http://www.etherzone.com/2009/mako020909.shtml
Note by me: Once against Makow supports the unbiblical Papacy that murdered millions of people. He is right that Blair is a pro-new world order phony Christian, but omitting the unscriptural nature of the Catholic Church is just as wrong as Blair's actions. Much of the alternative media will expose many evils in many organizations, but not the Vatican. That's a red flag for me.
By Timothy
4 comments:
Perhaps we're not all preachers. Did that ever occur to you?
I see no reason why Makow should have to ruminate upon the scriptural relevance of Catholicism. Articles have a topic and "a point." The point was that Blair is a fake; Makow has neither the expertise, the inclination, nor is it appropriate (or a fair expectation) for him to get into a Protestant-Catholic shouting match.
"Much of the alternative media will expose many evils in many organizations, but not the Vatican. That's a red flag for me"
Yes, it certainly would be if you are stuck in a rut of the tired-old "Catholic bad; Protestant good" shtick.
I knew you would respond in that fashion.
That is very silly by you. The reason is that just because all of us are not preachers doesn't mean we sit into a ball of Ecumencial frenzy. Makow may not want to expose Romanism, but I will. This has nothing to do with some theological shouting match. It has to do with history and common sense. Some in the alternative media yell about the Zionists or Bilderbergers all day. Yet, when the Vatican topic comes up, they run for the hill.
Sorry, I don't run for the hills on that issue. I will expose all evils anywhere in all human history. Also, you are false to place me into a Catholic/Protestant rut. I expose all evil group. I just don't act like some people who are caught up covering up the Papacy's crimes though.
"This has nothing to do with some theological shouting match"
Then why was your beef this: "omitting the unscriptural nature of the Catholic Church is just as wrong"?
It is plain as day. You admonished Makow for not ruminating upon "the unscriptural nature" of the Church; when 1) he's not a preacher; and 2) you shouldn't expect him to be.
Post a Comment