Friday, June 19, 2009

Friday Developments



The U.N. is at it again. Bob Unruh from WND.com wrote that an U.N. protocol is being used to regulate homeschoolers. There is a British plan to allow local authority the right to allow access to homes and the right to speak with a child alone. The purpose of this activity is to allow the British authorities to evaluate homeschooling families, so they can do what the government wants. This is immoral since it is violating the educational rights of homeschoolers. Also, this is a warning that could happen in America according to the world's largest homeschool advocacy organization. "On June 11, 2009, a report on home education in England by Graham Badman, a former Managing Director of Children, Families and Education in the County of Kent, was accepted in full by the British Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families," according to today's report from the Home School Legal Defense Association. The report makes the erreneous case that homeschooling that should be extensively regulated in England. HSLDA mentions that: "...Aside from registering with the state and mandating reports by homeschoolers, the Badman report makes references to balancing the rights of parents with the rights of children. This idea is expressed in the UNCRC." The HSLDA doesn't agree with the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Child since they feel it is anti-homeschooling. The UNCRC has been approved of in the United Kingdom and now it could be approved in America. The Senate needs a 2/3 majority approval in order to approve of UNCRC. HSDLA believes that the documents from the U.N. give rights toward children that could conflict over parental rights. For example, the international documents bans reasonable spanking to their children, children would be granted authority by the state to choose thier own religion, and it can force parents to have children attend state-sponsored sex education courts. There is a ParentalRights.org website that notes if approved, the treaty would supersede "the laws of all 50 states on children and parents." The HSLDA is saying I told you so: "Ever since the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and opened to nations across the world for ratification in 1989, HSLDA has been deeply concerned about the implications of this treaty for U.S. homeschoolers, if the U.S. were to ratify the treaty," the organization said today. "We have consistently warned that this treaty could be the vehicle opponents of home education could use to effectively ban or severely regulate homeschooling." The HSLDA fears that if the Senate approves the UNCRC, it can supersede all state laws plus U.S. judges would be forced to follow the provisions of the treaty. Now, family and education laws are state-based, so if the UNCRC are ratified, these policies could be governed by the U.S. Congress (under the United Nations' mandates). UNCRC supporters believe that no where in the proposal will dictate how parents raise their children. Yet, the UNCRC could restrict homeschooling freedoms in England via the Badman report. The Badman report wants more power in giving the state the authority to choose the curriculum for homsechoolers (and the UNCRC are going to be used in the UK as justification to enact this proposal). Homeschoolers of course oppose the Badman recommendations since the recommendations want to register all homeschoolers, have a government review of them, and allow authorites to investigate them without a warrant, etc. So, there should be parental rights, children rights, and homeschooling rights in our world. Restriction of these rights are evil of course.





Geoengineering has always acculumated numerous risk factors in the world. A Rutgers Professor is mentioning and warning that geoengineering could cause disasters and a global famine. There is a strong debate about the possibility that geoengineering the Earth's climate (via aerosol particles) could exist soon according to a discussion at the recent National Academy of Sciences workshop. This top Rutgers University professor has warned at the meeting that messing around with the planet's ecosystem can create famines and droughts. This according to him, could threaten no less than a third of the world's population. Some scientists are planning to shoot aerosols (or dust particles) into the Earth's upper statrosphere in an attempt to cool the planet down (plus end the effects of global warming when man-made global warming is a hoax). Harvard University's Dan Schrag said that this is an emergency response to environmental problems. “I think we should consider climate engineering only as an emergency response to a climate crisis, but I question whether we’re already experiencing a climate crisis — whether we’ve already crossed that threshold,” Schrag said. According to an NPR report on the meeting, University of Calgary’s David Keith urged the introduction of geoengineering experiments on a global scale and that they should be conducted “sooner rather than later.” Rutgers University professor Alan Robock disagrees with utilizing geoengineering experiments as threatening our ecosystem. He said that it could damage the ozone layer plus potentially altering the stratosphere by getting rid of weather patterns (like the annual Asian monsoon rain reason, which about 2 billion people rely upon to water their crops and feed the population). “Imagine if we triggered a drought and famine while trying to cool the planet,” Robock said. Some believe that this geoengineering (involving blocking the sun's rays by shooting particles in the upper atmosphere) is already occuring with chemtrails plus other related experiments. Chemtrails aren't contrails since chemtrails can stay in the sky for hours. They form an X or a grid like pattern in the sky, which can cause a hazy overcast after a clear blue sky. Last year, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm). There were also trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Some of these substances are very toxic. Barium is a hallmark of chemtrails. KSLA reported that the barium levels in its samples are at 6.8 ppm. This is equivalent to more than 5 times the toxic level set by the EPA. KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, who is the Director of the Poison Control Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that “short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure problems.” The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to weakening the immune system, which many speculate is the purpose of such man-made chemical trails. The federal government have performed dangerous engineering projects for decades in America. The CFR proposes similar geoengineering endeavors via their document called "Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering." This documents wants varied methods of reflecting sunlight back into space (like adding small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere, adding more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere, and using reflecting objects. These objects are proposed to be placed in space, near the Earth, or at a stable location between the Earth and the Sun). They want to this stop in their minds global warming. The CFR document prosposals accurately describe the atmospheric effects of the aftermath of chemtrail spraying. So, we don't need geoengineering at all. It's dangerous and can harm the environment for real.





Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com Editor on June 15, 2009 wrote about how Canadian pro-life advocates are asking for more calls to oppose an assisted suicide bill. This group is called LifeCanada. They want to stop a pro-euthanasia bill that would legalize assisted suicide. They also oppose it since the bill would target the elderly and disabled patients with death instead of care and treatment. "While we oppose any legislation that would allow assisted suicide or euthanasia under any circumstances, this bill is particularly dangerous," LifeCanada says. LifeCanada says that the bill can make a depressed 18 year old who refused medication to ask and get a lethal prescription. The group said that individuals can be coerced to accept assisted suicide or euthanasia if they appear to be lucide, have dementia, confusion, incapacitating depression, and other factors. The organization is calling on letters, calls, and emails in order to stop the bill from passing in Canada's legislature. LifeCanada have placed talking points on its website to express their striking dissent with the bill. They want MPs to oppose the bill. LifeCanada says refusing or "withdrawing life-prolonging treatment when dying a natural death is not assisted suicide/euthanasia. There is nothing wrong with letting death occur naturally when treatment is no longer effective." Yet, this doesn't include withdrawing foods or fluids. "Providing food and water is basic care that under no circumstances should be withdrawn unless the body is no longer able to absorb nutrients due to imminent death," the group adds. "'Quality of life' considerations should never be a factor—food and water is a basic human right for every living person." Almost 4,000 Canadians die by suicide every year. Sucidie is the second leading cause of death in young Canadians from the ages of 15-34. Lalonde is making her third attempt in trying to legalize assisted suicide in Canada. She first introduced Bill C-407 in June 2005 and Bill C-562 in June 2008 and (Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, told LifeNews.com about the prior battles). Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition said that both bills aren't limited to kill terminally ill persons, but people who have chronic physical and mental pain. Lalonde's bill are falsely being promoted under the guise of choice and autonomy. Yet, they are about legalizing giving one person the power to intentionally and directly cause the death of another person casually. Schadenberg said the third time may be a charm for Lalonde because she is number forty-two in the private members bill order of precedence. That means that, unless a national election is called, it is likely that her bill will receive a vote at second reading. Pro-Life citizens are concerned about the potential vote on the bill, because Washington state legalized assisted suicide. Montana legalized it as well and it borders Canada. Yet, the state Supreme Court in Montana is discussing the issue (which the lower court allowing doctors to kill their patients). Hopefully, Canada won't legalize assisted sucide since it's another from of murder just like abortion is.






Mike Adams from NaturalNews on Wednesday at June 17, 2009 reported about how Ritalin (or the ADHD drug) is linked to a 500 percent increased risk of sudden death in children. This fact has been exposed by the scientific research that was funded by the FDA and the National Institute of Mental Health. A child named Matthew Hohmann died suddenly in 2004 by collapsing. He was discovered by parents or siblings. ADHD drugs like Ritalin are, of course, amphetamine stimulants. They used to be sold on the street as “speed,” but now they’re prescribed by psychiatrists to children after a subjective diagnosis of a fictitious disease: ADHD — a “disorder” which has no measurable biological symptoms whatsoever. The FDA banned ephedra or a herbal stimulant. This was after ephedra killed a handful of consumers from consuming huge amounts of the herb in a desperate effort to lose weight. In that case, in banning the herb, the FDA announced “the risks outweigh the benefits,” declaring thatephedra is not safe at any dose.” Conversely, the FDA supports the ADHD drugs killing children hypocriting saying that "the benefits are worth the risk." Michael Adams believe that ADHD have no benefits since they have no long term positive effect on children. In fact, the available studies show that ADHD drugs stunt the physical growth of children while impairing brain development. Children who taken these drugs, in other words, are not merely at a 500 percent increased risk of sudden death; they are almost assured to be stunted in their brain and body growth by this dangerous amphetamine stimulant drug. The Big Pharma companies are benefiting from the drugs relating to ADHD though. Hence, pharmaceuticals pose an imminent danger to our children. Most people would trust doctors and the FDA saying that Ritalin is completely safe. Yet, the FDA, the drug companies and the psychiatrists are all working in collusion, knowingly pushing dangerous, deadly drugs onto families for the sole purpose of generating profits. The lesson here is that we shouldn't trust Big Pharma unconditionally at all. Real medicine in this modern world is fine to embrace, but not dangerous substances like flouride, aspartame, Ritalin, etc.


The FED is trying to get more sweeping new powers. Some in the mainstream media are saying that the total lack of transparency in this affair is equated to regulation. The Federal Reserve is privately owned and run. Even former chairman Alan Greenspan has most recently pointed out, given that the Fed is an independent entity, accountable to no one, it will have the power to simply reject and overrule any advice it is offered. The new proposed rules wants the FED to get authority to regulate any company whose activity it believes could threaten the economy and the markets. “The final plan due to be released on Wednesday — which originally aimed to streamline and consolidate banking and securities regulation in one or two agencies — now is expected to sidestep most jurisdictional disputes and simply impose across the board standards to be applied by all financial regulators, according to administration and industry sources, ” reports the Washington Times. So, the FED is already unaccountable to Congress and wants to have complete control of all of the U.S. financial system without repercussion. The LA Times even reports that the government working with the FED would seize and control any company it wishes. People are opposed to this plan from across the political spectrum. That is why Senator Christopher J. Dodd (who is the chairman of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs) has agreed to create a "watchdog" council of regulators to advise the FED (under the Obama administration). The mainstream media reported that this oversight plan is necessary, but the details of the plan will be what the bankers have desired for weeks. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said at a Time Warner Economic Summit in New York on Monday that derivatives contracts will be regulated and subject to supervision. The catch is that heads of nine of the biggest banks in the derivatives market, including JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Bank of America, secretly lobbied to keep derivatives under Federal Reserve “oversight” and away from real scrutiny. As reported by The New York Times, they all met secretly to discuss how to use the lax regulation and institutional secrecy of the NY Fed to shield their credit-default swaps business from prying eyes and attempts at regulation. The banker lobby is called the CDS Dealers Consortium and they accepted TARP funds in October of 2008 to protect their interests. Edward Rosen headed the efforts and wrote a confidential memo to the Treasury Department (and leaders of Capital Hill) to propose derivatives to be traded in privately managed clearinghouses with less disclosure. The clearinghouse of choice for the big banks in Rosen’s CDS Consortium is ICE U.S. Trust, which is in turned regulated only by the Federal Reserve system. So, the big picture is that there is limited regulations, while the Federal Reserve's fractional reserve banking system plus the federal government still exist to expand its power (while the corporate media tells us that a strict crackdown is underway when it isn't). Even Democratic Chairman Agriculture Committee Collin Peterson said that the bankers run the U.S. Congress (when he proposes to limit derivatives to public exchanges not private clearinghouse, which are managed by banks). Democratic Senator Dick Durbin said that the banks are the most powerful lobby in Congress when the banks bear some responsibility in causing the crisis in the first place. The FED shouldn't run our economy at all (allowing trillions of dollars to be grabbed up from the U.S. taxpayers which is almost the size of the entire GDP of America). This is the same privately run entity that refused to comply with congressional demands for transparency and disclose the destination of trillions dollars in bailout funds. It is the same privately owned entity that has withheld internal memos, in spite of freedom of information act requests. That is why it's fine to audit, repeal, and end the Federal Reserve. Most Americans don't want to see their descendants to endure debt and be in an entrenched servitude to a group of private banks and the inflated government at all.





Mass Vaccinations are regularly promoted by the government all of the time. The WHO declared the swine flu as being on the level of pandemic status. The Associated Press reported that the government is telling schools nationwide that they are to be prepared to be used as clinics for mass vaccination programs (which is set to be instituted later this year). Schoolchildren will probably be targeted as the first recipents of a swine flu vaccine, which is now being developed. This is despite of the fact that swine flue has proven far less lethal than originally feared. It has killed 160 people worldwide, which is much less than the number of people who die annually from the regular flu virus. Although, any life lost is significant. The World Health Organization increased the hysteria surrounding swine flu last week, raising their alert status to level 6, indicating a global pandemic was underway. The Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said on Tuesday that she's urging school superintendents around the country to spend the summer preparing for the possibility of mass vaccinations. In 1976, mass vaccinations exist for real to combat the swine flu of 1976. This resulted in dozens of deaths and hundreds of injuries after the Ford administration attempted to use the infection of soldiers at Fort Dix as a pretext for a mass vaccination of the entire country. For years, Americans have been conditioned by the mass media to accept forced mass vaccination campaigns. One example is when Time Magazine six weeks ago wanted officials to force and institute draconian measures to combat the swine flu like mass mandatory vaccination programs. Some schools now are working with the government to run mass vaccination drills. Eleven schools in Alaska recently participated in an exercise focused around dispensing mass vaccinations in the event of an outbreak. Therefore, forced vaccinations are wrong since they violate individual liberty. These actions are promoted in spite of the fact that the swine flu isn't as deadly as the WHO is making it out to be.



Secret Societies are real in the world. Thee are the Wallenberg aristocrafts of Swedish business. They are connected to the Order of the Seraphim. The Order of the Seraphim's logo has the IHS image on it. This image is found in Freemasonry and the Jesuit Order. Some have compared the Wallenbergs to the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. The Swedish National Broadcasting (or the SVT) did a 3 part documentary about the Wallenberg. It included interviews from family members as well. This family created the Stockholms Enskilda bank. Marcus Wallenberg (who is a district judge) is a Knight of the Order of the Seraphim. In 1916 they set up Investor, an investment company with a major interest in Scania, Ericsson, Saab, ABB, Electrolux, AtlasCopco, AstraZeneca, and a ridiculous number of others besides. The Wallenbergs claimed that they help Jewish people from Hungary during WWII. This Order is exclusive to Sweden and I find this interesting since Seraphim is Hebrew for a class of Angel (the highest one). The insignia of the Order of the Seraphim has 3 crown. Some believe that the 3 crown comes from the runes and the Kabbalah. The Seraphim is mentioned in the Book of Enoch as well. The Book of Enoch is not accepted by Orthodox Christianity as apart of the Biblical canon. The Order of the Seraphim (in Hebrew for a category of Angels) or the Order of His Majesty the King (Swedish Serafimerorden or Kungl. Maj:ts Orden) is a Swedish Royal order of chivalry created by King Frederick I of Sweden on February 23, 1748, together with the Order of the Sword and the Order of the Polar Star. After the reorganization of the orders in 1975 the order is only awarded to foreign heads of state and members of the royal family. The order has only one grade with the dignity of Knight (Member for women and clergymen), and is the foremost order of Sweden. When a Knight of the Order dies, his coat of arms is hung in the royal burial church of Riddarholmskyrkan in Stockholm. The funeral occurs when the church bells are run constantly from 12:00 to 13:00. The collar of the Order is in gold with 11 double crosses in blue plus 11 seraphim. There is a Maltese cross in the insingia. The reverse central disc is also in blue enamel, with white-enamelled letters "FRS" (Fredericus, Rex Sueciae, Frederick King of Sweden). The badge is topped by a gilt crown.


By Timothy

No comments: