Wednesday, September 09, 2009

The U.N. and 9/11

The United Nations is calling for the establishment of the bank of the world and a new global currency. So, the UN is calling for a new global reserve currency to be overseen by a bank. This is done in an effort to reduce the role of the dollar in international trade. These proposals come from a report from the UN Conference on Trade and Development. The report wants the new global reserve bank to monitor and manage the national exchange rates of member states. "There's a much better chance of achieving a stable pattern of exchange rates in a multilaterally-agreed framework for exchange-rate management," Heiner Flassbeck, co-author of the report and a UNCTAD director, told Bloomberg News. Flassbeck He said that the UN backed strengthening the Special Drawing Rights or SDRs. The SDRs is a synthetic paper currency issued by the IMF that was dormant for about 50 years until earlier this year. This was don't to protect emerging markets. This is the latest call for a new reverse currency from the UN. The UN have talked about replacing the dollar as an international economic standard for years now. Meanwhile, an influential Chinese policy maker has slammed the US Federal Reserve’s policy of printing money to buy Treasury debt, declaring that it threatens to set off a serious decline of the dollar and compel China to redesign its foreign reserve policy. China have joined Russia in calling for a new supra-national global currency as an alternative to the dollar as the world reserve currency. The new economic world order have been called by other like French President Nicolas Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, UK Business Secretary and top Bilderberg member Peter Mandelson and EU heads such as Joaquin Almunia, to name. If the dollar internationally is gone to be replace by a de factor currency, the greenbacks are still held in foreign exchange reserves by many foreign countries.

Maria Vitale, who is a LifeNews.com Editorial Coumnist, on September 9, 2009 wrote about abortion. She wrote that what do abortion supporters have against the human body and unborn children. She exposed that even a pro-life group was forced to get rid of its life-like fetal models at a county fair. The reason is that the images have been deemed "disgusting." That's a lie since the models weren't manipulated, they haven't been dismembered or covered with fake blood at all. The images simply outlined representations of the human body at various stages of development. The criticism of fetal models is nothing new. There were pro-abortion parents at a private school angry since the little baby dolls dared to make an appearancei n the classroom. So, baby frogs and hamsters were fine, yet baby humans caused offense. This offense is silly and shows the mentality of the cultural landscape of America. Even months ago, in the Netherlands, 150 models were sent to members of the Parliment. Each model had a letter and a book on why abortion were harmful toward women. The Dutch House of Representatives reportedly called the pro-life group known as Cry for Life and said the materials would not be sent to the legislators and would be destroyed if Cry for Life did not reclaim them. The extremists fear models since they are effective in showing the truth on abortion. Abortion doesn't kill a blob of tissue. It kills human life with eyes staring back at you. It's easy to point to a fetus as a person and a model of the being looks a great deal like a younger person. According to the National Right to Life, models appear to people of all ages (especially children who are drawn to the life size models of unborn babies. These images are common in pro-life fair booths). There was even a 2 year old walking up to a pro life table seeing a fetal model in a basket. The baby tells her parent that it's a baby. If a toddler can recognize the humanity of the unborn children, others can. Abortion violates human rights, it makes a heart to stop beat, and it's dehumanization. Fetal models proves that abortion destroys human life. That is why pro-abortion groups want these images to be suppressed.


9/11 Truth is coming forward rapidly. Charlie Sheen is a controversy figure who wants to talk to President Barack Obama about 9/11 issues. Sheen believes that the official story about 9/11 doesn't add up and even most of the members of the 9/11 Commission doubt some parts of their own commissions. These points are accurate. Some of Sheen's detractors agree with some of his "20 Minutes with the President" letter. Charlie Sheen went public in March 2006 with questions about how the official story of 9/11 play. The official story doesn't makes since there are questions about NORAD standdown, the ISI chief giving Mohammad Atta $100,000, the foreknowledge of the American government about planes hitting U.S. targets, and other issues.
There are others like on article from the Associate Content website that bash 9/11 Truthers as a psychologically disturbed fringe. That's a lie, because many credible invididuals have questioned the official story of 9/11. These human beings include people in and out of the government, military leaders, intelligence professionals, legal scholars, architects, engineers, etc. Sheen's letter wasn't a hoax. The 9/11 Truth Movement is certainly growing. Martin Sheen though is pro-Jesuit and radically anti-gun though. So, I am aware of that. I am also aware that we have a right to answer questions about 9/11.


Health Care is a very important issue. President Barack Obama's speech to Congress and the nation is his attempt to promote his proposals. It could make or break his bill in Congress. Obamacare has brought debates and name calling even. It's certain accurate to point out that America does need health care reform. People are dying in the streets, Big Pharma has too much power, and poisons are in our water supply (plus in the air we breathe). The question is what is the right type of health care reform is necessary to lower costs and increase people to have the adequate coverage that they need (including how the whole plan is going to be paid and by whom). These questions ought to be answered by President Barack Obama and anyone. The health care plan has problems like the government visitation parts, possible abortion funding in the public option, the end of life care meetings, and the privacy concerns of our health records. His speech in Congress had Congress cheering in some instances. Obama called for health care reform and denied that he wants a government takeover, that grandma will be killed in a panel, and that abortion will be funded in the bill. The abortion funding in the bill have been confirmed by many sources like the AP not just conservatives. Even Planned Parenthood wants abortion funding in the bill. Barack Obama issued Edward Kennedy's words in describing health care reform as a moral issue. Barack Obama wants the insurance companies to be required to provide preventative care. His passion was evident in the speech that he gave.

By Timothy

No comments: