UNESCO is still at it. One Copenhagen spokesman calls for a "Creation of Vision" through Works of Fiction at UNESCO Conference. UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon for the UNESCO's International Conference on Broadcast Media and Climate Change said that broadcasters play a vital role by informing and educating people about climate change. He wanted Copenhagen to support the climate change agenda. UNESCO had a conference in September 2009 to promote the man-made global warming hoax to select audiences. Convention on Climate Change Eric Hall called for the creation of “an imagination, and a vision” through works of fiction for people to chew on in the run-up and exceeding the Copenhagen conference next week. Hall wants reality TV, soap operats, etc. to propagandize the messge of man-made global warming. He made this statement at the United Nations Scientific and Cultural Organization's conference called "Broadcast Media and Climate Change." These eco-extremists want awareness on climate change globally. So, Eric Hall wanted to use mind control into context to try to brainwash people.Jean Reveillon, Director General of the European Broadcasting Union, outlines the mission at the very start of the conference (Session 1, 00:8:36): “We believe that the subject at hand is of great importance and the very idea that people from the media- and in particular broadcasters- be able to come together and reflect on the best way to cover information on climate change in order to provide the best possible public service mission that is ours to the world (…)” During the first session of the conference, NObel peace prize winner Rajendra K. Pachauri supports man made climate change (in a grassroot movement). Vice-Chair of the IPCC, Jean-Pascal Van Ypersele, seconds Mr. Pachauri’s statements wants the broadcast media to promote the IPCC's opinions. In response, the Director General of the European Broadcasting Union immediately replied: Thank you very much. And indeed I can confirm that we from the media want to do our best to accomplish that mission.” So, the UN and others want the media to promote enviornmental extremism. Even Alex Kirby, who is a 20 year BBC veteran environment reporter, doesn't want to see opposing views of the IPCC fairytale. He compares man-made global warming skeptics to Apartheid proponents, which is wrong. Eric Hall wants the propaganda to show his views as similar to the hoax of the Cold War and it threatens human civilization, which isn't true. This hoax is fiction when the leaked documents of the Climate Research Unit of the the University of East Anglia prove that research was omitted and exaggerated information pertaining to climate change. This is climategate. UNESCO has long sponsored the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) and the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS), which are precisely what their names imply, and are fundamental to the progress made by the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Fully 91% of coordinating authors of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report were WCRP scientists, and thus had the support of UNESCO behind them. So, these institutions promote the myth of man-made global warming and folks are exposing their lies.
Afghanistan is a controversial subject. Carl Levin (who is a Michigan Democrat and Chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services) went to Face the Nation days ago and talked about Afghanistan. Levin's Senate Committee made a report that believes that George W. Bush messed up. They believe Bush allowed Osama bin Laden to get away at Tora Bora. Levin told Harry Smith of CBS that if the U.S. military murdered Osama, we wouldn't of been in Afghanistan presently. The truth is this. The invasion of Afghanistan didn't have to do with Osama bin Laden or the September 11, 2001 attacks in America. The official story on Afghanistan has been a big deception. The occupation of Afghanistan (which Levin probably knows about since he's the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee) has a great deal to do with geopolitics. This geopolitics (as exposed by Zbingniew Brzezinksi's "The Grand Chessboard" book) is about the U.S./West having a footprint in Central Asia (to offset Russia and China) and to gain the oil/mineral resources of the Caspian Sea, which is north of Afghanistan. The BBC reported on September 18, 2001 reported that the U.S. planned to invade Afghanistan before 9/11. Niaz Naik (or a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary) was told by senior American officials in mid-July 2001 that military action against Afghanistan would occur by the middle of October. The idea was to overthrow the Taliban and install a “moderate” government — a government not as intransigent as the Taliban — led by former Afghan King Zahir Shah. Before 9/11, the U.S. was an ally of the CIA/ISI spawned group of the Taliban. An expert on Afghanistan and Pakistan Ahmed Rashid wrote that: "...Between 1994 and 1996, the USA supported the Taliban politically through its allies Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, essentially because Washington viewed the Taliban as anti-Iranian, anti-Shia, and pro-Western. Between 1995 and 1997, US support was even more driven because of its backing for the Unocal [pipeline] project..." Back in 1995, oil giant Unocal penned a 8 billion dollar deal with Turkmenistan. This was done to build 2 pipeline (one for oil and one for gas) to transport oil through Afghanistan and into Pakistan. The Taliban rejected the deal and American forces invaded Afghanistan in 2001. So, the Afghanistan history is very complex.
FEMA Camps are real and the shill SPLC group still deny the existence of them. A new CNN report support the DHS propaganda on FEMA Camps. John Acosta said that the federal government isn't building detention camps nationwide and there is absolutely no proof of these kinds of activities. He's false of course. Also, there is a controversial documentary that was released months ago that proves in almost 90 minutes, the federal government's plans for martial law and FEMA Camps being very real. "Camp FEMA" is the name of the documentary. It's the most comprehensive documentary every created on the topic of concentration camps in America. The beginning of the film shows that the government used detention camps against innocent people like the forced detention of over 120,000 Japanese Americans in the early 1940's. The federal government did forced labor, compulsory vaccinations, and mandatory “Americanization” classes top the list of atrocities committed against fellow citizens. This is nothing new. Does history repeat itself? Yes. The Senate Select Committee Hearings and official FBI documents show the rhetoric spewed forth by the DHS and MIAC reports that demonized patriot minded third party supporters into potential terrorists (that are homegrown. The DHS also criticized unfairly homeschoolers, gun rights advocates, pro-life people, etc. as guilty until proven innocent. Tyrannical governments historically have demonized innocent people in the past). CNN’s John Acosta also forgot to mention H.R. 645 introduced in early 2009 by Rep. Alcee Hastings, a Democrat from Florida convicted of bribery charges. In Camp FEMA, the audience learns the true meaning of “Emergency Centers.” The intent of the national emergency centers, according to Section 2 of HR 645, is to meet, “…for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster…” and can be used to advance “other purposes” not defined in the bill. H.R. 645 is very specific. It says that if a "relocation center" is to be a closed military installation, the installation will no longer be under the Secretary of Defense. The jurisidiction is sent into the Secretary of Homeland Security. As “relocation centers” will be established in the wake of a “national emergency,” the center should then fall under FEMA. The Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA, is the emergency response arm of the Federal Government. Established during the Carter Administration to respond to national emergencies and disasters, and under the Bush administration FEMA was brought under the Department of Homeland Security. CNN and Acosta can look at Army Regulation 210-35 that was created during the Reagan Presidency. It surfaced under the Clinton Administration. 12 camps are said to be created and ready to house American citizens. The CNN reported ignored participating of NORTHCOM in creating an advertisement. For the first time in U.S. history, there has been an army unit assigned to The United States. The deal is that NORTHCOM in an article in the Army Times: “…may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios…” The ad for a “Corrections Officers and Internment/Resettlement Specialists” was removed in mid August. Camp FEMA points out that the ad was specific with regard to the needs of the National Guard; someone to train “as Internment Settlement Specialists, to control and supervise detainees.” CNN ignored that the government reports of terror suspects that the U.S. government adds people database daily. Some people on the list are innocent of any crime. There are 1.2 million names on the DHS watch list at a least. Camp FEMA is a documentary refuting the CNN's views on internment camps.
The Health Care bill can make a federal giant of the Health and Human Services group under the Senate plan. ex-Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius is the head of the HHS. Sebelius could have new unprecented health care powers as as who would get covered. "The legislation lists 1,697 times where the secretary of health and humans services is given the authority to create, determine or define things in the bill," said Devon Herrick, a health care expert at the National Center for Policy Analysis. One example is in page 122 of the 2,079 page bill, the secretary is given the power to establish: "...the basic per enrollee, per month cost, determined on average actuarial basis, for including coverage under a qualified health care plan..." The HHS Secretary would have the power to decide where abortion allowed under a government-run plan, which has drawn opposition from Republicans and some moderate Democrats. The bill even gives power to the department to form a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation that would have the authority to make cost-saving cuts without having to get approval of Congres first. "It's a huge amount of power being shifted to HHS, and much of it is highly discretionary," said Edmund Haislmaier, an expert in health care policy and insurance markets at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Haislmaier believes that the HHS could regulate isnurance when states have this power. If the bill past, the federal government would usurp it from them. The federal government can put restrictions and changes in place that can disrturb the private insurance market (including forcing companies to lower premiums and other charges). The HHS has no experience in these affairs. The health care reform legislation would rely on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force for recommendations as to what kind of screening and preventive care should be covered. Last week, the group, which operates under HHS, drew sharp criticism for advising that mammograms should begin at age 50, a decade later than the current standard. Some bleieve that that HHS shouldn't alter health care delivery. Some want the govenrment making the decisions (like many Democrats who want the government to handle the patient and doctor relationship not an insurance company bureaucrat).
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment