news articles say that they are worth about 1 quadrillion dollars. Bob Chapman wrote that half of them are unregulated, poor, and risky of the OTC derivatives market. Some predict that these extreme bailout are used to force citizens to controlled by the oligarchs in the government so they can be completely dependent on the government. The deal now is that people want solutions. There is a need to start over, but not where the power of the economy is centralized unto private banks, the FED, or the government. The deal is that the Constitution says that Congress should handle the currency of Americans. The Congress has every right to focus on sound money being based on gold and silver metals. There should be an ending of the fracitional banking system of the Federal Reserve. There needs to be saving of money from the ending of the war on terror (in Iraq, Afghanistan, military bases worldwide, etc.) to help build up the infrastructure in our nation. You can cancel out all derivatives and all debt that can't be paid off in order to built the economy from the ground up (not just from the top bottom). There shouldn't be a tax burden of taxpayers to support Wall Street (with fair trade practices and investments in our nation, you can create better jobs in our urban plus rural areas). There should be rewards for taxpayers and those that stay their jobs here in America. There needs to oversight (notice that that the bailout bill has pork and allows the Treasury leaders to label any bank as bad then take it over. It has no judicial review in some sections of the law even. The bill was passed with little discussion which is unprecendented since the Patriot Act. Some Congresspeople said that they were threatened with martial law if they didn't vote in favor of the bill. The law increases the executive branch instead of all branches of government encorporating the balance of power) to prevent corporate corporations from acting in immoral lending practices. This banker bailout also bails out foreign banks. In other words, immoral speculators using our money can no longer be a concrete reality in our economy. There needs to be corporate responsibility. This has nothing to do with a true free market, because this market now is manipulated and shifted by numerous institutions (along with some banks doing fraud, theft, and having criminal immunity). We should control the government not the elite or multinational corporations using the government to control us.





Northcom is being exposed more and more. Tom Burghardt from Antifascist Calling on October 11, 2008 described about the militarization America with NORTHCOM's Joint Task force civil support. Tom wrote that Donald Rumsfeld signed off on revisions to the Pentagon's secretive COOP (or the Continuity of Operations Program. This was done nine months before the 9/11 attacks). Based on a document (which is named AR 500-3) published by the whistleblowing website Wikileaks, it described “all hazards COOP planning” as the mechanism by which “the Army remains capable of continuing mission-essential operations during any situation, including military attack, terrorist activities, and natural or man-made disasters.” These news are relevant to the Army Times report in September of 2008. The Army Times said that the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team (BCT) would be deployed on October 1. They were be under day to day control of U.S. Army North or a service componenet of NORTHCOM (an illegal military unit controlling much of the military affairs in North America). Now, the Army Times believes that the “non-lethal crowd control package” described earlier for operations in the heimat, “is intended for use on deployments to the war zone, not in the U.S., as previously stated.” Despite that, the Pentagon and other agencies have done surviellance suppressing dissent in America. Simple examples of the suppression of our liberties are the repression of liberties among the protestors during the Democratic and Republican National Conventions. Some of the protestors were charged with domestic terrorism as under the illegal Patriot Act. Another example of surveillance is how the the Pentagon’s now defunct Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA), as revelations that State police agencies in Maryland routinely spied on antiwar organizers, shared this information with the National Security Agency and classified them as “terrorists” in government-run databases. Christopher Ketchum in his report from Radar Magazine (on its May/June 2008 issue) said that the Main Core database (linked to the continuity of government contingency planning) including dissident, activists, lawyers, gun onwers, and even average people. The financial crisis is giving a big opening for government agencies to have a big militarization of domestic law enforcement. That's why so-called "non-lethal weapons" system (some of them are utilized by the military in the first place) are being deployed in a rapid pace. This includes data mining, DHS spy-satellite surveillance, blanket CCTV coverage of American cities, illegal FBI deployment of infiltrators and provocateurs, “mission creep” by the Pentagon into civil affairs. Ft. Stewart in Georgia have NORTHCOM people testing mock drills in working with FEMA as well. Military operations going on domestically against citizens is a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. Bush didn't feel bound to the repeal of the section allowing him to deploy armed forced to restore public order even without state permission (this was repealed form the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year). The deal is that NORTHCOM is having too much power in influencing the domestic lives of Americans.



The FCC is trying to probe the Defense Department. Many have accused the Department of Defense of infilitrating the mainstream media in order to promote their agenda in various newscasts. The FCC wants to see if news networks or military analysts violated the Communications Act of 1934 along with FCC rules. This year, the New York Times reported on something. They outlined that a Department of Defense program had ex-military officers presenting the Bush administration’s position on the War on Terror as objective analysis on major television news programs. Their opinion were also displayed on 24-hour cable news networks. Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro and Congressman John Dingell wrote to the FCC to investigate allegations that the news networks and the analysts failed to disclose the ex-military officers’ ties to the Pentagon. Each Congressperson wanted to figure out if these analysts had violated sponsorship identification requirements in the Communications Act. DeLauro wants the FCC to continue to investigate the matter. According to the Times report, Department of Defense documents described the analysts as “message force multipliers” instructed to deliver “administration themes and messages” to the public “in the form of their own opinions.” The report found that these analysts -- who The Times called “a media Trojan horse” for the administration -- were encouraged to convey specific Defense Department talking points to the public, even when they suspected the information could be exaggerated or false. Network members admit that they had limited understand of their ties to the governent. Yet, the network leaders argue that it is the analysts' responsibilities to outline any potential conflict of interests. Operation Mockingbird is an example of the CIA controlling huge sections of the mainstream media for manipulation of what information is shown unto the public. This has been going on for many eons of human history. Just look at yellow journalism promoting evil imperalism against Cuba and the Philippines during the late 1800's.




It doesn't take a rocket scientist to comprehend that the media is biased on the abortion issue. Most of them are pro-abortion of course from Chris Matthews to Katie Couric. The National Right to Life received notice from the ABC Radio Network that it would not air National Right to Life's ad entitled "Waiting for Obama's Apology," during Sean Hannity's radio program. ABC Radio Network executives did this. They've claimed that the ad was geered more to electioneering than just showing a Pro-Life position. The ad was to be paid for by National Right to Life Political Action Committee (NRL PAC), which is allowed to do "electioneering" under federal law. The ad was about telling Obama to apologize since the state bill he opposed in 2003 was nearly identical to the federal bill. The bill was about the born alive abortion law that prevents born alive infants who survived abortion from being killed basically. Also, FactCheck.org confirmed that both bills are nearly identical as well. Obama called the NRLC liars when they weren't. They have been vindicated by many independent studies of the bill. Derrick Jones, who is the NRLC Communications Director, said that ABC banned the ad for political reasons not for any other. He said that ABC and most of the mainstream media are pro-Obama. It's obvious that many in the media want to omit Obama's extreme abortion record (which including opposing the partial birth abortion ban, opposing the Mexico City policy, wanting to force taxpayers to fund Planned Parenthood whether they want to or not, and wanting the FOCA which can invalidate all pro-life laws nationwide. Even Joe Biden voted for the partial birth abortion ban in 2003). This is an ABC gag rule. ABC is practicing censorship nothing more. This issue of abortion shouldn't be covered up by any media organization. Some in the mainstream media are hypocrites. They strongly ask Sarah Palin many questions about her abortion views, but none toward Obama or even Biden about the same issue at all. So, you can't trust any candidate 100% regardless of what party they reside in. You can only trust God 100% of the time.













McCain has controversy with his associates as well. This is coming from Keith Olbermann. Olbermann is a partisan, but he is right on some issues. Now, Olbermann is accusing McCain of saying nothing about his associations with extremist characters. These people include racists, fascists, and eugenicists. He said that board members of the US Council for World Freedom are connection to John McCain. John McCain sat in the US Council for World Freedom for years according to Keith. One board member is Dr. Antony Bouscaren of the Pioneer Fund. The Pioneer Fund as researchers know is a racist organization that promotes eugenics. Its members believe that whits have intellectual superiority and no intervention can radically improve the intellectual capacity of non-whites (especially black people). These are lies and liars of course. Jay Parker, is a ‘registered foreign agent for the apartheid government in South Africa,’ while uniting with McCain. Although, Barack Obama's ties to ACORN, Bill Ayers, and others are legitimate to discuss as well. Keith Olbermann criticized McCain as saying nothing to a bomber of woman's clinic. Bombing clinics is wrong. Yet, Olbermann hypocritically supports abortion which is apart of eugenics and it's the destruction of human life. Abortion is eugenics since abortion views certain human being worthy of death even if they are innocent. Keith is definitely in league with wanting Barack Obama elected. Keith Olbermann is a known distorter of what the Second Amendment really says. It promotes gun rights. The 2nd Amendment is more than just muskets, it's about the right to bear arms. That's his right, but to not expose what abortion really is sad from him. Barack Obama and John McCain are funded by the establishment including Wall Street, the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, etc. John McCain has called for tax credits and billions of dollars to handle bad mortgages. This is similiar to Obama's plan (with Barack Obama adding tax credits for companies that stay their jobs here, increased retrieval of money from certain accounts without a tax penalty, and delay in foreclosures so people can renegoitate the terms of their mortgages so citizens can pay for them more effectively).




LISA W. FODERARO from the NY Times on October 9, 2008 wrote about the Eco-Police. Lisa wrote that Jennifer Ross feels that she can't make a move at home without inviting the scorn of her daughters (who are 10-year-old Grace and 7-year-old Eliza). Ross said that her daughters are more environmentally conscious than she is. She wants to use a hybrid car and other devices. These kids according to the writer are eco-kids. There is nothing wrong with trying to help the environment in real ways. These ways include recycling, having clean water, and having clean air. It is a problem when eco-policies go out and violate the rights of citizens. These violations include a carbon tax proposed by some governments. That's impossible since humans by their nature exhale carbon dioxide all of the time. Also, Australia proposed forced child limits to solve "climate change." The agenda of global warming paranoia is sponsored by the Club of Rome, the Rockefeller Foundation, and other globalists to control private property. They have done this under Agenda 21 and other programs. Yet, groups like the Club of Rome, the UN, and other are more bold in their advocacy of a global carbon tax and other anti-liberty proposals. If you want real changes, we should ban poisons in our water and foods like sodium flouride, aspartame, MSG, the immoral testing of dangerous toxins in our water (and among people). There should be independent development of our resources and legitimate industralization to help out the Third World (that include electricity and trading modernization globally).




Alberto Rivera is a controversial figure. He's one the first people in the modern era who exposed the Jesuit Order in a higher level. He is demonized not only by Catholics, but by ecumencials to this very day. As time goes on, Rivera's views have been validated even more so than what I could of imaged. He wasn't perfect as all humans aren't perfect. Yet, his foundational opinions of dissent with Romanism, opposition to the agenda of the Jesuits, and the faithful expression of his religious beliefs are accurate completely. Some criticize Rivera for saying that the Jesuits tried to infiltrate Protestant and other churches. Alberto Rivera is correct, because Nino Lo Bello, in his book, The Vatican Papers which was published by New English Library 1982, in the 19th chapter entitled, "The Vatican's Spy Network," described a Vatican spy network. This network has over a million people back in the 1980's. Rev. J. A. Wylie wrote of the Jesuits doing the same thing pretending to be Protestants and other creeds. Alberto Rivera is right that Ignatius Loyola invented the Jesuit Order and that Loyola was accused of sympathizing with the Alumbrados (a Spanish version of the Illuminati) by the Inquisition in 1527. Rivera's most controversial charge is that the Vatican helped create Islam. We do know that Islam and Catholicism have many connections with each other. They include each religious having Rosary Beads, each praise of Fatima, both have the encorporation of a works based salvation, and both have a relationship to the Babylonian Egyptian Mystery Religions (i.e. The Kabba, the mitre, the Pope or Pontifex Maximus, and other parts of both religions have relationships to ancient Babylon or ancient Egypt. Allah is a pre Islamic name refering to masculine deities of the sun and some believe it relates to Bel. The Arabic polytheists before Islam outlined that Allah has a consort. This consort was named Allat, with her two daughters of Uzza and Manat. The star and crescent is found in ancient times and today in Masonry. Albert Pike in his Morals and Dogma book mentioned that the crescent and the disk combines means the Sun and the Moon). They have pilgrimages, each have a history of anti-Jewish persecutions in high levels, each religions have obelisk in its capital cities (ie. both in Vatican City and Mecca have obelisks. In Mecca, people throw rocks at the obelisk), each have a history of enforcing their rule via the state, and each colloborated with each other for over 10 centuries. That's why we have an apparent of a war on terror, when the Muslim elites are working with the West for more globalization (not to mention that both nations of Afghanistan and Iraq make Islam the official religion of each nation). Rivera is right on the history of the Ustashi, the Ecumencial Movement, the modern versions of the Bible having errors, 33rd Degree Freemason Ronald Reagan aligning with the Vatican, the persecution of John Wycliffe, and other information.




David J. Stewart (I don't agree with him on every issue like on Israel, but he's right on tons of other issues) wrote that Madalyn Murray O'Hair wasn't an atheist. That's interesting, because O'Hair was one of the first Americans who publicly outlined her atheism with obscene hatred of anyone who believed in God. She called God sadistic, brutal, and other sick names. It's ironic she said that because you can't have utter hatred for God if in her mind God doesn't exist. William O'Hair is now an evangelist. William was her eldest son. William said that Madalyn's home was filled with rage and violence. Mary had pure outbursts of angers. William said her uncle loved pornography, her grandmother was involved in Tarot cards, and her mother worshipped statues of mating animals. Therefore, if she worshipped statues, by definition, she wasn't a full fledged atheist at all. Madalyn used unrepentant murderers to work in her office and bragged about watching an X-rated move in downtown Baltimore. William accused her mother of stealing money, being corrupt, and other evil deeds. William made the right point that certain cultural changes were bad and these problems exceeded Madalyn's extremism. For example, the Supreme Court limiting religious expression, allowing abortion on demand nearly, and and other policies have degraded America in more ways than one. Hence, many atheists like Madalyn really acknowledge God's existence, but choose to reject him because of his characteristics. The good news is that God can forgive anyone's sins and allow people to live their lives righteously in real tolerance and truth. Atheists typically demonize religions constantly, but omit the atheist-led genocides of many dictators (like Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, and others who lived in history).



Our Health is important to know about it. Most realize that bad eating habits can cause inflammation and changes in behavior. Overeating of course can give people devestating health effects. It can contribute to chronic diseases like arthritis, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. A new study published in the October 3rd issue of the journal Cell found that overeating causes changes in the brain. The hypothalamus is an almond sized part of the brain. It's cone shaped and found attached to the pituitary gland lying near the brain stem. It makes sure that the body maintains homeostasis or the tendency toward a stable, constant state of equilibrium (i.e. That part of our brain helps to keep our balance). The hypothalamus regulates body temperature, hunger, fatigue, thirst, anger, sexual desire, blood pressure, water balance, and circadian cycles. The hypothalamus even communicates through the nervous and endocrine systems. Now, when there is a high fat diet, the protein IKKbeta/NK-kappaB is in high quantity in the hypothalamus. This can cause obesity, heart disease and diabetes since this protein is resistant to insulin (along with leptin). This protein can cause inflammation (when used by macrophages and leukocytes) in the body, while the immune falsely attacks an invader when it isn't there. Insulin is a hormone that is produced by the pancreas which produces to make cells take up glucose not fat as an energy source. Leptin is a key substance in the regulation of appetite, metabolism, and reproductive function. Leptin regulates insulin as well. Some scientists believe that not all fats are involved in causing obesity though since there is complexity in human metabolism. Certain fats are good for you. What we do know is that certain anti-inflammatory foods can lead to a reduction of inflammation of the body. These foods are bell peppers, broccoli, collards, Kale, lemons, organes, pineapples, salmon, and of course green tea. Moderation in food consumption is key in improving our health completely. That's reality. The stream of history keep going on like water.




By Timothy