There is yet another case of police brutality. Now, there is video footage of a cop punching a woman in the face 4 times during an arrest for just riding a bike. The video was released as apart of a lawsuit against the police officer in Millville, Philadephia. Police brutality is affecting us from across backgrounds and income levels. It isn't just a problem for a certain community. If injustice occurs against one person, it affects us all. The video talks about how a woman punches a woman in the face four times after he bungled an attempt to arrest her for riding a bike on the sidewalk. As reported by NBC news, Sheila Stevenson, 42, has filed a civil suit (PDF), alleging that the police used excessive force, after then-Millville Police Officer Carlo Drogo stopped her one year ago on February 3, 2008. A newly released video shows that Drogo attempted to use pepper spray on Stevenson, while she was on the bike. Yet, the officer sprayed himself in the face. As Stevenson struggles, a reeling Drogo knocks her off the bike and onto the ground. 2 more cops arrive and haul Stevenson to the curb. One of them put full force of his upper onto her neck and head. The same cop then thrusts his knee into her back twice, with full force, whilst attempting to handcuff her. “I am not doing nothing,” Stevenson screams. Later, Drogo like the coward that he is punches the women 4 times in the face while being handcuffed. Drogo resigned from the police force in October for undisclosed reasons. To this day, he defends his actions and has released a statement maintaining that Stevenson's allegations represent a distortion of the facts. That's a lie of course since Drogo was the one out of order. The victims of police brutality have little choice, but to bring up lawsuits and protest. The reason is that in a lot of times, it is difficult to achieve justice. Justice though is still a clear aim in response to the evils ever present in America and the world.
The Fairness Doctrine is always a real threat in America. The Fairness Doctrine is about the censorship of talk radio, especially against folks who are conservative. Back in the day in 1949, the FCC had this policy of having opposing viewpoints (when discussing controversial and political issues. The FCC ended this policy in 1987). After 1987, talk radio exploded into thousands of stations nationwide. Despite some Democrats denying a Fairness Doctrine today, there are still politicans desiring the existence of the Fairness Doctrine now. "For many, many years, we operated under a Fairness Doctrine in this country," Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., told Albuquerque radio station KKOB last year. "I think the country was well-served. I think the public discussion was at a higher level and more intelligent in those days than it has become since." Former broadcaster Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind, made the right point that the Fairness Doctrine is an attack on the First Amendment. Nowadays, new, slick tactics are being done in order to promote censorship on the airwaves. The FCC might use community advisory boards to force local programming to have mandatory control by the FCC according to McDowell. A think tank headed by John Podesta, co-chairman of Obama's transition team, mapped out a strategy in 2007 for clamping down on talk radio using language that has since been parroted by both the Obama campaign and the new administration's White House website. Podesta's report wanted equal time to be forced onto talk radio. That is why Pence and others are sending legislation into Congress to permanently ban the Fairness Doctrine from the USA. The Fairness Doctrine is still immoral and ought to be banned completely, so it won't rise again.
Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on February 4, 2009 described about how President Barack Obama's new faith based advisors include abortion advocates. Obama just complied a new group of faith based advisors that will comprise his new White House Office for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. There are abortion advocates in this clique of people. The new White House office will direct federal funds to religious and neighborhood groups for social service projects. Joshua DuBois is a 26 year old political activist who is heading up the religious outreach for the Obama campaign. He is one of the members of the new panel. The Obama faith tour was criticized by pro-life people during the campaign, because it falsley called Barack Obama pro-life on abortion (especially by professor Doug Kmiec). During that time, NRCL legislative director Douglas Johnson told Lifenews.com that: "...That is just is a public relations product cooked up at liberal think tanks like Third Way, where veteran pro-abortion activists specialize in developing strategies to help hard-core pro-abortion politicians camouflage their positions..." Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Washington-based Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, a political group, will also be involved in the White House faith group. However, the center Saperstein heads agreed to co-sponsor the national pro-abortion march Planned Parenthood, NARAL and other abortion advocates organized in 2004. In addition, former NARAL President Kate Michelman was invited to attend the Union for Reform Judaism's biennial convention in Minneapolis in 2003. Bishop Vashti McKenzie (who is a member of a sorority), the first female bishop in the African Methodist Episcopal Church, is involved in the group. She supported CFR member Rick Warren joining Barack Obama in November of 2006 at an AIDS summit. The list includes pastor Joel Hunter, who calls himself pro-life (He issued the closing prayer at the Democratic convention). Joel believes that abortion rates didn't decline during the Bush years. In January 2008, AGI reported that the number of abortions nationwide have fallen to their lowest point in 30 years and have declined 25 percent since 1990 -- with half of that time period coming under pro-life presidents. Meanwhile, research from a nonpartisan political watchdog group finds the claim false when compared with national and state abortion statistics. The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania says that claims that abortions have not decreased under President Bush are "not true." The reality is that pro-abortion policies will increase abortion and real pro-life policies will lower abortions nationwide in America.
The United Nations is at it again. Chelsea Schilling from WND.com report that an United Nations human rights treaty could something negative again. It could ban children from being spanked or homeschooled. It could even forbid parents from deciding their families' religion according to a legal expert. This expert is Michael Farris of Purcellville, Va. He is president of ParentalRights.org, chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association and chancellor of Patrick Henry College. He told WND that under the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, or CRC, every decision a parent makes can be reviewed by the government to determine whether it is in the child's best interest. He believes that these treaties are apart of the Obama/Clinton era agenda to make America a more socialist country. In a treaty, nations are bound to it whether they are good or bad components in it (unless they are repealed). The CRC proposal is opposed, because it might damage parental rights. According to the Parental Rights website, the substance of the CRC dictates that A murderer aged 17 years, 11 months and 29 days at the time of his crime could no longer be sentenced to life in prison and the best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every parent if a government worker disagreed with the parent's decision. Allowing parents to opt their children out of sex education has been held to be out of compliance with the CRC. Children would have the right to reproductive health information and services, including abortions, without parental knowledge or consent. This is a disgraceful proposed treaty like usual. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Barbara Boxer are supporters of this treaty. Parental freedom is just as important to perserve as children freedom.
Arezow Doost from CBS 11 TV on February 4, 2009 wrote about teens facing daytime curfews in Dallas. That's silly of course. Dallas wants to force young people to be in class. They claim that since truancy (or skipping class) will be a problem, the Dallas City Council is considering expanding its current child (and teen curfew to include the daytime). Now, teens under 17 years old can't be out past 11 p.m. during the week and midnight on the weekends. “For me, it’s like the night time curfew is enough for me,” Kristle Castaneda agrues. “It (a change) wouldn’t be reasonable at all.” Annette Offord is a 10th grader who was not in class during the day of Tuesday. She doesn't like it either. Offord said that she is not in that specific school, because she was trying to get enrolled at another school. City officials believe that this tighter policy will curb truancy according to Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Elba Garcia. Garcia claimd that truancy was linked to residential burglaries. This is silly, because the government has no right to control where children go to during the morning at all. Dallas is expecting fines as a punishment for breaking a morning curfew to be about $500. These measures are unfair, because what about children who aren't in the public school system. You can't just fine or lock up children if they are innocent, but walk around (in the timeframe beyond the morning curfew). This may affect homeschooling as well. So much for constitutional rights. Also, it forces parents to pay more unnecessary fines when you have a big economic recession going on in America. Curfews have always been a means where the government causes authoritarian control over a community.
Al Gore has always been an extremist when it comes to the environment. Jeff Poor from Business & Media Institute on Thursday, on February 5, 2009 outlined more proof of this. The Glen Beck radio program aired how Al Gore told kids that questioning parents' beliefs in climate change is similar to questioning segregration. That's insane since segregation was about using coercion to deprive people their right to live where they want to live. Questioning man nade global warming is a legitimate outline of inquiry that has been done by many mainstream scientists for years. Questioning man made global warming is never equated to questioning segregration at all. It's disrespectful not only to scientists, but to real civil rights people that shed their blood so we could live in a better world. Al Gore should be ashamed of himself. Gore's words is very fascist since it stifles dissent about an issue. This isn't the Soviet Union. This is America. The audio was aired on the February 4th Glenn Beck Radio Program. Gore was advising school children on the eve of the inauguration of President Barack Obama, presumably at the University of Maryland Presidential Youth Inaugural Conference. Now, Club of Rome member Al Gore is trying to use young children in his sick campaign of promoting the government to have harsh eco-policies (that will damage our GDP if they are implemented). Gore believes in the lie that all forms of CO2 is a pollutant, which it is not true. CO2 is a common chemical necessary for the development of organisms including plant life. “’There are some things that you know that older people don’t know?’” Beck said. “That is – and I’m just getting started. That is one of the most incredible things I have ever heard. ‘There are some things that you know that older people don’t know.’ He is pitting the youth of this nation against their parents. We have a former vice president of the United States, a man who claims to have been President of the United States saying to the best and the brightest 12-year-olds that, ‘You know better than your parents,’ that ‘you don’t have to listen to your parents on things because they just don’t know.’” Therefore, we should oppose the agenda of eco-extremists like Al Gore at every step of the way. This man made global warming fraud is being exposed now in 2009 like no other time in history. Even the Ice Caps of the North Pole have grown in 2008 from 2007. There are record winter temperatures worldwide. The sunspots on the sun are disappearing, which is why some researchers believe that a new Ice Age is upon us.
The economy is still in uncertain waters. Barack Obama shouldn't be blamed for the cause of this crisis, but his administration is responsibility for the result of any stimulus plan being passed for now on. The House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to sell the stimulus plan now. She issued paranoia about 500 million Americans will lose their jobs each month if the stimulus isn't passed. The problem with that statement is that there is only slightly above 300 million people living in America today. Chris Wallace from FOX News had to correct her. Wallace said that she meet 500,000 people. Therefore, Barack Obama believes that his plan will invest in building up America's jobs, our health care, education, etc. Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, now top White House economic advisers, said that the plan is uncertain in how many jobs it could create. On January 21, economist Mark Zandi predicted the House bill would create 4 million jobs, based on assumptions that all its money would be spent by the end of 2010. Soon thereafter, the Congressional Budget Office projected that more than one-third of the bill’s spending and tax cuts would not occur until after 2010. According to Joel Prakken, chairman of Macroeconomic Advisers, the so-called economic stimulus package will do nothing to prevent unemployment. Prakken said he expected Friday’s comprehensive payrolls report issued by the government to show a drop of about 500,000 jobs for the month of January. What is true is that we have to do something. Doing nothing is not an option if you want real, tangible economic group to transpire in the United States. Things will continue as they are unless excessive credit, mortgage problems, and the foreclosure problems are really addressed. That is why the bankers via the FED contributed to the liquidity crisis. “I suspect that part of what we’re seeing in the freezing up of lending markets is strategic behavior on the part of big financial players who stand to benefit from the bailout,” David K. Levine, a liquidity constraints and game theory economist at Washington University in St. Louis, told Bloomberg last September. According to Levine, the bankers orchestrated the freezing of lending markets in order to benefit central bankers (while stealing money from taxpayers). This crisis has been exploited to promote global government or a new world order (as promoted by Gordon Brown, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Nicolas Sarkozy, Tony Blair, Angela Merkel, and others). Even Barack Obama admitted that this stimulus package will not immediately fix the economy. Now, if you want solutions, it's time to end the FED. The FED has been involved in hyperinflation that has depleted the value of the dollar currency (with fiat money). Congress and the people ought to control the issuing of currency (that is backed by a stable commodity like gold or silver) not the FED, which is a private banking enterprise. Failing banks should be allowed to fall, you can cut out wasterful spending, and use money is a better way. We ought to have fair trade and incorporate real investments in our own nation via cutting taxes, having funds, and placing incentives to assist those in need.
Secret Societies are ever real with a key agenda. This agenda is to attempt to form an occult-inspired Utopian society. Some of these societies hate conservative religion and want a one world religious state like Rosicrucian Nicholas Roerich desired. Roerich's works inspired 32nd Degree Freemason Henry Wallace to put the Great Seal design into the Dollar bill by the year of 1935. Freemason David Ovason believed that an Omega sign is in the Dollar bill to represent completion or the end of all things. In other words, the Dollar Bill represents the plan of secret order to create the new Aquarian age of the new world order basically. One of the occult inspired object that signifies the new world order is the Philosopher's Stone. The Eye of the Phoenix film believes that this stone is about the foundation stone of America (or heralding the new world order). It's interesting that the Templars existed and influenced the Jacobite movement to promote the Royal House of Stuart (from Scotland). Many of these Jacobites would come into America like Hugh Mercer to be apart of the American Revolution. Princess Diana is related to the House of Stuart. The Stuarts are apart of a bigger bloodline of the Merovingians (who include other European families). These bloodlines are related to each other. That is why over half of all American Presidents are related to the kings of France, Scotland, and England. The Templars have been accused of for a long time of being the basis for the development of modern Freemasonry (including the Rosicrucians. The Invisible College was Sir Francis Bacon's idea that evolved into the Royal Society of England). Chris Everard accuses the Knights Templar of doing Kabbalah rituals, envoking demons, and other sick ceremonies. Freemasonry itself is based on the ancient Mysteries (even Druidism) that is merged with Theism. Many of these high level occult groups worship Lucifer (which is cloaked and called the sun god. The sun god, the serpent, etc. is the same being of Lucifer/Satan in code). The reestablishment of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem is another goal of Freemasons (using America as the New Atlantis as a tool. This New Atlantis agenda didn't just originate with Bacon. It extended as a transaltantic conspiracy to create world government) and other secret societies. This Temple is not a true Temple of God, but a man-made structure that will house the Antichrist (since Biblical prophecy says that a false Christ in a Temple will claim to be God, but he isn't).
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment