http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=27796
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=27655
_____________________________
Carl Haushofer was a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor as stated in VAIII. Hitler followed his geopolitical plan for taking Austria, Cezchoslovakia and attacking Poland. After the war, he was "debrifed" by American Army Colonel and Georgetown Jesuit priest who oversaw the Nuremberg trials. That priest was Knight of Malta Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh---the master of General Eisenhower who murdered two million Germans after the war. So much for the benevolent American occupation of Germany!
Therefore I am not surprised to see Haufshofer's connection to the Jesuit Order's Green Dragon Society. The Jewish Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Ignace Trebisch Lincoln was also a member of that society.
A great discovery Douglas, that the Jesuits founded the Green Dragon Society many years ago. This ruthers my conclusion that the Order controlled both Hirohito and FDR for the entire duration of the war. And at the War Crimes trials in Tokyo, it was Jesuit Walsh who spared the life of another Coadjutor, Masonic Hirohito, through Walsh's control of 33rd Degree Freemason General Douglas MacArthur..
Brother Eric
Boris, Eric...
Wow! "mystical experience" as a code term.
But it makes sense that the RCC would have established/infiltrated such an entity to consolidate their political control over Japan.
Douglas Willinger
----- Original Message ----
From: Grönemeyer Consulting <boris@borisgroenemeyer.de>
To: Douglas Willinger <dougwill2001@yahoo.com>
Cc: Eric Jon Phelps <eric@vaticanassassins.org>; annunaki@fastmail.fm
Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 7:11:18 AM
Subject: AW: Max Kolbe and the Oder Neisse Line- additions
"Brother Arnold may be right in thinking that Father Maximilian, in talking about his mystical experience in Japan, was buoying his own spirits."
A mystical experience in Japan? It clicked the moment I read it: this could be connected to the Order of the Green Dragon! They were into mysticism and the likes.
Now remember Haushofer?
"Karl Haushofer (General and Professor) of Geo-Politics infamy (Alan LeVey was also a fanboy), was one of only three westerners ever, who have become members of the Green Dragon Society. Haushofer was a military attache in Tokyo when he joined before WW1."
http://www.carnwyffa.u-net.com/documents/g...gon.html#one%22
I again refer to the Black Dragon
"Further, the man made connections with the Kokuryu Kai (Black Dragon Society). An ultra-right Japanese secret society infiltrating business and governmental positions, the Black Dragons sought imperial expansion and military supremacy, filling Haushofer's mind with possibilities and pride (The New Axis). Haushofer, fascinated by the sect's exclusivity, stealth, and reach, wanted to create his own Black Dragons."
Der Puppenspieler: The Role of Karl Haushofer in the Third Reich - By Peter Tatara
http://www.ithaca.edu/hs/history/journal/p...03Haushofer.htm
I came across something that was new to me:
Do you know why in my theory Haushofer was able to join the Green Dragon, connect to the Black Dragons and why Japan supported Hitler during WWII and how they on the highest political and military levels were able to orchestrate events like Pearl Harbor?
"In 1692 the Jesuit Christian Missionaries who have trained and influenced Emperor Kang Hsi and bring about the "Sacred Edict" and the creation of the Green Dragon Society as a secret and sacred brotherhood. This was part of the master design of Jesuit missionary Matteo Ricci (1552 -1610). Ricci found Confucianism consistent with Christianity and became the first to translate the Confucian classics into a western language, Latin."
http://johnkeehan.blogspot.com/2006/10/gre...iscoveries.html (Go and read the article in whole)
Now this also could connect to what Kolbe did over there, couldn't it?
WbR,
Boris
Therefore I am not surprised to see Haufshofer's connection to the Jesuit Order's Green Dragon Society. The Jewish Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Ignace Trebisch Lincoln was also a member of that society.
A great discovery Douglas, that the Jesuits founded the Green Dragon Society many years ago. This ruthers my conclusion that the Order controlled both Hirohito and FDR for the entire duration of the war. And at the War Crimes trials in Tokyo, it was Jesuit Walsh who spared the life of another Coadjutor, Masonic Hirohito, through Walsh's control of 33rd Degree Freemason General Douglas MacArthur..
Brother Eric
Boris, Eric...
Wow! "mystical experience" as a code term.
But it makes sense that the RCC would have established/infiltrated such an entity to consolidate their political control over Japan.
Douglas Willinger
----- Original Message ----
From: Grönemeyer Consulting <boris@borisgroenemeyer.de>
To: Douglas Willinger <dougwill2001@yahoo.com>
Cc: Eric Jon Phelps <eric@vaticanassassins.org>; annunaki@fastmail.fm
Sent: Monday, August 6, 2007 7:11:18 AM
Subject: AW: Max Kolbe and the Oder Neisse Line- additions
"Brother Arnold may be right in thinking that Father Maximilian, in talking about his mystical experience in Japan, was buoying his own spirits."
A mystical experience in Japan? It clicked the moment I read it: this could be connected to the Order of the Green Dragon! They were into mysticism and the likes.
Now remember Haushofer?
"Karl Haushofer (General and Professor) of Geo-Politics infamy (Alan LeVey was also a fanboy), was one of only three westerners ever, who have become members of the Green Dragon Society. Haushofer was a military attache in Tokyo when he joined before WW1."
http://www.carnwyffa.u-net.com/documents/g...gon.html#one%22
I again refer to the Black Dragon
"Further, the man made connections with the Kokuryu Kai (Black Dragon Society). An ultra-right Japanese secret society infiltrating business and governmental positions, the Black Dragons sought imperial expansion and military supremacy, filling Haushofer's mind with possibilities and pride (The New Axis). Haushofer, fascinated by the sect's exclusivity, stealth, and reach, wanted to create his own Black Dragons."
Der Puppenspieler: The Role of Karl Haushofer in the Third Reich - By Peter Tatara
http://www.ithaca.edu/hs/history/journal/p...03Haushofer.htm
I came across something that was new to me:
Do you know why in my theory Haushofer was able to join the Green Dragon, connect to the Black Dragons and why Japan supported Hitler during WWII and how they on the highest political and military levels were able to orchestrate events like Pearl Harbor?
"In 1692 the Jesuit Christian Missionaries who have trained and influenced Emperor Kang Hsi and bring about the "Sacred Edict" and the creation of the Green Dragon Society as a secret and sacred brotherhood. This was part of the master design of Jesuit missionary Matteo Ricci (1552 -1610). Ricci found Confucianism consistent with Christianity and became the first to translate the Confucian classics into a western language, Latin."
http://johnkeehan.blogspot.com/2006/10/gre...iscoveries.html (Go and read the article in whole)
Now this also could connect to what Kolbe did over there, couldn't it?
WbR,
Boris
_______________
Dear Ray,
I shall reply below as I was away for a week.----- Original Message -----
Hi Eric,
I agree it is a waste of time, but not necessarily due to the points you cited. I do not hear anyone calling for your death.
Have you read Aquinas lately or even the Jesuit Order's Council of Trent that the pope is sworn to uphold? In these documents you will see the call for my death and every other heretic and liberal on the face of the earth.
To state that no Catholics are Christians indicates a lack of knowledge on your part.
I speak of the doctrine of Rome which all Roman Catholics are to believe and uphold. The Croatian Ustachi were all "good Catholics" while murdering the Orthodox Serbs. And why so? Because these "Christian" Roman Catholics were enforcing the doctrines of Trent. Biblical Christianity kills no one for their religious beliefs; but the Papacy has institutionalized religious murder as a matter of foreign policy. Thus, Romanists who wage the pope's Crusades and man his Inquisitions (Nazism, Communism, Fascism, etc.) cannot be Christians.
You are assuming a position that you should not take - one of judgement, which is God's alone.
The Christian judges all things based upon the Word of God. That final authority for the Christian enables him to embrace the truth or attack falsehood. The AV1611 enables him to perceive inward evil in the form of outward goodness---such as the Papacy. This I am commanded to do (Ephesians 5:11).
You violate your own belief structure by doing so. You cannot tell me who my allegiance is to, because you realistically do not have that knowledge.
To the contrary, YOU call yourself a Roman Catholic. Thus, by logical deduction, you must embrace the doctrines of the institution of which you are a part. My attack is not upon you personally (directly), but upon the Papacy which you defend bringing you personally into the fray (indirectly). Deny the works of Thomas Aquinas, Jesuit Molina, Jesuit Jesuit Suarez, Jesuit Sa, Jesuit Bausenbaum, Jesuit Cardinal Bellermine, Jesuit Laynez and his Council of Trent, Jesuit Loyola and his Spiritual Exercises, the mass-murder of the Spanish and Roman Inquisitions as documented by Llorente and Henry C. Lea, the works of Pope Pius XI who brought Hitler to power via the Jesuit-trained Archbishop Pacelli, the German Roman Catholic Center Party (led by Knight of Malta Franz von Papen) who made Hitler Chancellor and who backed the Enabling Act which paved the way for the resultant Concordat between Hitler and Cardinal Secretary of State Pacelli, and I will begin to consider you to be a Christian. It is not what you say, it is the doctrine that you stand for by your mere membership in the Roman Catholic Institution. In effect you are saying that as a member of the Masonic White KKK you do not hate the Jews, or as a member of the Masonic Black NOI you do not consider all White men to be "Blue-eyed devils."
You overstep the boundaries that should be in place in any conversation when you do so. Do I say who or what your allegiance is to - no, because at this point , I really do not know.
You must make that judgment. And that judgment is crucial for your survival. You must consider my doctrine and then judge me to be either in truth or in error. The final authority for that judgment is the Word of God, the AV1611 of the Protestant Reformation and its underlying texts---which the Council of Trent rejects out of hand. You must discover if I put any other writings in an equal level with the Bible and if so, I am just another cultist. No, Ray, you must judge me and that judgment must be based upon the Bible and no other authority.
You say you are Christian, but you lack some basic understandings and basic ways of dialoging. You set yourself up as "the authority" on everything, and then go from there. How is dialog possible in that case?
To the contrary, I am not an authority on everything. But I am an authority on the Word of God and true history for one simple reason: I know how to marshall my facts from a host of sources---Roman Catholic sources at that which no true Roman Catholic would ever seek to deny in the presence of any priest. You attack me, and not my sources for you know in that area I cannot be refuted. That, sir, is Jesuit casuistry at its finest and has been used for centuries against those who demolished the doctrines of Rome with the Word of God.
It sounds like you just want to talk to yourself and have people say "Oh yes, you are so right"... Did you ever think you could be wrong about something? And your use of Bible quotations are selective. You need to look at the whole message and start treating your fellow Christians accordingly.
I accept correction for which reason I have an email list. This is a trait of Biblical humility. Those on the list have corrected me many times for which I am thankful---and I have never removed one of them even if they are wrong. But you are accusing me of the tactics you yourself use---such as the quoting of selective Bible verses while ignoring substantive points that you cannot nor even attempt to refute. This is dishonest. And "fellow Christians?" When you deny the heresies of Rome, and defend historic Bible doctrines for which millions have perished at the mand of the Vatican, then I will consider you to be a "fellow Christian."
You present an extremist view that does not match with the present reality. For to die in Christ is to gain, so why do you use that as your excuse to attack people anyway? Christ loved his enemies to His death.
My view is indeed extremist, as all Biblical views are extreme. Indeed, to physically die in Christ is gain, but I am admonisted to contend for the faith once delivered to the saints against all that oppose the truth as set forth in the Word of God---not the traditions of men. Indeed, Christ loved his enemies to the extent that he called them a generation of vipers and hypocrites. I attemt do the same.
If all your 20 years of research has led you to such a position, then something is wrong in your approach, because you have deviated from basic Christianity 101.
Basic Christianity 101 is found in the Word of God, the AV1611. All in opposition to the maxims set forth in that Book are the enemies of God---including all Romanists and apostate Protestants who give allegience to the doctrines of Rome (Arminian cooperative salvation) and consider the Pope to be infallible (God on earth).
Ray
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
I shall reply below as I was away for a week.----- Original Message -----
Hi Eric,
I agree it is a waste of time, but not necessarily due to the points you cited. I do not hear anyone calling for your death.
Have you read Aquinas lately or even the Jesuit Order's Council of Trent that the pope is sworn to uphold? In these documents you will see the call for my death and every other heretic and liberal on the face of the earth.
To state that no Catholics are Christians indicates a lack of knowledge on your part.
I speak of the doctrine of Rome which all Roman Catholics are to believe and uphold. The Croatian Ustachi were all "good Catholics" while murdering the Orthodox Serbs. And why so? Because these "Christian" Roman Catholics were enforcing the doctrines of Trent. Biblical Christianity kills no one for their religious beliefs; but the Papacy has institutionalized religious murder as a matter of foreign policy. Thus, Romanists who wage the pope's Crusades and man his Inquisitions (Nazism, Communism, Fascism, etc.) cannot be Christians.
You are assuming a position that you should not take - one of judgement, which is God's alone.
The Christian judges all things based upon the Word of God. That final authority for the Christian enables him to embrace the truth or attack falsehood. The AV1611 enables him to perceive inward evil in the form of outward goodness---such as the Papacy. This I am commanded to do (Ephesians 5:11).
You violate your own belief structure by doing so. You cannot tell me who my allegiance is to, because you realistically do not have that knowledge.
To the contrary, YOU call yourself a Roman Catholic. Thus, by logical deduction, you must embrace the doctrines of the institution of which you are a part. My attack is not upon you personally (directly), but upon the Papacy which you defend bringing you personally into the fray (indirectly). Deny the works of Thomas Aquinas, Jesuit Molina, Jesuit Jesuit Suarez, Jesuit Sa, Jesuit Bausenbaum, Jesuit Cardinal Bellermine, Jesuit Laynez and his Council of Trent, Jesuit Loyola and his Spiritual Exercises, the mass-murder of the Spanish and Roman Inquisitions as documented by Llorente and Henry C. Lea, the works of Pope Pius XI who brought Hitler to power via the Jesuit-trained Archbishop Pacelli, the German Roman Catholic Center Party (led by Knight of Malta Franz von Papen) who made Hitler Chancellor and who backed the Enabling Act which paved the way for the resultant Concordat between Hitler and Cardinal Secretary of State Pacelli, and I will begin to consider you to be a Christian. It is not what you say, it is the doctrine that you stand for by your mere membership in the Roman Catholic Institution. In effect you are saying that as a member of the Masonic White KKK you do not hate the Jews, or as a member of the Masonic Black NOI you do not consider all White men to be "Blue-eyed devils."
You overstep the boundaries that should be in place in any conversation when you do so. Do I say who or what your allegiance is to - no, because at this point , I really do not know.
You must make that judgment. And that judgment is crucial for your survival. You must consider my doctrine and then judge me to be either in truth or in error. The final authority for that judgment is the Word of God, the AV1611 of the Protestant Reformation and its underlying texts---which the Council of Trent rejects out of hand. You must discover if I put any other writings in an equal level with the Bible and if so, I am just another cultist. No, Ray, you must judge me and that judgment must be based upon the Bible and no other authority.
You say you are Christian, but you lack some basic understandings and basic ways of dialoging. You set yourself up as "the authority" on everything, and then go from there. How is dialog possible in that case?
To the contrary, I am not an authority on everything. But I am an authority on the Word of God and true history for one simple reason: I know how to marshall my facts from a host of sources---Roman Catholic sources at that which no true Roman Catholic would ever seek to deny in the presence of any priest. You attack me, and not my sources for you know in that area I cannot be refuted. That, sir, is Jesuit casuistry at its finest and has been used for centuries against those who demolished the doctrines of Rome with the Word of God.
It sounds like you just want to talk to yourself and have people say "Oh yes, you are so right"... Did you ever think you could be wrong about something? And your use of Bible quotations are selective. You need to look at the whole message and start treating your fellow Christians accordingly.
I accept correction for which reason I have an email list. This is a trait of Biblical humility. Those on the list have corrected me many times for which I am thankful---and I have never removed one of them even if they are wrong. But you are accusing me of the tactics you yourself use---such as the quoting of selective Bible verses while ignoring substantive points that you cannot nor even attempt to refute. This is dishonest. And "fellow Christians?" When you deny the heresies of Rome, and defend historic Bible doctrines for which millions have perished at the mand of the Vatican, then I will consider you to be a "fellow Christian."
You present an extremist view that does not match with the present reality. For to die in Christ is to gain, so why do you use that as your excuse to attack people anyway? Christ loved his enemies to His death.
My view is indeed extremist, as all Biblical views are extreme. Indeed, to physically die in Christ is gain, but I am admonisted to contend for the faith once delivered to the saints against all that oppose the truth as set forth in the Word of God---not the traditions of men. Indeed, Christ loved his enemies to the extent that he called them a generation of vipers and hypocrites. I attemt do the same.
If all your 20 years of research has led you to such a position, then something is wrong in your approach, because you have deviated from basic Christianity 101.
Basic Christianity 101 is found in the Word of God, the AV1611. All in opposition to the maxims set forth in that Book are the enemies of God---including all Romanists and apostate Protestants who give allegience to the doctrines of Rome (Arminian cooperative salvation) and consider the Pope to be infallible (God on earth).
Ray
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
_____________________________________
Dear Lenny,
I have not insulted this man. He has refused to address my basic claims about the Papacy, i.e., the pope's temporal power, etc. At the last of our emails before I ended the dialog he insulted me.
If this man or any other does not address my questions regarding the doctrines of the papacy but responds with personal attacks, he admits defeat and the conversation ends. He started the the insulting demeanor and I ended it.
This clever man then twists the truth so as to attack the Cloak. I say let him depart but not in peace for he has declared war on both of us.
I shall further reply below.
WHY HAVE YOU INSULTED THIS GUY?
THAT IS NOT A CHRISTIAN ATTITUDE NOW IS IT?
LENNY
Hi Lenny,
I have been trying to have a running email dialogue with your co-host, Mr. Eric Phelps. However, he has decided to brand me as a non-Christian. That is because I am Catholic. I made the point that there are Christian Catholics and non-Christian Catholics, just as there are Christian Protestants and non-Christian Protestants, but he takes a different position. He says that all Catholics are non-Christian.
Correct. Protestantism, unlike Catholicism has never had a pope or an Inquistion thus the two are incomparable. Anybody who believes the doctrines of Rome as found in Canon Law is not a Christian. It is these people who have murdered us Bible believers by the millions over the centuries.
Then there are Protestants and Apostate Protestants. So according to his classification, the only Christians in existence are Protestants that are not Apostate.
Incorrect. Most Protestants are apostate---they are rejectors of the Reformation Bible and thus the Lord Jesus Christ Who used his godly sons go get it into our hands inspite of the diabolical Church of Rome ruled by the Jesuits.
This sounds like the old Roman Catholic doctrines in reverse. Nobody was going to heaven except Catholics in the "state of grace". He in effect is trumping old catholic teachings in reverse that have since been repudiated by the catholic church itself!
What nonsense, and what persistant cunning! The present Nazi Pope has declared that there are no Christians outside of the RCC. Biblically, nobody is going to heaven apart from the true Jesus Christ of the Reformation Bible----the Bible Rome has burned for centuries. As you know, for the Romanist, the Bible is not the final authority of faith and practice; it is the dogma of the Pope and his penholders, the Jesuits.
The other claim he made is that my allegiance is to Romanism, which is not true. It is very interesting as to how he can so quickly become judge of everything, including my Christianity and allegiances. Like he knows me better than I know myself!!!
More personal attacks. Based on his admissions and confessions I deducted that his allegiance was not to the Word of God and thus to real Lord Jesus Christ of the Bible, but to Rome and to the doctrines of Rome which he defends without a blush!
It is extremely discouraging that someone so biased and incorrect is getting air time on your web broadcasts. I am not tuning in unless he is removed. You can let me know by email whenever that happens.
This is good news. Ray is cleverly manipulating you. He appears so benign, yet he is using a deadly Jesuit tactic. When exposed cry " My Holy Religion," but never defer to details of doctrine or past histories. And above all, never use over much zeal. This man is quite convincing apart from the facts of our exchanges. Please review them Lenny, and behold his perfidy!
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Ray
I have not insulted this man. He has refused to address my basic claims about the Papacy, i.e., the pope's temporal power, etc. At the last of our emails before I ended the dialog he insulted me.
If this man or any other does not address my questions regarding the doctrines of the papacy but responds with personal attacks, he admits defeat and the conversation ends. He started the the insulting demeanor and I ended it.
This clever man then twists the truth so as to attack the Cloak. I say let him depart but not in peace for he has declared war on both of us.
I shall further reply below.
WHY HAVE YOU INSULTED THIS GUY?
THAT IS NOT A CHRISTIAN ATTITUDE NOW IS IT?
LENNY
Hi Lenny,
I have been trying to have a running email dialogue with your co-host, Mr. Eric Phelps. However, he has decided to brand me as a non-Christian. That is because I am Catholic. I made the point that there are Christian Catholics and non-Christian Catholics, just as there are Christian Protestants and non-Christian Protestants, but he takes a different position. He says that all Catholics are non-Christian.
Correct. Protestantism, unlike Catholicism has never had a pope or an Inquistion thus the two are incomparable. Anybody who believes the doctrines of Rome as found in Canon Law is not a Christian. It is these people who have murdered us Bible believers by the millions over the centuries.
Then there are Protestants and Apostate Protestants. So according to his classification, the only Christians in existence are Protestants that are not Apostate.
Incorrect. Most Protestants are apostate---they are rejectors of the Reformation Bible and thus the Lord Jesus Christ Who used his godly sons go get it into our hands inspite of the diabolical Church of Rome ruled by the Jesuits.
This sounds like the old Roman Catholic doctrines in reverse. Nobody was going to heaven except Catholics in the "state of grace". He in effect is trumping old catholic teachings in reverse that have since been repudiated by the catholic church itself!
What nonsense, and what persistant cunning! The present Nazi Pope has declared that there are no Christians outside of the RCC. Biblically, nobody is going to heaven apart from the true Jesus Christ of the Reformation Bible----the Bible Rome has burned for centuries. As you know, for the Romanist, the Bible is not the final authority of faith and practice; it is the dogma of the Pope and his penholders, the Jesuits.
The other claim he made is that my allegiance is to Romanism, which is not true. It is very interesting as to how he can so quickly become judge of everything, including my Christianity and allegiances. Like he knows me better than I know myself!!!
More personal attacks. Based on his admissions and confessions I deducted that his allegiance was not to the Word of God and thus to real Lord Jesus Christ of the Bible, but to Rome and to the doctrines of Rome which he defends without a blush!
It is extremely discouraging that someone so biased and incorrect is getting air time on your web broadcasts. I am not tuning in unless he is removed. You can let me know by email whenever that happens.
This is good news. Ray is cleverly manipulating you. He appears so benign, yet he is using a deadly Jesuit tactic. When exposed cry " My Holy Religion," but never defer to details of doctrine or past histories. And above all, never use over much zeal. This man is quite convincing apart from the facts of our exchanges. Please review them Lenny, and behold his perfidy!
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
Ray
_______________________________________
This is the flagrant murder of anti-communist Russian soldiers and people by CFR member and Papal Knight (a clandestine Knight of Malta as told to me by a former member of USAF Intelligence), General Dwight Eisenhower. This wicked sinner, later advised by Knight of Malta and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, was the utter tool of Archbishop Francis Cardinal Spellman at the time of Operation Keelhaul. Spellman was JFK's murderer.
Notice the picture of brother Masons Stalin and Truman. Both oversaw Keelhaul---and the American Protestant and Baptist Churches were silent and thus complicit in the holocaust of Orthodox, anti-communist Russians. We are going to pay for it in the near future.
Brother Eric
OPERATION KEELHAUL
By Albert Burns
We just passed a significant anniversary. On October 16, 1933, Franklin Roosevelt granted diplomatic recognition to the Soviet Union. The Communist government was about to collapse for lack of financing. Granting them diplomatic recognition literally saved the Soviet government which had been ostracized by virtually every other government in the world. Throughout the rest of the 1930s and the 1940s, two disparate groups infiltrated dozens of agents or members into the executive branch under Roosevelt. Those two groups were the Communist Party and the Council on Foreign Relations. While these two groups had radically different motivations, they both had the same ultimate goal, i.e., to weaken and eventually destroy American freedom and independence.
Very few people today remember that World War II started in 1939 because Germany AND RUSSIA invaded Poland at the same time. The Soviet Union was exactly as responsible for STARTING that war as Germany was. This was known and condemned at the time. However, in 1941 when Hitler attacked Russia, suddenly our mass media made a 180 degree about face and Russia became our "noble ally" in fighting the war. Of course, it was up to the United States to supply Russia with the armament to fight the war.
The world went to war to "save" Poland and the other countries of Eastern Europe. Yet, at Yalta, before the war was over, the United States State Department AGREED that the Soviet Union would be allowed to add Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, half of Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Rumania, and Bulgaria to its territory in Europe. Before the addition of those countries and peoples, at the end of the war, Russia had a population of about 160 million people and controlled a land area smaller than the Russia of the Czars. Soviet industry had been almost totally destroyed by the Nazi war machine. Communism was a third rate power, militarily, industrially and economically. There was, literally, no reason for Eastern Europe to be handed over to the Communists other than the influence of the Communist agents in OUR State Department.
Operation Keelhaul
In Operation Keelhaul what we see follows “During World War II, some 2.5 million Soviet citizens found themselves in Germany and the occupied countries as prisoners of war, slave laborers, or refugees. From 1944 to 1947, these people were forcibly repatriated in a number of operations, the best known of which was Operation Keelhaul in 1946-7. Many committed suicide rather than return to Soviet slavery.
To the best of my recollection, I have NEVER seen ANY still or moving pictures of similar trainloads of men, women and children which OUR government was responsible for shipping off to a similar fate.
In 1945, General Dwight Eisenhower ordered that "Operation Keelhaul" be put into effect. This involved rounding up and shipping back to "their countries of origin" ALL the refugees from communism: men, women and children, soldier or civilian, male or female — even though many of them had been fighting on OUR side during the war. Since all of Eastern Europe was then under Communist domination, sending these people back was, quite literally, a sentence of death, some by immediate execution and the rest by slow extermination from overwork and malnutrition in the Soviet slave labor camps in Siberia.
These people were rounded up at bayonet point, forced into freight cars and shipped off to a terrible fate. There was no accurate count kept but the MINIMUM figure was 2,000,000 people and a maximum of 5,000,000. The elimination of all these anti-Communist people made the Communist domination of Eastern Europe MUCH easier. And the American people were kept blissfully unaware of this action which Eisenhower enforced rigidly, even though it violated international law, the laws of his own country and laws of humanity.
Germans were prosecuted at Nuremberg for similar crimes but control of the news ensured that Eisenhower, and those under his command who took part in this outrage, were never even officially accused of wrong doing. Ike carried out Operation Keelhaul deporting innocent refugees from eastern Europe to Stalin’s clutches. The Communists often machine-gunned these people as they arrived in Soviet territory -sometimes while still on the trains. Most of these people were nothing more than White Christian refugees, who didn’t want to live in a communist tyranny.
Notice the picture of brother Masons Stalin and Truman. Both oversaw Keelhaul---and the American Protestant and Baptist Churches were silent and thus complicit in the holocaust of Orthodox, anti-communist Russians. We are going to pay for it in the near future.
Brother Eric
OPERATION KEELHAUL
By Albert Burns
We just passed a significant anniversary. On October 16, 1933, Franklin Roosevelt granted diplomatic recognition to the Soviet Union. The Communist government was about to collapse for lack of financing. Granting them diplomatic recognition literally saved the Soviet government which had been ostracized by virtually every other government in the world. Throughout the rest of the 1930s and the 1940s, two disparate groups infiltrated dozens of agents or members into the executive branch under Roosevelt. Those two groups were the Communist Party and the Council on Foreign Relations. While these two groups had radically different motivations, they both had the same ultimate goal, i.e., to weaken and eventually destroy American freedom and independence.
Very few people today remember that World War II started in 1939 because Germany AND RUSSIA invaded Poland at the same time. The Soviet Union was exactly as responsible for STARTING that war as Germany was. This was known and condemned at the time. However, in 1941 when Hitler attacked Russia, suddenly our mass media made a 180 degree about face and Russia became our "noble ally" in fighting the war. Of course, it was up to the United States to supply Russia with the armament to fight the war.
The world went to war to "save" Poland and the other countries of Eastern Europe. Yet, at Yalta, before the war was over, the United States State Department AGREED that the Soviet Union would be allowed to add Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, half of Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Rumania, and Bulgaria to its territory in Europe. Before the addition of those countries and peoples, at the end of the war, Russia had a population of about 160 million people and controlled a land area smaller than the Russia of the Czars. Soviet industry had been almost totally destroyed by the Nazi war machine. Communism was a third rate power, militarily, industrially and economically. There was, literally, no reason for Eastern Europe to be handed over to the Communists other than the influence of the Communist agents in OUR State Department.
Operation Keelhaul
In Operation Keelhaul what we see follows “During World War II, some 2.5 million Soviet citizens found themselves in Germany and the occupied countries as prisoners of war, slave laborers, or refugees. From 1944 to 1947, these people were forcibly repatriated in a number of operations, the best known of which was Operation Keelhaul in 1946-7. Many committed suicide rather than return to Soviet slavery.
To the best of my recollection, I have NEVER seen ANY still or moving pictures of similar trainloads of men, women and children which OUR government was responsible for shipping off to a similar fate.
In 1945, General Dwight Eisenhower ordered that "Operation Keelhaul" be put into effect. This involved rounding up and shipping back to "their countries of origin" ALL the refugees from communism: men, women and children, soldier or civilian, male or female — even though many of them had been fighting on OUR side during the war. Since all of Eastern Europe was then under Communist domination, sending these people back was, quite literally, a sentence of death, some by immediate execution and the rest by slow extermination from overwork and malnutrition in the Soviet slave labor camps in Siberia.
These people were rounded up at bayonet point, forced into freight cars and shipped off to a terrible fate. There was no accurate count kept but the MINIMUM figure was 2,000,000 people and a maximum of 5,000,000. The elimination of all these anti-Communist people made the Communist domination of Eastern Europe MUCH easier. And the American people were kept blissfully unaware of this action which Eisenhower enforced rigidly, even though it violated international law, the laws of his own country and laws of humanity.
Germans were prosecuted at Nuremberg for similar crimes but control of the news ensured that Eisenhower, and those under his command who took part in this outrage, were never even officially accused of wrong doing. Ike carried out Operation Keelhaul deporting innocent refugees from eastern Europe to Stalin’s clutches. The Communists often machine-gunned these people as they arrived in Soviet territory -sometimes while still on the trains. Most of these people were nothing more than White Christian refugees, who didn’t want to live in a communist tyranny.
__________________________________
Hi Eric;
I hope that this finds you and your family well.
I once read some literature from Jack Chick that included a chart indicating that all governments were of the devil. Noting how you seem to manage to find something disparaging to report on all of our country's leaders (I still hold US citizenship) I would like to ask you if there are any acting politicians in the federal government (congress etc) that support your views or come close to them.
None that I know of, and if they sought to resist the Order's CFR domestic and foreign policies they would be "Kennedyed" or "Nixoned" or "Wellstoned."
I would also ask this with regard to the press, media etc. I also would like to ask what your take might be on the time when Pat Robertson was running for president but I think I know that you are not a supporter of Pat.
Pat Robertson is controlled by the Knights of Malta via the Council for National Policy, not to mention SMOM Jeremiah Denton and the late J. Peter Grace. Robertson is a traitor to his nation and the Savior.
In fact, are there any known politicians that can be trusted?
On a federal level, none that I know of.
Turning to Israel, isn't it possible that with his faults, Bibi has more to offer than the other leading Israeli politicians and that he at least works toward building up the security of this country?
Benjamin Netanyahu is a high-level Jewish Freemason subordinate to the Vatican. Though he advocates some right policies as does Irish Roman Catholic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Bill O'Reilly of Fox News, he still is in the grip of Rome. Israel will never be governed by truly nationalistic Jews for the benefit of Jews. The Popish anti-missionizing law of the 1970s proves this as the most patriotic Hebrew/Jews in Israel are Bible-believing Messianic Jews. I know two of them in the IDF.
Further, Bibi will never advocate a plan to end the Arab/Hebrew conflict that has been stoked for over 60 years by the Vatican via its American Empire ruled by the CFR. I could implement policies that would end the conflict within 3-5 years at most.
What about Moshe Arens?
I don't know of this man.
Isn't he a decent man who would have worked for the security and benefit of this country but grew exasperated and tired?
Quite possibly. The same is true for the former Israeli Prime Minister who gave away the Sinai. He left politics and died a broken man.
Waiting to hear from you.
All the best,
Barry
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
I hope that this finds you and your family well.
I once read some literature from Jack Chick that included a chart indicating that all governments were of the devil. Noting how you seem to manage to find something disparaging to report on all of our country's leaders (I still hold US citizenship) I would like to ask you if there are any acting politicians in the federal government (congress etc) that support your views or come close to them.
None that I know of, and if they sought to resist the Order's CFR domestic and foreign policies they would be "Kennedyed" or "Nixoned" or "Wellstoned."
I would also ask this with regard to the press, media etc. I also would like to ask what your take might be on the time when Pat Robertson was running for president but I think I know that you are not a supporter of Pat.
Pat Robertson is controlled by the Knights of Malta via the Council for National Policy, not to mention SMOM Jeremiah Denton and the late J. Peter Grace. Robertson is a traitor to his nation and the Savior.
In fact, are there any known politicians that can be trusted?
On a federal level, none that I know of.
Turning to Israel, isn't it possible that with his faults, Bibi has more to offer than the other leading Israeli politicians and that he at least works toward building up the security of this country?
Benjamin Netanyahu is a high-level Jewish Freemason subordinate to the Vatican. Though he advocates some right policies as does Irish Roman Catholic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Bill O'Reilly of Fox News, he still is in the grip of Rome. Israel will never be governed by truly nationalistic Jews for the benefit of Jews. The Popish anti-missionizing law of the 1970s proves this as the most patriotic Hebrew/Jews in Israel are Bible-believing Messianic Jews. I know two of them in the IDF.
Further, Bibi will never advocate a plan to end the Arab/Hebrew conflict that has been stoked for over 60 years by the Vatican via its American Empire ruled by the CFR. I could implement policies that would end the conflict within 3-5 years at most.
What about Moshe Arens?
I don't know of this man.
Isn't he a decent man who would have worked for the security and benefit of this country but grew exasperated and tired?
Quite possibly. The same is true for the former Israeli Prime Minister who gave away the Sinai. He left politics and died a broken man.
Waiting to hear from you.
All the best,
Barry
Sincerely in Faith,
Brother Eric
________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment