Monday, September 07, 2009

Labor Day 2009






The war Afghanistan is immoral and is still taking place. Now, Defense Secretary Robert Gates is now more open to increase more U.S. troops in Afghanistan as more civilians die. This position is support by top U.S.commander in Afghanistan by the name of General Stanley McChrystal. Stanley wants more U.S. occupation by saying that: “I absolutely do not think it is time to get out of Afghanistan.” Barack Obama now is set to double troops in Afghanistan this year to 68,000 including 21,000 new troops to deploy. Gates once oppose deploying too many troops and now he's changing his mind. Ray McGovern dissaproves of this action as trying to fight in an immoral fashion. Justin Raimondo opposes this policy as well. Justin wrote that the war in Afghanistan have nothing to do with fighting a threat, but it's a war of aggression against the Middle East. Raimondo writes that fear and vengeance is apart of this war. Also, we're bombing Pakistan when Pakistan's missiles can't reach America at all. Pakistan is not a direct threat to America and the 9/11 "hijackers" were facilities by Western Intelligence plus the U.S. government for years. Some of them chased women and drinked beer, which isn't the character of a true Muslim. Now, most Americans oppose the war in Afghanistan suprisingly. A CNN poll released on September 1 shows that 57% of Americans, including 75% of Democrats, currently oppose the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan. Most Republicans support the war effort obviously. Barack Obama still believes that this war is of necessity not choice when wars are brought about by choice in their fundamental definition. Even conservative columnist at the Washington Post George Will desires the U.S. to leave from Afghanistan. Will criticizes nation building as impossible to achieve. Some of the establishment liberal crowd (unlike real liberals. Some anti war groups like United for Peace and Justice are trying to organize demonstrations against the Afghanistan war) refuse to criticize the administration since Obama is a Democrat. The problem now is that Barack Obama will try to fund the war anyway despite us being in a depression. The Afghanistan War could be Barack Obama's war soon. It's certain time to end the war on terror completely and immediately.



Pro-Life News are still here. Pro-Life youth groups want to protest President Barack Obama's speech to schools. 3 pro-life organizations desire the youth to ask students next week to protest a speech President Barack Obama will be carried in schools across the nation. They want students to make their peers aware of how Obama has constantly promoted abortion since taking over the White House. In a Tuesday speech, Barack Obama will address America's returning students in a special address that they we welcome them back to the classroom and encourage them to excel in their education. The speech was originally planned to talk about how America's youth could assist the needs of Obama. Now, it was altered and will discuss personal education goals. Abortion has murdered over 50 million unborn children since 1973 in America alone. Many of the murdered people could of been in classrooms today if Roe didn't exist. 3 pro-life groups said that this speech is disingenuous. In an effort to counter the Obama Administration's pro-abortion agenda, Students for Life of America, Stand True Ministries, and Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust have joined forces and are encouraging high school students to make their voices heard and take action. These groups want pro-life students to wear plain, white T-Shirts with the words of "Abortion is not Health care" written in large across the front in an effort to protest Barack's health care proposals (which include government funded abortions). Kristan Hawkins is the director of Students for Life America. She told Lifenews.com that: "Students for Life acknowledges the very real danger in passing a nationalized health care plan, and we are doing everything we can to raise awareness about the dangers in this bill." She wants high school students on Tuesday to not support any health care legislation that proposes government funded abortions. Bryan Kemper (who is the President of Stand True Ministries) have said that students need to understand what's at stake in the health care debate. "By very virtue of Obama addressing our students in the classroom at such a critical time when he is dropping in the polls for his radical healthcare reform policies, it is important that students understand that this will be the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade,' he told LifeNews.com. He wants students to wear shirt to express their views. Jeff White of Survivors is a co-founder of the group. White said that Obama believes in the right to kill unborn children. Some have criticized President Barack Obama from speaking in classrooms nationwide. The truth is that abortion isn't health care at all. It's murder.



The Obama website once called opponents of his heath care proposal as right wing domestic terrorists. Bobby Eberle wrote for GOP USA exposed this reality on the Heritage Foundation website. Rory Cooper from the Heritage Foundation notes a page (that was removed) is now standard Obama memory hole fashion. The post called for the faithful to stay home on Patriot Day or 9/11. They want people to call Congressional leaders far and wide to support Obamacare. They demonize people expressing their First Amendment right to disagree with Obamacare as showing anti-democratic hate speech, which is alie. Yet, Eberle falsely views this as solely in Left/Right terms by saying that al-Qaeda is a threat and they flew planes into America (that is embraced by Democrats, Republicans, and the corporate media). Eberle embraces neo con politics and old lie that al-Qaeda is an almost godlike entity hiding in caves. In reality, al-Qaeda is a contrived organization by the CIA/ISI in order to pacify nations and exort illegal wars oversees. The Heritage Foundation supports this extreme neo con foreing policy agenda while rightfully disagreeing with Obamacare. Terrorism is enact not only by Muslim radicals, but by elements of the West (in murdering over 1 million and a half Iraqis, thousands of Afghans and Pakistanis plus over 3 million Southeast Asian people). The U.S. funded death squads in El Salvador or those in Indonesia responsible for killing between 300,000 to 400,000 “communists” (i.e., folks who opposed the brutal CIA-installed dictatorship of Suharto). "Right wing extremists" is language used Janet Napolitano's DHS document (that ws drafted during the Bush years). The big picture is that real extremists in the government want to demonize and marginalize those in the patriot movement (not neo cons per se) with the brush of a terrorist enemy, which is a lie. Folks from across the political spectrum nationwide have disagreed and protested the extremist parts of the health care bill (some neo cons have hijacked parts of the libertarian tea party movement. The corporate media is now jumping on the chance in calling them a degatory name as well). The FEMA camps and the restrictive laws won't much effect neo cons like Michelle Malkin, FOX News, or Glen Beck, but real patriots exposing the fake left/right paradigm. There is no question that a year isn't here yet in President Barack Obama's administration. Yet, the threats to our liberties as just as real now as it were during the Bush administration. Soon, 400,000 troops will soon be put on the streets of America to do with those who disagree in this nation.


There is a Pandemic propaganda campaign and now might be a time of it being engineered for forced vaccination possibly. There is a case of this H1N1 virus infecting 2,000 people at Washington University. The incident is shown by the mainstream media on how the fast the virus can spread. Real engineered pandemics typcially commence in crowded conditions. The 1976 Swine flu outbreak was used as an excuse utilized by the government to inoculate millions of Americans with a deadly vaccine. This vaccine was responsible for numerous deaths and the neurological debilitation of possibly hundreds of thousands of people began at Fort Dix. Earlier this year, the corporate media and the government hyped up the H1N1 vrius outbreak that spread into crowded conditions of Mexico City and its environs. WHO and the U.S. government warned that half or more of the American population will come down with H1N1 later this year. The incident at Washington State University will definitely be exploited by the government (plus the mainstream media) in order to submit to take a risky, experimental vaccine (which was created by the vaccine cartel and Big Pharma). Even a month ago, England reported that the the British government’s Health Protection Agency said in a letter to neurologists that they needed to look out for increases in Guillain-BarrĂ© syndrome in people subjected to the so-called immunization program. “The vaccines used to combat an expected swine influenza pandemic in 1976 were shown to be associated with GBS and were withdrawn from use,” Prof. Elizabeth Miller, head of the HPA’s immunization department, wrote in the letter sent last month to neurologists. The corporate media in the United States virtually ignored the story. It doesn't take a genius to see that the experimental vaccine is a cocktail of poisons that can damage the human immunological system. It has mercury (which is a dangerous neurotoxin) and squalene. Squalene is used to stimulate the immune system to respond to the vaccine, but squalne is link to multiple sclerosis (rhematoid arthrities, and lupus. These diseases can harm the immune system). The oil based adjuvant has been responsible for the Gulf War syndrome, which has murdered thousands of U.S. service personnel since the Gulf War ended in 1991. Some future H1N1 outbreak may continue in America to be exploited to promote the eugenic vaccinations. Forced vaccinations have been agenda of the elite for a while (under the guise of forming a high tech slick police state in the 21st century). The globalists want this in American society and we have a right to oppose this dangerous H1N1 vaccine and the paranoia about H1N1.


The G20 meeting is coming about recently. The European countries talked about the role that excessive payouts to banking executives played in the current crisis via feuling risk-taking. They want bonuses to be severely curbed. Now, there is a $645 + trillion derivatives bubble. Yet, curbing bonuses will not totally solve the economic crisis completely. The big picture is that the crisis has hundreds of trillions of dollars owed by the corporate elite to each other. This can't be paid back and want the global population to pay that debt, not the executive collecting eight or nine figure bonsues. The G20 meeting show the dispute on about how to handle the economic crisis. Tim Friends from a Jazeera reported that the rift is aobut how to handle the issue of the bankers's bonuses. France, Germany, and Japan have all officially come out of recession and now begin the tricky task of withdrawing those big stimulus packages that were used to stimulate the world economics begin. The U.S. don't want to talk about bonuses at all. Its Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (being the former head of the New York Federal Reserve) is famous economic person. Geithner's allies were involved in robbing trillions of dollars for years. Geithner wants to focus on U.S. attempts to start talks on a new international accord to increase banks' capital reserves. The U.S. proposal would form stronger global standards for reserve banks and they are required to hold to cover potential loan losses. The U.S. want to reach an accord by the end of 2010 with countries agreeing to implement the plan by the end of 2012. The U.S. now has created 12 million dollars out of thin air to feed the Wall Street's international banksters. They are doing this to prevent the dollar from collapsing. Other countries want to inflate their currencies at somewhat a similar rate to further indebt everyday people who are losing their jobs are facing higher costs of living at the same time. If any economic solutions benefit people in America, it won't radically until next year at least.



Healthcare is an important issue. Many people who aren't Republicans or Democrats disagree with parts of all of the health care proposals in Congress. These people love freedom, liberty, and the Cosntitution. Many want a solution that can be done without raising taxes and without the Federal or state governments being involved in the doctor-patient decision making process. Some want a single payer system as a solution and others don't. The current healthcare bill have caused controversy. The bill isn't a single payer system at all. Essentially, this bill is going to require every American to purchase a private insurance plan with their own money. If you can’t afford this private insurance, then you will be “taxed” or fined by the government (Title IV, P.167). Section 1233 of the bill have clauses that establish government control over the health care procedures you undergo particularly at the end of life. On pg. 425 of this section 1233, there is end of life counseling require (who those who get the government option) every 5 years for end of life counseling relating to Medicare. Page 430 of the same section 1233 deal with a government board determine what level of treatment people will recieve if at the end of your life. Section 1162 indicates that the government will mandate what it calls “outcome based measures,” which is a polite way of saying rationing (Section 1162, P.335). U.S. Government panels already existed from the stimulus law called the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. This was modeled after the UK board that oversses the rationing of healthcare procedures in that country. It uses a formula to determine who recieves care and who doesn't according to McCaughey. Former Senator Tom Daschle, also a former Obama nominee for the position of Health and Human Services Secretary, actually wrote many of these provisions in the bill (according to McCaughey). Daschle is quoted in his book as saying that Americans expect too much from their healthcare system and that Europeans should be commended for being more willing to accepting “hopeless diagnoses” and foregoing “experimental treatments (according to McCaughey). He also goes on to say that seniors should be more accepting of these hopeless diagnoses and illnesses that come with age instead of treating them (according to McCaughey). Even Ezekiel Emanuel believes that the Hippocratic oath should not involve helping the patient regardless of the cost or effects of others. Emaneul wrote for the Hastings Center that people with dementia shouldn't be guaranteed treatment for their condition. That's eugenics purely and Ezekiel Emanuel is one major architects of the healthcare bill. The healthcare bill also contains other frightening clauses such as Subpart XII, Section 340L which establishes a “Corps” that will conduct “Home Healthcare visits” as explained in Section 1713 to assess the designated families’ “economic self-sufficiency, employment, school readiness, and educational achievement” and to coach them on how to raise their children (from Section 1713,P.768). The bill even has parts in it that set the wages of doctors as found in Section 225 and Section 223. It has the creation of a National Medical Device Registry (Section 2521), and the potential to mandate even the food we eat (Section 3121). The real truth is that the healthcare bill doesn't provide healthcare for all and it isn't even a single payer system. It provides government control in home visits, rationing, and the bill violates other liberties. The media may use phony issues, but the real truth is coming out.



One Barack Obama czar named Cass Sunstein advocated removing organs without explicit consent. Sunstein is the head of the OIRA or the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. He has advocated a policy under which the government would presume someone has consented to having his or her organs removed for transplatation into someone when someone else died. The exception is the person who has explicitly indicated that his or her organs should not be taken. This policy will have hospitals harvesting organs from people who never gave permission for this to be done. Sunstein and his co-author Richard H. Thaler in their 2008 book entitled, "Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness" mentioned that the main reason that more people don't donate their organs is because they are required to choose donation. Sunstein and Thaler wrote in the book that doctors often ask the deceased's family members whether or not their dead relative would have wanted to donate his organs. These family members typically err on the side of caution and refuse to give their loved one's organs. They want to get the consent of surviving family members in order to get organs. So, Thaler and Sunstein want to get rid of explicit consent (when we use on our license or card to not have our organs taken after we died) to presumed consent which we are forced to give up our organs unless we explicitly choose not to. “Presumed consent preserves freedom of choice, but it is different from explicit consent because it shifts the default rule. Under this policy, all citizens would be presumed to be consenting donors, but they would have the opportunity to register their unwillingness to donate,” they explained. In cases where the deceased’s wishes are unclear, Sunstein and Thaler argued that a “presumed consent” system would make it easier for doctors to convince families to donate their loved one’s organs. That's fascism plain and simple since the government has no right to take our organs under presumption at all. They wanted mandated choice or the government forcing you to make a decision on organs. They want organ donation more popular. There is nothing wrong with voluntary organ donoring, but it shouldn't be presume or coerced by the government at all. There are immoral organ harvesting even in America plus throughout the Earth that ought to be exposed as well.




By Timothy

No comments: