Monday, February 16, 2009

2009 Events








Pakistan is still being bombed by American forces. MUNIR AHMAD from The Associated Press on Saturday at February 14, 2009 reported on how a suspected U.S. missile strike had killed 27 people in Pakistan (This nation is the Islamic world's only nuclear-armed nation). This suspected missile strike came from a drone aircraft, which flattened a militant hide out in northwestern Pakistan on Saturday. According to intelligence officials, those killed included locals and foreign insurgents. Other purported militants were wounded in the attack in South Warziristan. al-Qaeda leaders like Ayman al-Zawahri are believed to be hiding there. The new U.S. administration brushed off Pakistani criticism that the missile strikes will fuel religious extremism and boost anti-American sentiment in the Islamic world. To the contrary, they do. The reason is that it is immoral to use a preemptive strike to attack a nation that isn't a threat to America like Pakistan. If preemptive warfare against Iraq was wrong, so are these U.S. missile strikes in Pakistan. Not to mention that Pakistan is a famous ally of America. It's foolish to try to agitate conflict in that government when Pakistan has an unstable leader. If that leader is replaced with a more militant President, the problems in Pakistan will be so much more worse than it already is. Caution and realism is so much better than unnecessary military strikes.


Free Speech is under threat all of the time. Philip Johnston from the Telegraph on February 13, 2009 talked about free speech issues in Europe. People in Britian refused to allow Dutch MP Geert Wilders to speak in Britian. The UK has decreased its free speech rights in a mighty way. Decades ago, the Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran issued a fatwa (or death threat) to Salman Rushdie for insulting Muhammad in his book, "The Satanic Verses." The government of the UK in that time protected Rushdie's right to create his book. Britian denounced the threat to his life and broke off diplomatic relations with Iran. Sir Geoffrey Howe, then foreign secretary, told the Commons: “This action is taken in plain defence of the right within the law of freedom of speech and the right within the law of freedom of protest.” There were mass book burnings, protests worldwide (even in Bolton and Bradford), and threats of violence. Yet, the book is still being published and sold worldwide. Now, free speech isn't just suppressed in Britian, but in Canada, New Zealand, Austria, and even in America now. Geert Wilders was denied to speak since he is an anti-Islamist person. He called the Koran inherently inflammatory and feels that he's justified in believing that. He believes that certain verses of the Koran are inciting Muslims to act violenty and anti-democraticially. I don't agree with him on every issue, but he has a right to believe in what he wants to. The Home Office banned Wilders to speak. Wilders is promoting his film called Fitna. Yet two years ago, Lord Ahmed invited Mahmoud Abu Rideh, a Palestinian previously detained on suspicion of fundraising for groups linked to al-Qaeda, to Westminster to meet him. There is a double standard here. If someone viewed the Bible as inflammatory, they will still be invited to speak in Britian. Wilders is no true liberty lover since he wants the Koran to be banned. The point is that whether you agree with him or not, he has a right to express his viewpoints in a peaceful fashion.


Economics is on the mind of the world. It is expected that Barack Obama will sign his stimulus bill soon. Some believe that this plan will help the economy. Others feel that it will potend a sign that government socialism is one the way. The bill is related to socialism, but it's something bigger than that. It's about the international bankers further centralizing their economic control over the taxpayers. In fact, the international bankers are controlling the government and then the government is controlling more portions of our industries, etc. Many in the Heritage Foundation believe that the stimulus will increase welfare spending. Obama’s supposedly “socialist” borrow and spend bill “will add to the growing number of people dependent on government and, thus, politicians, who will never show them the way out of poverty, but give them only enough money to sustain them in poverty and then tell them if they don’t vote for Democrats, those nasty Republicans will take their checks away,” according to Rector. If you take it one step further, what's happening is that the bankers are imposing debt on the USA as a whole. That is why this plan is forcing the Treasury to borrow about About 2.5 trillion dollars in 2009 and about $4 trillion in 2010. Jerome Corsi said that this will increase the national debt by 65% in 2 years. Corsi cites Craig Smith, founder and CEO of Swiss America, who estimates it would take approximately four generations of Americans to pay off the interest of the U.S. Treasury bonds sold as debt to create the $1 trillion stimulus package (factoring in a 3 percent growth rate in the economy throughout that time). The whole plan is about debt slavery and control. That is why most Republicans supported George W. Bush's increasing the national debt by more than $4 trillion during his reign. That was the largest increase in U.S. history. The Federal Reserve was based on creating money out of thin air (while placing inflation on that money causing fraud, debt, and usury. This was apart of the fractional reserve banking system). The Reserve Act was created by the international bankers after they've met in Jekyl Island. Even Jefferson and Jackson warned against allowing private banks to control the issue of our money. The Constitution is very clear that only Congress has the authority to issue currency in the USA. Barack Obama's cabinet have many members of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, Jesuit trained people, and the Bilderbergers (i.e. Obama's financial advisor is Paul Volcker). This stimulus bill isn't just about the government violating our privacy by controlling our medical records, suppressing gun rights, etc. It's about the international bankers to economically enslave our nation and the world with debt and inflation.





Some have made a connection between the cover up of 9/11 and the plan crash near Buffalo. The FBI told the 9/11 Commission that the black boxes from Flight 11 and Flight 175 wasn't found despite being built to withstand direct full speed crashes and temperatures of 1800 degrees. Yet, the black box of flight Q400 was found near Buffalo, New York within 15 hours. They also claimed that the voice recorder from Flight 77 and the flight data box from Flight 93 were damaged beyond recovery. Some believe that it is a possiblility that the databoxes could be found of the other flights, because the WTC site was meticulously cleaned up (even finding tiny bone fragments in the process). In 2004, New York firefighters Mike Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi went public to say they had found the black boxes at the World Trade Center, but were told to keep their mouths shut by FBI agents. Nicholas DeMasi said that he escorted federal agents on an all-terrain vehicle in October 2001 to help them locate the devices. This story is confirmed by rescue volunteer Mike Bellone. The Philadephia Daily News reported at that time that there could be a cover up at Ground Zero about the data recorders. In addition, a source at the National Transportation Safety Board later told Counterpunch, “Off the record, we had the boxes….You’d have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.” One reason for this cover up is that the pilot's conversations in 9/11 might contradict the official story about 9/11 (including how men with boxcutters could overpower ex-military pilots and scores of passengers with ease). The public is awaiting the present locations of the black boxes that were found at the World Trade Center. The flight data recorder and the cockpit recorder were found in perfect condition (from the plane crash near Buffalo in upstate New York). That plane near Buffalo nose dived. The Buffalo crash and the Beijing skyscraper fire are just 2 recent events that refute the official story of 9/11 completely (when the Beijing never collapsed despite sustaining a massive amount of fires burning).


Life related new is going on. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on February 13, 2009 described another incident where innocent pro-lifers were arrested in a violation of their free speech rights. Local officials in Birmingham (which is the largest city in Alabama) arrested a group of pro-life advocates. They were sharing their message against abortion outside Parkert High School. Nine college aged participants in the Survivors Campus Life Tour were arrested on a public sidewalk. They were distributing literature to students on last Thursday. The group of pro-life youth activists quietly held signs, distributed literature and peacefully dialogued with students on the public sidewalk. Local officials threatened the pro-life people with arrest. So, the pro-life students conctacted their attorneys, who told them that their location on the public sidewalk (and their free speech activity) was legal according to local (including state) laws. Once the pro-team finished distributed their literature (and were loading their van in preparation to leave), officiers handcuffed (and arrested) all nine pro-life advocates without warning. One woman of the team was still arrested even though she didn't assist in the distribution of literature at all. She was handcuffed so tightly, that she started to cry in pain. Kortney Blythe, Director of Survivors Campus Life Tours, told LifeNews.com that she repeatedly asked Officer Cooley, one of the arresting officers, the reason for the arrests. The police said that the team was detained and not arrested. The police never informed them on why they were arrested or what they were charged with. One officer questioned his superiors by saying "What are we arrested them for again?" The crazy thing is that the police confiscated the pro-team's video cameras, their personal belongings, and impounded (plus searched their vain). This is fascist since the police didn't tell them why they were arrested (including stealing their property without telling them why). The pro-life advocates are now being held in Birmingham City Jail, the jail from which Martin Luther King, Jr. issued his famous letter condemning apathy and injustice. The group had an early Friday morning hearing, and were informed the pending charge was "criminal trespass." All nine members of the Survivors Campus Life Tour have been released from custody. Allison Aranda (who is a staff attorney with the Life Legal Defense Fund and is handling the case) said that she is shocked that people can be arrested for just standing on a public sidewalk with the intentions of handing out literature. This is wrong since their free speech rights were blatantly violated. I don't want to hear anymore of people denying that pro-life people's rights are being perserved. No, their rights are being violated all of the time. The message is clear: Abortion is still murder regardless of what anyone says.


Judi McLeod from Canada Free Press on February 14, 2009 wrote about how the stimulus is a cover for more gun control. The mainstream media isn't talking about HR 45 or the Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009. The bill targets gun owners in America. This bill will strip the constitutional right to bear firearms on any level. It forces people within the first 2 years that all new guns to be registered. It doesn't matter if it's a small handgun. That means that all firearms in a citizen's possession must be registered, not just those purchased after the bill passes. In other words, all firearms in a citizen's possession must be registered. This even applies to antique firearms as well. Every five years the firearm owner must go through a complete renewal process for each weapon owned. Failure to comply carries stiff penalties including confiscation of the firearms and jail time (penalties as high as ten years imprisonment in some cases). The bill forces the government to do searches without warrant and the creation of a federal bureaucracy to monitor firearm possession. This bill is drocanian and should be opposed by Americans. Of course, gun grabbers like Freemason Chuck Schumer and Diane Feinstein want to have this bill passed. Americans died to protect the laws in the Bill of Rights. We have a right to disagree with this bill. This evil is just getting worse and worse. The good news is that folks are waking up. People are getting annoyed with this evil and are opposing it. Gun control is lie not only because it doesn't work in places like Chicago, London, and Australia. Also, it's premise about the permanent regulation of gun ownership has no precise limit. These anti-gun limits effects law abiding citizens the most (not criminals since criminals will disregard any law whatsoever).



The Bilderberg is being exposed all of the time. Now, Wikipedia is threatening to delete the list of Bilderberg attendees. The Bilderberg Group is a secretive international group that desires a new world order. Wikipedia wants to do this anti-liberty deal because they believe it is an inaccurate list possibly defaming people. This is silly of course. The announced deletion will occur five days from 2009-02-18 at 14:53. Wikipedia offers people concerned about this possible deletion the ability to edit the page. “You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, it should not be replaced.” An editor wanted to retain page added references, but they were removed according to a common. Wikipedia's ties to the establishment are readily known. In 2007, Virgil Griffith (he is a Cal Tech computation and neural-system graduate student) developed a software tool that the identities of organizations that edit Wikipedia entries. The software revealed editorial changes made by the CIA, the FBI, Diebold, the Democratic Party and the Vatican. Other edits have been made by the Republican Party, the EPA, Diebold, Wal-Mart, and even Al-Jazeera. “According to clues accumulated by ordinary citizens around the world, it could be that the CIA and other intelligence agencies are riding the information wave and planting disinformation on Wikipedia,” explains Ludwig De Braeckeleer. “The fact that most Internet search engines, such as Google, give Wikipedia articles top ranking only raises the stakes to a higher level.” UK journalist and columnist Neil Clark claimed that his Wikipedia entry was edited in a maliciously way (after he criticially reviewed a pro-war book created by Oliver Kamm. Kamm was writing for the Daily Telegraph). Wikipedia for years have been infilitrated by Western secret services, political parties, intelligence agencies, and other corporate elitists. Wikipedia is fine for trivia, but I wouldn't trust it for major serious information. In 2008, Steve Watson wrote that Google is in the business of providing the search features for a private Wikipedia-style site, called Intellipedia. “Google is selling storage and data searching equipment to the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency, and other intelligence agencies, who have come together to build a huge internal government intranet,” Watson reported. Ironically, CIA leaders have been Bilderbergers like CIA Director John M. Deutch, CIA Director Walter Bedell Smith, and Cord Meyer. So, the deal is that we need to trust God alone.



By Timothy

No comments: