http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/03/rightbloggers_l_1.php?page=2
is the link of the propaganda piece by Roy. He stereotypes people like us as "Rightbloggers" when we are very indepedent. He accurately points out that Teddy Roosevelt isn't a conservative. Then, you uses extreme rhetoric from neo cons as an excuse to intimidate people with legitimate dissent of Theodore Roosevelt on some issues. Roy needs to realize that Roosevelt was an imperialist. He was involved in the Rough Riders to invade Cuba and try to utilize imperialism against the Philliphines. Also, Theodore Roosevelt did have neo-Confederates and traitors as his allies and relatives. Roosevelt was sympthatetic to eugenics as well. I don't support Glen Beck either. Beck supports the Patriot Act, the VAT Tax, the war on terror, and other things that I strongly oppose. As Webster Tarpley written: "...Roosevelt's maternal uncle was Captain James D. Bulloch, the head of the Confederate intelligence services in Europe and the outfitter of the infamous Confederate raiders Alabama, Shenandoah, and others. Theodore Roosevelt's elevation to the presidency represented a personal union between the New York-Boston patrician financiers with the secessionist slaveholders. First and foremost, Teddy Roosevelt was a political steward of the Morgan interests which dominated Wall Street. We see that Teddy Roosevelt's networks shared some essential features with those of George Bush. In many ways, these are the same networks..." I'm not a Republican either. I believe in individual liberty, but I believe in some legitimate programs to help the poor and the disadvantaged in society. Roy's ignorant ideas is typical of him. He needs to get out of the Left/Right paradigm and believe in reality. Some of what TR did was legitimate, but I'm not aligning with some pro-eugenicist, imperialist. Roy is silly to pigeonhold Revolt426, me, and others to some neo cons like CFR member Boot and Glen Beck.
By Timothy
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/009/cuddy/eugenics.htm
http://jonesreport.com/article/09_08/05eugenics.html
No comments:
Post a Comment