http://racismws.com/2013/07/21/peep-the-showcasing-blacks-game/
Ms. J says:
Well, I have to say that I appreciate the work of you and the entire Umoja group, Pam. You all are trying fighting against racism and don’t seek any large-scale public attention to yourselves.
Part of me wonders if some black people often do “anti-racism” work to get more attention, but I think the RWS know very well that it’s the unsung heroes who often do more for Black people than the Black people shown all over the media. After all, the message is much more important than the messenger.
Other Black people tell me that they think I’m going to be a big leader someday, but I just want to help others who need it without any large-scale recognition. We ALL can be leaders if we just look around us and get constructive things done. I find it interesting that Black people are supposed to have some “Leader” tell them what to do, but many White people talk or act that way.
But I have a question for all of you: Do you think Black people would be in a much better position if Mr. Fuller’s Code was much more popular with Black people during the Civil Rights era? I often wonder where we’d be as a people if we were all individually codified but united.
______________________________
TrojanPam says:
@ Ms J
I agree that the message is more important than the messenger. That’s why we published under a pen name to keep the focus OFF of us. We are the least important part of our message.
Becoming a “Leader of One” teaches us to think for ourselves BUT UNITED with other like-minded individuals to achieve a common goal using a common strategy.
We have seen what happens when black people follow a ‘leader’ and that leader is jailed or killed. The followers become demoralized, discouraged and derailed.
If Mr. Fuller had his code back in the early 60s (I don’t think he did) and we had chosen that road instead of “integration” we would have been an entirely different, more sane, and more self-respecting people, but I also think the white supremacy system’s reaction to us would have been entirely different.
Hard to say how that would have turned out but it is an interesting question.
Here’s the link to some Neely Fuller Sound clips on “codification”
http://theblackcodefiles.com/the-united-independent-compensatory-code/
________________________
Mariama says:
@Pam
I love your “Leader Of One” comment. I think that if more of our people used this one, they would be so much better off. We should not care about integration, we should just want equality!
________________
TrojanPam says:
@ Mariama
I think being a “Leader of One’ is the most practical solution for the Victims of White Supremacy.
Unfortunately, the system has refined their method of NEUTRALIZING any potential black “leader” that they cannot control. They learned their lesson during the 1960s during the “negro uprising” and unlike their Victims, they LEARN FROM THEIR MISTAKES, go back to the drawing board and come up with a NEW PLAN.
the NEW PLAN is to CREATE “BLACK LEADERS” and finance them and control them so black people will be led astray and never be able to overcome our oppression.
Actually, I don’t seek “equality” because that is impossible within a white supremacy system. What I seek is “JUSTICE” and unfortunately, I have concluded that the only POSSIBLE way to overcome our oppression is to SEPARATE FROM WHITE PEOPLE. At this time, it’s not practical, but I see no other recourse.
___________________________
TrojanPam says:
@ Ms J
I appreciate your support for our efforts!
I think more whites use “anti-racism” to make money than black people. Working in so-called “civil rights” is different from anti-racism work, in my opinion, because most civil rights prominent people don’t talk about “white supremacy” (in my limited experience) and are always seeking more integration than separation.
I don’t think Mr. Fuller had a “code” in the 1960s, he was still developing it, I suspect, but, yes, black people would be MUCH BETTER OFF, had we had Mr. Fuller’s code and information.
Of course, the white supremacy wasn’t going to sit idle and lose money, and that’s where the CODIFICATION + A LEADER OF ONE would come in
for example, instead of MARCHING, black people would just stay HOME instead of financially supporting degrading films
Instead of calling another black person a foul name, we would refrain from name calling each other
Instead of sharing our precious black bodies with racist man and racist woman, we would spend our intimate time and energy VALIDATING AND LOVING EACH OTHER
all those things are LEGAL, UNQUESTIONABLY A CHOICE, and something that would have HUGE RAMIFICATIONS if millions of black people became a LEADER of ONE and started LEADING OURSELVES toward more self-respecting behavior.
____________________________
Kushite Prince says:
@TrojanPam
Cornel West has been on a rampage lately! In this article he calls Al Sharpton and other prominent blacks nothing but rent-a-negroes! Very strong words!
http://www.eurweb.com/2013/07/west-msnbc-is-rent-a-negro-net-and-sharpton-is-on-obama-plantation/
I can’t deny that what he says has a lot of truth to it. But those that are NOT codified will not realize that West is one also!lol Deception is the name of the game. And that is a game that racist man/woman know how to play very well.
______________________________
TrojanPam says:
@ Kushite Prince
I don’t know what the deal is with Cornel West, but if his “tirades” didn’t benefit the system of white supremacy, he wouldn’t get a SECOND of on-air time.
I strongly suspect that he is being used to promote more anti-blackness not just among black people, but also non-black people, who are watching black people literally PULVERIZE other black people on air. Not too long ago Rae Dawn Chong was blasting Oprah (have no idea why), saying the most awful things.
I would warn ANY AND ALL PARENTS of black children to STEER THEM AWAY from the entertainment field (which includes newscasters and pundits), it is one of the most TOXIC DUMPS on the planet for black people
___________________________
Ms. J says:
Speaking of Racial Showcasing, the Hispanic juror from the George Zimmerman trial did an interview on Good Morning America. She said that she wanted Zimmerman to be charged as guilty, but she faced much pressure from the five White females to not push for a hung jury.
This woman looks like she could have some Black ancestry, and she’s the only one who has publicly shown her face. This is so telling. Thanks for the post, Pam!
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-george-zimmerman-trial-juror-chicago-20130725,0,4361149.story
_______________________________
TrojanPam says:
@ Ms J
I heard about that Juror, too. As soon as the verdict was announced, the news media in my town were already giving specific details about the Hispanic juror but NONE about the white female jurors, and when I heard that, I thought, uh-oh, here we go, throwing the non-white person under the bus.
Now, she’s getting all this attention and surely, some black people will be angry at this non-white person and will have forgotten that the MAJORITY OF JURORS WERE WHITE FEMALES.
I told a black male friend of mine before the verdict was announced that afterwards, NOBODY BLACK would be talking bad about those WHITE FEMALE JURORS or white females in general, but would still be talking BAD about that 19-year-old black female witness, Rachel Jantel.
So far, I haven’t heard a peep of a comment about white females.
___________________________
LBM says:
Posted on CREE :
One of the things we can start to do is stop maintaining white folks lies. Anyone watching the ESPY Awards can see clearly that WHITE FEMALES ARE NOT AFRAID OF BLACK MALES. Can we stop THAT lie?? I live in NYC and I see white females with the nattiest, blackest, etc etc dudes. So please. More than one of those jurors probably “rented a dread” at some point. My last trip to Senegal/Gambia was filled with images of white female predators paying for Black “escorts”. Where’s the fear? Stop the nonsense.
Another ache in my tooth : stop mimicking “black on black crime” unless we’re going to start saying “white on white crime.” No matter how many white males kill their wives and feed them to the neighbors, or white females kill their children – no one is saying it’s okay for any random Black person to walk up to a white creature and murder them.
These may seem minor but they things we can do (or not do) immediately.
P.S. Some of those flappin’ jaw “showcasers” on CNN and the like, sex with white females so why aren’t they questioning this supposed “fear factor?”
_______________________
TrojanPam says:
@ LBM
Excellent points, just like Zimmerman wasn’t afraid of a 17-year-old UNARMED black male, OTHERWISE he wouldn’t have stalked him or gotten close enough to provoke a confrontation.
You’re absolutely right. White females are NOT the least bit fearful of black males OR black people. The only exceptions might be some circumstances where any woman would be afraid but otherwise, I have seen no evidence of that “fear.”
I have watched white females get aggressive with black males with the expectation that he will back down (and they are seldom disappointed). I have seen a white female deliberately step on a black male’s shoe and laugh it off like a joke (no, he didn’t know her AND no, he didn’t think it was funny).
I have seen random white females wandering around poor black neighborhoods (hunting for a ‘good time’), coming into black bars and nightclubs, and associating with (sexing) random black males like they didn’t have a fear in the world. Years ago, I was friendly with some young black males (in their 20s) who used to talk about the white females who would come to where they were hanging out and offer to have sex with them in the bushes, and this was so COMMON that these males didn’t think it was a big deal.
And like you mentioned, thousands of white females of all ages travel a thousand MILES or more just to have random sexual encounters with strange black males in Senegal and who knows where else in the world they travel just to have sex with the big, black boogey-men of their twisted and racist imaginations.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/senegal/100428/senegal-news-sex-tourism
That’s not fear, that’s WHITE ENTITLEMENT. And as far as that old white-damsel-in-distress routine of grabbing their purses when a black male in a business suit gets on an elevator is all part of MAINTAINING THE WHITE SUPREMACY SYSTEM by demonizing their Victims.
I’ll also add (and this might offend some) but the DOMINANT POSITION of the white female in a white supremacy system ALSO MEANS she is the DOMINANT ONE in a sexual relationship with a black male. Without realizing it, the black male is SUBMITTING to the white female– it is NEVER the other way around, regardless of what lies she tells him OR what he believes.
That ACT OF SUBMISSION on the part of the black male actually FEMINIZES HIM, not in the physical sense, but in a PSYCHOLOGICAL SENSE, which might explain the tendencies of black males (who exclusively sex white females) to be very aggressive, even hostile toward black females.
I have experienced this behavior personally many times, and now I believe that this aggression is DISPLACED ANGER that he cannot express toward that DOMINANT white female population that has demeaned and humiliated him publicly and privately — even while in the same bedroom — because it is unsafe for the black male to take it out on the white female population unless he’s willing to risk jail or death.
SEX with white people MANDATES that the black person (male and female) is always the SUBMISSIVE ONE, even when it appears to be the opposite, because that white person is calling the shots and is the one who more than likely initiated the sexual encounter.
White people always do the choosing, NOT the other way around. I talk about this behavior in the book, “The Interracial Con Game.”
Once black people understand the (con) game called “interracial sex,” they will never again believe that it is a liberating or humanizing experience, but is one of UNEQUALS where the white person is engaging in an act of EXPLOITATION.
Your second point (excellent also) about the media never calling white people killing other white people as “white-on-white crime.” Or that whites killing whites means black people oughta be able to do it, too.
Never thought about that! In that light, I agree that we should cease and desist calling it “black-on-black” as though killing is the domain of black people, something that has roots in our defective character and genetics.
Both your points are worthy of a blog all by themselves, and if I get time, I might write them
_________________
Sharina says:
Thanks for the enlightenment you bring.
____________
TrojanPam says:
@ Sharina
Thank you for supporting this blog!
