Secrets are Getting Revealed

Interesting news about FEMA is coming about. There is a large church organization that is refusing to divulge how many of its pastors are on the FEMA payroll. This is after a member presented concerns about religious leaders being utilized to condition their congregation to accept the declaration of martial law. Even back in May of 2006, people discovered about how FEMA was training pastors and other religious representatives to be secret police enforcers (i.e. informants for the government). FEMA wants to immorally teach congregations to obey the government unconditionally in prepartion for a declaration of martial law, property and firearms seizures, and forced relocations. A KSLA news report confirmed that Clergy Response Teams are being trained by the federal government to “quell dissent” and pacify citizens to obey the government in the event of a declaration of martial law. This church is called the Worldwide Church of God. Obviously, I don't agree with that church's theology at all. It has about 64,000 members in 860 congregations in about 90 countries. A member asked the head office of the church if they were involved in the FEMA program. “The head office quickly replied hastily within an hour by telling me, “Sorry, that is privileged information”, the man states. “The reply was in big bold script like I’ve never seen before in emails. I was also a bit put off by the word “privileged.” The member wasn't answered yes or no if the church people on the payroll of FEMA at all. This is a shame, because Homeland Security is intimidating people from even religious quarters. Now, FEMA is setting up concentration camps (in case of national emergencies, which is apart of a new bill being proposed in Congress). In late 2008, there was an announcement that tens of thousands of active military personnel are to be placed inside the United States under Northcom, partly for purposes of dealing with “civil unrest” and “crowd control." Therefore, we should reject this government fascism. We should never have unconditional support of the government at all. The reason is that if the government says do murder, abortion, rape, etc. we have every right to not follow those government orders.



CNBC.com from Monday on February 2, 2009 outlined about oil prices in America. Oil prices are going up into about $100 a barrel. This was preceded by a huge decline over the past twelve months. Robin Griffiths, who is the technical strategist at Cazenove Capital, told CNBC that: "...After a major fall like that you would expect it to retrace a quarter, a third or a half of the previous fall and as that was an enormous fall, quite a decent bounce is likely to come..." Oil prices were at the high of above $147 in July of 2008. Therefore, oil prices are in uncertain waters. There has been Big Pharma promoting drugs to be weaponized in fighting mind wars (upon possible future battlefields). David Gutierrez from NaturalNews on Tuesday at February 3, 2009 described this information in further detail. Big Pharma claims that these products will boost the performance of army soldiers, while undermining the minds of their "enemies" (according to a National Research Council report drafted for the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency). A report entitled, "Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies" questioned on how neuroscience technologies and an increased understanding of the mind's functioning will affect the police (and the military). Some believe that it is way too early to see if this technology is practical or not. While the narcolepsy drug modafinil and the attention deficit disorder drug Ritalin are already thought to be widely used by U.S. soldiers trying to stave off combat fatigue, the report says. The military want to develop more "effective" drugs in the future in order to increase alertness including physcial performance. The military wants weaponized drugs in order to harm the enemy as well. One such method might involve transcranial direct current stimulation, which is the firing of electrical pulses into a detainee’s brain to disrupt their neurons. Hence, it makes "the enemy" harder to lie about circumstances. Direct human-machine interfaces, or machines controlled directly by a human mind, could allow the deployment of weapons from a distance (or even give a soldier entirely new ways of perceiving and processing information). Ethically, these devices may cause problems because it is immoral to harm a person's mind in a damaging manner. Also, this technology have been used for years against citizens of Americans, especially during large protests. Therefore, this research and technologies are a clear and present danger in our society.




There has been controversy about Barack Obama and rendition. Many have legitimately criticized Obama for continuing the previous Bush administration's policy of rendition. Barack Obama signed an executive order securing the continued practice of secretly capturing, transporting, and imprisoning so-called "enemy combatants." These executive orders were issued by Barack Obama just 2 days before his tenure. This order says that the CIA has the authority to carry out renditions. Renditions are about secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States. Torture is common among renditions. “The Obama administration appears to have determined that the rendition program was one component of the Bush administration’s war on terrorism that it could not afford to discard.” writes Greg Miller. A minor part of one executive order says that it will instruct the closure of CIA's secret prisons, but doesn't refer to places where they hold people on a short term transitory basis. In others, the black sites would remain open. Even most former CIA officials have admitted that rendition is mostly unproductive. Some officials in government still want rendition to exist in some capability. The black sites hit the headlines in late 2005 when U.S. and foreign intelligence officials blew the whistle on the CIA’s practice of hiding and interrogating “al Qaeda” captives at a Soviet-era compound in Eastern Europe. The secret facility was apart of a secret CIA prison system. It was set up after 9/11. Such black sites are located in 8 nations like Thailand, Afghanistan, and in Eastern Europe. The European nations involved in the program remain unknown from pressure form senior U.S. officials. Horror stories of brutality and psychological torture of detainees at the secret prisons emerged soon after. The European Parliament classified the practice of rendition as illegal under international law. Barack Obama, to his credit, is correct to want to close Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Human Rights Watch hypocritically opposes Bush's rendition secret facilities, but support Obama's decision to keep some of the rendition locations. Some writers like Tom Eley found loopholes on Obama's orders about torture. Eley wrote that Obama's plan won't free the 600 people at Bagram prison camps in Afghanistan. Barack Obama won't prosecute those responsible for the torture and secret detention from the previous administration at all. This isn't real CHANGE at all. Also, the illegal torture policies of the America were done long before George W. Bush was President. It won't end with him either unless radical changes are done. The global empire must end if we want real reform in our government and society. Torture is always wrong of course.



Life news are existing. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on February 1, 2009 wrote about how a lawsuit filed for the baby born alive at the abortion business is hidden from the police. Now, a leading pro-life law firm have filed a lawsuit on behalf of a baby born alive after a failed abortion. The pro-life law firm is called the Thomas More Society. They have retained the prominent Miami personal injury attorney Tom Pennekamp to prepare and prosecute the case. The Thomas More Society accused the abortion center owner (who is named Belkis Gonzalez) of ultimately being responsible for the baby's death. This occured at a Miami abortion business. The baby born was named Shanice Denise Osbourne. She was born in July of 2006. Later, staff at the facility put her body on the roof of the building to hide her death from the local police. According to numerous witnesses, a young woman went to the GYN Diagnostic Center abortion facility in Hialeah, outside Miami, for an abortion. The police said that the 18 year who had the abortion returned the next day to complain of severe stomach pain. Abortion facility staff told her the abortion practitioner was not available and that she would have to wait. After being taken to a waiting area, the woman allegedly gave birth to the baby that she thought had been aborted the day before. Officials hid the baby's body when local officials investigated. 13 defendants (including Gonzalez, abortion practitioner Pierre Jean-Jacques Renelique and their conglomerate of four South Florida abortion clinics) have already been sued for many charges. These charges are for being involved in unlicensed and unauthorized medical practices, botched abortions, evasive tactics, and having false medical records. They are also charged with the killing, hiding and disposing of the baby. Tom Brejcha took an interest in the case when a local law school professor said that it isn't homicide if the baby wasn't viable. Tom is the President and chief counsel of the Thomas More Society. "That opinion is dead wrong," Brejcha told LifeNews.com. "A disabled or dying patient may not be 'viable' in the sense of being able to live very long or without help, but if you kill them, it's murder. This was a case of infanticide, and we're not going to let it go ignored or unpunished," he explained. The deal is that justice should be met when the unborn child was murdered by hospital officials. Abortion is still murder.





It's common sense that people ought not to watch too much television. The Telegraph from February 2, 2009 goes as far as saying that watching too much television can make children mentally ill. The Telegraph writes that this excessive exposure may make children more materialistic (thereby it will affect their relationship with their parents and their health). This information is found in a new wide ranging survey into British children, which was produced for the Children's Society. It says that children are part of a new form of consumerism. The survey found that children who are under 16 years old are spending £3 billion of their own money each year on clothes, snacks, music, video games and magazines. The survey describes how some advertisers use peer pressure and other tactics in order to get children to buy their items. The report says that the celebrity saturated culture can reduce a child's self esteem. The Good Childhood inquiry, compiled by more than 35,000 contributors is independent of the Church of England affiliated society but has been endorsed by the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams. The report has found that only a quarter of children with mental health problems get any specialist help, and one in 10 five to 16-year-olds now have mental health issues, ranging from anxiety or depression to conduct disorders such as destructive behaviour. The report wants information about relationships shown to people. When I decrease the amount of time I watch television, my mind is more clear, my analysis is more accurate, and I'm more attuned to personal relationships with other human beings. It's the truth. Television is a very important tool. It can be utilized for both good and evil purposes. The reality of television is not become over obssessive with it. It's jsut tube with electromagnetic energy in it. It isn't a human being at all. We should limit our TV time. Some people don't look at TV at all. That's their choice and right. Some people watch television and they have a right to that as well.







Gun rights are still apart of American history and culture. Howard Nemerov described about how the Brady campaign is trying to prevent the civil rights of America. The Brady group justify their actions as trying to promote common sense gun laws, but we have hundreds of gun laws right now on the books. What more laws do we need. Sarah Brady said that they want even more anti-gun laws on the books. Also, what defines a common sense gun law anyway. Now, a study found that Brady's highest rated states have the highest average violent crime and murder rates. In these states, only 2 have shall issue concealed carry laws. Brady’s “failed” states (not enough “reasonable gun measures”) have the lowest violent crime and murder rates, and the highest levels of gun ownership. All of these states have shall issue concealed carry laws. Therefore, Brady's criteria for "senisble gun laws" include more restrictions on civilian gun ownership (plus having a less oppurtunity for law abiding citizens to protect themselves against violent criminals). Even the Supreme Court ruled that an individual have a right to possess a firearm. Gun control that is permanent never works to solve crime. Britian and Australia confiscated huge amounts of guns during the 1990's. Later, there came higher murder rates in both nations include robberies while America's robbery (and assault rates dropped in that time span from the 1990's to the early 2000's). Citizens owning weapon can help women to protect themselves form rapists even. Howard Nemerov wrote about an incident where female potential rape victims fired their guns to protect themselves from criminals. Therefore, the Second Amendment is an important right to defend. Now, gun sales have gone up in late 2008, because of fears about Barack Obama wanting to restrict gun rights. Eric Holder is the Attorney General. Holder was against the Supreme Court decision to have individual gun rights (therefore, Holder wanted the D.C. gun ban to exist). Barack Obama says that he supports gun rights for law abiding citizens, hunters, etc. Yet, Obama has supported gun control for years. Barack Obama opposes the concealed carry laws in states nationwide. He also subscribed to taxing ammunition, while he was in the Illinois state legislature.





I've just seen the whole film of "Eye of the Phoenix." This film has been highly popular on the Internet and on topics in my blog. The film was nearly 3 hours long and it was very long. What do I think of it? I think it is worth every cent. It was one of the greatest documentaries I've ever seen in my life. It focused not only on the Great Seal, but other subjects like the Illuminati, the Theosophical Society (whose co-founder was of course Madame HP Blavatsky. She followed the Gnostic lie that the Devil in the Bible offering Adam the fruit of knowledge was the good guy, while Jehovah was the bad guy. That is one definition of the creed of Gnosticism), the Philosopher Stone, and other issues. The film made known that certain occultists want to create their utopian new world order (and involved in that goal is the re-establishment of Solomon's Temple. Freemasonry explicitly lust after this goal as quotes exist of this). It outlined information that I knew about and it presented information that I didn't knew about. One of the major parts of the film was about the Phoenix bird. The Phoenix bird in legend would die and burn plus it would reappear later. In ancient cultures, it represented the false sun god (even a peacock or a strange feathered bird) or even Lucifer. That is why occult Secret Societies to this day outline a worship of Lucifer (or Satan) under the guise of the "sun god" or "Nature." One of the old names for the Phoenix is FENEX in the Greek language, which equals 666 in the Greek gematria calculation. Additionally, the Phoenix was called the shining one, which is an old name for Lucifer ironically. The occult groups believe that ancient knowledge didn't just exist in ancient Babylon, but in Ancient Atlantis (where objects like The Emerald Tablets of Thoth and the lapis exillis existed. These objects were lusted after by Rosicrucian Nicholas Roerich and his temporary ally 32nd Degree Freemason Henry Wallace). Myths claim that the lapis exillis was the stone from Lucifer's crown that broken after Lucifer fought the archangel Michael. This story is found in Manly P. Hall's literature. Masonic apologists may deny that the Great Seal is of Masonic origin (even though Masonic symbols are on them), but the one Dollar Bill is definitely of Masonic origin. People certainly will compare the Eye of the Phoenix to Riddles and Stone. In my opinion, the Eye of the Phoenix is a level above Riddles and Stone in terms of the information describing America's secret history. What was particularly great about the film was how it described the Jacobite Rebellions in a simplistic fashion. The Jacobites supported the pro-Catholic King James II of England. He was forced out of the throne via the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The Jacobites in large numbers went into America and their Scottish descendants influenced the American Revolution (with Masons like Hugh Mercer). The Eye of the Phoenix is an excellent film that delves into higher levels of information revolving around the agenda of Secret Societies. Nicholas Roerich as the documentary proves wanted to create the global government system (even an Asian Union first). The film is similar to presenting information overload since it reaches into more facts then elaborate into another level of concepts. The reality is that as believers in God, we don't need mythological occult beliefs. God is here and without secrecy at all.


By Timothy