Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Dr. Martin Luther King's last speech in 1968
WTU208
1 year ago
Fantastic- 5 stars
talyathree
1 year ago
Thank You Jesus for usaing tis mighty man You creatd. What a speech! MLK knew his time was near and listen to what he said, "he just want to do God's will.
Fluoride Is Toxic
From http://www.infowars.com/fluoride-is-toxic/
Fluoride Is Toxic
Ryan Banister
Infowars.com
August 31, 2010
It has been said that fluoride is a safe, healthy and necessary chemical for a human body. Many advocate that tooth decay could be prevented from increasing intake of fluoride in one’s diet. There is one article in the February 18th issue of the Rose Garden Resident which gave many positive reasons that fluoride should be put into the local water supply. This all seems fine unless the claims given in the article are found to be false. Some of them actually have been found to be false. The article mainly discusses a group called The Health Trust, and their mission to fluoridate San Jose’s water supply. The group’s chief argument is that San Jose, California is one of the largest metropolitan areas in the nation to not have a fluoridated water supply. There is a false dilemma here in saying that somehow because many other metropolitan cities have fluoridated water that this is reason enough to bring it to San Jose. Now, the main fallacy in this article to be refuted are the claims of Health Trust CEO, Frederick Ferrer, and his supporters saying fluoridating San Jose’s water will improve the health of the residents. Fluoride is a toxic compound that will not improve the health of anybody who consumes it.
This article, in a negative connotation, makes a brief mention of Fluoride Action Group, an opponent of fluoridating water and a corresponding local group, Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, who is headed by a woman named Maureen Jones. I had the chance to interview her on this issue. She happens to be the daughter of a former Mayor of San Jose, Clark Bradley, who also opposed the fluoridation of water. She adopted the idea from her dad that people need to be able to choose whether they want a chemical in their water that is made to affect the development of people. She continued saying, “Fluoride is the only people-treatment chemical added to public water. And that’s an ethical ‘no-no,’ no matter what. A third grader can think of ten reasons why that’s a bad idea.” Mr. Ferrer and his supporters apparently do not agree. In the article, he is quoted as saying, “We cannot drill our way out of this problem…The science is settled, the law is settled. For us it’s about the political will and the costs.” Maureen responded, “This is not a case of drilling your way out of it, it’s an education thing.”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
The science of fluoride reveals quite an interesting history. There are four kinds of fluoride reported to exist in drinking water; they are calcium fluoride, sodium fluoride, sodium silico fluoride, and fluosilicic acid. Calcium fluoride comes from floor spar and is naturally occurring in water. The other three compounds come from a very different source, rock phosphate. Rock phosphate was used during the Cold War period for the extraction of uranium to make bombs. It is questionable as to why we would want to use this substance for consumption by humans. Maureen told me that all four compounds are toxic, but the fluosilicic acid, which is planned to be used in San Jose water, is much more toxic than the rest. She stated, “In small cities they often use the sodium fluoride, and more and more and more of the sodium fluoride is actually coming in from China and Mexico. It’s their toxic waste that some small cities are drinking."
In the 1930s an LD-50 study was conducted in France on fluoride. They tested rats with each of the four aforementioned compounds of fluoride. The results turned out to show calcium fluoride to be the least toxic, and the other four were at least 20 times more toxic. The article states, “Fluoride is naturally occurring at some level in all water.” The type of fluoride they are talking about is the much less toxic kind, calcium fluoride. This is a hasty generalization to say that it already exists in the water, when the article is mainly discussing the adding of fluosilicic acid to the water supply. It is important to note again that fluosolicic acid comes from a completely different source than calcium fluoride. Fluoride has been found in many more recent studies to be a neurotoxin; by attaching to aluminum, which already occurs in the water supply, it can pass through the blood-brain barrier and kill brain cells. It has also been found to cause many bone problems, such as joint fractures, by attracting to calcium and making the bones more brittle, as well as Osteosarcoma, a bone cancer. Fluoride also has been proven to cause Alzheimer’s disease. This is alarming information, especially when considering that many large cities across this country, approximately 70%, have fluoridated water.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
Maureen Jones and many other people she knows have sent many studies and declassified documents to San Jose legislators, as well as Frederick Ferrer, which prove the toxicity of fluoride. They have simply ignored all of this convincing information. They have also been presented with an array of historical incidents where fluoride caused overwhelming health problems in other communities. Maureen sees no motivation for them to continue this pursuit for water fluoridation other than political or corporate gain. She would support The Health Trust if they were working towards the health of the community, but she simply does not believe that they are. She told me, “There’s all kinds of things The Health Trust could do if they had the political will to actually help poor kids.” There is overwhelming information that water fluoridation supporters are overlooking. When it comes down to education, San Jose legislation is not doing its part in looking at both sides of this issue. This is not just a friendly mistake, it is an immoral act of negligence. Maureen says it best, “It’s absolutely, in my opinion, flat-out criminal.”
Fluoride Is Toxic
Ryan Banister
Infowars.com
August 31, 2010
It has been said that fluoride is a safe, healthy and necessary chemical for a human body. Many advocate that tooth decay could be prevented from increasing intake of fluoride in one’s diet. There is one article in the February 18th issue of the Rose Garden Resident which gave many positive reasons that fluoride should be put into the local water supply. This all seems fine unless the claims given in the article are found to be false. Some of them actually have been found to be false. The article mainly discusses a group called The Health Trust, and their mission to fluoridate San Jose’s water supply. The group’s chief argument is that San Jose, California is one of the largest metropolitan areas in the nation to not have a fluoridated water supply. There is a false dilemma here in saying that somehow because many other metropolitan cities have fluoridated water that this is reason enough to bring it to San Jose. Now, the main fallacy in this article to be refuted are the claims of Health Trust CEO, Frederick Ferrer, and his supporters saying fluoridating San Jose’s water will improve the health of the residents. Fluoride is a toxic compound that will not improve the health of anybody who consumes it.
This article, in a negative connotation, makes a brief mention of Fluoride Action Group, an opponent of fluoridating water and a corresponding local group, Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, who is headed by a woman named Maureen Jones. I had the chance to interview her on this issue. She happens to be the daughter of a former Mayor of San Jose, Clark Bradley, who also opposed the fluoridation of water. She adopted the idea from her dad that people need to be able to choose whether they want a chemical in their water that is made to affect the development of people. She continued saying, “Fluoride is the only people-treatment chemical added to public water. And that’s an ethical ‘no-no,’ no matter what. A third grader can think of ten reasons why that’s a bad idea.” Mr. Ferrer and his supporters apparently do not agree. In the article, he is quoted as saying, “We cannot drill our way out of this problem…The science is settled, the law is settled. For us it’s about the political will and the costs.” Maureen responded, “This is not a case of drilling your way out of it, it’s an education thing.”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
The science of fluoride reveals quite an interesting history. There are four kinds of fluoride reported to exist in drinking water; they are calcium fluoride, sodium fluoride, sodium silico fluoride, and fluosilicic acid. Calcium fluoride comes from floor spar and is naturally occurring in water. The other three compounds come from a very different source, rock phosphate. Rock phosphate was used during the Cold War period for the extraction of uranium to make bombs. It is questionable as to why we would want to use this substance for consumption by humans. Maureen told me that all four compounds are toxic, but the fluosilicic acid, which is planned to be used in San Jose water, is much more toxic than the rest. She stated, “In small cities they often use the sodium fluoride, and more and more and more of the sodium fluoride is actually coming in from China and Mexico. It’s their toxic waste that some small cities are drinking."
In the 1930s an LD-50 study was conducted in France on fluoride. They tested rats with each of the four aforementioned compounds of fluoride. The results turned out to show calcium fluoride to be the least toxic, and the other four were at least 20 times more toxic. The article states, “Fluoride is naturally occurring at some level in all water.” The type of fluoride they are talking about is the much less toxic kind, calcium fluoride. This is a hasty generalization to say that it already exists in the water, when the article is mainly discussing the adding of fluosilicic acid to the water supply. It is important to note again that fluosolicic acid comes from a completely different source than calcium fluoride. Fluoride has been found in many more recent studies to be a neurotoxin; by attaching to aluminum, which already occurs in the water supply, it can pass through the blood-brain barrier and kill brain cells. It has also been found to cause many bone problems, such as joint fractures, by attracting to calcium and making the bones more brittle, as well as Osteosarcoma, a bone cancer. Fluoride also has been proven to cause Alzheimer’s disease. This is alarming information, especially when considering that many large cities across this country, approximately 70%, have fluoridated water.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
Maureen Jones and many other people she knows have sent many studies and declassified documents to San Jose legislators, as well as Frederick Ferrer, which prove the toxicity of fluoride. They have simply ignored all of this convincing information. They have also been presented with an array of historical incidents where fluoride caused overwhelming health problems in other communities. Maureen sees no motivation for them to continue this pursuit for water fluoridation other than political or corporate gain. She would support The Health Trust if they were working towards the health of the community, but she simply does not believe that they are. She told me, “There’s all kinds of things The Health Trust could do if they had the political will to actually help poor kids.” There is overwhelming information that water fluoridation supporters are overlooking. When it comes down to education, San Jose legislation is not doing its part in looking at both sides of this issue. This is not just a friendly mistake, it is an immoral act of negligence. Maureen says it best, “It’s absolutely, in my opinion, flat-out criminal.”
Climate Change Lies Are Exposed
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/climate-change-lies-are-exposed.html
Climate Change Lies Are Exposed
Donna Bowater
Daily Express
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
THE world’s leading climate change body has been accused of losing credibility after a damning report into its research practices.
A high-level inquiry into the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found there was “little evidence” for its claims about global warming.
It also said the panel had emphasised the negative impacts of climate change and made “substantive findings” based on little proof.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Having A Supply Of Healthy Foods That Last Just Makes Sense (AD)
The review by the InterAcademy Council (IAC) was launched after the IPCC’s hugely embarrassing 2007 benchmark climate change report, which contained exaggerated and false claims that Himalayan glaciers could melt by 2035.
The panel was forced to admit its key claim in support of global warming was lifted from a 1999 magazine article. The report was based on an interview with a little-known Indian scientist who has since said his views were “speculation” and not backed by research.
Independent climate scientist Peter Taylor said last night: “The IPCC’s credibility has been deeply dented and something has to be done. It can’t just be a matter of adjusting the practices. They have got to look at what are the consequences of having got it wrong in terms of what the public think is going on. Admitting that it needs to reform means something has gone wrong and they really do need to look at the science.”
Full story here.
Climate Change Lies Are Exposed
Donna Bowater
Daily Express
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
THE world’s leading climate change body has been accused of losing credibility after a damning report into its research practices.
A high-level inquiry into the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found there was “little evidence” for its claims about global warming.
It also said the panel had emphasised the negative impacts of climate change and made “substantive findings” based on little proof.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Having A Supply Of Healthy Foods That Last Just Makes Sense (AD)
The review by the InterAcademy Council (IAC) was launched after the IPCC’s hugely embarrassing 2007 benchmark climate change report, which contained exaggerated and false claims that Himalayan glaciers could melt by 2035.
The panel was forced to admit its key claim in support of global warming was lifted from a 1999 magazine article. The report was based on an interview with a little-known Indian scientist who has since said his views were “speculation” and not backed by research.
Independent climate scientist Peter Taylor said last night: “The IPCC’s credibility has been deeply dented and something has to be done. It can’t just be a matter of adjusting the practices. They have got to look at what are the consequences of having got it wrong in terms of what the public think is going on. Admitting that it needs to reform means something has gone wrong and they really do need to look at the science.”
Full story here.
Monday, August 30, 2010
Washington, D.C., etc.
There was the OSS Officer named Otto Albrecht von Bolschwing. He lived in America in the postwar period of WWII. He was the President of a high technology investment firm with headquarters in Sacramento and subsidiaries in Silicon Valley. It was bankrupt via the 1971 scandal. His business associates were millionaires, bankers, and scientists. e had a rare disease against his brain stem. So, he was in isolation in a Carmichael rest home. He told his friends that he had worked for the Americans during and after the World War II event. Later, in May, the federal government started proceeding to deport him for lying about his Nazi past. Von Bolschwing was also spying on the Zionist Hagana army, a Jewish paramilitary organization that was part of the British Mandate of Palestine and would later become the nucleus of the Israeli Defense Force. These activities would cease when the British expelled von Bolschwing from Palestine for espionage. The Justice Department wants to revoke von Bolschwing's citizenship. The reason i that he helped Hitler's persecution of European Jewish people. He was an associate of Adolf Bormann. Bormann was the main architect of Nazi Germany's mass killing program. Von Bolschwing's life proves the link between the Nazi heirachy, the CIA, and to the highest levels of American business. The Nazi met many eople in the California elite world. They include many people like justice William A. Newsom of the 1st District Court of Appeals in San Francisco Thomas A. Franzioli (or the banker to the Boston Cabot family), Emauel Fthenaukis, Fairchild Corp., Elmer Bobst, Albert Driscoll (or the former New Jersey Governor and Warner Lambert's Chairman). von Bolschwing worked with American forces after WWII in the dialetical reality of the Cold War. In other words, the global elite aided the Soviets militarily in power, but never yet them have too much power to overwhelm them. Some of the Nazis worked for the West to spy on the Soviets, yet the elite's goal of globalism still remained down the decades. Even William Newson met with Bolschwing from 1969 to 1970. They traveled into Europe on behalf of TCI. William is the father of Gavin Newson or the mayor of San Franscisco. The Pelosi family is extremely close to William Newsom. Pelosi’s brother-in-law was once married to William Newsom’s sister (Finnie).
People know that the Texas State school system are promoting textbooks with historical revisionism in them. It sansitizes slavery, sympthatizes with the Confederacy, and promotes American imperialism (under the title of American Exceptionalism). Now, more secrets are coming out about the reactionaries who supported these propaganda textbooks. One textbook architect addressed a neo-nazi rally twice. Republican Daniel Webster is supported by David Barton. Barton is the man who supports the read writing of history in the Texas textbooks. Barton wants a voter guide to promote Republican candidates. Barton claimed that he has accidently addressed the neo-Nazi meetings. Barton believes that America is a Christian nation when even Chris Pinto has a new film exposing some Founding Fathers were occultists and Deists. Many people back then did believe in one God and tried to do the right thing, so I want to make that clear. Barton addressed the Rocky Mountain Bible Retreat of Pastor Pete Peters’ Scriptures for America and Kingdom Covenant College in Grants Pass, Oregon, both associated with neo-Nazi ideology. Barton believes that there is no seperation of church and state. Yet, if you unite church and state, it will create an oppressive atmosphere that can violate the rights of people of many faiths (especially those who embrace no faith. People have the right to embrace the freedom of conscience). Rev. Randolph Bracy, president of the Orange County NAACP criticized Barton as well. Barton have made more errors. Earlier this year, he pushed for César Chávez and Thurgood Marshall to be removed from Texas textbooks. Barton argued that civil rights leaders can’t be given credit for civil rights victories because only “majorities” – white people – have the ultimate power to change the law, according to the Washington Monthly. “Only majorities can expand political rights in America’s constitutional society,” he testified. That's blatantly racist, because many minorities have contributed to improvement of society including in the realm of civil rights. Civil rights is fundamentally apart of American history since civil rights is human rights. You can't have an authentic society when any group of people of denied basic human rights. Barton supports Webster against the Democrat Alan Grayson. Grayson made the point about Republican wanting to kill people and other controversial comments. Recently, I am starting to see that some Republicans (not all of them) would want people to die (for the sake of them being opposed to anyone recieving any form of governmental assistance). The reactionaries wanted death for eons. That's historical. Grayson is right to point out that Gingrich is a disagrace to assume that let them eat cake Austrian economics is the way to go.
Supreme Court Justice Justice Sonia Sotomayor was taking to students at the University of Denver. This occured in last Thursday. She said that the Wikileaks case will result in the Court to weigh into the First Amendment against national security. She answered a student's question. “That was not the beginning of that question, but an issue that keeps arising from generation to generation, of how far we will permit government restriction on freedom of speech in favor of protection of the country,” Sotomayor said. “There’s no black-and-white line.” According to Sotomayor, the balance between national security and free speech is “a constant struggle in this society, between our security needs and our first amendment rights, and one that has existed throughout our history.” Wikileaks released over 90,000 documents in July. The Pentagon found no evidence that the disclosure harmed U.S. national security or endangered American troops in the field. The Pentagon review team consists of many people. They include military intelligence analysts, lawyers, and others working for the Joint Chiefs of Staff plus other elements of the Defense Department. The Barack Obama administration and some Congress people have portrayed the release as a threat to national security. That is why President Baack Obama has asked Britain, Germany, Australia, and other allies to consider criminal charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Defense Secretary Robert Gsaid that the organization is guilty of moral culpability in the murder of U.S. soldiers. Rep. Peter King is the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee. He said that the release of the dcouments violates espionage laws and amounts to treason. The FBI is investigating and
the Justice Department said it was looking into pursuing criminal charges in the case. Rep. Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican, has demanded the death penalty for SPC Bradley Manning, the man arrested and charged with providing the documents to Wikileaks. Considering the death penalty for this event is harsh. Julian Assange contacted the White House before releasing the documents and the New York Times acted as an intermediary. The Wikileaks wanted to to give the government a chance to make sure that innocent people were identified. Yet, the White House didn't respond to the offer. The Times, Britain's The Guardian, and the German weekly Der Spiegel published selected Wikileaks documents without consulting the government. Sotomayor's words is a warning that the Supreme Court could see the Wikileaks case to restrict the First Amendment. American media didn't report on her comments except for the Associated Press. Sen. Charles Schumer and Senator Dianne Feinstein want the Free Flow of Information Act to be modified in response to Wikileaks. The Senators want to change the language to specify that Wikileaks and organizations like it will not be able to use the act to protect the identities of confidential sources. Kurt Wimmer is an attorney representing the Newspaper Association of America. He said that: "...There’s a distinction (between) how Wikileaks works and how news media organizations work,” he said and described Wikileaks as more of “a drop box for leaked documents” than a legitimate news source. The government for some time wanted to roll back the First Amendment under the guise of national security. Hugo Black was a former Klansman and a Mason. He isn't my role model. Yet, he was right to say that a free press ought to exist without government censorship. So, we shouldn't have censorship of free speech at all.
The film "Blood Money" is an important pro-life film. It is infomative and a gripping documentary. The film featured many pro-life leaders. They include Dr. Alveda King (who is the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.), former abortion facility owner Carol Everett, Joe Schneidler, Norma McCorvey, etc. It gives testimonies from post-abortive women. Their stories are serios. One woman said that she experienced a late term abortion from the late George Tiller. Another woman said that she recounts having to tell her young daughter that she had an older sister. She was in tears. She was told by her mother about the abortion, her daughter's face took an expression of fear according to her mother. There are little graphic abortion photos. There is a bried scene showing a Face the Truth Tour. Yet, the graphic images are blurred by the camera. The filmmaker didn't want to make these images shown in the documentary, because that is their choice. The film doens't sanitize aboriton. It shows verbal descriptions of what goes on inside of an abortion facility. "Blood Money" exposes the link between some contraception and aboriton (and Planned Parenthood's extreme sex education plus racist agenda). The film exposes the truth that science outlines the beauty and uniqueness of human life in its earliest stages. It shows how abortion on demand became the law of the land. David K. Kyle is the film's producer, writer, and director. He was present for the screening. "Blood Money" should be promoted in the pro-life community just like Life Dynamics' "Maafa 21."
Glen Beck and Al Sharpton lead competing rallies in Washington, D.C. on the day of Dr. Martin Luther King speech in 1963 in front of the Lincoln Memorial. Each man brought a message. Glen Beck's message was about unity and patriotism. Al Sharpton wanted to describe the King legacy in his own terms. There should be a sense of honor in America. There should be a respect for labor and the poor too. The mutual truth isn't found in worshipping conservativism nor liberalism. It's the embrace of the independent spirit of truth, justice, and mutual respect. Even Glen Beck wanted to apologize for caling President Barack Obama a racist. Beck is wrong to ignore how Dr. Martin Luther King respected social justice, economic justice, and an opposition to the Vietnam War. The Glen Beck rally had many sincere people that wanted unity, peace, and reconcilitation. Tons of the people there who are black, white, Asian, Hispanic, etc. legitimately want individual freedom and a sense of devotion to compassion and love of their fellow man. Yet, Beck's slick goal is to preach the false gospel of militarism and neo con policies. Glen Beck is a famous FOX News TV personality. I remember when he was on CNN. I saw some of the march on CNN and C-Span. There were thousands of people in that location. FOX News and other media outlets have promoted this march. Glen Beck uses entertainment and mix of half truths in order to gain more audiences to adhere to his message. Yet, his message is nothing new. It's the same agenda from the aristocrats filled with austerity, militarism, religious exploitation, and extreme law and order propaganda. Beck wanted to promote the themes of "Faith, Hope, and Charity." Sarah Palin even spoke there to promtoe the military. While Beck hailed King and the civil rights movement Saturday as “people of faith” who merely believed that “everybody deserves a shot,” earlier this year he used one of his broadcasts to denounce King as a “radical socialist” and question why a national holiday had been proclaimed in his honor. Glen Beck don't agree with the economic agenda of the civil rights movement. Glen Beck didn't offer real concrete proposals in the march. It was a large pep rally. Murdoch, the Scaife family foundation, and the Koch family fund FreedomWorks and some of the Tea Party network. Beck doesn't offer radical solutions to decrease unemployment, wage cutting, etc. but charity begins at home at home. Charity does begins at home, but compassion is more than just private charity too. We don't need massive cuts in Social security Security, the violation of our civil liberty, the police/military suppressing liberty, and other policies in that nature. We need to rebuild our infrastructure, get Wall Street accountable for its acts for real, have economic justice, and promote real individual liberty for all people.
By Timothy
People know that the Texas State school system are promoting textbooks with historical revisionism in them. It sansitizes slavery, sympthatizes with the Confederacy, and promotes American imperialism (under the title of American Exceptionalism). Now, more secrets are coming out about the reactionaries who supported these propaganda textbooks. One textbook architect addressed a neo-nazi rally twice. Republican Daniel Webster is supported by David Barton. Barton is the man who supports the read writing of history in the Texas textbooks. Barton wants a voter guide to promote Republican candidates. Barton claimed that he has accidently addressed the neo-Nazi meetings. Barton believes that America is a Christian nation when even Chris Pinto has a new film exposing some Founding Fathers were occultists and Deists. Many people back then did believe in one God and tried to do the right thing, so I want to make that clear. Barton addressed the Rocky Mountain Bible Retreat of Pastor Pete Peters’ Scriptures for America and Kingdom Covenant College in Grants Pass, Oregon, both associated with neo-Nazi ideology. Barton believes that there is no seperation of church and state. Yet, if you unite church and state, it will create an oppressive atmosphere that can violate the rights of people of many faiths (especially those who embrace no faith. People have the right to embrace the freedom of conscience). Rev. Randolph Bracy, president of the Orange County NAACP criticized Barton as well. Barton have made more errors. Earlier this year, he pushed for César Chávez and Thurgood Marshall to be removed from Texas textbooks. Barton argued that civil rights leaders can’t be given credit for civil rights victories because only “majorities” – white people – have the ultimate power to change the law, according to the Washington Monthly. “Only majorities can expand political rights in America’s constitutional society,” he testified. That's blatantly racist, because many minorities have contributed to improvement of society including in the realm of civil rights. Civil rights is fundamentally apart of American history since civil rights is human rights. You can't have an authentic society when any group of people of denied basic human rights. Barton supports Webster against the Democrat Alan Grayson. Grayson made the point about Republican wanting to kill people and other controversial comments. Recently, I am starting to see that some Republicans (not all of them) would want people to die (for the sake of them being opposed to anyone recieving any form of governmental assistance). The reactionaries wanted death for eons. That's historical. Grayson is right to point out that Gingrich is a disagrace to assume that let them eat cake Austrian economics is the way to go.
Supreme Court Justice Justice Sonia Sotomayor was taking to students at the University of Denver. This occured in last Thursday. She said that the Wikileaks case will result in the Court to weigh into the First Amendment against national security. She answered a student's question. “That was not the beginning of that question, but an issue that keeps arising from generation to generation, of how far we will permit government restriction on freedom of speech in favor of protection of the country,” Sotomayor said. “There’s no black-and-white line.” According to Sotomayor, the balance between national security and free speech is “a constant struggle in this society, between our security needs and our first amendment rights, and one that has existed throughout our history.” Wikileaks released over 90,000 documents in July. The Pentagon found no evidence that the disclosure harmed U.S. national security or endangered American troops in the field. The Pentagon review team consists of many people. They include military intelligence analysts, lawyers, and others working for the Joint Chiefs of Staff plus other elements of the Defense Department. The Barack Obama administration and some Congress people have portrayed the release as a threat to national security. That is why President Baack Obama has asked Britain, Germany, Australia, and other allies to consider criminal charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Defense Secretary Robert Gsaid that the organization is guilty of moral culpability in the murder of U.S. soldiers. Rep. Peter King is the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee. He said that the release of the dcouments violates espionage laws and amounts to treason. The FBI is investigating and
the Justice Department said it was looking into pursuing criminal charges in the case. Rep. Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican, has demanded the death penalty for SPC Bradley Manning, the man arrested and charged with providing the documents to Wikileaks. Considering the death penalty for this event is harsh. Julian Assange contacted the White House before releasing the documents and the New York Times acted as an intermediary. The Wikileaks wanted to to give the government a chance to make sure that innocent people were identified. Yet, the White House didn't respond to the offer. The Times, Britain's The Guardian, and the German weekly Der Spiegel published selected Wikileaks documents without consulting the government. Sotomayor's words is a warning that the Supreme Court could see the Wikileaks case to restrict the First Amendment. American media didn't report on her comments except for the Associated Press. Sen. Charles Schumer and Senator Dianne Feinstein want the Free Flow of Information Act to be modified in response to Wikileaks. The Senators want to change the language to specify that Wikileaks and organizations like it will not be able to use the act to protect the identities of confidential sources. Kurt Wimmer is an attorney representing the Newspaper Association of America. He said that: "...There’s a distinction (between) how Wikileaks works and how news media organizations work,” he said and described Wikileaks as more of “a drop box for leaked documents” than a legitimate news source. The government for some time wanted to roll back the First Amendment under the guise of national security. Hugo Black was a former Klansman and a Mason. He isn't my role model. Yet, he was right to say that a free press ought to exist without government censorship. So, we shouldn't have censorship of free speech at all.
The film "Blood Money" is an important pro-life film. It is infomative and a gripping documentary. The film featured many pro-life leaders. They include Dr. Alveda King (who is the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.), former abortion facility owner Carol Everett, Joe Schneidler, Norma McCorvey, etc. It gives testimonies from post-abortive women. Their stories are serios. One woman said that she experienced a late term abortion from the late George Tiller. Another woman said that she recounts having to tell her young daughter that she had an older sister. She was in tears. She was told by her mother about the abortion, her daughter's face took an expression of fear according to her mother. There are little graphic abortion photos. There is a bried scene showing a Face the Truth Tour. Yet, the graphic images are blurred by the camera. The filmmaker didn't want to make these images shown in the documentary, because that is their choice. The film doens't sanitize aboriton. It shows verbal descriptions of what goes on inside of an abortion facility. "Blood Money" exposes the link between some contraception and aboriton (and Planned Parenthood's extreme sex education plus racist agenda). The film exposes the truth that science outlines the beauty and uniqueness of human life in its earliest stages. It shows how abortion on demand became the law of the land. David K. Kyle is the film's producer, writer, and director. He was present for the screening. "Blood Money" should be promoted in the pro-life community just like Life Dynamics' "Maafa 21."
Glen Beck and Al Sharpton lead competing rallies in Washington, D.C. on the day of Dr. Martin Luther King speech in 1963 in front of the Lincoln Memorial. Each man brought a message. Glen Beck's message was about unity and patriotism. Al Sharpton wanted to describe the King legacy in his own terms. There should be a sense of honor in America. There should be a respect for labor and the poor too. The mutual truth isn't found in worshipping conservativism nor liberalism. It's the embrace of the independent spirit of truth, justice, and mutual respect. Even Glen Beck wanted to apologize for caling President Barack Obama a racist. Beck is wrong to ignore how Dr. Martin Luther King respected social justice, economic justice, and an opposition to the Vietnam War. The Glen Beck rally had many sincere people that wanted unity, peace, and reconcilitation. Tons of the people there who are black, white, Asian, Hispanic, etc. legitimately want individual freedom and a sense of devotion to compassion and love of their fellow man. Yet, Beck's slick goal is to preach the false gospel of militarism and neo con policies. Glen Beck is a famous FOX News TV personality. I remember when he was on CNN. I saw some of the march on CNN and C-Span. There were thousands of people in that location. FOX News and other media outlets have promoted this march. Glen Beck uses entertainment and mix of half truths in order to gain more audiences to adhere to his message. Yet, his message is nothing new. It's the same agenda from the aristocrats filled with austerity, militarism, religious exploitation, and extreme law and order propaganda. Beck wanted to promote the themes of "Faith, Hope, and Charity." Sarah Palin even spoke there to promtoe the military. While Beck hailed King and the civil rights movement Saturday as “people of faith” who merely believed that “everybody deserves a shot,” earlier this year he used one of his broadcasts to denounce King as a “radical socialist” and question why a national holiday had been proclaimed in his honor. Glen Beck don't agree with the economic agenda of the civil rights movement. Glen Beck didn't offer real concrete proposals in the march. It was a large pep rally. Murdoch, the Scaife family foundation, and the Koch family fund FreedomWorks and some of the Tea Party network. Beck doesn't offer radical solutions to decrease unemployment, wage cutting, etc. but charity begins at home at home. Charity does begins at home, but compassion is more than just private charity too. We don't need massive cuts in Social security Security, the violation of our civil liberty, the police/military suppressing liberty, and other policies in that nature. We need to rebuild our infrastructure, get Wall Street accountable for its acts for real, have economic justice, and promote real individual liberty for all people.
By Timothy
Flu Vaccine Propaganda Fails, Readers Awake to the Truth
From http://www.infowars.com/flu-vaccine-propaganda-fails-readers-awake-to-the-truth/
Flu Vaccine Propaganda Fails, Readers Awake to the Truth
Matt Ryan
Infowars.com
August 30, 2010
The Kansas City Star published an article stating that the new flu vaccines are available and that everyone should get one. The opening phrase sets a strange tone, “Just after the news that “swine flu” is no longer a global threat, it’s time to roll up our sleeves for another shot.”
The article continues:
These are some of the concerns you can lay to rest.
•No need to worry about the safety of H1N1 vaccine. While some worried last year that the shot for this novel virus hadn’t been tested adequately, Norman said: “I think we feel a terrific amount of comfort with the H1N1 vaccine. … It has a very, very favorable safety profile.”
•No need to worry about getting a shot too early, experts said. Immunity is good for at least six months — enough to get through peak flu season — and perhaps as long as a year.
•No need to worry about shortages. Without glitches, plenty of shots and nasal spray should be available.
While this article may ignore the countless studies and incidents reported around the world of severe and sometimes deadly side effects of the vaccine, it also ignores the heart of people’s concerns. Australia banned the vaccine after children suffered serious side-effects, Finland suspended swine flu shots after they were linked with neurological disorder, and the Telegraph reported on links between flu jabs and “fits” in children under 5. These concerns aren’t addressed by the article calling for everyone to roll up their sleeve and take the shot.
There is a glimmer of hope. The reader comments are almost entirely made up of statements against vaccines citing the same concerns that have been covered up by most of the mainstream media. One comment states, “Sweden’s Medical Products Agency (MPA) has started to investigate H1N1 vaccine Pandemrix, which has been linked to narcoleptic on the request of the European Commission.” Another says, “Here they go again, they tried it last year and a few suckers ran and got it. Thankfully more people now have done the research and discovered that this shot is not safe and you should avoid it at all cost. However, like PT Barnum, ‘a sucker is born every minute’……”
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
This is a clear sign that people are waking up and learning to question and research what they hear. While many news sources would make the vaccines sound completely safe, they continually deny the fact that there are very real dangers associated with them. In many cases, the cure can be worse than the disease.
Flu Vaccine Propaganda Fails, Readers Awake to the Truth
Matt Ryan
Infowars.com
August 30, 2010
The Kansas City Star published an article stating that the new flu vaccines are available and that everyone should get one. The opening phrase sets a strange tone, “Just after the news that “swine flu” is no longer a global threat, it’s time to roll up our sleeves for another shot.”
The article continues:
These are some of the concerns you can lay to rest.
•No need to worry about the safety of H1N1 vaccine. While some worried last year that the shot for this novel virus hadn’t been tested adequately, Norman said: “I think we feel a terrific amount of comfort with the H1N1 vaccine. … It has a very, very favorable safety profile.”
•No need to worry about getting a shot too early, experts said. Immunity is good for at least six months — enough to get through peak flu season — and perhaps as long as a year.
•No need to worry about shortages. Without glitches, plenty of shots and nasal spray should be available.
While this article may ignore the countless studies and incidents reported around the world of severe and sometimes deadly side effects of the vaccine, it also ignores the heart of people’s concerns. Australia banned the vaccine after children suffered serious side-effects, Finland suspended swine flu shots after they were linked with neurological disorder, and the Telegraph reported on links between flu jabs and “fits” in children under 5. These concerns aren’t addressed by the article calling for everyone to roll up their sleeve and take the shot.
There is a glimmer of hope. The reader comments are almost entirely made up of statements against vaccines citing the same concerns that have been covered up by most of the mainstream media. One comment states, “Sweden’s Medical Products Agency (MPA) has started to investigate H1N1 vaccine Pandemrix, which has been linked to narcoleptic on the request of the European Commission.” Another says, “Here they go again, they tried it last year and a few suckers ran and got it. Thankfully more people now have done the research and discovered that this shot is not safe and you should avoid it at all cost. However, like PT Barnum, ‘a sucker is born every minute’……”
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
This is a clear sign that people are waking up and learning to question and research what they hear. While many news sources would make the vaccines sound completely safe, they continually deny the fact that there are very real dangers associated with them. In many cases, the cure can be worse than the disease.
The African People
http://www.africanholocaust.net/news_ah/africanrace.html
http://www.brothermalcolm.net/mxwords/whathesaidarchive.html
http://malcolmxfiles.blogspot.com/
http://www.malcolm-x.org/speeches/spc_021465.htm
http://www.malcolmxonline.com/malcolm-x-speeches.html
http://www.africawithin.com/malcolmx/quotes.htm
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/malcolm-x/index.htm
http://negroartist.com/writings/MALCOLM%20X/Malcolm%20X%20The%20Last%20Speeches.htm
http://www.brothermalcolm.net/mxwords/whathesaidarchive.html
http://malcolmxfiles.blogspot.com/
http://www.malcolm-x.org/speeches/spc_021465.htm
http://www.malcolmxonline.com/malcolm-x-speeches.html
http://www.africawithin.com/malcolmx/quotes.htm
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/malcolm-x/index.htm
http://negroartist.com/writings/MALCOLM%20X/Malcolm%20X%20The%20Last%20Speeches.htm
Government Think Tank Calls For Infiltrating Conspiracy Websites
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/government-think-tank-calls-for-infiltrating-conspiracy-websites.html
Government Think Tank Calls For Infiltrating Conspiracy Websites
Common Purpose marxist front group Demos says state needs to “fight back” against people who question the authorities to “increase trust in government”
Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Planet.com
Monday, August 30, 2010
Furious that state involvement in major terror attacks is being exposed to a wider audience than ever before via the Internet, a UK think tank closely affiliated with the Downing Street has called for authorities to infiltrate conspiracy websites in an effort to “increase trust in the government”.
“A Demos report published today, The Power of Unreason, argues that secrecy surrounding the investigation of events such as the 9/11 New York attacks and the 7/7 bombings in London merely adds weight to unsubstantiated claims that they were “inside jobs,” reports the London Independent.
In other words, the fact that the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that both 7/7 and 9/11 were “inside jobs” of one form or another, and that huge numbers of people are now aware of this via the increasing influence of the Internet, is hampering efforts to commit more acts of terror, therefore the government needs to change its strategy.
In the report, Demos, “Recommends the Government fight back by infiltrating internet sites to dispute these theories.” One of the tools Demos already employs to “fight back” against conspiracy theories is by labeling anyone who challenges the government’s official story as an extremist or a terrorist recruiter.
The strategy mirrors that advocated by White House information czar Cass Sunstein, who in a 2008 white paper similarly called for conspiracy websites to be infiltrated and undermined in order to dilute their influence. In the same report, Sunstein also called for taxing conspiracy theories (any viewpoint that differs with the official version) and outright banning free speech that the authorities disapproved of.
What Demos and Sunstein are essentially calling for is classic “provocateur” style infiltration, updated for the 21st century, that came to the fore during the Cointelpro years, an FBI program from 1956-1971 that was focused around disrupting, marginalizing and neutralizing political dissidents, often using illegal methods.
The fact that governments on both sides of the pond have been caught over and over again habitually lying about everything under the sun, allied to a compliant corporate media that has aided authorities in covering up their misdeeds, has prompted a complete collapse in trust from the people, an effect that is now seriously hampering the state’s efforts to enlist implied consent, with millions of people rebelling against the system through civil disobedience and non-compliance in a myriad of different ways.
That’s why Demos, a mouthpiece for the British authorities, is desperate to infiltrate “conspiracy websites,” ie groups of people who broadcast the truth, in order to “increase trust” in a government that has lost all credibility.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
As we have documented, governments all over the world, most notably the U.S. and Israel, already employ teams of agents whose sole job revolves around infiltrating and subverting websites that publish the truth about government corruption and atrocities.
Demos is a front for the insidious Common Purpose network, a group that Lt Cdr Brian Gerrish has exposed as playing a fundamental role in the advancement of Britain’s role in the new world order. Julia Middleton, Chief Executive of Common Purpose, sits on Demos’ advisory council.
Demos was founded in 1993 by marxists Martin Jacques and Geoff Mulgan, and was seen as being closely affiliated with Tony Blair’s Labour government. Mulgan went on to work inside Downing Street in 1997. Current British Prime Minister David Cameron also works closely with Demos and has given speeches at the group’s events.
Demos has routinely acted as a platform for elitists who wish to drastically alter society, eliminate freedoms, and sacrifice British sovereignty in pursuit of global government. On August 9, 2006, British Home Secretary Dr John Reid, another former marxist, gave a speech at a Demos conference stating that Britons “may have to modify their notion of freedom”, claiming that freedom is “misused and abused by terrorists.”
Demos is partnered with numerous other globalist organizations from government and industry, including IBM, The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, and Shell International. The organization’s logo includes an all-seeing eye within its design.
Although the group poses as an independent think tank, Demos is little more than a public relations firm for the British government and security services. Its efforts to demonize conspiracy theories in order to “increase trust in the government” is a transparent ploy to do the bidding of its masters, by demonizing anyone who challenges a corrupt, lying state and its nefarious activities as an extremist and a potential domestic terrorist – contributing to the chilling process which seeks to crush free speech on the Internet.
Government Think Tank Calls For Infiltrating Conspiracy Websites
Common Purpose marxist front group Demos says state needs to “fight back” against people who question the authorities to “increase trust in government”
Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Planet.com
Monday, August 30, 2010
Furious that state involvement in major terror attacks is being exposed to a wider audience than ever before via the Internet, a UK think tank closely affiliated with the Downing Street has called for authorities to infiltrate conspiracy websites in an effort to “increase trust in the government”.
“A Demos report published today, The Power of Unreason, argues that secrecy surrounding the investigation of events such as the 9/11 New York attacks and the 7/7 bombings in London merely adds weight to unsubstantiated claims that they were “inside jobs,” reports the London Independent.
In other words, the fact that the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that both 7/7 and 9/11 were “inside jobs” of one form or another, and that huge numbers of people are now aware of this via the increasing influence of the Internet, is hampering efforts to commit more acts of terror, therefore the government needs to change its strategy.
In the report, Demos, “Recommends the Government fight back by infiltrating internet sites to dispute these theories.” One of the tools Demos already employs to “fight back” against conspiracy theories is by labeling anyone who challenges the government’s official story as an extremist or a terrorist recruiter.
The strategy mirrors that advocated by White House information czar Cass Sunstein, who in a 2008 white paper similarly called for conspiracy websites to be infiltrated and undermined in order to dilute their influence. In the same report, Sunstein also called for taxing conspiracy theories (any viewpoint that differs with the official version) and outright banning free speech that the authorities disapproved of.
What Demos and Sunstein are essentially calling for is classic “provocateur” style infiltration, updated for the 21st century, that came to the fore during the Cointelpro years, an FBI program from 1956-1971 that was focused around disrupting, marginalizing and neutralizing political dissidents, often using illegal methods.
The fact that governments on both sides of the pond have been caught over and over again habitually lying about everything under the sun, allied to a compliant corporate media that has aided authorities in covering up their misdeeds, has prompted a complete collapse in trust from the people, an effect that is now seriously hampering the state’s efforts to enlist implied consent, with millions of people rebelling against the system through civil disobedience and non-compliance in a myriad of different ways.
That’s why Demos, a mouthpiece for the British authorities, is desperate to infiltrate “conspiracy websites,” ie groups of people who broadcast the truth, in order to “increase trust” in a government that has lost all credibility.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
As we have documented, governments all over the world, most notably the U.S. and Israel, already employ teams of agents whose sole job revolves around infiltrating and subverting websites that publish the truth about government corruption and atrocities.
Demos is a front for the insidious Common Purpose network, a group that Lt Cdr Brian Gerrish has exposed as playing a fundamental role in the advancement of Britain’s role in the new world order. Julia Middleton, Chief Executive of Common Purpose, sits on Demos’ advisory council.
Demos was founded in 1993 by marxists Martin Jacques and Geoff Mulgan, and was seen as being closely affiliated with Tony Blair’s Labour government. Mulgan went on to work inside Downing Street in 1997. Current British Prime Minister David Cameron also works closely with Demos and has given speeches at the group’s events.
Demos has routinely acted as a platform for elitists who wish to drastically alter society, eliminate freedoms, and sacrifice British sovereignty in pursuit of global government. On August 9, 2006, British Home Secretary Dr John Reid, another former marxist, gave a speech at a Demos conference stating that Britons “may have to modify their notion of freedom”, claiming that freedom is “misused and abused by terrorists.”
Demos is partnered with numerous other globalist organizations from government and industry, including IBM, The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, and Shell International. The organization’s logo includes an all-seeing eye within its design.
Although the group poses as an independent think tank, Demos is little more than a public relations firm for the British government and security services. Its efforts to demonize conspiracy theories in order to “increase trust in the government” is a transparent ploy to do the bidding of its masters, by demonizing anyone who challenges a corrupt, lying state and its nefarious activities as an extremist and a potential domestic terrorist – contributing to the chilling process which seeks to crush free speech on the Internet.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Glenn Beck Cult Holds Creepy Revival at Lincoln Memorial in DC
From http://www.infowars.com/glenn-beck-cult-holds-creepy-revival-at-lincoln-memorial-in-dc/
Glenn Beck Cult Holds Creepy Revival at Lincoln Memorial in DC
Andrew Steele
America 20xy
August 29, 2010
People gathered Saturday in DC at the Lincoln Memorial as part of an event that Glenn Beck was hosting. The rally was a hybrid neocon pep rally/religious revival, consisting of pictures on a giant TV screen of famous moments from American history, along with inspirational music, waving flags, and talk of destiny and God from a loudmouth Fox News preacher who hides the insincerity in his eyes behind a thick layer of glasses while weeping in breathy sobs to mask his laughter.
Glenn Beck arrives to speak at his ‘Restoring Honor’ rally in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 28, 2010.
A speaker at the event even said “Glenn Beck is one of America’s most trusted and honored citizens”.
With Beck being inserted into the mainstream consciousness as the “patriot” opposition to Barack Obama and his gang of globalist thugs, so many who now wave the Gadsden flag and give lip service to the Constitution watch Beck with fawning adoration, having forgotten or choosing to ignore the kind of person the man really is.
Just a few years ago Glenn Beck implied that Ron Paul supporters were dangerous potential terrorists, contributing to the mainstream media marginalization of Paul’s campaign in favor of neocon candidates like John McCain and Mitt Romney who advocated more war and more loss of civil liberties. Beck also led the swarm on grassroots Constitutionalist candidate for TX Governor Debra Medina in a calculated attempt to knock the feet out from under her campaign before she could outshine the mainstream Republicans in the primary.
In 2009, without any basis whatsoever, Glenn Beck falsely stated that the Holocaust museum shooter, James W. von Brunn, was a “hero” to people who question the official story of 9/11– a transparently deliberate attempt to associate the Truth movement with violence.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
Even in non-political settings and non-9/11 related issues Beck has shown contempt for average people he considers himself superior to. A good example of this is an old segment on his radio show called “Moron Trivia” in which he would call convenience stores and ask the beleaguered workers there trivial questions about current issues while secretly ridiculing them to his audience. Though Glenn Beck gleefully pretended he was doing the cruel segment against his own will, the fact is that if he truly didn’t want to do it, he wouldn’t have. It’s much like a sadistic husband beating his wife, all the while voicing his regret over what her actions are making him do.
Someone once said, “When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” Though Beck talks of God and stopping injustice, he advocates the hazardous and bloody neocon foreign policies that have killed countless innocents, made America more hated around the world, and further weakened our national security. Indeed, Glenn Beck’s establishment backed rise as a “patriot leader” is simply plan B for shepherding the patriot movement back to the fake left/right machine, and channeling public outrage at Obama’s actions as President into a form that can be manipulated and controlled…the same way Obama did for liberals who opposed the actions of George W. Bush.
Manipulating the people of a country that have been the victims of psyops over and over again, and who are looking for leaders to believe in, is not only self-serving, but mean. Because Beck has the showmanship and organizational backing to pull off his deception he has decided to take his thirty pieces of silver and proudly display them as “Godly”.
Some are falling for it. Many others are not.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
The only accidentally true statement Glenn Beck uttered during his speech at the rally is something he said when talking about World War 2 and the memorial in DC– “You cannot coexist with evil”.
Perhaps a few activists in 9/11 Truth shirts should have shown up at Beck’s rally. (If any did, I don’t know.) That way some real patriotism and justice could be injected into Beck’s adoring mob.
Glenn Beck Cult Holds Creepy Revival at Lincoln Memorial in DC
Andrew Steele
America 20xy
August 29, 2010
People gathered Saturday in DC at the Lincoln Memorial as part of an event that Glenn Beck was hosting. The rally was a hybrid neocon pep rally/religious revival, consisting of pictures on a giant TV screen of famous moments from American history, along with inspirational music, waving flags, and talk of destiny and God from a loudmouth Fox News preacher who hides the insincerity in his eyes behind a thick layer of glasses while weeping in breathy sobs to mask his laughter.
Glenn Beck arrives to speak at his ‘Restoring Honor’ rally in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 28, 2010.
A speaker at the event even said “Glenn Beck is one of America’s most trusted and honored citizens”.
With Beck being inserted into the mainstream consciousness as the “patriot” opposition to Barack Obama and his gang of globalist thugs, so many who now wave the Gadsden flag and give lip service to the Constitution watch Beck with fawning adoration, having forgotten or choosing to ignore the kind of person the man really is.
Just a few years ago Glenn Beck implied that Ron Paul supporters were dangerous potential terrorists, contributing to the mainstream media marginalization of Paul’s campaign in favor of neocon candidates like John McCain and Mitt Romney who advocated more war and more loss of civil liberties. Beck also led the swarm on grassroots Constitutionalist candidate for TX Governor Debra Medina in a calculated attempt to knock the feet out from under her campaign before she could outshine the mainstream Republicans in the primary.
In 2009, without any basis whatsoever, Glenn Beck falsely stated that the Holocaust museum shooter, James W. von Brunn, was a “hero” to people who question the official story of 9/11– a transparently deliberate attempt to associate the Truth movement with violence.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
Even in non-political settings and non-9/11 related issues Beck has shown contempt for average people he considers himself superior to. A good example of this is an old segment on his radio show called “Moron Trivia” in which he would call convenience stores and ask the beleaguered workers there trivial questions about current issues while secretly ridiculing them to his audience. Though Glenn Beck gleefully pretended he was doing the cruel segment against his own will, the fact is that if he truly didn’t want to do it, he wouldn’t have. It’s much like a sadistic husband beating his wife, all the while voicing his regret over what her actions are making him do.
Someone once said, “When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” Though Beck talks of God and stopping injustice, he advocates the hazardous and bloody neocon foreign policies that have killed countless innocents, made America more hated around the world, and further weakened our national security. Indeed, Glenn Beck’s establishment backed rise as a “patriot leader” is simply plan B for shepherding the patriot movement back to the fake left/right machine, and channeling public outrage at Obama’s actions as President into a form that can be manipulated and controlled…the same way Obama did for liberals who opposed the actions of George W. Bush.
Manipulating the people of a country that have been the victims of psyops over and over again, and who are looking for leaders to believe in, is not only self-serving, but mean. Because Beck has the showmanship and organizational backing to pull off his deception he has decided to take his thirty pieces of silver and proudly display them as “Godly”.
Some are falling for it. Many others are not.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
The only accidentally true statement Glenn Beck uttered during his speech at the rally is something he said when talking about World War 2 and the memorial in DC– “You cannot coexist with evil”.
Perhaps a few activists in 9/11 Truth shirts should have shown up at Beck’s rally. (If any did, I don’t know.) That way some real patriotism and justice could be injected into Beck’s adoring mob.
Priviatization Lies refuted
Here's the link with the half truths and deception:
http://www.roguegovernment.com/10_Statist_Myths_Debunked/22629/0/6/6/Y/M.html
_______________________________
Here's the link refuting that link's deception:
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-taxgrowth.htm
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-taxshare.htm
http://truthseeker2473.blogspot.com/2010/04/flying-dutchs-words-on-economics-in.html
http://christianinfobomb.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=14135
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17219
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=538
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/smedley.htm
http://www.roguegovernment.com/10_Statist_Myths_Debunked/22629/0/6/6/Y/M.html
_______________________________
Here's the link refuting that link's deception:
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-taxgrowth.htm
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-taxshare.htm
http://truthseeker2473.blogspot.com/2010/04/flying-dutchs-words-on-economics-in.html
http://christianinfobomb.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=14135
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17219
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=538
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/smedley.htm
Saturday, August 28, 2010
EPA denies petition calling for lead ammunition ban
From http://www.roguegovernment.com/EPA_denies_petition_calling_for_lead_ammunition_ban/22616/0/17/17/Y/M.html
EPA denies petition calling for lead ammunition ban
Published on 08-27-2010 Email To Friend Print Version
Source: AP
The Environmental Protection Agency on Friday denied a petition by five environmental groups to ban lead in hunting ammunition, saying the issue is not within the agency's jurisdiction.
The EPA said it did not have the authority to enact the ban, aimed at protecting wildlife, under the Toxic Substances Control Act, as the groups had requested.
But the agency said it's still reviewing another part of the petition, to ban lead fishing sinkers.
The EPA informed one of the groups, American Bird Conservancy, of the decision in a letter.
The groups had argued in their petition that millions of animals are dying from eating lead-shot pellets or carcasses contaminated by lead. They said an estimated 10 million to 20 million birds and other animals die each year from lead poisoning in the U.S.
In a petition filed earlier this month, the environmental groups argued that instances of lead poisoning from ammunition and fishing sinkers "present an unreasonable risk of injury" to both human health and the environment.
The petition cited nearly 500 peer-reviewed scientific articles that the environmental groups said document the toxic effects of lead on wildlife.
These studies "conclude that the lead components of bullets, shotgun pellets, fishing weights and lures pose an unreasonable risk of injury to human and wildlife health and the environment," the Aug. 3 petition argued.
The EPA was required to respond to the petition within 90 days.
"EPA is taking action on many fronts to address major sources of lead in our society such as eliminating childhood exposure to lead," Steve Owens, the agency's assistant administrator for chemical safety and pollution prevention said in a statement.
But he said the agency "was not and is not considering taking action on whether the lead content in hunting ammunition poses an undue threat to wildlife."
The environmentalists were sharply critical of the EPA decision, arguing the agency has the authority to act and that there is a wide range of non-lead ammunition available.
"The EPA had ample evidence that lead bullets and shot have a devastating effect on America's wildlife, yet has refused to do anything about it," said Darin Schroeder, vice president for conservation advocacy at the American Bird Conservancy, one of the petitioners. "It's disappointing to see this country's top environmental agency simply walk away from the preventable poisoning of birds and other wildlife."
Also signing the petition were the Association of Avian Veterinarians, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and Project Gutpile.
EPA denies petition calling for lead ammunition ban
Published on 08-27-2010 Email To Friend Print Version
Source: AP
The Environmental Protection Agency on Friday denied a petition by five environmental groups to ban lead in hunting ammunition, saying the issue is not within the agency's jurisdiction.
The EPA said it did not have the authority to enact the ban, aimed at protecting wildlife, under the Toxic Substances Control Act, as the groups had requested.
But the agency said it's still reviewing another part of the petition, to ban lead fishing sinkers.
The EPA informed one of the groups, American Bird Conservancy, of the decision in a letter.
The groups had argued in their petition that millions of animals are dying from eating lead-shot pellets or carcasses contaminated by lead. They said an estimated 10 million to 20 million birds and other animals die each year from lead poisoning in the U.S.
In a petition filed earlier this month, the environmental groups argued that instances of lead poisoning from ammunition and fishing sinkers "present an unreasonable risk of injury" to both human health and the environment.
The petition cited nearly 500 peer-reviewed scientific articles that the environmental groups said document the toxic effects of lead on wildlife.
These studies "conclude that the lead components of bullets, shotgun pellets, fishing weights and lures pose an unreasonable risk of injury to human and wildlife health and the environment," the Aug. 3 petition argued.
The EPA was required to respond to the petition within 90 days.
"EPA is taking action on many fronts to address major sources of lead in our society such as eliminating childhood exposure to lead," Steve Owens, the agency's assistant administrator for chemical safety and pollution prevention said in a statement.
But he said the agency "was not and is not considering taking action on whether the lead content in hunting ammunition poses an undue threat to wildlife."
The environmentalists were sharply critical of the EPA decision, arguing the agency has the authority to act and that there is a wide range of non-lead ammunition available.
"The EPA had ample evidence that lead bullets and shot have a devastating effect on America's wildlife, yet has refused to do anything about it," said Darin Schroeder, vice president for conservation advocacy at the American Bird Conservancy, one of the petitioners. "It's disappointing to see this country's top environmental agency simply walk away from the preventable poisoning of birds and other wildlife."
Also signing the petition were the Association of Avian Veterinarians, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and Project Gutpile.
Fidel Castro Claims Osama bin Laden is a US Spy
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/fidel-castro-claims-osama-bin-laden-is-a-us-spy.html
Fidel Castro Claims Osama bin Laden is a US Spy
Chris McGreal
London Guardian
Saturday, August 28, 2010
FLASHBACK: CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July 2001
FLASHBACK: Bin Laden Family ‘Evacuated’ From US
FLASHBACK: Bush Senior Met With Bin Laden’s Brother on 9/11
FLASHBACK: Latest Bin Laden Tape: Another of the NeoCons’ “Greatest Hits”
FLASHBACK: October Surprise Bin Laden Appears Right On Cue
Fidel Castro has more reason than most to believe conspiracy theories involving dark forces in Washington. After all, the CIA tried to blow his head off with an exploding cigar.
But the ageing Cuban revolutionary may have gone too far for all but the most ardent believer in the reach and competence of America’s intelligence agency. He has claimed that Osama bin Laden is in the pay of the CIA and that President George Bush summoned up the al-Qaida leader whenever he needed to increase the fear quotient. The former Cuban president said he knows it because he has read WikiLeaks.
Castro told a visiting Lithuanian writer, who is known as a font of intriguing conspiracy theories about plots for world domination, that Bin Laden was working for the White House.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
“Bush never lacked for Bin Laden’s support. He was a subordinate,” Castro said, according to the Communist party daily, Granma. “Any time Bush would stir up fear and make a big speech, Bin Laden would appear, threatening people with a story about what he was going to do.”
He said that thousands of pages of American classified documents made public by WikiLeaks pointed to who the al-Qaida leader is really working for.
“Who showed that he [Bin Laden] is indeed a CIA agent was WikiLeaks. It proved it with documents,” he said, but did not explain exactly how.
Full story here.
Fidel Castro Claims Osama bin Laden is a US Spy
Chris McGreal
London Guardian
Saturday, August 28, 2010
FLASHBACK: CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July 2001
FLASHBACK: Bin Laden Family ‘Evacuated’ From US
FLASHBACK: Bush Senior Met With Bin Laden’s Brother on 9/11
FLASHBACK: Latest Bin Laden Tape: Another of the NeoCons’ “Greatest Hits”
FLASHBACK: October Surprise Bin Laden Appears Right On Cue
Fidel Castro has more reason than most to believe conspiracy theories involving dark forces in Washington. After all, the CIA tried to blow his head off with an exploding cigar.
But the ageing Cuban revolutionary may have gone too far for all but the most ardent believer in the reach and competence of America’s intelligence agency. He has claimed that Osama bin Laden is in the pay of the CIA and that President George Bush summoned up the al-Qaida leader whenever he needed to increase the fear quotient. The former Cuban president said he knows it because he has read WikiLeaks.
Castro told a visiting Lithuanian writer, who is known as a font of intriguing conspiracy theories about plots for world domination, that Bin Laden was working for the White House.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
“Bush never lacked for Bin Laden’s support. He was a subordinate,” Castro said, according to the Communist party daily, Granma. “Any time Bush would stir up fear and make a big speech, Bin Laden would appear, threatening people with a story about what he was going to do.”
He said that thousands of pages of American classified documents made public by WikiLeaks pointed to who the al-Qaida leader is really working for.
“Who showed that he [Bin Laden] is indeed a CIA agent was WikiLeaks. It proved it with documents,” he said, but did not explain exactly how.
Full story here.
Friday, August 27, 2010
Life is Continuing even in late August 2010
Conclusive evidence is shown that the global distribution of Rockefeller funded anti-fertility vaccine that was coordinated by WHO. The Rockfeller Foundation's made efforts to promote vaccines for mass scale fertility reduction. Population control is promoted by the UN Population Fund, the World Bank, and the World Health Organization under the guise of a "Task Force on Vacciens for Fertility Regulation." For 4 years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched a massive funding operations into anti-feritility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the WHO, World Bank, and UN Population Fund. Its mission according to one of its members to support: "...“basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this international, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.” The Task Force wants to acts a coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D in the various working groups and support research on different approaches. Thsi include anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines. This is created to neutralize the biological functions of hCG. The Task Force has succeeded in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG vaccine. P.D. Griffin is one of the Task Force members. He promoted the Fertaility Regulating Vaccines as being in the following: "...The Task Force has continued to coordinate its research activities with other vaccine development programmes within WHO and with other international and national programmes engaged in the development of fertility regulating vaccines..." Griffin exposed the purposes of the vaccines in the implementation of it in developing countries by his words: "...If vaccines could be developed which could safely and effectively inhibit fertility, without producing unacceptable side effects, they would be an attractive addition to the present armamentarium of fertility regulating methods and would be likely to have a significant impact on family planning programmes..." So, they promote trying to create cheap anti-fertility vaccines. This is has been promtoed by the 1978 WHO's Task Force (then it was called the Task Force on Immunological Methods for Fertility Regulation). In 1976, the WHO Expanded Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction published a report that promoted regulation in fertility. The report wanted WHO research to make this plan work via health servies. The Anti-Fertility Vaccine was coined by the Rockfeller Foundation. was replaced by the more bureaucratic sounding “Fertility Regulating Vaccine (FRV), the programme was obviously the same. Besides, The time line shows conclusively that the WHO, UN Population Fund and World Bank continued on a path outlined by the Rockefellers in the late 1960s. So, it isn't a secret that the WHO even in the early 1970's want to have an anti-fertility vaccine. The 1992 document wanted engineered FRVs or Fertility Regulating Vaccines to promote a reduction of the human population. Since the early 1990's, scientists hae used vaccines to interfere with sperm function and fertilization. The Rockefeller Foundation did trilas of anti-fertility drugs in China, Brazil, and Austria.
John McCain is easily a political shill today. He's apart of the CFR or the Council on Foreign Relations. Now, John McCain introduced 2 bills in the Senate. They are Machiavellian. One is S.3081. It will authorizethe federal government to detain American citizens indefinitely without a trial. S.3002 is a bill that would authorize the federal government to regulate vitamins, minerals, and virutally all health plus natural food products. According to Examiner.com, “John McCain introduced a bill into the U.S. Senate which, if passed, would actually allow U.S. citizens to be arrested and detained indefinitely, all without Miranda rights or ever being charged with a crime.” The Examiner reports says that the bill isn't conservative at all. It would take away our right to trial. It would allow the federal government to arrest and imprison anyone the current administration deems "hostile." Recently, the DHS called veterans, retired law enforcment, Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin supporters, and conservatives as equivalent to terrorists. McCain has issues with promoting our Constitution. People have the right to a speedy trial by jury and the constitutional right to habeas corpus. No one of these rights should be invalidated under the names of national security and the war on terrorism. On February 3, 2010, John McCain introduced to the United States Senate the Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010. This act compares supplements to radioactive enriched uranium. Vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and botanicals can help people. The Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 has supports from many liberals in Congress. It allows the FDA to have broad new powers that Europe has. It approved supplements that the government allows. There is nothing wrong with legitimate oversight, but not equating vitamins to poisions. McCain wants a tougher global warming treaty. He claims to be for economic populism, but he won't condemn derivatives. cCain told the Hoover Institute in May 1, 2007 that if he were President, he would created the international organization of the LD or the League of Democracies. In advancing the LD, McCain said, “We should go further and start bringing democratic peoples and nations from around the world into one common organization, a worldwide League of Democracies.” He then added, “The new League of Democracies would form the core of an international order . . .” The LD would be similar to the U.N. McCain is trying to play both sides of the immigration issue like Lindsey Graham. So, McCain is promoting policies that are against the constitutional freedoms and liberties that people respect and love.
There is a controversy over absteinence programs. President Obama and some in Congress want to cut funding for about 176 abstinence programs despite a new study. These programs are going into youth and young adults on September 30, because Congress and the Obama administration canceled all grants going to abstinence centered programming in their FY2010 budget. the new study shows the effectiveness of abstinence education progrsm and the support parents have for them. "We are greatly concerned that the sex education policy being implemented by this administration does not reflect the values of what most parents and teens clearly want," Valerie Huber, Executive Director of the National Abstinence Education Association told LifeNews.com today. Huber said that some programs will lose their midstream in their 5 year grant awarad. She said that almost 2 million student wouldn't recieves lessons in dealing with abstinence education. A recent HHS study said that most teens and their parents support the core message of the program. The study is called The National Survey of Adolescents and Their Parents, was posted Monday to the HHS website after significant grassroots pressure. It calls into question whether recent sex education policy decisions truly reflect cultural norms or clear evidence-based trends. According to the findings, about 70% of parents agreed that it is “against [their] values for [their] adolescents to have sexual intercourse before marriage” and that “having sexual intercourse is something only married people should do.” Adolescents gave similar responses. Larry McAdoo is the executive director of STARS, which is an abstience progrm in Mississippi. It could lose funding if the cuts occured. Larry said that cuts in funding is unnecessary since according to him Mississipi has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the nation. McAdoo want teenagers to make healthy chices in their lives. The ACF is a division of the HHS. It funded a survey of 1,000 adolescents of 12-18 years old in order to measure parent-adolescent communication and adolescent attitudes toward sex and abstinence. The study found that parents who strongly support the concept that sexual relatiosn are best saved for a martial relationship and parents' attitudes are more important (in influencing adolescent views than the level of parent communication with their adolescent). The American Public Health Association (APHA) highlighted the results on its web site: “Adjusting for all other factors in the model, parent and peer factors are more consistently associated with differences in adolescent attitudes about sex and abstinence than are measures of adolescent exposure to sex and abstinence topics in a class or program." However, during an APHA conference, researcher Lisa Rue, Ph.D., who specializes in adolescent behavior, was intrigued by the study and requested the full report. She was denied access and the Obama administration denied a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for it. The National Abstinence Education Association responded by encouraging interested persons to submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the public release of a study. Huber of the NAEA said that hundreds submitted the request for openness regarding the stuy. So, the HHS posted the entire study report on Monday. Huber concluded in her comments: "It is important that the representative government reflects the desires of its constituents. This study's findings call for a reinstatement of funding for abstinence education within the next fiscal budget." People desiring abstinence is fine in their personal lives, yet sexual education being comprehensively shown is fine as well.
The President is cornered by many forces. The corporate forces have attacked people for thousands of years. Now, they want the whole privitization of te public sector. Even with some attacks against President Barack Obama by some bankers, there has been billions of dollars sent from the government into Wall Street coffers. Still, Wall Street is even more demanding with their agenda. It is certainly immoral to place profit above the legitimate concerns of the people. Some of the Democrats have been pacified of fear of offending FOX News and their ilk. The Republican Party have been hijacked by Austrian economic extremists as well. The Tea party cry out their demands as well. Many Tea party people ignore the corporate relationship to the recession in 2007. Even President Barack Obama's concessions to the establishment in health care, the war on terror, etc. isn't enough for the elite. Wall Street really wants to hord the wealth in order to promote free market extremism. They certainly don't desire a radical infrastructure build up or banning derivatives. The drive for austeriy is a rallying cry of the elite. They want to devour any public resource in their way in trying to act like budget hawks (when military expenditures are in records highs for America). Corporate hijacking of education and cuts in Social Security are threats today.
Secret Societies still exist worldwide. "Father" Francisco Calvo was a Freemason in Costa Rica. He promoted it there. Some of the priests he worked with were also Freemasons. On his return to Costa Rica, together with other Masons already residents, he established Lodge Caridad No. 26, which was granted a Charter on June 28,1865, by the Grand Orient of New Granada. The Supreme Council of Central America was located in San Jose, Costa Rica. It was created in January 9, 1871 under a Charter granted by the Supreme Council of New Granada to Ill. Bro.
By Timothy Dr. Francisco Calvo,33", dated November 27,1870, which empowered him to created the Grand Orient and the Supreme Council of Central America, in the city of San Jose.
This Supreme Council was allowed to be taken temporally to the City of Guatemala, under the condition that it be returned seven years later. Freemasonry have a long history in Mexico. The first two political parties in Mexico were Masonic, "the yorkinos" (York Rite) and the "escoceses" (Scottish Rite). Catholic priests and the first U.S. ambassador, Joel Poinsett, helped to introduce Masonry to Mexico.
Illegal Abortion Myths: What Would America Look Like Without Abortions?
From http://lifenews.com/nat6661.html
Illegal Abortion Myths: What Would America Look Like Without Abortions?
by Maria Vitale
August 27, 2010
LifeNews.com Note: Maria Vitale is an opinion columnist for LifeNews.com. She is the Public Relations Director for the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation and Vitale has written and reported for various broadcast and print media outlets, including National Public Radio, CBS Radio, and AP Radio.
Email RSS Print
To those who came of age long after 1973, it’s understandably difficult to imagine America without legal abortion. After all, they can't remember a time when abortions were not routinely carried out. They grew up thinking that, if birth control failed to prevent pregnancy, abortion was the back-up plan.
But even proponents of legal abortion have said they believe that Roe v. Wade’s days are numbered. They realize that the U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion could be overturned in our lifetime.
So the question becomes, what would an America without legal abortion look like?
Abortion supporters would have you believe that the major consequence of outlawing abortion is that deaths from illegal abortions will become epidemic. But history does not bear out that supposition.
Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a founder of the National Abortion Rights Action League who became pro-life, admitted that he lied about the number of women who perished from illegal abortions before 1973. Nathanson was quoted as saying, “We spoke of 5,000 – 10,000 deaths a year…I confess that I knew the figures were totally false..it was a useful figure, widely accepted, so why go out of our way to correct it with honest statistics?”
Information from the National Center for Health Statistics indicates that it wasn't the legalization of abortion that reduced the number of abortion-related deaths. Rather, it was the introduction of antibiotics which helped to save women’s lives.
Another myth about making abortion illegal is that it would result in the jailing of women. But it would be the abortion practitioners, not the female victims, who would be held accountable for the crime of abortion.
Just imagine the victim impact statements that would be read at the court proceedings. Women would talk about how they ached for the children that they lost and how they had been robbed of the priceless gift of motherhood. They would speak of infections, hemorrhaging, perforations of the uterus, convulsions, and endotoxic shock. They would talk of their thoughts of suicide, and the endless agony that propelled them into drug and alcohol abuse.
Fathers would talk about lost opportunities—never being able to play catch with their sons…never being able to walk their daughters down the aisle. They would speak of relationships that were torn asunder by the abortionist’s knife.
Grandparents would speak of the unbearable pain of never being able to hold their grandchildren in their arms...never being able to tuck their grandchildren in at night. They would talk of a branch of the family tree that had been severed by abortion…and of a line of descendants who would never see the light of day.
Abortion claims many victims, in addition to the more than 50 million children who have been lost since 1973. One can only hope that the law will someday recognize the tragic toll that abortion has taken on America, lamenting the many victims this heinous crime against humanity has left in its wake.
Buzz up!
Illegal Abortion Myths: What Would America Look Like Without Abortions?
by Maria Vitale
August 27, 2010
LifeNews.com Note: Maria Vitale is an opinion columnist for LifeNews.com. She is the Public Relations Director for the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation and Vitale has written and reported for various broadcast and print media outlets, including National Public Radio, CBS Radio, and AP Radio.
Email RSS Print
To those who came of age long after 1973, it’s understandably difficult to imagine America without legal abortion. After all, they can't remember a time when abortions were not routinely carried out. They grew up thinking that, if birth control failed to prevent pregnancy, abortion was the back-up plan.
But even proponents of legal abortion have said they believe that Roe v. Wade’s days are numbered. They realize that the U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion could be overturned in our lifetime.
So the question becomes, what would an America without legal abortion look like?
Abortion supporters would have you believe that the major consequence of outlawing abortion is that deaths from illegal abortions will become epidemic. But history does not bear out that supposition.
Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a founder of the National Abortion Rights Action League who became pro-life, admitted that he lied about the number of women who perished from illegal abortions before 1973. Nathanson was quoted as saying, “We spoke of 5,000 – 10,000 deaths a year…I confess that I knew the figures were totally false..it was a useful figure, widely accepted, so why go out of our way to correct it with honest statistics?”
Information from the National Center for Health Statistics indicates that it wasn't the legalization of abortion that reduced the number of abortion-related deaths. Rather, it was the introduction of antibiotics which helped to save women’s lives.
Another myth about making abortion illegal is that it would result in the jailing of women. But it would be the abortion practitioners, not the female victims, who would be held accountable for the crime of abortion.
Just imagine the victim impact statements that would be read at the court proceedings. Women would talk about how they ached for the children that they lost and how they had been robbed of the priceless gift of motherhood. They would speak of infections, hemorrhaging, perforations of the uterus, convulsions, and endotoxic shock. They would talk of their thoughts of suicide, and the endless agony that propelled them into drug and alcohol abuse.
Fathers would talk about lost opportunities—never being able to play catch with their sons…never being able to walk their daughters down the aisle. They would speak of relationships that were torn asunder by the abortionist’s knife.
Grandparents would speak of the unbearable pain of never being able to hold their grandchildren in their arms...never being able to tuck their grandchildren in at night. They would talk of a branch of the family tree that had been severed by abortion…and of a line of descendants who would never see the light of day.
Abortion claims many victims, in addition to the more than 50 million children who have been lost since 1973. One can only hope that the law will someday recognize the tragic toll that abortion has taken on America, lamenting the many victims this heinous crime against humanity has left in its wake.
Buzz up!
Cramer Predicts “Mass Panic” In Markets, “Shocker” GDP Figure
From http://www.infowars.com/cramer-predicts-mass-panic-in-markets-shocker-gdp-figure/
Cramer Predicts “Mass Panic” In Markets, “Shocker” GDP Figure
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, August 27, 2010
CNBC’s Jim Cramer is predicting that a shockingly low GDP figure today will create “mass panic” in the stock markets today, forecasting that gross domestic product will slip to 0.5 per cent, a figure that will all but guarantee the United States is heading for a double dip recession.
Most economic analysts expect a drastic downgrade of GDP figures for the second quarter from 2.4pc to around 1.4pc, but Cramer’s forecast of a mere 0.5pc would send chills through the market and stocks would undoubtedly plummet in a similar fashion to their May 6 “flash crash” where the Dow experienced a sudden drop of almost 1,000 points.
“Look, I’m going to give you my forecast right now – I think we’re going to get 0.5 percent GDP, OK?” Cramer said. “But, let’s say we get 0.5 percent GDP. Everyone’s going to say it’s horrible. We’re going to go track down economists, Nobel winners who think it’s a double dip. And it’ll be like shocker – 0.5 percent. And I’m telling you it’s going to be 0.5 percent. It’s like the housing number. On my show I said it’s going to be declined 50 percent. We get 30 percent. It was like shocker. Whoever is making these estimates is just so wrong because you know, you piece these pieces together on a daily basis like I do and come up with something between zero and 1 percent growth. So when it comes out as 0.5 percent – other people are – I don’t know who those people are. I don’t know who they’re listening to or talking to. But it’s very clear that we’re going to have no growth. Why is that shocking?”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed below 10,000 yesterday as fears that lingering unemployment and the potential for a fresh round of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve will signal that the so-called “recovery” has been nothing but hot air.
The host of “Mad Money” did not mince words, predicting a “mass panic” in the markets on the back of a terrible GDP revision.
“Tomorrow I’m predicting mass panic tomorrow morning,” Cramer said. “[M]ass panic, market looking down 15 ticks. It will be that way because it will be like, ‘Oh, my.’ And how can it be ‘Oh, my?’ We’re on a national TV show right now, OK? We’re watched by everybody. I’m telling you it’s going to be 0.5. How when it comes out and 0.5 [percent] is that shocking to people? Are you not watching? What are you watching? ESPN? Are they talking about 0.8 percent on ESPN? Maybe that’s it. Maybe on the YES Channel they’re using 2 percent. I don’t know what they’re watching.”
Some will undoubtedly accuse Cramer of trying to manipulate the market by spooking traders into dumping stocks in violation of SEC rules. However, futures for today are up and it remains to be seen whether Cramer’s 0.5pc GDP forecast is wildly off base or chillingly accurate.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
We won’t have to wait long to find out. GDP figures are likely to be announced just before 10am EST this morning. The outcome will go a long way to defining exactly how wrong the happy-clappy “recovery” crowd were all along.
Watch the clip below.
Cramer Predicts “Mass Panic” In Markets, “Shocker” GDP Figure
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, August 27, 2010
CNBC’s Jim Cramer is predicting that a shockingly low GDP figure today will create “mass panic” in the stock markets today, forecasting that gross domestic product will slip to 0.5 per cent, a figure that will all but guarantee the United States is heading for a double dip recession.
Most economic analysts expect a drastic downgrade of GDP figures for the second quarter from 2.4pc to around 1.4pc, but Cramer’s forecast of a mere 0.5pc would send chills through the market and stocks would undoubtedly plummet in a similar fashion to their May 6 “flash crash” where the Dow experienced a sudden drop of almost 1,000 points.
“Look, I’m going to give you my forecast right now – I think we’re going to get 0.5 percent GDP, OK?” Cramer said. “But, let’s say we get 0.5 percent GDP. Everyone’s going to say it’s horrible. We’re going to go track down economists, Nobel winners who think it’s a double dip. And it’ll be like shocker – 0.5 percent. And I’m telling you it’s going to be 0.5 percent. It’s like the housing number. On my show I said it’s going to be declined 50 percent. We get 30 percent. It was like shocker. Whoever is making these estimates is just so wrong because you know, you piece these pieces together on a daily basis like I do and come up with something between zero and 1 percent growth. So when it comes out as 0.5 percent – other people are – I don’t know who those people are. I don’t know who they’re listening to or talking to. But it’s very clear that we’re going to have no growth. Why is that shocking?”
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
");
//]]>-->
The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed below 10,000 yesterday as fears that lingering unemployment and the potential for a fresh round of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve will signal that the so-called “recovery” has been nothing but hot air.
The host of “Mad Money” did not mince words, predicting a “mass panic” in the markets on the back of a terrible GDP revision.
“Tomorrow I’m predicting mass panic tomorrow morning,” Cramer said. “[M]ass panic, market looking down 15 ticks. It will be that way because it will be like, ‘Oh, my.’ And how can it be ‘Oh, my?’ We’re on a national TV show right now, OK? We’re watched by everybody. I’m telling you it’s going to be 0.5. How when it comes out and 0.5 [percent] is that shocking to people? Are you not watching? What are you watching? ESPN? Are they talking about 0.8 percent on ESPN? Maybe that’s it. Maybe on the YES Channel they’re using 2 percent. I don’t know what they’re watching.”
Some will undoubtedly accuse Cramer of trying to manipulate the market by spooking traders into dumping stocks in violation of SEC rules. However, futures for today are up and it remains to be seen whether Cramer’s 0.5pc GDP forecast is wildly off base or chillingly accurate.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
We won’t have to wait long to find out. GDP figures are likely to be announced just before 10am EST this morning. The outcome will go a long way to defining exactly how wrong the happy-clappy “recovery” crowd were all along.
Watch the clip below.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Senate To Sneak Through Internet Kill Switch Bill
From http://www.prisonplanet.com/senate-to-sneak-through-internet-kill-switch-bill.html
Senate To Sneak Through Internet Kill Switch Bill
Legislation likely to be attached to Defense Authorization bill in bid to pass cybersecurity before midterms
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, August 26, 2010
The Senate is attempting to sneak through the infamous Internet kill switch cybersecurity bill by attaching it to another piece of legislation that is almost guaranteed to pass – the defense authorization bill – in an underhanded ploy to avoid the difficult task of passing cybersecurity on its own.
“It’s hard to get a measure like cybersecurity legislation passed on its own,” Democratic Senator Thomas Carper, who is co-chair of a Senate subcommittee with cybersecurity oversight, told Government Information Security.
That’s why lawmakers pushing cybersecurity have resolved to introduce the legislation as a “rider” to a Senate defense bill that is likely to be easily passed before the midterm elections.
Senators are still working to merge two different versions of the cybersecurity bill, one sponsored by Senator Joe Lieberman and another sponsored by Democrat Jay Rockefeller, into a single omnibus package, in preparation for a final vote when the Senate returns to session in mid-September.
“We’re very close to where we need to be in developing a joint proposal,” said Carper.
Lawmakers are in a race to pass cybersecurity before the midterms because if they wait until Congress returns after the November 2nd vote, the chances of getting the bill through “would significantly dim should the Republicans pick up a significant number of seats”. That leaves a four week window from the middle of September to the start of election campaigning for Senators to sneak through the legislation.
Lieberman’s version of the cybersecurity bill includes language that would hand President Obama the power to shut down parts of the world wide web for at least four months with no congressional oversight in the event of a cyber attack on critical infrastructure systems in the U.S.
Senators argue that they will be able to attach the Internet kill switch bill to the Defense Authorization Act because cybersecurity is a component of national security. However, the primary justifications behind treating “cybersecurity” as a national security matter are completely overblown and erroneous.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Proponents of cybersecurity have constantly argued that government needs to have more power over the Internet because cyber-terrorists could hack in and dismantle the entire U.S. power grid, large industrial plants, and the national water supply. This is a complete misnomer because, as a recent Wired News article highlighted, power grid and drinking water systems, “Are rarely connected directly to the public internet. And that makes gaining access to grid-controlling networks a challenge for all but the most dedicated, motivated and skilled — nation-states, in other words.”
As we documented in our piece on the issue, the threat from cyber-terrorists to the U.S. power grid or water supply is minimal. The perpetrators of an attack on such infrastructure would have to have direct physical access to the systems that operate these plants to cause any damage. Any perceived threat from the public Internet to these systems is therefore completely contrived and strips bare the real agenda behind cybersecurity – to enable the government to regulate free speech on the Internet.
Having A Supply Of Healthy Foods That Last Just Makes Sense (AD)
This was revealed when Senator Lieberman told CNN’s Candy Crowley that the real motivation behind cybersecurity was to mimic the Communist Chinese system of Internet policing.
“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said Lieberman.
As we have documented, the Communist Chinese government does not disconnect parts of the Internet because of genuine security concerns, it habitually does so only to oppress and silence victims of government abuse and atrocities, and to strangle dissent against the state.
The decision to try and sneak through the Internet kill switch bill as part of another package of legislation is undoubtedly a reaction to increasing awareness about how the terms of the bill would completely undermine the foundations of the Internet as an outlet of truly unregulated free speech.
*********************
Senate To Sneak Through Internet Kill Switch Bill
Legislation likely to be attached to Defense Authorization bill in bid to pass cybersecurity before midterms
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, August 26, 2010
The Senate is attempting to sneak through the infamous Internet kill switch cybersecurity bill by attaching it to another piece of legislation that is almost guaranteed to pass – the defense authorization bill – in an underhanded ploy to avoid the difficult task of passing cybersecurity on its own.
“It’s hard to get a measure like cybersecurity legislation passed on its own,” Democratic Senator Thomas Carper, who is co-chair of a Senate subcommittee with cybersecurity oversight, told Government Information Security.
That’s why lawmakers pushing cybersecurity have resolved to introduce the legislation as a “rider” to a Senate defense bill that is likely to be easily passed before the midterm elections.
Senators are still working to merge two different versions of the cybersecurity bill, one sponsored by Senator Joe Lieberman and another sponsored by Democrat Jay Rockefeller, into a single omnibus package, in preparation for a final vote when the Senate returns to session in mid-September.
“We’re very close to where we need to be in developing a joint proposal,” said Carper.
Lawmakers are in a race to pass cybersecurity before the midterms because if they wait until Congress returns after the November 2nd vote, the chances of getting the bill through “would significantly dim should the Republicans pick up a significant number of seats”. That leaves a four week window from the middle of September to the start of election campaigning for Senators to sneak through the legislation.
Lieberman’s version of the cybersecurity bill includes language that would hand President Obama the power to shut down parts of the world wide web for at least four months with no congressional oversight in the event of a cyber attack on critical infrastructure systems in the U.S.
Senators argue that they will be able to attach the Internet kill switch bill to the Defense Authorization Act because cybersecurity is a component of national security. However, the primary justifications behind treating “cybersecurity” as a national security matter are completely overblown and erroneous.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Proponents of cybersecurity have constantly argued that government needs to have more power over the Internet because cyber-terrorists could hack in and dismantle the entire U.S. power grid, large industrial plants, and the national water supply. This is a complete misnomer because, as a recent Wired News article highlighted, power grid and drinking water systems, “Are rarely connected directly to the public internet. And that makes gaining access to grid-controlling networks a challenge for all but the most dedicated, motivated and skilled — nation-states, in other words.”
As we documented in our piece on the issue, the threat from cyber-terrorists to the U.S. power grid or water supply is minimal. The perpetrators of an attack on such infrastructure would have to have direct physical access to the systems that operate these plants to cause any damage. Any perceived threat from the public Internet to these systems is therefore completely contrived and strips bare the real agenda behind cybersecurity – to enable the government to regulate free speech on the Internet.
Having A Supply Of Healthy Foods That Last Just Makes Sense (AD)
This was revealed when Senator Lieberman told CNN’s Candy Crowley that the real motivation behind cybersecurity was to mimic the Communist Chinese system of Internet policing.
“Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said Lieberman.
As we have documented, the Communist Chinese government does not disconnect parts of the Internet because of genuine security concerns, it habitually does so only to oppress and silence victims of government abuse and atrocities, and to strangle dissent against the state.
The decision to try and sneak through the Internet kill switch bill as part of another package of legislation is undoubtedly a reaction to increasing awareness about how the terms of the bill would completely undermine the foundations of the Internet as an outlet of truly unregulated free speech.
*********************
Secrets of the Past being revealed
Pre Crime technology is to be used in Washington D.C. Law enforcement agencies in D.C. have started to use this technology. It is claim that it can predict when crimes will be committed and who will commit them (before they actually happen). The Minority Report is a movie and some of it is occuring now in 2010. Pre-crime software is being developed by Richard Berk, who is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania. There has been similar technology being developed as software being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia. Yet, they were limited to predictions of murders by and among parolees and offenders on probation. According to a report by ABC News, the latest version is to be implemented in Washington, D.C. It can predict other future crimes according to them as well. “When a person goes on probation or parole they are supervised by an officer. The question that officer has to answer is ‘what level of supervision do you provide?’” Berk told ABC News, intimating that the program could have a bearing on the length of sentences and/or bail amounts. The program deals with sifting in a database. It has thousands of crimes and uses algorithms and different variables (like geographical location, criminal records, and ages of previous offenders) to come up with predictions of where, when, and how a crime could possibly be committed and by who. The program operates witout any direct evidence that a crime will be done. It simply takes detasets and computes possibilities. Beck wanted to see if precrime technology can predict a person doing a murder in the future if they done an armed robberty at age 14. Critics said that the program promtoed categorizing individuals on a risk scale via computer mathematics, rather than on real life, etc. Monitoring people based on a premise is against the justice system. The justice system is meant to be founded on the premise of the presumption of innocence. Other police departments and law agencies across the country have begun to look into and use similar predictive technologies. TheMemphis Police Department for example uses a program called Operation Blue CRUSH. It uses predictive analystics and it was developed by IBM. Other forms of pre-crime technology in use or under development include surveillance cameras that can predict when a crime is about to occur and alert police, and even neurological brain scanners that can read people’s intentions before they act, thus detecting whether or not a person has “hostile intent”. It is not too far fetched to imagine all these forms of the technology being used together in the future by law enforcement bodies. The British government has once debated introducing pre-crime laws in the name of fighting terrorism. The idea was that suspects would be put on trila using MI5 or MI6 intelligence of an expected terror attack. This would be enough to convict if ofund to be true "on the balance of probabilities" rather than beyond the reasonable doubt. The governmetn in the UK want to collect lifelong records on all residents starting at the age of 5. They want to screen for those who might be more likely commit crimes in the future. Another disturbing possibility for such technology comes in the form of a financial alliance of sorts between Internet search engine giant Google and the investment arm of the CIA and the wider U.S. intelligence network. Googel and In-Q-Tel have injected recently a sum of up to 10 million dollars into a company called Recorded Future. This includes "...analytics to scour Twitter accounts, blogs and websites for all sorts of information, which is used to “assemble actual real-time dossiers on people.” The company describes its analytics as “the ultimate tool for open-source intelligence” and says it can also “predict the future." Recorded Future takes in vast amounts of personal information such as employment changes, personal education, and family relations. Promotioanl materials have categories covering pretty much everything else (like entertainment, music, and movie releases like innocuous things like patient filings and product recalls). Those detached from any kind of moral reality will say “If you’ve got nothing to hide then what is the problem with being scanned for pre-crime? If it keeps us all safe from murderers, rapists and terrorists I’m all for it." The technological Big Brother police state system is still real with precrime technology that can violate individual liberties of citizens.
Some in CNN view opposition to the policies of the government and bankers as criminal. CNN's Rick Sanchez and the SPLC propagandist Mark Potok teamed up to demonize the Sovereign Citizen Movement. Sanchez show hatred of this movement. The FBI and Ministry of Homeland Security consider the movement a form of domestic terrorism. “The agency has already outlined two separate domestic terror threats — eco-terrorists/animal rights extremists and lone offenders — and its latest addition is a discussion of the Sovereign Citizen Movement,” the Homeland Security Newswire reported in April. “Members of the Sovereign Citizen Movement are anti-government extremists who believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or ‘sovereign’ from the United States. As a result, they believe they do not have to answer to any government authority, including courts, taxing entities, motor vehicle departments, or law enforcement.” Some people refuse to obey the government since corporate terrorists have hijacked the government. The FBI want people to tell them about these group as an informant. The FBI says that the sovereign citizens promote scams. Ironically, Joseph Kane and his 16 year old were gunned down by cops. They accepted the sovereign citizen philosophy. According to police, Kane handed sovereign citizens paperwork to Arkansas police after he was pulled over. It is said Kane’s son then pulled out an AK 47 and killed two police officers. “West Memphis police recently finished training on how to identify the groups by peculiar license plates or bumper stickers. They were also taught how to best approach them during a traffic stop,” Fox News reported. The MIAC document compared even Chuck Baldwin supports and Ron Paul advocates as equivalent to dangerous terrorists. The DHS had its own document that compared pro-life people, constitutionalists, advocates of the 2nd Amdnement, some veterans, etc. as equal to domestic terrorist. Potok believes that the sovereign citizen movement is the progeny of white supremacists. The “FBI lists this extremist movement as a domestic terrorist threat, saying some ‘sovereign citizens’ murder, threaten judges, use fake currency and engineer various mortgage fraud scams. Many don’t pay taxes,” reports the Memphis Fox affiliate. Sovereign citizens haven't done an epidemic of murdering judges at all. Some of them reject federal and state paperwork, some don't pay taxes, and some ignore laws plus they oppose banksters in foreclosure cases. This isn't equivalent to terrorism even if you disagree with some of these policies. Even Timothy Geithner once didn't pay his taxes, but he doesn't want to kill judges though. The government consider the sovereign citizen movement terrorists since they reject their authority.
Some good news occur in the Pro-Life movement. President Barack Obama wanted to force taxpayers to fund the destructive embryonic stem cell research. Another side disagreed with this policy. Now a judge made a decision on Monday to temporarily halt the funding while the lawsuit is going on. The U.S. district Judge Royce Lamberth gave a preliminary injunction against the funding authorized by Obama's executive order. There is the Christian Medical Association. It was one of the parties that brought the lawsuit. It said that the Obama executive order and subsequent funding from the National Institutes of Health violated the Dickey Amendment, a federal law prohibiting taxpayer funding of research that destroys human embryos. David, MD, the head of the CMA responded that: "...This case highlights the harm that diverting federal funds away from proven effective research poses to those patients who are waiting for cures. We are grateful that the Court also recognizes the clarity of the law and the harm that funding illegal and unethical embryo-destroying research poses to ethical researchers." "The bottom line is that ethical stem cell research that does not destroy a living human embryo is the fastest, most efficient and effective means to obtaining real cures for real patients," he told LifeNews.com. "Already providing hope and help for patients with over 70 diseases, ethical stem cell research that does not destroy living human embryos holds proven promise for even more amazing breakthroughs in the future." The Alliance Defense Fund is a pro-life legal group. It served as co-counsel in the case. It respected the order that prevented the administration from carrying out its embryonic stem cell research policy while the court considers the lawsuit. “The American people should not be forced to pay for experiments--prohibited by federal law--that destroy human life," said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Steven Aden. "The court is simply enforcing an existing law passed by Congress that prevents Americans from paying another penny for needless research on human embryos," he continued. “No one should be allowed to decide that an innocent life is worthless." Aden said, "Experimentation on embryonic stem cells isn't even necessary because adult stem cell research has been enormously successful. In economic times like we are in now, it doesn't make sense for the federal government to use precious taxpayer dollars for this illegal and unethical purpose.” The district court's preliminary injunction order says that: "...If one step…of an ESC [embryo steam cell] research project results in the destruction of an embryo, the entire project is precluded from receiving federal funding by the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.
“Because ESC research requires the derivation of ESCs, ESC research is research in which an embryo is destroyed. Accordingly, the Court concludes that, by allowing federal funding of ESC research, the Guidelines are in violation of the Dickey-Wicker Amendment," the court added. The Barack Obama administration can try to appeal the decision granting the preliminary injunction or could try to rewrite the guidelines to comply with the law. Dr. Theresa Deisher (of AVM Biotechnology and Dr. James L. Sherley, who was a former MIT professor and scientist) are parties to the lawsuit. They believed that adult stem cell research was positive and embryonic stem cell research was ineffective. Embryonic stem cell research could be funded by private funds. Sam Casey, General Counsel of Advocates International's Law of Life Project, a public interest legal project also involved in the case, pointed out that NIH officials have admitted they violated the public comment process by ignoring the majority of comments coming from pro-life advocates opposed to destroying unborn children for their stem cells.
"The majority of the almost 50,000 comments that the NIH received were opposed to funding this research, and by its own admission, NIH totally ignored these comments," he said. "The so-called spare human embryos being stored in IVF clinics around the United States are not 'in excess of need,' as the NIH in its guidelines callously assert. They are human beings in need of biological or adoptive parents."
Embryonic stem cell research has yet to help a single patient, unlike adult stem cell research -- which has helped patients with more than 100 diseases and medical conditions and which President Bush supported with hundreds of millions in federal funding.
Yuri Kochiyama is one of the unsung heroes of the Civil Rights Movement. The person who influenced her a lot was Malcolm X ironically. She knew and respected Malcolm X before she met him. When they have both met, they became very close friends. She back then agreed with the view that black people who have self-determination, self reliance, self defense, and a sovereign sense of total liberation (as Malcolm X believed). Yuri Kochiyama shook Malcolm X's hand in a courthouse in Brookyln, NY. Ms. Kochiyama talked wanting to shake his hand in these words: “Malcolm, can I shake your hands, too?” Later, Malcolm X said: “What for?” Later, Yuri said: “What for?...Because what you’re doing for your people.” And he said, “And what am I doing for my people?” Now, she thought, “What would I say to that?” So, she said that: “You are giving directions.” Malcolm strode out of the crowd with a smile, and shook Ms. Kochiyama’s hand. This event occured in October 16, 1963, which was before JFK's assassination. Yuri wanted Malcolm X to speak at a Hiroshima/Nagasaki Wrld Peace Study in a meeting. Malcolm X came in the door of the meeting in 1964 to make comments at the small convention. Malcolm X thanked the Japanese for ocming into Harlem. Later, Malcolm X gave the Japanese people a tour of neighborhoods and living conditions in Harlem that was in contrast to Harlem's "The World's Worst Fair." Yuri even worked in the OAAU or the Organization for Afro-American Unity. She joined Malcolm X's Liberation School to understand information on Black history and politics. She says in --- “…we didn't know anything about black history, black thinking, or black culture, and in order to understand the black community and and its people, we thought we'd better sign up. So we enrolled, along with our three eldest children, Billy, Audee, and Aichi. The education we received was priceless." Malcolm X and Yuri agreed with the view that if a person doesn't know their history and the essence of their culture, you can't have real interactions between different cultures. Malcolm X believed in black nationalism in that black people should operate, own, and control their own businesses and communities. He also said that: "...We will work with anyone, with any group, no matter what their color is, as long as they are genuinely interested in [ending black injustice]." Kochiyama was of course a Japanese human rights activist. She and her family went into the concentration camps of WWII. This was when about 120,000 Japanese Americans were unjustly interned during WWII. She saw segregration in the camp near Arkansas via Jim Crow. By 1960, she and her husband Bill moved to Harlem, NY to fight for human rights. She was present at his assassination on February 21, 1965 at the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem, and held him in her arms as he lay dying. In 1977, she tried to promoted Puerto Rican independence via joining a group of Puerto Ricans (that took over the Statue Liberty). She wanted to promote the rights of political prisoners and called for nuclear disarmament. She was nominated for the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize.
By Timothy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)