Homeland Security desires to recruit girl scouts. This is another example of how the federal government is recruiting young people to serve the state (under the guise of Obama's "civilian security force"). The AFP reported that America wants to enlists it 3.4 million Girl Scout in an effort to combat hurricanes, pandemics, terrorist attacks, and other disasters. The Department of Homeland ecurity launched this campaign on Tuesday to entice the blue, brown, and green clad multitudes to be even more prepared with the promise of a new patch if they pitch in. The girls will be allowed to emblazon their sale or vests with the new DHS patch if they complete training course according to the article. The news about the Girl Scouts are to be recruited for disaster preparedness by the federal government follow similar programs. One program is run by the DHS in wanting to train Boy Scout on about how to conduct armed raids on discontented American citizens, described as terrorists and drug dealers by Homeland Security. The program had a scenarior where the Boy Scouts were trained to kill a disgrunted U.S. war veteran. This mock training scenario have the Boy Scouts being ordered to Put him on his face and put a knee in his back,” by a Border Patrol agent, who added “I guarantee that he’ll shut up.”
Given recent concerns over the DHS definition of “right wing extremists” and the agency’s penchant to affiliate veterans, gun owners, Ron Paul supporters and even those who question the mainstream media with terrorists, one wonders exactly who the Boy Scouts and now the Girl Scouts are being trained to target. These programs will do nothing to end the concerns that President Barack Obama wants to have a "national civilian security force" that tries to stifies dissent in America. These fears increase when Obama's own website once called its political adversarie a "right wing domestic terrorists." The Department of Homeland Security have too much power as it is. Now, they are trying to brainwash the youth to do their dirty work in a police state like atmosphere. That's a disgrace.
9/11 was a terrible event. Today is the 8th anniversary of 9/11. Now, Manny Badillo from NYC CAN (or the New York Coalition for Accountability Now) broke major news in the developments of New York City citizens' redressing their grievances with the current investigation results of the 9/11 attacks. The NY City Clerk reported that the city will accept the original petition signatures submitted on June 24 and will no longer dispute their validity. CAN said that they went to the board of election to see the referee or judge and the city called them and said it conceded according to Badillo. Manny then went onto commend the different groups who are working together approaching their 8th anniversary to get the word out. Those who get the words out include: Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, We are Change, NYC CAN, Alex Jones (I don't agree with him on every issue though) and Charlie Sheen and his “20 Minutes with the President” letter. On June 24th NYC CAN members submitted 52,000 signatures calling for a creation of a local, independent commission to investigate 9/11. On July 24th, the City Clerk reported that only 26,003 signatures were valid leaving them 3,996 signatures short of the 30,000 needed to submit a referendum to the city council and to be included on the November 2009 election ballot. NYC CAN countered with a lawsuit that was filled on Thursday in August 27. They submitted a Bill of Particulars catalouging 7,166 additional signatures that NYC CAN contends should be deemed valid. “The system is not set up to hear the will of the people” said Badillo, “it’s set up for the bureaucracy to continue.” NYC CAN wants to win an ongoing court case to determine a legality of their petition. From there, it can be put on the ballots as a referendum in November 2009 election. On September 9, Badillo announced that many of the 80,000 plus petition signers will march from Union Station to City Hall to show to the world that New Yorkers are demanding a new investigation into the events around 9/11/01.
Some believe that the Health care bill will give aid to illegal immigrants and some disagree with the assumption. Barack Obama gave his speech to give his endorement of Obamacare. In his prime time address, South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson yelled out that Barack Obama was lying about illegal immigrants and health care. Wilson made his accusation after Obama pointed to the Republican side of the aisle and criticized them for mostly oppoing the government plan during his speech to Congress. Some have called for disciplinary action against Wilson (who include some Democrats) even though Wilson backed down quickly. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said that Wilson' words and actions were unacceptable in the House of Representatives. “It’s time for us to talk about health care, not Mr. Wilson,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. It should be time to talk about health care indeed. Wilson has his First Amendment right to express himself, but I wouldn't yell out to the President in that fashion. Last month, the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee defeated an amendment which would have excluded illegal alien from Obama's health care bill. The Democrat-dominated committee voted 23-18 to defeat the measure. It was introduced by Rep. Dean Heller (R-NV). This would of have required the use of the existing Income and Eligibility Verification System and the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements System before care is dispensed. This defeat will find it difficult to verify the citizenhip of those seeking care in Barack Obama's health care plan.
CNN reported last month the Congressional Research Service, the nonpartisan policy research arm of Congress, found that without a citizenship verification system illegal aliens would receive subsidies. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies, told CNN the report “undermines the claims of the president and others that illegal immigrants would not be covered under the House version of the bill.” Many Democrats say that illegal immigrant will not be included in the health care bill, but all amendments that prevent that from happening were rejected by Congress. Some want verification mechanisms in place to prevent illegal immigrants (some undocumented workers who live in America for a time will be classified a residents which would meet the subtantial preence test required under HR 3200 to have health insurance) from participating in the program. The truth is regardless of what Pelosi and others say, people have a right to disagree with part of the corporate media sponsored health care proposal that Barack Obama desire. There should be health care reform though.
A pro-life Democrat promises that abortion will not being in the health care bill again. This person is named Rep. Bart Stupak from Michigan. He's the leader of the caucus of pro-life Democrat in the Houe. If the pro-abortion Democratic leaders fail to include language to prevent abortion funding in the government run health bill, he and his colleagues will block the legislation. "What I've told the speaker and the leadership and the administration is first of all you have to give us that vote," Stupak told CBN News about the desire for an amendment to stop the abortion funding. He said that if you don't them the date, everything is off the table. Stupak is concerned about bill language that would leave it up to the Obama administration or bureaucrat to determine if abortion are funded or abortion mandated. He told CBN that he doesn't want any back door policies. Stupak said that every time they try to place pro-life language in the bill or propose similar amendments, it get either banned or watered down. "And we're very cautious and we want to see the language and we want to work with pro-life groups. We want to make sure we are doing everything right because this will be a policy for the whole of the United States," the pro-life Democrat continued. He told CBN that the current abortion funding language in HR 32000 is a big change from where we've been as a nation as far as publlic funding for abortions. He and other pro-life lawmakers will not promise a vote on the final bill until they have a chance to read it and figure if it does anything to jeopardize the sanctity of human life (at the beginning of life or the end of life). In July, Stupak told CBS News that a total of 40 Democrats could be prepared to vote against the final health care restructuring bill if it does not exclude abortion funding. He is confident that at least 39 Democrats will join him in opposing the bill. "If there is not direct language and we are denied our amendment we will focus our attention on the rule," Stupak warned. Stupak said the pro-life and moderate Democrats would "demand" an up or down on the abortion funding limits before allowing the health care bill to move forward. Before a bill can be debated on the House floor, the House Rules Committee adopts the rules for debate and Stupak's warning could mean votes against the rule both in committee and on the floor before the debate on the bill could get underway. That would block the legislation and could defeat the entire bill. Stupak' number of 40 Democrats will likely include the 20 including him. They signed the letter to House Speaker Nancy Peloi in June saying they will not support any health care restructuring bill that does not explicitly prevent abortion funding and coverage. Pelosi also got another letter from 4 more Democrats who didn't make the same language, but urged that abortion limits be included.
Secret orders are ever real. Mitch Horowitz wrote his new book entitled: "Occult America: The Secret History of How Mysticism Shaped Our Nation." It easily proves that occult movements and secret societies have a key history of American society. You can't comprehend all of American history and American culture without learning about secret societies (and occult movements) period. Mystics even came into areas near Philadephia to have thier meetings (to practice kabbalah, numerology, and esoteric false Christianity). Mitch writes that Spirutalism (or talking to the dead) had members like Victoria Woodhull, who was a medium and voting rights activist for women. He proves that Henry Wallace was a temporary mystic follower of Rosicrucian Nicholas Roerich. Wallace studied Freemasonry, astrology, Eastern religions, and Native American shamanism. He wanted to discover the chalice and he was criticized for his New Age beliefs. Wallace was instrumental in getting the occult symbols on the One Dollar Bill by 1935. Freemasonry use arcane symbols in their rituals and outlines their teachings about morality or other issues. I don't agree with Mitch almost praising the occult and spiritualism, but if we want to decipher America's history learning about this portion of its history can give insight about the past.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment