King David
King David was one of the famous men
of history. Even non religious individuals understand a lot about King David. He was known as a warrior and the writer of Psalms. He is held into
great esteem by Jewish human beings and Gentile human beings. He ruled Eretz
Yisrael for 40 years from ca. 1010-970 B.C. He was a great uniter of the tribes
of Yisrael. He led Israeli forces to win battles and he ruled lands. His reign
paved a way for his son named Solomon to build up the First Temple (where the
Shekinah Glory of God was found). The Books of the Prophets and the Writings
describe his life in great detail. David was the 8th and youngest son of Jesse.
Jesse was from the kingly tribe of Judah. David was the direct descendant of
Ruth the Moabite. David worked as a shepherd in Bethlehem. Sound familiar. The
prophet Samuel allied him out of the field and anointed him without the
knowledge of the then current King Saul. David returned to his sheep. King Saul
wanted someone to play music for him, so the King's attendant summoned the
skilled David to play for him. Saul respected David and kept him as a musician.
David had courage when he used a stick and a few stones to confront the nine
foot bronze Philistine giant Goliath of Gath. Many other skilled warriors had
fear for 40 days. David had a single slingshot, invoked God's name, and killed
the giant. Saul later took David as his commander of his troops and he had a
close friendship with Jonathan or Saul's son. David won battles against the
Philistines. Saul became jealous and tried to kill David by throwing a spear at
him. Saul wanted to kill David on many occasions. David went into Moab to
escape Saul. Moab is in modern day Jordan. David gained the support of 600 men. In Ein Gedi, David confronted
Saul instead of trying to kill him. Saul broke down and told David that he
would one day be King and asked David to swear that he would not destroy Saul's
descendants or wipe out Saul's name. David swore to this, but it did not stop
Saul from continuing to pursue him. Finally, David and his supporters joined
the service of Achish, the Philistine king of Gath who entrusted David with
control of the city of Ziklag. Under Achish's employ, David raided the cities
of nomads who harassed the Jews and gave the spoils as gifts to the leaders of
Judah to win their support for him against Saul. King Saul and Jonathan died
when they were fighting the Philistines in Mt. Gilboa. David would be King of
all of Israel at the age of 30 years old. He ruled over Judah for 7 years and 6
months. He had numerous wives and he had many children. He built up Jerusalem
and brought the Holy Ark into Jerusalem as well. The prophet Natan said David
would not build the Temple since he had been a warrior and shed blood. Natan
said that David's son would build the Temple, which was King David's desire. He
defeated the Moabites, the Edomites, the Ammonites, and the Arameans. King
David continued the growth of the Davidic Empire from the Jordan to the
Mediterranean Sea. David allowed districts to pay taxes and the people made
pilgrimages to Jerusalem each year on the holidays of Passover, Shavout, and
Sukkot. King David was known for his errors. He slept with a married woman
named Bathsheba (who David sent her husband Uriah the Hittite to his death in
battle) after looking at her from his rooftop. When confronted by Natan the
prophet, David admitted his sin. Bathsheba and David conceived a second son
named Solomon. David's own son Absalom wanted to conquer his Kingdom.
King David anointed Solomon as the future King of Israel to the opposition of David's oldest son named Adonijah. David delivered a last set of instructions to his son Solomon, telling him to follow the words of God and to repay in kind specific people that had either wronged David or helped him. David then died after 40 years as king, 33 of those in Jerusalem. He was buried in the City of David. Rabbis believe that David wrote the Book of Psalms. Two archaeological finds, the Tel Dan Stele and the Mesha Stele, have direct bearing on the question of the existence of a historical David. The first of these is an Aramean victory stele (inscribed stone) discovered in 1993 at Tel Dan and dated c.850–835 BCE: it contains the phrase ביתדוד
King David anointed Solomon as the future King of Israel to the opposition of David's oldest son named Adonijah. David delivered a last set of instructions to his son Solomon, telling him to follow the words of God and to repay in kind specific people that had either wronged David or helped him. David then died after 40 years as king, 33 of those in Jerusalem. He was buried in the City of David. Rabbis believe that David wrote the Book of Psalms. Two archaeological finds, the Tel Dan Stele and the Mesha Stele, have direct bearing on the question of the existence of a historical David. The first of these is an Aramean victory stele (inscribed stone) discovered in 1993 at Tel Dan and dated c.850–835 BCE: it contains the phrase ביתדוד
(bytdwd),
and the reading "House of David" for this "is now widely
accepted." The Mesha Stele from Moab, dating from approximately the same period, may also contain the name David in line 12, where the interpretation is uncertain, and in line 31, where one destroyed letter must be supplied. King David was a poet. The Messiah is the son of David since the Messiah is from the Davidic dynasty. The Messiah Yeshua will build the real Third Temple. Even today, Jewish human beings and Christians pray for the coming of the Messiah.
The Cold War
The Cold War is another
controversial part of the aftermath of World War II. Instead of having Henry Wallace's vision of
peaceful coexistence in the globe, the Cold War witnessed conflicts globally
(and America and the Soviet Union were almost at a stage of nuclear exchange in
many instances). The roots of the Cold War came from WWII. Democracy,
capitalism, communism, socialism, and other ideologies existed all over human
history. Yet, by WWII, humans had a capacity in the first time in human history
to kill all human life with the advent of nuclear technology. The Cold War
existed when the Portuguese, Dutch, British, and French colonial empire were
starting to end. That was a good thing since colonial Empires in the globe are
always immoral. To Franklin Delano Roosevelt's credit, he was a vigorous
opponent of colonialism. He wanted nations to have independence and be free
from colonial, nefarious oppression. FDR agreed with the Atlantic Charter that
allowed nations to be free in formulating their own system of
government excluding economic exploitation or inherit oppression. It
is also important to note that in this time period, African Americans strongly
advanced independence for former colonized human beings as well like Paul
Robeson. Elliott Roosevelt or FDR's son said that FDR was fighting WWII to
see former colonies to develop economically. Roosevelt wanted Vietnam to be
independent from French colonialism as well before he died. Nationalists like
Sukarno of Indonesia, India's Jawaharlal Nehru, Zhou Enlai of China wanted
freedom. Sukarno said that he wanted equality and social justice in the realm
of nationalism and internationalism. He said that Internationalism cannot grow
without the soil of nationalism. Sukarno gave the Panca Sila or the Five
Principles to the word. It included nationalism, internationalism,
representative government, social justice, and a belief in God. The
African/Asian Bandung Conference of 1955 wanted a neutral Non-Aligned Movement
as a means for human beings to advance their own interests without being
manipulated by mainstream Capitalists or mainstream Communists.
When FDR died, Harry Truman took on a more reactionary approach to foreign policy affairs. Dean Acheson and Averell Harriman (a Bonesman) stirred President Harry Truman to advance recolonization and Cold War near hysteria. Humans are not cattle. Man is made in the image of God, so the nation state ought to reject feudalism and advance human liberty. The state should serve human beings and allow every male and every female to contribute their talent to the civilization of the world as a whole. Mountbatten was a British military leader who led imperialism after WWII as well. The elite used unjust wars and placed the total blame on America as a means to try to slander Americans collectively (when the new world order system and its imperialist aims came from European elitists not all Europeans). Now, Truman allowed more agitation in the Cold War. Eisenhower became more reasonable in foreign policy though since he seen war up close and personal. He lived it. Winston Churchill made his Iron Curtain speech where he talked about Communism and the Soviet Union as an evil empire bent on world domination. Churchill and other extremists exploited the rise of Mao over China and other events in Greece (like the late 1940's Greek civil war) as an excuse to talk about the Red Scare (or the silly view that all Communists collectively wanted to dominate all aspects of the world society via in a totalitarian fashion). You can easily disagree with Communism and allow nations to accept or reject Communism as an economic system if they want to in a peaceful fashion.
When FDR died, Harry Truman took on a more reactionary approach to foreign policy affairs. Dean Acheson and Averell Harriman (a Bonesman) stirred President Harry Truman to advance recolonization and Cold War near hysteria. Humans are not cattle. Man is made in the image of God, so the nation state ought to reject feudalism and advance human liberty. The state should serve human beings and allow every male and every female to contribute their talent to the civilization of the world as a whole. Mountbatten was a British military leader who led imperialism after WWII as well. The elite used unjust wars and placed the total blame on America as a means to try to slander Americans collectively (when the new world order system and its imperialist aims came from European elitists not all Europeans). Now, Truman allowed more agitation in the Cold War. Eisenhower became more reasonable in foreign policy though since he seen war up close and personal. He lived it. Winston Churchill made his Iron Curtain speech where he talked about Communism and the Soviet Union as an evil empire bent on world domination. Churchill and other extremists exploited the rise of Mao over China and other events in Greece (like the late 1940's Greek civil war) as an excuse to talk about the Red Scare (or the silly view that all Communists collectively wanted to dominate all aspects of the world society via in a totalitarian fashion). You can easily disagree with Communism and allow nations to accept or reject Communism as an economic system if they want to in a peaceful fashion.
Far too often, some individuals ignore the great contributions of Black Americans in anti-colonialism efforts. African American human beings of numerous intellectual and ideological perspectives publicly disagreed strongly with the nefarious injustice of Western imperialism. These African Americans wanted true racial equality or true racial egalitarianism in a modern or contemporary sense. During the era of World War Two, black newspapers like the Pittsburgh Courier, the New York Amsterdam News, and others gave African American an outlet to view that the United Nations can terminate colonialism. Now, this was before the UN was ultimately infiltrated fully by Western elitists and others though from the Council on Foreign Relations, etc. The Courier was a Republican paper, but it was extremely anticolonial. It gave great, extensive coverage of nationalist movements around the world and it hailed the successes of colonial troops. They allowed columns from nationalist leaders to be in their work like Indian nationalist Kumar Goshal, the Chinese writer Liu Liang Mo, and the African nationalist Prince A. A. Nwafor Orizu of Nigeria. The Courier was read in colonies as well. This proved that tons of African Americans have an internationalist mindset and understood the struggle of human beings of color worldwide. These individuals wanted everything that everyone else deserves: independence, equality, and freedom. This anti-colonialist feeling was expressed from black human beings from across the political spectrum. Mainstream leaders like Walter White and A. Philip Randolph urged African Americans to support the war while seeking the achievement of racial equality at home and the abolition of colonialism abroad. The Courier also published regular columns that frequently discussed international affairs by a Pan-Africanist Marxist, George Padmore; by a black nationalist popular historian, J. A. Rogers; and by a curmudgeonly Menckenesque anticommunist, George Schuyler. The distinguished Howard University historian, Dr. Rayford W. Logan, then the most prominent African American specialist on international relations in the Courier. Many of the authors in the Courier viewed Winston Churchill as an imperialist and Tory like bigot who wants to advance white supremacy. Winston Churchill was radically in favor of the British Empire. Kwame Nkrumah wanted immediate independence for colonies in 1945. At a May 18, 1945 meeting of the American delegation, Charles W. Taussig, FDR's confidant on colonial affairs, read an impassioned statement arguing that the United States would have poor relations with the non-white peoples of the world if it refused to support independence for colonial possessions. Yet, the delegates in the early UN wanted some token efforts for the sake of paranoia about the Soviet Union. The San Francisco Conference failed to advance real independence, but allow the trustees of colonial powers to dictate alone the terms of independence. It would take years later for the Third World to be more successful for being free from imperialists. ....
....
One of the parts of the Cold War was
that the establishment used propaganda in advancing deception about the Cold
War. The establishment is made up of the power elite in international finance,
business, and professions in the Western Hemisphere and Europe. Even Edith
Kermit Roosevelt believed that there was a socialist conspiracy to harm the
world including the U.S. Constitution (which is a red baiting ideology). Edith was a rabid anti-Communist who did
not care about the real interests of the ordinary working human beings of the
world. Edith was a rabid anti-communist. She even organized pro-Vietnam War rallies
in Washington alongside Rev. Carl McIntyre. Her family worked for the CIA. When
you look at the bigger pictures, things stand out. We see that the Morgans, the
Mellons, the Rockefellers, and others having huge influence in American
economic including political circles in the early 20th century. The Western
establishment further controlled U.S. foreign policy, especially after FDR
died. The Wall Street insiders Kennan, Acheson, Bohlen, Lovett, Harriman, and
McCloy were Harry Truman's trusted advisors. Harry Truman created the CIA by
signing the National Security Act of 1947. Truman allowed China to be taken by
Mao's Communism when he or Truman claimed to be so anti-Communist. We know that
the Truman Doctrine created the basis for American preventive actions and
interventionist against any nation that was going Communist. One example
was when Harry Truman was active in giving aid to the reactionary Greeks in the
Greek civil war of 1947. Harry Truman did execute some legitimate things domestically
(like desegregating the Armed Forces via Executive Order 9981, he wanted
national health insurance, he tried to end the Haft-Tarpley Act), but on
foreign policy matters, he was highly lax in opposing colonialism or
imperialism. The Cold War intensified when the Communists took over
Czechoslovakia in February of 1948 and the Berlin Blockade began on June 24,
1948. Mao Zedong took over China by September of 1949. NATO was ratified in the
same year as well. In February 1950, Joseph McCarthy begins his Communist witch
hunt. The members of the American Security Council aided Senator McCarthy.
McCarthy believed that a vast Communist conspiracy threatens the entire world. Joseph
McCarthy was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1946. He was right that human
beings have the right to peacefully and vigorously disagree with Communism from
a philosophical or ideological standpoint. He is wrong to try to ruin folks'
lives and human free speech rights, because of someone's views on economic or
political issues. We have the freedom of expression for a reason here. Even if someone is a Communist, that person has the right to be a Communist in a free and open society. The
Adams Chronology, even toned down, cited 48 instances of pressure being put on
Army officials by McCarthy and Cohn, to attempt to secure preferential
treatment for Schine, including regarding Schine's postings, and demands for
frequent passes for Schine. These passes were not only for weekends but weeknights, even during basic
training. It also showed Cohn threatening to "wreck the Army," if his
petulant demands for Schine's company were not granted. In the final
analysis, FBI leader J. Edgar Hoover agitated that reactionary movement as a means to
eliminate more progressive voices in American society under the guise of
anti-Communism. It was during the 1950's where McCarthyism violated human civil
liberties. Even if you disagree with Communism, being a Communist in America is
not illegal at all. When he or Joe McCarthy started to accused Generals like General George C.
Marshall and military leaders (he tried to humiliate a decorated WWII General
Ralph Zwicker at a hearing on February 18 in New York City) of being
sympathetic to Communists, then the Eisenhower administration has a license in
their mind to publicly oppose McCarthy. Ironically in response to the
McCarthyite hysteria, the Eisenhower Supreme Court ironically did something
about it. The high court threw out state sedition laws that were on the books
in 33 states. It affirmed the right to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege
against self-incrimination, and that an assertion of the privilege could not be
used as a confession of guilt. It cut back the Federal loyalty program, and it
threw out a number of Smith Act convictions. Finally, it threw out a
contempt-of-Congress conviction. This allowed the curtailing the powers of
Congressional committees to conduct investigations that strayed far beyond
legitimate oversight or law-making. Leading Pilgrim Society members would be
founders and leaders of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, the
Council on Foreign Relations, the Atlantic Councils, Bilderberg, the Trilateral
Commission, the Atlantic Institute of International Affairs, the International
Institute of Strategic Studies, the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations, the
U.S.-U.S.S.R. Trade and Economic Council, the U.S.-China Business Council, the
America-China Society, the Americas Society, etc. Many of these organizations dealt with Cold War issues. Therefore, the Western
establishment exploits the economic systems of capitalism and communism as a
means to rule over the major functions of society in general. The CFR, since
the end of World War II, has in fact been the most important foreign policy
engine promoting Anglo-American corporate Imperialism around the
world, utilizing laissez faire Capitalism as their weapon, and not
Communism. So, we should have a fair economy, strong nation-states, and call
for the government to promote and protect the general welfare of all of its
citizens.
Winston Churchill's Iron Curtain
speech increased anti-Communist paranoia. This caused many sincere nationalists
to be slandered as communists. In Thailand, the Free Thai's Pridi was replaced
by Philbun, who agreed with allying with the Anglo-American Cold warriors.
Stalin used a blockade of Berlin; he occupied Czechoslovakia, and had a more
confrontational policy in Asia. These actions were a part of the Cold War
history. Many Western imperialists and many communists acted against the
nationalists. That is why some falsely subscribed to the notion that any
nationalist action is equivalent to communism. Many in the West failed to
assist nationalists and some leaders joined with the Soviets since the West
refused to assist them (like Ho Chi Minh asking America for help in building
Vietnam back in 1949. They refused, so Ho Chi Minh received assistance from the
Soviet Union). Even the Cold Warrior John Foster Dulles (back in the 1950's)
pressured the French to continue their colonialism against Vietnam until they
were defeated in Dien Bein Phu (in 1954). John Foster Dulles was an enemy of
Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Dulles refused to recognize the People's Republic of
China. Regardless if you agree with all of China's policies or not, even
Richard Nixon recognized China when he was President. When Eisenhower was
discussing even détente with China, Dulles refused to accept that goal. Dulles
didn't even like China being allowed to participate in the Korean armistice
talks. He hated the Geneva talks of 1954 with Chinese involvement. Eisenhower
continued with the talks anyway. Dulles refused to shake the hand of Zhou
Enlai. He or Enlai wanted peaceful coexistence with China's neighbors and
Western powers. Before the Geneva Convention on Vietnam, which was back in
April of 1954, Zhou made bilateral agreements with India and Burma. This caused
the Five Peaceful Coexistence. These principles talked about mutual respect for
sovereignty, territorial integrity, equality, and non-interference in internal
affairs. The Spirit of Bandung is influenced by this initiative as advanced by
Zhou, Nehru, and U Nu. Sukarno opened the Bandung Conference as being the:
"...first international conference of colored peoples in the history of
mankind..." The Bandung Conference led the Africans and the Asians to not worship
NATO or the Cominform, but the can just be independent nations. Neither
capitalism nor communism is God. Almighty God is God. The Conference wanted
peaceful solutions to solve issues internationally. John Foster Dulles still
rejected neutrality as obsolete, which was naïve on his part. The Non Aligned
Movement was made up of African and Asian nations that wanted to be politically
neutral during the Cold War. They didn't want to ally with the Anglo-American
empire or the Soviet Union. This came as a fruit of the Bandung Conference
indeed. The Cold War has interesting history indeed.
Adlai Stevenson is a mystery to some. He was right on some issues, but when you look at his total legacy, it is more moderate than what is suspected. He was less liberal than even then Senator John F. Kennedy on numerous issues. He was assaulted and spat upon. Of course, I don't agree with those things happening to him or any innocent man. Yet, we have to know the record about his political views. He was tepid in his criticism of Jim Crow or segregation. He refused to call for national health care, which even Harry Truman advocated. Adlai Stevenson wanted to love the anti-union Taft-Hartley Act. That law passed despite Truman's vetoes. Back in 1952, he even considered to vote for Dwight D. Eisenhower when he was a Republican. Many intellectuals supported him and ironically he won heavily from southern and border states. He lost the 1956 election in desiring a more tolerable campaign without mudslinging. On foreign policy, he was more progressive than war hawks. He loved the United Nations and wished for more international cooperation as a means to solve international problems during the Cold War. He was right to criticize Joseph McCarthy, because Joseph followed a faux patriotism that sought to ruin the lives of American citizens because of ideological disagreements. Like JFK, Adlai had a great oratory ability in communicating words to the wider populace. JFK and Adlai once didn't like each, but later learned to deal with each other as for the good of the country. One of the positives of Adlai Stevenson was that he was not an extremist in foreign affairs. He sincerely wanted peace in the world. There are more secrets about this situation. Adlai Stevenson's father or Adlai I was a Scottish Rite Freemason who wanted international courts to govern the affairs of nations. This came many decades later in the globe whether you agree with these courts or not. Adlai Stevenson II was one founder of the CFR in Chicago too. JFK by the 1960's changed and wanted détente with the Soviet Union and Cuba. According to author Donald Gibson, he or John F. Kennedy was debating against Wall Street interests. Kennedy agreed with nationalist independent movements in the four corners of the world and he wanted to decrease U.S. involvement in Vietnam. As early as May 11, 1961, Kennedy issued the National Security Memorandum 52, which rejected an appeal from the Joints Chiefs of Staff, which wanted a deployment of U.S. ground troops in Vietnam. He didn't want U.S. troops to fight in combat missions in Vietnam like McGeorge Bundy and Secretary of State Dean Rusk wanted. The establishment hated him for it. JFK wanted economic investments in engineering, science, and technology as a means to grow the economy. He agreed with Social Security and grants for the growth of educational services in the confines of the United States of America. In other words, he wanted industry to build up the commonwealth. John F. Kennedy was an ally of Patrice Lumumba, Dag Hammarskjöld, John Kenneth Galbraith, and other progressive leaders.
Adlai Stevenson is a mystery to some. He was right on some issues, but when you look at his total legacy, it is more moderate than what is suspected. He was less liberal than even then Senator John F. Kennedy on numerous issues. He was assaulted and spat upon. Of course, I don't agree with those things happening to him or any innocent man. Yet, we have to know the record about his political views. He was tepid in his criticism of Jim Crow or segregation. He refused to call for national health care, which even Harry Truman advocated. Adlai Stevenson wanted to love the anti-union Taft-Hartley Act. That law passed despite Truman's vetoes. Back in 1952, he even considered to vote for Dwight D. Eisenhower when he was a Republican. Many intellectuals supported him and ironically he won heavily from southern and border states. He lost the 1956 election in desiring a more tolerable campaign without mudslinging. On foreign policy, he was more progressive than war hawks. He loved the United Nations and wished for more international cooperation as a means to solve international problems during the Cold War. He was right to criticize Joseph McCarthy, because Joseph followed a faux patriotism that sought to ruin the lives of American citizens because of ideological disagreements. Like JFK, Adlai had a great oratory ability in communicating words to the wider populace. JFK and Adlai once didn't like each, but later learned to deal with each other as for the good of the country. One of the positives of Adlai Stevenson was that he was not an extremist in foreign affairs. He sincerely wanted peace in the world. There are more secrets about this situation. Adlai Stevenson's father or Adlai I was a Scottish Rite Freemason who wanted international courts to govern the affairs of nations. This came many decades later in the globe whether you agree with these courts or not. Adlai Stevenson II was one founder of the CFR in Chicago too. JFK by the 1960's changed and wanted détente with the Soviet Union and Cuba. According to author Donald Gibson, he or John F. Kennedy was debating against Wall Street interests. Kennedy agreed with nationalist independent movements in the four corners of the world and he wanted to decrease U.S. involvement in Vietnam. As early as May 11, 1961, Kennedy issued the National Security Memorandum 52, which rejected an appeal from the Joints Chiefs of Staff, which wanted a deployment of U.S. ground troops in Vietnam. He didn't want U.S. troops to fight in combat missions in Vietnam like McGeorge Bundy and Secretary of State Dean Rusk wanted. The establishment hated him for it. JFK wanted economic investments in engineering, science, and technology as a means to grow the economy. He agreed with Social Security and grants for the growth of educational services in the confines of the United States of America. In other words, he wanted industry to build up the commonwealth. John F. Kennedy was an ally of Patrice Lumumba, Dag Hammarskjöld, John Kenneth Galbraith, and other progressive leaders.
President John F. Kennedy was once a
strong Cold Warrior. Later, he saw the truth and became more reasonable in
dealing with foreign affairs. He entered the White House in 1961 and was a
young man when he entered the White House. The ill-conceived Bay of Pigs
failed invasion of Cuba was in its final stages. Even when JFK started in the
White House, there were extensive covert operations by the West done in Africa
and Asia (as a means to defend European colonial interests). Congo gained
independence by 1960 from Belgium. Yet, the British and Belgian mineral cartels
wanted the division of the mineral rich Katanga province by a traitor to his
own black people and warlord named Moise Tshombe. Malcolm X exposed Tshombe as
a war criminal. The nationalist leader Patrice Lumumba was assassinated while
being held captive by Tshombe's forces. President Kennedy respected Lumumba and
Lumumba was a great hero of black people and humanity in general. Lumumba was
killed with the help of the CIA and Eisenhower's approval, which was one of
Eisenhower's greatest Presidential errors. CIA agents were fighting in Laos in
the early 1960's not only against the communist Pathet Lao, but the neutralist
government as well. Even back in the 1950's, then Senator John F. Kennedy
opposed colonialism publicly. JFK loved the fact that Algeria gained its
independence from France. His 1957 speech about wanting Algeria to be free was
denounced in London and Paris. Theodore Sorenson was his friend and adviser.
Sorenson said that JFK viewed communist aggression and subversion intolerable,
not communism itself. In other words, he believed that a nation has the right
to embrace whatever economic system that they desire as long they don't try to
pervert the economic or political system in any other nation. JFK refused to
use U.S. military forces to fight in Laos, but he agreed with allying with the
neutralist government of Laos. JFK was influenced by his more dovish tone by
the April 1961 meeting with General Douglas MacArthur. The General told JFK
that he shouldn't advance any new ground war in Asia like Vietnam. General
Charles de Gaulle told President John F. Kennedy the same advice. The Non
Aligned Movement was made as a means to have sovereign nation states without
participation in military alliances (like NATO, SEATO, the Central Treaty
Organization, etc.). John F. Kennedy was an ally of Indonesian President John
F. Kennedy. JFK wanted to meet with him again in the Spring of 1964. Sukarno
believed in self-determination. They met with each other back in 1961. JFK
wanted to assist nations that wanted independence. Sukarno visited the White
House. JFK dealt with the Vietnam War as well. John Kenneth Galbraith was
Kennedy's friend and economic adviser. He visited Vietnam as an Ambassador to
India. Galbraith said that United States involvement in Vietnam will end in
failure and only a political settlement with Ho Chi Minh would end that
situation (with help from India's Nehru). Later, Kennedy began to disengage
from Vietnam. JFK wanted a technologically developing society where peace can
come via strength. Diem was a dictator and a criminal, but according to
sources, the North Vietnamese (and Diem) were working towards peaceful
settlement. The Harriman Bundy faction wanted no such negotiations with Ho Chi
Minh at all in the early 1960's. The murder of Diem ended any neutralist peace
agreement. JFK opposed the coup in November 1, 1963. The architects of the coup
used the Diem's unjust suppression of the religious liberty rights of the
Buddhists in South Vietnam as a cover. They really wanted to stop Diem and
Nhu's overtures for peace with Ho Chi Minh.
Malcolm X worked in a great deal in the Cold War era. He was a revolutionary, a nationalist, and a pan African nationalist. He was a never a liberal Democrat as implied by the late Manning Marable. The colonial movements in Africa and Asia influenced Malcolm X to advocate liberation and independence for the human beings of color in the world. He criticized capitalism as well. Malcolm X knew that the fight against black oppressed in the U.S. was linked to the Western imperial attacks against foreign nations too. That is why he wanted the former colonial peoples of the world to unite with American blacks as a means to make America accountable for its crimes (and to allow justice, freedom, and equality to really exist in the global society). Marable is definitely wrong to assume that Malcolm X supported the Arizona Republican Senator Barry Goldwater for President in the 1964 election. Goldwater back then was an extremely reactionary, anti-Communist libertarian who had voted against the Civil Rights Act. Malcolm X said that Goldwater was a wolf and the so called liberals were foxes in the same machine. Malcolm X in his own article on September 12, 1964 said that he didn't support LBJ or Goldwater. So, Malcolm X knew that the Republicans and the Democrats were the enemies of black rights. Only via revolutionary action can we can see rights for the homeless, the poor, and the oppressed, not just the workers. The reformists never work sufficient to engineer real change since you just have a slicker form of imperialism. We know what the Republican Party is all about. Yet, the reformist Democratic Party wants us to use pressure politics and token moves to not gain true revolutionary changes, but accommodation to the existing order mixed with a few crumbs. That is why the bipartisan war on crime was influenced by the 1968 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act that was passed under Democratic President Johnson (even before Nixon's war on crime action). In that administration, COINTELPRO or the Cold War domestic Counterintelligence Program existed. It targeted numerous social activists. In 1968, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover vowed, “The Negro youth and moderate[s] must be made to understand that if they succumb to revolutionary teachings, they will be dead revolutionaries.” The FBI via COINTELPRO killed 38 Black Panthers and railroaded hundreds of others into prison. Now, there are some who want to believe in the bootstraps deception. It is the lie where victims are blamed for their own oppression and it involved the near deification of private, corporate power. It is a reactionary philosophy. Even as intelligent as Booker T. Washington was, Booker T. Washington was still dead wrong to have anti-union, pro-accommodationist views. Even rich capitalist Andrew Carnegie gave Washington and his wife a lifetime income. Even with the Democrats in power, we still have harsh conditions in the ghettos, mass unemployment, the mass incarceration of human beings, police brutality, etc. Now, the state is used as an instrument of the ruling class to suppress human rights (via crooked cops, prisons, unjust laws, etc.). Malcolm X spoke eloquently to the illusions in the Democratic Party when he said, “Either party you align yourself with is suicide because both parties are criminal. Both parties are responsible for the criminal condition that exists.” Also, the Brother Dr. Martin Luther King was definitely a revolutionary. He opposed the Vietnam War, criticized the weaknesses of capitalism, he supported anti-imperialist, revolutionary movements in the Motherland of Africa, and he wanted a redistribution of economic including political power (just like Brother Malcolm X). Ultimately, the Western establishment allowed token reforms in society as advanced by some of the middle class without radical changes to the USA. We have the right to have real equality, jobs, decent housing, and adequate schools.
Lyndon Baines Johnson became President after the evil assassination of JFK in 1963. His legacy is filled with triumphs and controversy. One of the great errors of LBJ was that he reverted from a more peaceful foreign policy into a more reactionary one. He allowed ground combat military U.S. troops in Vietnam at Da Nang in March 1965, two months after Johnson's inauguration. He aided anti-Communist regimes globally no matter how reactionary or totalitarian that they were. He was so committed to a military strategy as ending the Vietnam War that he even disagreed with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s goal of ending the war in a negotiated settlement. In this era, Malcolm X was assassinated. Malcolm X lived his entire life during the Cold War and he was a genius about international affairs. He wanted African Americans to have human rights beyond civil rights and make America accountable for its crimes against black Americans. He wanted to get allies in the Third World and other nations in the United Nations as a means to make the USA accountable for its errors. He was assassinated in February 1965 before he could get his goals accomplished. In this time period from 1963 to 1968, the anti-war movement grew in leaps and bounds. It would be only after the Tet Offensive of January 1968 that LBJ finally wanted peace negotiations with North Vietnam. He failed, because Nixon operatives caused the North Vietnamese to reject an offer until after Nixon was elected President. This was treason according to some since Nixon was acting in the scale of a diplomat. The war could of ended sooner if the Paris peace conference came about. LBJ's more positive legacy would be him signing historic civil rights and housing legislation like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Housing Act of 1968. He signed Medicare and Medicaid. He dealt with environmental and immigration issues, which makes him one of the progressive Presidents domestically in American history. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. opposed the Vietnam War (and he wanted to fight the great scourge of poverty) including Edward Kennedy later on. Both men were unjustly murdered by extremists, who can't stand the truth or dissenting points of views.
Malcolm X worked in a great deal in the Cold War era. He was a revolutionary, a nationalist, and a pan African nationalist. He was a never a liberal Democrat as implied by the late Manning Marable. The colonial movements in Africa and Asia influenced Malcolm X to advocate liberation and independence for the human beings of color in the world. He criticized capitalism as well. Malcolm X knew that the fight against black oppressed in the U.S. was linked to the Western imperial attacks against foreign nations too. That is why he wanted the former colonial peoples of the world to unite with American blacks as a means to make America accountable for its crimes (and to allow justice, freedom, and equality to really exist in the global society). Marable is definitely wrong to assume that Malcolm X supported the Arizona Republican Senator Barry Goldwater for President in the 1964 election. Goldwater back then was an extremely reactionary, anti-Communist libertarian who had voted against the Civil Rights Act. Malcolm X said that Goldwater was a wolf and the so called liberals were foxes in the same machine. Malcolm X in his own article on September 12, 1964 said that he didn't support LBJ or Goldwater. So, Malcolm X knew that the Republicans and the Democrats were the enemies of black rights. Only via revolutionary action can we can see rights for the homeless, the poor, and the oppressed, not just the workers. The reformists never work sufficient to engineer real change since you just have a slicker form of imperialism. We know what the Republican Party is all about. Yet, the reformist Democratic Party wants us to use pressure politics and token moves to not gain true revolutionary changes, but accommodation to the existing order mixed with a few crumbs. That is why the bipartisan war on crime was influenced by the 1968 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act that was passed under Democratic President Johnson (even before Nixon's war on crime action). In that administration, COINTELPRO or the Cold War domestic Counterintelligence Program existed. It targeted numerous social activists. In 1968, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover vowed, “The Negro youth and moderate[s] must be made to understand that if they succumb to revolutionary teachings, they will be dead revolutionaries.” The FBI via COINTELPRO killed 38 Black Panthers and railroaded hundreds of others into prison. Now, there are some who want to believe in the bootstraps deception. It is the lie where victims are blamed for their own oppression and it involved the near deification of private, corporate power. It is a reactionary philosophy. Even as intelligent as Booker T. Washington was, Booker T. Washington was still dead wrong to have anti-union, pro-accommodationist views. Even rich capitalist Andrew Carnegie gave Washington and his wife a lifetime income. Even with the Democrats in power, we still have harsh conditions in the ghettos, mass unemployment, the mass incarceration of human beings, police brutality, etc. Now, the state is used as an instrument of the ruling class to suppress human rights (via crooked cops, prisons, unjust laws, etc.). Malcolm X spoke eloquently to the illusions in the Democratic Party when he said, “Either party you align yourself with is suicide because both parties are criminal. Both parties are responsible for the criminal condition that exists.” Also, the Brother Dr. Martin Luther King was definitely a revolutionary. He opposed the Vietnam War, criticized the weaknesses of capitalism, he supported anti-imperialist, revolutionary movements in the Motherland of Africa, and he wanted a redistribution of economic including political power (just like Brother Malcolm X). Ultimately, the Western establishment allowed token reforms in society as advanced by some of the middle class without radical changes to the USA. We have the right to have real equality, jobs, decent housing, and adequate schools.
Lyndon Baines Johnson became President after the evil assassination of JFK in 1963. His legacy is filled with triumphs and controversy. One of the great errors of LBJ was that he reverted from a more peaceful foreign policy into a more reactionary one. He allowed ground combat military U.S. troops in Vietnam at Da Nang in March 1965, two months after Johnson's inauguration. He aided anti-Communist regimes globally no matter how reactionary or totalitarian that they were. He was so committed to a military strategy as ending the Vietnam War that he even disagreed with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s goal of ending the war in a negotiated settlement. In this era, Malcolm X was assassinated. Malcolm X lived his entire life during the Cold War and he was a genius about international affairs. He wanted African Americans to have human rights beyond civil rights and make America accountable for its crimes against black Americans. He wanted to get allies in the Third World and other nations in the United Nations as a means to make the USA accountable for its errors. He was assassinated in February 1965 before he could get his goals accomplished. In this time period from 1963 to 1968, the anti-war movement grew in leaps and bounds. It would be only after the Tet Offensive of January 1968 that LBJ finally wanted peace negotiations with North Vietnam. He failed, because Nixon operatives caused the North Vietnamese to reject an offer until after Nixon was elected President. This was treason according to some since Nixon was acting in the scale of a diplomat. The war could of ended sooner if the Paris peace conference came about. LBJ's more positive legacy would be him signing historic civil rights and housing legislation like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Housing Act of 1968. He signed Medicare and Medicaid. He dealt with environmental and immigration issues, which makes him one of the progressive Presidents domestically in American history. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. opposed the Vietnam War (and he wanted to fight the great scourge of poverty) including Edward Kennedy later on. Both men were unjustly murdered by extremists, who can't stand the truth or dissenting points of views.
Richard Nixon had a huge role in the
Cold War indeed. Richard Nixon was a strange legacy. Richard Nixon was a man who suffered indignities in his life. He has a choice to follow a more righteous path or a more compromising path. On many occasions, he followed the wrong path. He was involved in the
secret bombing of Cambodia. William Shawcross' "Sideshow" documents
about how the illegal, secret operation caused horrendous implications. It
caused the fall of Prime Minister Sihanouk to General Lon Nol. Sihanouk then
supported the communist rebels called the Khmer Rouge. They disposed Lon Nol in
1975. The Khmer Rouge later executed one of the greatest extermination programs
in history. The overthrow of Salvador Allende in Chile was a key moment during
the Nixon era. Nixon and National Security adviser Henry Kissinger were
concerned with Allende's coming to power in Chile. They wanted to pressure the
CIA as a means to come up with some way to stop his election. The CIA led the
operation with their field officer David Phillips to give millions of dollar to
an anti-Allende propaganda campaign in the Chilean election of 1970. Chile had
a history of being a democratic country and Allende won the election fairly.
David Rockefeller (whose family had a strong interest in Anaconda Copper) and
John McCone (a board member of ITT) caused great financial ties to the
economics of Chile. Both lobbied the White House. Nixon wanted the CIA Director
Richard Helms to sabotage Allende. Allende came to the UN in a speech on
December 1972 to expose U.S. interference in Chile. Salvador Allende was
patriotic. By 1970, the president of the Chilean branch of Nelson Rockefeller's
vast IBEC conglomerate, owned Chile's largest newspaper chain (El Mercurio),
largest granary, and largest chicken farm, as well as the Pepsi bottling
operation in Chile. Kissinger was, of course Nelson Rockefeller's former
advisor, and Helms, as CIA chief, simply took orders from the Establishment.
The Chilean government unanimously passed a constitutional amendment to allow
Chile to nationalize all copper mines. This action was not illegal. In
retaliation, American economic blockades harmed the Chilean economy. The coup
began with strikes and a revolt. The establishment supported General Augusto
Pinochet or a dictator to rule Chile in September 11, 1973. Operation Condor
allowed reactionaries to assassinate dissident in Latin America. Richard
Nixon's downfall was Watergate. He wanted to get rid of files implicating him
in political corruption. So, he authorized the creation of a team of
burglars in June 1971 led by ex-CIA operative E. Howard Hunt. However, their
black-bag operations ran aground when part of the team was captured inside the
Democratic National Committee at the Watergate building on June 17, 1972,
beginning the foundering of Nixon's Presidency which ended with his force
resignation on Aug. 9, 1974. One positive thing that Richard Nixon did was
recognizing China and getting arms agreements with the Soviets via the SALT or
the Strategic Arms Limitations Treaty. SALT I was signed in July 1972. Even
reactionaries opposed Nixon on that issue like Albert Wohlstetter, Richard
Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Paul Nitze (which started the modern neo conservative
movement in the 1970's). Each of them created a group called the Committee on
the Present Danger. These extremists falsely believed that Russia was
ahead of America in the arms race. Nixon tried to execute some
détente. April 17, 1975 was the date when North Korea defeats South
Vietnam. The reactionaries tried to influence Gerald Ford to be more extreme on
foreign policy issues. Two of the hardliners in the Ford administration was
White House chief of Staff Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
During the late 1970's, the Soviet Union declined rapidly its military strength, its economic
strength, and its political power. In that time period, individuals close to
Rockefeller interests continued their Cold War agenda like Opus Dei William
Colby, Knight of Malta William Casey, Knight of Malta Edwin Feulner, Henry
Kissinger, and Zbigniew Brzezinski (a man who worked closely to the Knights of
Americares).
There can be no full understanding of the Cold War without
learning about Ronald Reagan. Reagan followed the alarmist Committee on the
Present Danger. Reagan said that, "We're in greater danger today than we
were after Pearl Harbor. Our military is absolutely incapable of defending this country." (Stone/Kuznick, p. 436) The Reagan administration saw one of
the largest peacetime defense build ups in American history. Reagan loved
supply side economics. He lowered the top income tax rate from 70 percent to 28
percent. The combination of profligate military spending and large tax
cuts caused annual national deficits. These deficits were unprecedented at the
time. It created pressure to slash programs benefiting the poor.
William Casey was a hardliner and he was once head of the CIA under
Ronald Reagan. The Soviet threat was hyped up by the West during the 1980's.
The Soviet Union by that time was heavily weakened. The Soviet's military and
domestic services were decreasing. Folks were even criticized if they publicly
expressed that truth. Even a young Robert Gates worked in CIA jobs, but he
talked about the Soviets are on the march rhetoric as a means to justify huge
military spending. The Reagan administration funded reactionary death squads in
Latin America, because they felt that the Soviets had a huge influence in
Central and Latin America. Reagan sent $5 billion in aid to El Salvador, where
right-wing leader Roberto D'Aubuisson was running death squads. These
squads in the employ of wealthy landowners and the U.S.-trained military
were conducting its own massacres of peasants. The village of El Mozote had a
huge massacre. This was when a Salvadoran army battalion systematically
massacred hundreds of civilians including young children. Ray Bonner of the New
York Times exposed this tragedy. Yet, some from the Wall Street Journal and
other periodicals attacked his credibility. The Times was intimidated and they
pulled Bonner off his Central America assignment. Reagan kept on supplying such
governments in El Salvador, etc. in grants of aid. Assistant Secretary of State
Elliot Abrams still criticized Bonner as not credible. The CIA worked with
Argentina's intelligence services in training rebels in Nicaragua to attack its
leftist government. The leftists overthrew the dictator Anastasio Somoza in
1979. The CIA/Argentine manufactured group was called the Contras. The Boland
Amendment passed by Congress banned military aid to the Contras. Reagan still
authorized extra funds to be sent to the Contras, which was hidden from
Congress and the American human beings. By 1985, Reagan was selling arms
secretly to Iran as a means to get help in freeing American hostages who were
seized in Lebanon. The scandal exposed CIA Director Casey and NSC official
Oliver North doing it as a means to fund the Contras. The Contras worked with the
Latin American drug dealers and send drugs into America. The Iran Contra
scandal for the most part escaped President Reagan and Vice President George H.
W. Bush form serious political damage (instead of North, Casey, and other
subordinates). Reagan invaded Grenada as a means to end the Vietnam Syndrome or
the perception that America relinquished military morale and emotional
strength since Vietnam. The effort was later picked up by President George
H.W. Bush with his invasion of Panama in 1989 and the First Persian Gulf
War in 1990-91 after which Bush declared, "we've kicked the Vietnam Syndrome
once and for all." The Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was heavily
influentially in ending the Cold War. Regardless if you agree with his politics
or not, he was more moderate in his agenda than Stalin evidently.
Gorbachev negotiated with Reagan for deals and concessions. He did so
until he was deposed by a hardline coup in 1991. The pro-communist
coup was, in turn, defeated by the pro-capitalistic forces under Boris Yeltsin.
As American free-market ideologues descended on Russia as advisers, the Russian
economy collapsed and corrupt oligarchs plundered the country's wealth through
privatization in the 1990's. The Cold War allowed the intelligence communities
of both sides to harm authentic nationalist movements. The so called communist
threat was exaggerated as a means to strengthen Western Europe. The Cold War
executed the fiction that only capitalism or communism were the only feasible
economic options for any human to embrace. Even Joel Skousen,
Anthony Sutton, and other scholars have documented how mainstream capitalists
and mainstream communists collaborated with each other. The
weakening of Russia for a time caused America to have a huge political hegemony
in the 21st century.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment