Mid-June Updates

Some reports believe that Kyrgyzstan is on the brink of collapse. In the nation of Kyrgyzstan, there are thousands of refugees and hundreds of people have died. The Central Asia policy expert nmaed Andrea Schmitz told Spiegel Online that the Uzbek minority is being attack. There is the wobbly transitional government. The violence is trying to turn the Kyrgyz against the Uzbeks, but the violence is mostly foucsed against the Uzbek minority. Schmitz believed that this violence might of been caused by agents from Bakiyev (and organized crime circles). These are supporters of Bakiyev. Some of the people want to overthrow the transitional government of Roza Otunbayeva. This violence threatens the referndum on the new constitution. Many Uzbeks have fled the nation to escape the pogroms against them. Uzbekistan tried to open its borders up to 80,000 refugees entered the country. Uzbekistan can't accept more and this isn't implausible.
Russia wants the whole crisis to play out. They are deciding on whether to send a peacekeeping mission there or not. Russia dominates the Collective Security Treaty Organization. Russia wants power in the region, but don't want to get too caught up in the crisis. Russia figures that Kyrgyzstan's problems are very diverse with its ethnically diverse people. Intervention is having resistance from the parliament, the leadership, and the Russian public. Some fear that those behind the escalation might enter an alliance with the Islamist terrorists in the region. That could be wild. Schmitz wants humanitarian assistance for the refugees, the injured, nad the traumatized. The Collective Security Treaty Organization has promised to bring supplies to help stabilize the area -- fuel for example. Kyrgyzstan does need held. Now, Kyrgyzstan doesn't have a parliament. This referendum was scheduled for late June. It can relieve the situation, but now the referendum could be unrepresentative. That is why some want to postpone the referndum. Kyrgyzstan should be able to perserve its nationalism. The ethnic violence ought to end completely.





The Barack Obama administration wants to propose more taxpayer funded embroynic stem cell research. The Obama administration is again proposing that taxpayers want to foot the bill for more embronic stem cell research. This is beyond what President Barack Obama's executive order has already funded. That's despite the fact that scientists are no closer to correcting problems with the cells to actually help patients. Current adult stem cell research has helped patients dealign with more than 100 different diseases and conditions. This is a fact. Embryonic stem cells have never been tried in humans, because of problems in animal experiments with them causing tumors and the immune system rejecting them after injection for treatment. Despite that, the NIH Working Group on Embryonic Stem Cells recommend last week that 6 more embryonic stem cell lines be approved for federal taxpayer funding, bringing the total number of taxpayer-funded lines to 73. NIH approved three Harvard lines on June 3, says Family Research Council advisor Dr. David Prentice, formerly an Indiana State University biology professor. "The six lines recommended for approval are from the University of Connecticut (4 lines), University of New South Wales (1 line) and Advanced Cell Technology (ACT, 1 line)," Prentice explained. "ACT made their usual move of a premature press release, announcing approval." The NIH Director Francis Collins still must make a final decision on the recommendation, but he typically goes along with the recommendations of the working group. Prentice said the working group meeting procedure one surprise with its decision to reject 47 lines submitted by the Reproductive Genetics Institute (RGI). Prentice said that the reasoning was primarily that the consent forms (signed by the parents of the embryos sacrificed in the experiments) didn't conform to NIH policy by using exculpatory language. "On June 7, NIH published on their website a clarification regarding exculpatory language to be used in the consent forms for the parents. The Working Group noted that RGI simply needed to get new consent forms signed by the parents for reconsideration of these lines for approval," Prentice noted. Prentice noted that many of the RGI lines were form human embryos. They were destroyed after pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (or PGD) at their fertility clinic and that they had a genetic mutation. These diseased cell lines might of been some interests to labs. Labs using ESCs are dangerous since they aren't effective in having cures against human diseases. The induced pluripotent stem cell technique (or the iPS cell procedure) is better than ESCs. It has similar characteristics to ESCs without destroying human life in the process. Prentice says there is still no word on when NIH will address its proposed changes in its Guidelines in which it "proposed to broaden definitions so as to include more embryos as potential experimental subjects." "All of this continues to push political science rather than real science to benefit patients now, with adult stem cells," he concluded.

BP is found to be aware of cracks in the oil well 2 months before the explosion. BP was aware of cracks appearing in the Macondo as far back as February. This was around the time when Goldman sachs and BP Chairman Tony Hayward were dumping their stocks in the company on the eve of the explosion (that led to the oil spill according to information found by Congressional investigators). The Mining and Mineral Services agency released documents to Bloomberg. It showed that BP was trying to seal cracks in the well about 40 miles off the Louisian coast according to the people. The fissures, which BP tried to fix on February 13, could have played a role in the disaster, though this is a question still being explored by investigators. Improperly sealed, the cracks cause explosive natural gas to rush up the shaft. BP tried to do a cement squeeze. This squeeze involving pumping cement to seal the fissures according to a well activity report. The company made many attempts to plug cracks that were draining expensive drilling fluid called mud into the surrounding rocks according to the report. As we previously highlighted, eyewitness evidence indicates that Deepwater Horizon managers knew that the BP oil rig had major problems before its explosion on April 20. A crew member who rescued burning workers on the rig told Houston attorney Tony Buzbee of a conversation between Deepwater Horizon installation manager Jimmy Harrell and someone in Houston. According to the witness, Harrell was screaming, “Are you f___ happy? Are you f__ happy? The rig’s on fire! I told you this was gonna happen.” BP managers knew of the problems with the rig. They were seemingly unconcerned abou fixing them. This gives weight to indidcations that some of them in BP had foreknowledge of the disaster. On page 37 of the British Petoleum's own investigative report, it stated that the Hydraulic Control System on equipment designed to automatically seal the well in an emergency was modified without BP’s knowledge sometime before the explosion. There were highly suspicious stock and share trades by people connected to BP before the explosion indicate some extent of foreknowledge. Goldman Sachs dumped 44 percent of its shares in BP Oil during the first quarter of 2010. These shares that later lost 36 percent of its value. That equals to $96 million. The current chairman of Goldman Sachs is the Bilderberg luminary Peter Sutherland. He's the former chairman of BP. Later, the London Telegraph on June 5th, Tony Hayward (the the current BP CEO) sold £1.4 million of his shares in the fuel giant weeks before the spill. On April 12th, just over one week before the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, Halliburton, the world’s second largest oilfield services corporation, surprised some by acquiring Boots & Coots, a relatively small but vastly experienced oil well control company. The majority of 2 dozen lawsuits name Halliburton. These lawsuits were filed since the explosion by Gulf Coast people and businesses. They claim that the company is to be blamed for the disaster. Halliburton was forced to admit in testimony at a congressional hearing last month that it carried out a cementing operation 20 hours before the Gulf of Mexico rig went up in flames. The lawsuits claim that 4 Halliburton workers stationed on the rig improperly capped the well.

Senator Joe Lieberman wants to give Barack Obama the power to shut down the Internet in a time of emergency. This is wrong of course. A decentralized Internet has caused information to spread by rapidly to benefit the masses. The so-called Independent Lieberman has proven that he isn't very independent at all. “For all of its ‘user-friendly’ allure, the Internet can also be a dangerous place with electronic pipelines that run directly into everything from our personal bank accounts to key infrastructure to government and industrial secrets,” said senator Joe. “Our economic security, national security and public safety are now all at risk from new kinds of enemies — cyber-warriors, cyber-spies, cyber-terrorists and cyber-criminals.” So, Lieberman promotes paranoia to propose a bill is a complete violation of our First Amendment rights. Even according to Jim DeMint, the corporate/banking elite pass legislation in secret without the consent of the people that they represent. Cybersecurity has been exaggerated by the government to try to shut down information that they don't like. Elitists have no right to run over the Bill of Rights and Constitution to shut down the Internet. Lieberman introduced the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act. Others introducing it include Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) and Senator Tom Carper (D-DE). It follows a similar bill introduced by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) which would allow the federal government to unilaterally “order the disconnection” of targeted websites. Rockefeller opined at the time we would all be better off if the internet was never invented. Rockefeller is so wrong. Joe's bill is totalitarian government on steriods. “The bill would give a newly-formed National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications the authority to monitor the ’security status’ of private websites, ISPs and other net-related business within the U.S. as well as critical internet components in other countries,” writes Andy Chalk. “Companies would be required to take part in ‘information sharing’ with the government and certify to the NCCC that they have implemented approved security measures. Furthermore, any company that ‘relies on’ the internet, telephone system or any other part of the U.S. ‘information infrastructure’ would also be ’subject to command’ by the NCCC under the proposed new law.” That means that if you are on some security status, the site could be attacked by the government. There is no evidence that cyber security is an immediate threat to national security at all. Even the WMD debacle proves that deception can be common in the world. Joe called for the government control and censorship of television, which I don't agree with. So, this paranoia about cybersecurity deals with the government trying to control what e do in the Internet. the FCC voted 302 to open an inquiry into how the broadband industry is regulated. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski propsoed to place bbroadband services under the same regulatory framework as telephone service, which is more strictly regulated than broadband. In other words, more government control of the internet. Finally, Lieberman’s bill would allow the government to force internet providers to “immediately comply with any emergency measure or action developed by the Department of Homeland Security.” The Department of Homeland Security? We know who these folks consider a threat to national security — constitutionalists, gun owners, returning veterans, and militias.


Some progressives want citizens to be disarmed. Some of them justify the over 100 people murdered Branch Davidians that was done by Bill Clinton & Janet Reno. Some of them even ignore governmental corruption today. There is the over 1 million dead Iraqi civilians and tons of Afghan civilians died. Back then, there were the colledge kids from Kent State gunned down by the US National Guard. Today, Youtube shown thousands of videos of cops slamming 90 year old grandmothers and tasering 10 year old kids. Obama official Dennis Blair said that he had a list of Americans to assassinate. Yet, some progressives forgotten that a police state is more of a threat than law abiding citizens owning pistols and semi-automatic rifles. No American is permitted to own the weapons that the government has and if you talk about this stuff, some will call you a terrorist. Suppressing the Second Amendment equates to a slavery of our rights to the state. Man controls the State, but the State shouldn't control man in an oppressive fashion at all. Evem Thomas Jefferson and William Blackstone said that the liberty of arms is important to protect our freedoms. Blackstone wrote in the 18th century that when legal constraints on government fail, physical checks remain: The right to bear arms expresses the “natural right of resistance and self-preservation when the sanctions of society and laws are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression.” It isn't a one way street. Some neo cons call Barack Obama a Marxist. Yet, Obama was elected with the support of the U.S. military industrial complex, the insurance industry, Wall Street, Big Oil, AIPAC, etc. This isn't apart of Marxism. Wall Street isn't going to fund a real socialist in the White House. So, some progressives and some neo cons need to wake up that both major parties are instruments of control from the elite.

Secret Societies are real. They even have influence in other arenas as well. Some of the occult symbolism from Secret orders are found in popular culture. Rihanna's video called "Rockstar" shows what the popular culture is all about. The song features Slash. The video of "Rockstar" is strange just like her other videos. The video starts with Rihanna covered in colorings and an object on her head. She wears other clothings like chains too. There is an outline of a gun too that is related to a tattoo of a gun on her body. She moves in a darkened room at first. In the video, she tried to prove that she is a true rockstar and she's sexualized. Later, she wears a cop hat and sings. Rihanna shows the middle finger and wears a kitten like pants. Her left is made a circle around it. She walks in a fictionized colder environment talking about she doesn't want to be a victim, but she rather be a stalker (this is in reference to the domestic violence that she experienced in her life). She moves around broken bottles and other items. This signifies what much of the rock lifestyle is like. She uses a guitar string design on her legs. She shows the horned hand sign in the video. The most interesting part of the video is when she wears an horned heead gear moving around in a circular place. This place looks similar to wear witches conduct their ritual. The horned head gear look very much like Baphomet or goat like image. She tries to play tribute to Slash by wearing some of his gear. Videos like hers are risque and have been going on for years. Yet, there have been more risque videos now in the 2009-2010 period than in a long time.

By Timothy