Sunday, February 15, 2009

Principles

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75704

6 comments:

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Tim,

It's a sign of our troubled times that there appears to be no leader – political or business – who even pays lip service to this.

Wow, we can see where her brainmatter is hiding; can't we? So far up her ass, she got lost in deep vaccuum of zero point return no space -- dizzy there!!

I guess this pretend constitutionalist 'journalist' with the research skills of a two day duckling, ain't ever heard of:

Ron Paul,
Peter Schiff
Chuck Baldwin
Constitution Party
among many others.... ???

Perhaps she's WND's affirmative action quota?

Why they wouldn't hire a James Johnson, instead who could really demonstrate a black person of character and principles, who has not only read the constitution, but appears to practice it; I wouldn't know.

Anyway, that's my view.

Lara
[PS: The email address you gave me for her doesn't work]

Timothy said...

That's silly for you call the woman a quota hire. She's an intelligent woman. She was outlining real facts. You can whine and use profanity about population control, but I have right to criticize you on it.

Also, Ron Paul I really don't agree with him denying that 9/11 was an inside job at all.

by Timothy

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

That's silly for you call the woman a quota hire.

I'm getting to the point where I think the only people who weren't quota hire's were those who committed the 9/11 Inside Job Attacks, to start the War on 'Terror' (Overpopulation, and Wake those with Ears to Hear up to Islam's Exponential Population and Domination Ideology Time Bombs).

She's an intelligent woman.

Depends how you define 'intelligent'!! She doesn't think one Wall St. Executive has done squat illegal!! HELLO? How intelligent is that? She talks about 'ethics' and 'principles' and 'morals' and what the hell has she done to help Markopolos? What about Deep Capture and the work of Patrick Byrne, a modern day Wyatt Earp.....

She was outlining real facts.

Yeah, real facts about how she talks about issues of morality and principles, and ain't doing her homework to investigate and provide support to those for whom the words 'principles' don't just sound nice in a little goddamn fucking WND newscolumn, but who walk their talk practice it, facing down the Wall St. Capone SEC mob!!!

You can whine and use profanity about population control, but I have right to criticize you on it.

Indeed, you do have a right to criticise me. Go ahead.

If you are serious about your criticism and feedback, provide me with detailed examples; if not, just be vague and abstract with 'whine and profanity' verbiage.

Lara

Timothy said...

Here's my response to you.


YOu mention that the only people who weren't quota hires were those who committed 9/11, etc. That's your view. You haven't refuted why she is non-intelligence. She talks about a wide spectrum of issues and analyzes concepts in an indepth way. That is one sign of intelligence. You promote moral relativism in terms of defining concepts. I don't. Also, you saying that she don't live up to her principles is silly by you since you don't known her life at all in an indepth manner.


YOu are incorrect in saying that I don't provide examples about my criticism toward you on issues about moral absolutes and population growth. For months, I've answered you with studies, examples, etc. That's very wrong of you to mention. Also, the UN studies prove that population growth will go done by 2050. Also, the film called Demographic Winter proves that there in an underpopulation crisis in Europe. Many authors like Dr. Jacequline Kasun have cited evidence to refute the overpopulation myth. These are clear cases of examples. Don't lie and say that I don't present examples. These examples are concise.

I don't lie about you spewing profanity in an unstable manner in trying to get your point across. That's reality. Also, on many occasions, you act in vague verbiage. I never act vague. I'm in front with my words.

Timothy said...

Also, I wrote tons of articles with accurate and detailed information. They are located in this blog and other places in the internet. So, you need to reconsider calling me vague. Also, this women which you deride have done tons of excellent work in her own community.

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

I really don't have much to say that I think you want to hear.

I can't, nor would I want you to feel obliged to feel something you don't feel; or want to be with someone you don't want to be with.

I guess if you think you haven't been vague with me, and you have been clear with me; then clearly I just ain't getting it.

Anyway, what we want to hear, isn't often what we do hear; and no amoung of wanting to hear, can make what you want to hear true.

I don't know what to say to you Tim; I really don't. I hope you find what you are looking for, cause it sure doesn't appear to be me. Anyway, whatever it is, or she is, I hope you find it, or are happy wherever you are.

Love Lara