Varied Information

There are many things about the shooter of the Holocaust Museum that the mainstream media isn't showing for an obvious reason. The reason is that many of them want to demonize conservatives constantly after this evil incident. James von Brunn is the murderer's name. He was a Darwin lover who hated the Bible including Christians. This reality isn't the picture of a stereotypical "right winger" as some media pundits protray him as well. The Moonbattery blog revealed von Brunn advocated the socialist policies espoused by Adolf Hitler and used Darwinian theory to support his anti-Semitism. Most conservatives are pro-religion. von Brunn said that he hated the Christian religion, because it was used to promote the existence of the Holocaust. This liar von Brunn called Christianity and the Holocaust as hoaxes. He's a liar since Christianity is ever alive today and the Holocaust is ever real. I will never forget the degenerate suffering that the Holocaust inflicted on people of many backgrounds. von Brunn is now hospitalized. Von Brunn expressed his diatribe on religion by bashing the Gospel, Paul, and Jesus Christ. He lied and said that Paul believed that the world was flat when the Bible says that the world is round. von Brunn promotes the idea of hate when God's Word said that if a man hates his own brother, then he's no different than a murderer. Ironically von Brunn is a murderer and hates his own fellow human being by virtue of their ethncity or creed. "The anti-Semitism of von Brunn is the first thing one notices when visiting these bizarre websites. However, like those of most 'white supremacists,' many of von Brunn's political views track 'Left' rather than 'Right.' Clearly, a re-evaluation of these obsolete definitions is long overdue," Kathy Shaidle wrote from Examiner.com. Yet, von Brunn's views are not Left or Right. They are just extremist. von Brunn criticized President George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush. This comes around the time that Rev. Jeremiah Wright blamed Jewish people for his lack of access to Barack Obama. Now, Wright is saying Zionists (who aren't monolithic), but either way collectively blaming either group for his lack of access is wrong. von Brunn was a lunatic and a coward since he choose murder to express his views. No real man would use murder of innocent people as a means to present their arguments to the world at all. You use peaceful means to help society and von Brunn didn't want to help our society at all. He wanted to enact violence and bigotry. The neo cons shouldn't be blamed for von Brunn's actions just like the far left crowd (with people like George Galloway from Britian) shouldn't be blamed for the mruder of a security guard inside of the Holocaust Museum. Ultimately, James von Brunn is accountable.





Glen Beck is at it again. He's a Mormon and a neo-conservative. He went on FOX News to appear to present a populist message, but he is still in league with the establishment on many levels. Glen Beck made the outrageous lie by comparing 9/11 Truthers to the racist murderer James von Brunn. There is no doubt know that Beck is a government disinfo agent by saying that slander. FOX News is an extension of Papal Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch's empire and also being an extension of Operation Mockingbird. This is not only an assault on 911 Truth people, but on pro-liberty and pro-Constitution movements as well. “Our country is now vulnerable,” the operative Beck declares. “Those people who would like to destroy us — our enemies like Al Qaeda. They’d like to destroy us, and they will work with anyone. There are also people like white supremacists or 9/11 truthers that would also like to destroy the country. They’ll work with anybody they can.” Real 9/11 Truth individuals don't want to destroy America at all. They love America and want to show the truth about what happened on 9/11 to the world. 9/11 Truthers have no connection to the CIA/ISI invention of al-Qaeda at all. FOX News was slick in subverting tea parties and reducing the movement to a carnival sideshow. This is when CNN and MSNBC slander the protestors in the sexual degatory slur of "tea baggers." On October 22, 2007, Beck — then a host on Prime Time News — viciously attacked the 9/11 truth movement, describing the whole movement as “insane” and branding 9/11 activists as “dangerous anarchists.” Even back then, Beck said that people like us (who agree with 9/11 truth) want to tear America apart. That's a lie. In November of 2007, Beck the operative teamed up with the scurrilous ex-Marxist and neocon David Horowitz to denounce Ron Paul’s supporters as terrorists. Beck and much of the mainstream media now are trying to equate even peaceful dissenters of the federal government as terrorists. They are doing this in order to limit dissent and intimidate folks that disagree with the federal government. I will never be intimidated by the federal government or anyone else. I have views and I have the right to express through any legitimate means necessary. It's about paranoia involving the war on terror as well. Last week the corporate media reported that U.S. counterterrorism officials “authenticated” a video by a supposed al-Qaeda recruiter who claimed he has the ability to smuggle a biological weapon into the United States via tunnels under the Mexico border. In the video, Abdullah al-Nafisi also suggests that al-Qaeda might want to collaborate with “members of native U.S. white supremacist militias who hate the federal government,” according to the Washington Post. The video was posted on the web by MEMRI, a documented Mossad front and Israeli propaganda outfit run by intelligence operatives and neocons. An East Coast 9/11 truth activist is preparing to file a defamation lawsuit against TV / radio personality, Glenn Beck, the producers of the Glenn Beck Program, and the Fox News Channel. This person's name is Greg Hoover. He is suing the defendants of FOX, Glen Beck , and his producers for defamation. The reason is that Glen Beck called innocent 9/11 Truthes as terrorists, anarchists, and equivalent to Holocaust deniers. This lawsuit can clear names and it can make people to stand up to liars trying to unfairly demonize people with whom they disagree with. Mr. Hoover has not requested either legal or financial assistance. We hope that Hoover is successful.

Tara Vreeland from NewsOn6 on June 12, 2009 described news about the EMT wanting accountability from the Oklahoma Highway Patrol. EMT Maurice White says he is in a way glad that the scuffle with the Oklahoma Highway Patrol trooper occured. The reason is that it means that problems will be addressed and dealt with. He wants accountability from the OHP as he told the News On 6. “This situation can never happen again,” said Maurice White. Maurice White doesn't want to see anyone else in the position that he was in at the business end of a choke-hold from Oklahoma Highway Patrol Trooper Daniel Martin. White thinks that it will happen again to someone else unless some questions are answered. Maurice White wants light on the problems with the OHP and in order for things to move forward. White says even when flattened against his ambulance, he was worried about the patient in the back. It was a woman suffering from possible heat exhaustion whom he and his partner were taking to a hospital. The truth is while a cop is choking an innocent man (who wasn't even yelling at the cop), a woman was strapped to a gurney with an IV, and EKG, and oxygen. This person can't moved and she is hearing her family members scream outside that was tortured for her. She never deserved that. They (or his partner Paul Franks) didn't deserve this treatment from Trooper Martin. If a trooper did this to another trooper or other professionals, that trooper would be fired or suspended for a long time. The paramedics never started the scuffle as the dashcam video proves. The trooper was out of control and showed total disregard for the patient in the ambulance completely. The trooper said that he returning from Iraq caused him to act in that fashion, which is a lame excuse. White told The News On 6 he holds the OHP in the highest regard and says they generally are the epitome of professionalism when it comes to police work. White's lawyer, Richard O'Carroll, told The News On 6 that he will get the dashcam video, but it will take a lawsuit to do so which means there could be a civil lawsuit in the future. This should be America not a dictatorship. Unfortunately, dictator-like laws and policies exist in the United States of America. So, police brutality is an epidemic that must stop.





Mark C. Eades from June 12, 2009 wrote that U.S. neo cons favor Ahmadinejad in the Iranian election. That's sick, but it's true. I don't agree with Mark C. Eades in blaming conservatives for this since neo conservatives is not real conservativism at all. He needs to wise up about that truth. Many American neo conservatives are not rooting for the moderate reform candidate in Iran. This is a sign that numerous neo cons don't really want peace between America and Iran. They want war mongering and control of more Middle Eastern resoruces. If the reformist Mousavi wins the Iranian election and becomes President, there could be a more positive direct in U.S.-Iranian relations. So, far Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is calling himself the winner of the election. Protestors are coming on as well with violence, because of accusations of voter fraud. Eades is wrong to support the Obama Doctrine. The Obama Doctrine is more than about engagement with Iran and other adversaries. It's about the preemptive war in Afghanistan and Pakistan, which has killed innocent people. It's about the refusal to show torture pictures and the proposal to kill detainees even if they don't experience a trial. A better Iran/American relationship could undercut the neo con plans for war in Iran. Daniel Pipes is from the neo con Middle east Forum. He said that he would vote for Ahmadinejad if he would be allowed to vote in Iran. That's disgusting since Ahmadinejad supports the new world order, he suppresses rights for women plus others, and is a dictator over there. The American Enterprise Institute’s Michael Rubin likewise told Kathryn Jean Lopez at the National Review that it could be better for Ahmadinejad to win, because a Mir-Hossein Mousavi win might give Obama the impression that diplomacy was working. Painting Iran as inherently and hopelessly evil, Rubin said of the Iranian election that “should someone more soft-spoken and less defiant — someone like former prime minister Mir-Hossein Mousavi — win, it would be easier for Obama to believe that Iran really was figuratively unclenching a fist when, in fact, it had it had its other hand hidden under its cloak, grasping a dagger.” This is wild. The truth is that Iran should have a chance and hope like any other nation to improve its present condition without fear mongering. Without so openly rooting for Ahmadinejad, other neocons are playing down the significance of a possible Mousavi victory. They are obviously worried that a shift in power will signal a fresh start for U.S.-Iranian relations that could leave American and Israeli hawks out in the cold (even though tons of Israelis want real peace in the Middle East, so I want to make that clear). Eades is certainly wrong in demonizing conservatives as war mongering when I know plenty of conservatives who adhere to a wise, compassion foreign policy position. There should be peace in the Middle East and numerous neo conservatives don't really want that. They want agitation and possible conflict even if positive moves are potentially made in Iran (since neo-cons Martin Peretz and Ilan Berman said that it doesn't matter who is President in Iran since they still don't trust Iran to achieve better goals). So, I reject the neo conservative philosophy completely




Religious News are coming on fast. The Emergent Church apostate movement is growing rapidly. Phyllis Tickel is an Episcopalian lay Eucharistic minister and lector. She works as a Senior Fellow at the Cathedral College in the liberal Washington National Catheral. She is an influential voice in the emerging church and the comtemplative prayer movement. She believes in verbal contemplative praying. She says, “The whole business of entering prayer WITHOUT THE VEHICLE OF WORDS is very important, for it allows the spirit to flow freely with the spirit of God, and does not have to articulate what is happening until one comes out from prayer..” This is contrary to the Holy Scriptures. The Holy Bible says that speaking in prayer is always sufficient to improve our spiritual quality of life with God. Wordless mediation is not biblical prayer. This action has a history among pagan religions and can cause denomic deception. Tickle accepts more heresies of course. Tickle believe that God is both male and female. A male and female version of God is found in acceptance by occultists, some Freemasons, and other members of the global elite. Shack, a popular book in emerging circles, also depicts God as a woman. She calls the Holy Spirit he, she, or it, which is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is male and is God. Throughout the Bible in the OT and NT, God is described in masculine terms. This doesn't mean that females aren't important. They are. Yet, God is outlined as being totally masculine as found in the Word of God. She believes that the Lord's Supper is the literal eating of Jesus Christ's flesh, blood, and spirit. This heresy is common among the Romanist heresy of the Eucharist. She teaches that by partaking of the Lord’s Supper the believer is feeding God and reinvigorating the Holy Spirit, whatever that means. We don't eat God in the Lord's Supper. The Lord's Supper is a commeneration of remembrance of what Jesus Christ achieved from his death, resurrection, and ascension into Heaven. It's the remembering of Jesus Christ's power to save souls. Phyllis Tickle, Rob Bell, and Brian McLaren are some of the many new Emergent Church leaders. They are trying their best to infiltrate the Christian Church. The good news is that folks are waking up to their schemes. The New Evangelical magazine of Christianity Today praised the horror film of "Drag Me to Hell." The film isn't about true religion. It's about souls being sent into hell and "the heroine" is trying to use an occult seance to find redemption. Redemption isn't found via a seance. It's found by the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. After admitting that the movie is “a relentless, nonstop, inescapable journey into darkness,” that it features “graphic violence and terrifying imagery,” and that “the PG-13 rating may seem too mild,” CT still says that it offers a “satisfying experience” and that it might be “worth the ride” (review by Annie Young Frisbie, CT, May 29, 2009). The Bible, on the other hand, sounds the following clear warning that, “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them” (Ephesians 5:11). So, that horror movie is just another occult inspired film that has nothing to do with true repentance at all. Bily Graham approves Christianity Today ironically. Folks are waking and God will win in the end.




Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on June 12, 2009 outlined Bernard Nathanson views on George Tiller's death. Bernard was the former abortion practitioner in America. Now, he is pro-life. Bernard Nathanson said that he was a former mentor of George Tiller, who is the slain late term abortion practitioner. There is a new interview where Nathanson said that he was suprised about something. He was suprised that George Tiller never became pro-life himself because of the new medical technologies. Nathanson is known for performing more than 75,000 abortions himself during the 1960's and the 1970's. He presided over NARAL, which is that nation's premier pro-abortion groups. He earned great praised from the pro-life community because he created the movie called "Silent Scream." This film showed the advancement in ultrasound technology and proved about how abortion destroys human life. "I knew George Tiller years ago when I was on the pro-abortion side," he told the Washington Times. "He came to a course I was giving in the technique of abortion in New York in 1970 under the auspices of NARAL. And I did late-term abortions until I changed my opinion as of 1980." Nathanson said that he switched to pro-life not because of religion, but because of science. "Tiller was a church-going man, which doesn't say a whole lot in this country, but one wonders why he never changed his mind based on the scientific evidence. That is where I changed my mind, based on fetoscopies and ultrasound studies," Nathanson added. Nathanson said that when ultrasound exist, they could see the fetus. He learned the humanity of the fetus. If you don't realize that he said that you was just a creature of political ideology. "In 1970, there were approximately 1,100 articles on the functioning of the fetus. By 1990, there were 22,000. The data piled up swiftly and opened a window into the womb," Nathanson continued. The former abortion practitioner Bernard admitted that he could have been shot had he continued to do abortion. Yet, the murderer by the name of Scott Roeder was apart of a militia extremist group (although, some militias aren't extremist nor violent) with no affiliation to pro-life organizations at all. Roeder's family has also indicated that he battled with mental illness over the years. Mental illness is a common denominator in many of these shootings. Hundreds of pro-life groups have since issued statements condemning the shooting and saying it doesn't represent the views of the majority of Americans who are pro-life on abortion and seek legal and peaceful means to protect human life. However, that hasn't stopped pro-abortion groups from attacking the majority of Americans who take a pro-life position on abortion and referring to them as terrorists. So, the lesson is that George Tiller's murder was evil. Yet, abortion is evil and Tiller murdered babies when some of the mother weren't suffering a life threatening situation at all.



Singularity is promoted all of the time by Hollywood, certain scientists, and the establishment. Even the film "Terminator Salvation" advances the agenda of transhumanism. It just doesn't talk about car chases, explosions, and high tech shoot-outs. The plot shows the hero named Marcus Wright. He was a prisoner who was executed in 2004. He wakes up in 2018 as a cybernetically-enchanced participant in a war between humans and Skynet. Skynet is an artificial intelligence system that has become conscious and it turned on its human creators. The nuclear holocaust in the film obliterated most of humanity. The remaining remnant spend their time plotting to win back the planet and scream at each other. There are noises of machines colliding and exploding gas tanks. The half-machine, half-human Marcus (with T-4 titanium muscles) sacrifices himelf to save humanity. Singularity is the view that man will merge with machines to be a higher developed species. Some want to promote this concept of Skynet in transhumanism. Ray Kurzweil believes in transhumanism or that man can achieve godhood by merging with biometrics, etc. Ray is a pioneer of optical character recognition, speech recognition, and text to speech system. A documentary about him will be released later this year, called Transcendent Man. In summary, the visionary Kurzweil argues that artificial intelligence is improving exponentially, and eventually – the latest ETA is 2045 – it will become self-conscious and "alive." Technological change is rapid now. Ray wants man to be transformed to end death itself and wants life to be singularitarian. Kurzweil falsely compares human intelligence and emotions as just a highly complex biological computer. These things are creations from God with unique patterns not as similar to a computer. Some parts of our brain are biological, electronic, and chemical in some ways though. Kurzweil believess that he wants to reverse engineer our brain (in order to create powerful computers that can usher in Singularity). Later, he wants this new life form to be all over the unvierse to be a Universe super-intelligence god (in order to help people). This is one of the secret goals of the global elite that they want transhumanism. These pro-Singularity types wants nano-technology to merge with man, to have a hybrid of biological/non-biological intelligence , etc. into having a disembodied cyber immortality. This is important since man's structure has a limited lifespan. These developments can never solve poverty, hunger, disease, etc. Peter Thiel, the co-founder of PayPal, supports Singularity. The giant internet corporation Google is the major financial backer of a project called Singularity University. This will educate leaders who understand the exponential growth of technology and will use it to solve humanity’s grand challenges. Now, scientists are genetically engineering embryos, so children can't carry genes for genetic diseases. Some want the IVF to create offspring with higher IQs and bodies of super althetes. This will cost money of course. Some pro-transhumanists believe that if they successful, humans could be divided into two distinct species. One can be called Übermenschen with an enhanced genome which confers longer life, freedom from disease, and freedom from violence -- and the rest of us Untermenschen. That’s why the well-known American political scientist Francis Fukuyama has called transhumanism "the world’s most dangerous idea." "It is very possible, he writes, "that we will nibble at biotechnology's tempting offerings without realizing that they come at a frightful moral cost." Transhumanism certainly is a slicker form of eugenics, because it believes that all human life don't have equal value (and that we should manipulate ourselves in trying to be like unto God. See, the lie of the Serpent is found in the Singularity agenda. Their proponents want to be gods, which they can't since man is not God, but a creation of God). So, technology can be used for good or evil aims. We should be careful on how we utilize specific forms of futuristic technology.



By Timothy