Friday, September 25, 2009

Swine Flu research

IS THE "SWINE FLU HOAX" A HOAX ITSELF? HAS ANYONE CONSIDERED THE "DOUBLE BLUFF" POSSIBILITY? WHAT IS THE TRUTH ABOUT THE "THE FLU IS IN THE VACCINE" CLAIM?

Dear friends

A colleague of mine was recently off work with what was diagnosed as swine flu. He received orthodox medical treatment (drugs) & claims (& appears) to be recovered now. I was questioned by a mutual friend about this & I reasoned that his treatment was a mere placebo & that he probably had a more common form of flu, but that GP's being licensed drug pushers will in general dole out whatever is on the pharmo menu that week. .

Now consider this: What if a genuine vaccine is actually released for a truly lethal variant of swine flu that many contract & all of those who avoid the vaccine like the plague (sorry, no pun intended!), such as conspiracy researchers & Jews (who recent email that I have received states that they are being targeted for extermination via vaccination. What if the original sources of this information are false - let's face it, psy-op agents have a field day via the internet - & we are ultimately being double-bluffed & the above-mentioned groups actually targeted via their abstaining from genuine inoculations? I know that this is "conspiracy heresy" & that a number will question my motives to say the least, but I owe it to myself & my genuine fellow researchers (& beings) to at least consider this possibility.

How much can we trust the "trusted sources" of our trusted sources? Impossible to know much of the time.

So: Who knows of people either in the "real world" or in "internet land" who claim to have been diagnosed as having swine flu & received treatment & now appear to be fine? We need to start noting empirically observable incidents & see if the claims that we have been reading hold water & are not part of some more obscure strategy. It is an unfortunate truism that in our conspiracy research circles that "bad news" is "good news" - good for convincing ourselves & others of our prescience & omniscience & quickly brushing over things when our "predictions" sometimes don't materialise. Perhaps we would rather avoid facing the possibility that we are sometimes as duped as the general, non-inquisitive public - & in some cases more so - by the masters of counterintelligence. I can see that some ungrounded notion of perceived perceptive superiority to the disinfo directors often colours our vision & this can be very dangerous to ourselves & others. Many of us could be - if we are prepared to get outside the box that is outside the box, but for many others that is one box too many to be without. Note that I am not claiming that all of the "swine flu hoax" are false, but we seriously need to sharpen our wits & consider all possibilities in these times of fear-generating psychic lockdown - perhaps the biggest agenda of all.

Is the swine flu really in the vaccines as many non-mainstream pundits are claiming? What is the original source for this claim? Are we being as investigative as many of us think? Maybe the "swine flu hoax" is not a hoax, maybe it's not a double bluff, maybe the claim that the swine flu is in the vaccine - or will be at some stage or could even be a "time bomb" type innoculation - is true. But we owe it to ourselves & others to be very sure that our research is solid - very difficult to do from the sofa though isn't it?

Just a thought.

In truth & awareness -

TS

____________________


Even if the virus is real there are ways to eat yourself into health and protect against it. Not only does nicotine calm the cytokine storm, but staying away from certain foods and only eating certain herbs as well as injesting certain oils (Craig recommended a good book on his bird-swine flu audio on oils. Some of which will cause any and all flu viruses to simply die). Just stay away from the vaccine and eat well and do things like ozone. Virus or not, they will protect you.

-Antisionist

_______________________


I do not advocate "vaccines" for anything & will take my chances. I do wonder though if a more lethal strain has been hatched though not yet disseminated. Considering how much monies a relatively uncritical, long-term sick population is compared to a dead one, I would consider the distinct possibility that the critical minority would make a far better target, especially one which helpfully refuses to take a yet-to-be released inoculation against a yet-to-be-released superstrain. Makes sense to me.

-Troy

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

buying cufflinks to make sure no one can roll up my sleeves so easily