I Will never be intimidated period

 

The DNC and cages mix into a cold, calculating display of tyranny. Tillie Fong from the Rocky Mountain News on August 13, 2008 wrote about a story which is related to this issue. Fong wrote that if some protestors are arrested at the DNC or the Democratic National Convention, they could be jailed in a city owned warehouse. This warehouse is complete with metal cages and barbed wire as CBS4 has learned. Rick Sallinger (who is an investigative reporter) discovered the location and managed to get inside the camp on Tuesday for a look. This newly formed lockup in a warehouse is located in the northeast of Denver. It has dozens of metal cages made up of chain link fence material and it's topped by rolls of barbed wire. Each of these fenced in areas is about 15 feet by 15 feet with a lock on the door. A sign on the wall reads “Warning, electric stun devices used in this facility.” Sallinger outlined video of the warehouse to Adam Jung of Tent State University and Zoe Williams of Code Pink. These people are some leaders of various groups that plan to demonstrate during the convention. Williams compared it to a prisoner camp and a concentration cmap. It's similar to a concentration camp indeed, because these cages will treat human beings like cattle with the nuts and bolts of the cages. The Denver Sheriff's Department would not discuss the facility. The sheriff's department said that they will release a statement. The ACLU will ask the city of Denver on how prisoners will get food, water, bathrooms, telephones, how will they reach attorneys, and about medical care. If this plan goes through, these actions would be no different than the actions in 2004 with camps during the RNC. This is immoral, because you place criminals under arrest without placing them in concentration cmps. Back in 2004, many innocent protestors were even placed in such camps in New York City.


Free speech is under assault like never before in many quarters. The Fairness Doctrine is unfair like always. It's about stifling free speech not only for conservatives, but for all Americans. It's interesting that FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell admitted that the potential re-introduction of Fairness Doctrine under a Democratic administration could lead to the government dictating content policy on the Internet. The Fairness Doctrine once existed. It mandated broadcasters to have time to opposing viewpoints. That was abolished in 1987 rightfully by the Supreme Court. The prohibition of the Fairness Doctrine was done after it was discovered that it violated the First Amendment. McDowell admitted these threats to the Business and Media Institute. McDowell said that this false Doctrine would return under a different name (and with an over the door policy) for the government to regulate content on the Internet. McDowell said the net neutrality effort could win support of some conservatives. He is right that it's wrong to force bloggers and websites to have equal time or equal space for opposing points of view. The reason is that people have a right to free speech. Individuals have a right to display their individuality in the outline of information. The Fairness Doctrine is supported by the top Democratic powerbrokers like Nancy Pelosi and Bonesman John Kerry. This immoral doctrine could force people to parrot government propaganda and talking points or face the threat of closure or harrashment. No one should be intimidated. Pelosi and Kerry are hypocrites, because they claim to support freedom. Yet, they want freedom stiflied with their support of the Fairness Doctrine.


Verichip is causing a large portion of society to be remote-controlled. Ashkan Kazemian from Press TV on Thursday, at August 14, 2008 made known about this. The good news is that despite the efforts of Verichip to popularize microchips, most Americans are strongly opposed to the use of Verichip. In 2004, the US FDA (or the Food and Drug Administration) granted clearance for Verichip. Vercihip is an identification system that uses implantable radio frequency identification or RFID technology. This device has a handheld reader and a mircochip in the size of a grain of rice. This device has a unique 16 digit ID number. It can be implanted in the right arm to be tracked by a database. The Verichip Corporation is the producer of such microchips. Of course, they justify them as a means to access medical information more fast plus secure for thousands of patients in emergency departments. Today, things have gone too far with biochips, that infants are being implanted with microchips (even in America and other countries). Talk have existed of replacing ID and credit cards with Verichip. These microchips can violate privacy and hackers can retrieve information from them if they exist in a database (some criminals can even access personal information.) DAPRA or the Defense Advanced Research Agency is more threatening and advanced than even Verichip. DAPRA is the chief research and development organization for the Pentagon. For example, DARPA has been investing in MMEA. MMEA stands for the Multiple Micro Electrode Array. MMEA is a chip that can be surgically implanted into a human nerve or into a specific area of the brain. This can connect the brain to a computer. DARPA had promoted neuroscience, urban planning, the GIG, and other futuristic instruments of controlling society. Technology is a 2 edged sword. It can be used for good and evil. That is why we should be careful with any new technology that is manufactured.


Pro Life Information is common. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on August 13, 2008 outline on how the APA or the American Psychological Association are ignoring the abortion/mental health problem link. The APA released a new report. This report used the false conclusion that abortion causes no major mental health problems toward females. This is inspite of other research proving otherwise. This isn't suprising since the APA's results were biased. The panel was stacked with abortion advocates. The report only says that women with abortion may experience some grief or a sense of loss, but not significant mental health issues. Brenda Major who is the chairwoman of the panel released the official APA statement. She wrote that the relative risk of mental health problems is no greater if they have a single elective, first-trimester abortion or deliver that pregnancy. Many studies refute her distorted findings. A recent study from Norway (who were peered reviewed in medical journals and none of them experienced complaints about the methodology utilized to outline their own findings at the time) describe an abortion/mental health connection. Now, the Norwegian study, conducted by Dr. Willy Pedersen, was recently published in the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. The authors' conclusion in the abstract of the study is quoted as saying that: "Young adult women who undergo induced abortion may be at increased risk for subsequent depression." The Norwegian researchers studied 5,768 women between the ages of 15 and 27 years and asked then questions concerning abortion and childbirth They also asked them about family relationships and a number of individual characteristics, such as schooling and occupational history and conduct problems. They found that young women increase their risk of depression who had an abortion in their twenties. A study earlier this month in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology found 30 percent of women who purchase the abortion drug mifepristone on the Internet experience depression and negative feelings accompanying the abortion. The New Zealand study found that having an abortion as a young woman raises the risk of developing mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. There are other studies showing similar result. So, the APA is either wrong or lying about the tons of risk factors of abortion. They omit that abortion strips the life of the unborn human being completely. Barack Obama justifies voting against the born alive bill in Illinois by saying that the bill says nothing about Roe v. Wade. The deal is what does saying infants who survive abortion from being murdered have to do with Roe v. Wade at all. Roe v. Wade deals with pregnancies not babies who don't who don't experience pregnancy anymore at all. Also, Roe. v. Wade was a product of deceptive testimony (as admitted by one of the women involved in the case) and a distortion of what the Constitution says. The Constitution doesn't say that tearing unborn babies limb from limb is moral. That has nothing to do privacy or choice at all. It has to do with population control and murder.



Arkansas expands their sick martial law plan. Previously, the mayor of Helena, Arkansas imposed a curfew. He even allowed police to interrogate innocent citizens in the streets of Helena. Now, officers with military rifles have been stopping and questioning passers by. This neigbhorhood have been plagued with violence and is witnessing a 24 hour curfew for a week. On Tuesday, the Helena-West Helena City Council voted 9-0 to allow police to expand that program into any area of the city. That city council should be ashamed of themselves because you don't treat innocent people in this type of fashion. We shouldn't act like a fascist nation. The deal is that any form of injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. The ACLU lawyer said that the police stops were unconstitutional. However, such stops likely violate residents' constitutional rights to freely assemble and protections against unreasonable police searches, said Holly Dickson. Holly is a lawyer for the ACLU of Arkansas who addressed the council at its packed Tuesday meeting. The Police chief Fred Fiedler said that the patrols have earned them 32 arrests since they began in a 10 block neighborhood (or the small town on the banks of the Mississippi River with their troubles of poverty). You don't solve problems in any means no matter the cost. You don't do evil in an attempt to try to achieve some "good." It's still evil. Mayor James Valley loves the sick policy. He went as far as saying that infringement on constitutional rights is OK and denies violating the Constitution. That's an oxymoron. You say you haven't violated the law, but infringing on our rights is fine. That isn't fine. That's tyranny. The city council, the sheriff, the mayor especially, and others should be arrested for violating the Constitution, harrashing citizens, and other charges. There are militarized police in the city. It's stupid to say that no one should be out at night. People have right to be out at anytime of the day and anyplace as long as they follow the legitimate laws of the land. You solve this problem by building up communities, arresting people with a warrant or probable cause committing a crime, and reforming government. Also, it's been found that the government have been caught shipping drugs into this country by Gary Webb and others.











Rick Warren is at it again. He went out and wants a meeting between Barack Obama and John McCain about religious issues. This will occur on CNN tomorrow at 8pm. EST. They will discuss about social issues, the environment, and international issues. Now, Rick Warren is a big globalist, but is slick about it. The mainstream media even from CNN apparently love him, because he rarely discusses real issues and sucks up to the establishment. The mainstream media want a token preacher to pacify the public. This is done to promote his programs and such. Rick Warren admitted to Joseph Farah that he's a CFR member. The Council on Foreign Relations since its founding in 1921 have been dedicated to a new world order or the changing of our present system of national sovereignity. Richard Haas (who is the head of the CFR) admitted to this. They have been at the forefront of promoting the man made global warming myth and the war on terror distraction. The CFR came from the structures of the Round Table Group (invented by Freemason Cecil Rhodes. He based this group on the order of the Jesuits as well. Rhodes wanted global government headed by the British Empire). Warren is what Bible Believer Berit Kjos calls promoting an Emergent Theology. This is about using new ways of thinking and acting to make the church merge with government to tackle problems. I don't believe that the church should merge with the government at all. His book of the Purpose Driven Life outlines this view. Warren even admitted that he spoke at the United Nations (which is dedicated to a new world order). His PEACE Plan is a major instrument in carrying out his goals. Kjos believes that Warren is using the dialetic process of merging believers and unbelievers to have compromise in order to have change. He is definitely using his theology in a marketing type of way. He emphasizes purpose, but there is a cross plus repentance component in salvation. Warren quotes from the Message Bible which paraphrases words (it also has the as above so below quote in it. That concept is used by occultists to teaching that all is apart of God and is God. It's apart of the Hermetic Maxim). Warren Smith and other Christians have shown dissent with Warren's theology (Rick admits he was taught by Freemason and guru preacher of Robert Schuller) as well. Robert Schuller denies the Virgin birth, denies the resurrection, and teaches the New Age "Positive Thinking" theology all of the time in his California church.



Some Web site firms say that they track behavior without explicit consent. Ellen Nakashima from the Washington Post on August 12, 2008 reported on this story. That story revolves around how several Internet and broadband companies have admitted using targeted advertising technology without informing customers. This was revealed according to letters released yesterday by the House Energy and Commerce Committe. Google, who is the leading online advertiser, stated that it has begun using Internet tracking technology to enable them to more precisely follow Web-surfing behavior across affiliated sites. That's interesting since these actions violate the privacy of Internet users. A bipartisan inquiry came about how more than 30 Internet companies might have gathered data to target customers. Some privaacy advocates and lawmakers said that these disclosures help build up a case for an overaching online privacy law. Committee member Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), who created the Privacy Caucus 12 said that on a higher level, companies have no technological limits on how they collect information (and they can possibly sell that information as a commodity to other providers). He wants a law to create a set of legal guarantees that consumers have with respect to their information. Markey wants to introduce legislature next years that possesses an online privacy Bill of Rights. That would require that consumers must opt in to the tracking of their online behavior and the collection and sharing of their personal data. Some believe that this will damage the economy by preventing small companies from reaching customers. Rep. Cliff (R-Fla.) believes that self regulation is the answer to the problem with focusing on transparency and choice might be the best approach. What's true is that privacy is being violating when data mining by Web firms without the consent of people. Although, there shouldn't be an overreaching government approach that violates other people's privacy as a solution to the problem as well.



IDs and airplanes have created serious complications in the West. Joe Fay from The Register on Thursday, at August 14, 2008 described on how the TSA or the Transportation Security Administration has a policy. This policy has done a backflip on a policy of adding people who had forgotten their ID to its database of suspect fliers. This scheme is here from June on. According to the USA Today, the TSA agency officially declared people could not board planes in the US unless they showed ID. At the time the TSA said it would still allow people who had misplaced, (as opposed to refused to show), their ID onto the planes. Yet, there was no mention of the database. Fay wrote that being added to the TSA database effectively meant that innocent people could find their IDs in a database along with others (including folks who acted supiciously). TSA boss Kip Hawley told the USA Today that adding these innocent people in the database would enable the agency to track potential terrorists who are probing for weak points in the US airport security. Hawley phoned the paper back shortly afterwards and said that the TSA wouldn't retain detailes (if subjects could convince screeners of their actual ID). That means you have to have your ID to prove that you're not a terrorist. Hawley said that the names of ID-forgetful already in the database would be expunged within the months. Yet, Joe Fay wrote that people acting "suspiciously" have been held in the database for 15 years after they've been questioned by airport police (along with information about their travelling companions). The TSA have been caught harrashing passengers, having innocent people in their no fly lists, utilizing oppressive X-Ray devices that can see you whole body, etc. So, the TSA has many corruption issues then and now.



Russia and Georgia are accusing each other of breaking the cease fire. Now, back in 2006 Solzhenitsyn accused the U.S. and NATO of encircling Russia. Pravda from April 27, 2006 wrote about this story. Aleksander Solzhenitsyn is a famous nobel laureate and former Soviet dissident. He said these words in a newspaper interview. he also praised Vladimir Putin for working to restore a strong state. I don't agree with Putin on many issues, because he suppresses dissent and has an authoritarian mindset. Although, even Russia doesn't deserve to experience preemptive assaults by Georgia first or being encircled. In his interview to the liberal Moscow News, Aleksander outlined that NATO's ultimate aim was the loss Russia's sovereignity. Aleksander Solzhenitsyn also was the man who exposed the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin's repression and labor camps. Stalin killed about 50 million people in his camps. He said that Russia poses no threat, but NATO is building its military in the surrounding nation to the south and the east of Russia. Russia opposes Ukraine's drive to join NATO. Me personally, Ukraine has a right to determine their own destiny without Russia or America telling them what to do. There is a reason also for why McCain and Obama has taken an aggressive stance in favor of Georgia. See, McCain's top foreign policy advisor is found out to be a high level Georgian lobbyist. His name is Randy Scheunemann and he's a big Neo Con. Robert Scheer from the LA Times accuses McCain of exploiting the Russia/Georgia conflict to boost his election chances. Obama's foreign policy advisor of Zbigniew Brzezinski is an know hater of Russia. Brzezinski supported the Mujuhadeen attacking Russia in Afghanistan during the late 1970's. He also compared Putin to Hitler, which is a stretch to say the least. In his book The Grand Chessboard, that the top priority for the U.S. was seizing control of Eurasia and its rich oil resources (that's found in page 31, etc.). The region of Eurasia is crucial for the West and Neo con puppets in attempting to control it. The reason is that Eurasia is a gateway to other Eurasian countries and has important oil pipelines. That is why Georgia is being supported by America by its military (even a July article in the Atlanta Journal Constitution wrote that: "A large contingent of Georgia Army National Guard soldiers flew to the Republic of Georgia on Sunday for joint military exercises at a time when tension is brewing in the region). That is why the U.S. is sending troops into Georgia under the excuse of doing "humanitarian aid." It's obvious that the controllers of Barack Obama and John McCain wouldn't mind a conflict to try to weaken Russia and get oil resources in the Caucasus region (The mainstream media with leaders like Papal Knight of St. Gregory promote the agitation against Russia. Though Russia deserves to be legitimately criticized for its errors, even that nation doesn't need to be invaded).



Secret Societies have been exposed for eons now. When you think you understand most information about them, most of the time we are scratching the surface of them. They exist in many forms form the Jesuits, the Oddfellows, the Freemasonry, Skulls and Bones, the OTO, the Golden Dawn, and a list of other groups. Now, Freemasonry claims to be pro-Christianity, but that isn't the case at all. For one, there are many books using Bible verses from Masonic authors trying to justify their group. What they don't present is that major 33rd Degree Freemasons like Albert Pike admit that Masonry is a successor to the Mysteries. Even Pike said that Christianity should never of have rejected magic. Magic is forbidden by the Scriptures. Death oaths, the embrace of the Kabbala, the promotion of false gods and goddesses in rituals (like Osiris, Isis, Abbadon, and JAH-BUL-ON. Jah-bul-on is composite name of Jehovah, Baal, and Osiris which some Masons praise in a Degree ritual. Masons like Manly P. Hall worship Lucifer, and Freemasonry embrace the All Seeing Eye which relates to Horus, and other occultic beliefs), and the teaching of many religions worshipping the same god aren't Bible based at all. It's is in fact a prime example of a form of Theistic Ecumencialism merged with the ancient Mystery Religion. Some Masons praise Solomon's Temple and want it reestablished in Israel. Well, only God will reestablish the true Temple after the Tribulation is over. Masonry claims to teach concepts of morality in allegories and they have secrecy. Pike (he wrote these words in his Morals and Dogma book on pg. 819) admits that he wants false interpretations for low level members of the Blue Lodge, so they can appear to understand concepts. That's wrong, because secrecy is never transparent. Even Jesus Christ said "I said nothing in secret." The truth is that all human beings have the right to know the truth about God and life without restricting information from man (or hiding them in occult symbols). So, these are some reasons on why I disagree with Freemasonry. Yet, it's bigger than just Freemasonry. Other occult orders ought to be exposed like the Jesuits and the Skulls and Bones. Then there is Jerome Corsi. I don't agree with Corsi on every issue, but he is right to expose the North American Union and the pro-abortion policies of Obama. Now, the mainstream media and Obama fanatics are criticizing him for even questioning the official story of 9/11. The fact is that Dr. Steven Jones found thermate (his paper was peer reviewed. Thermate is an ingredient involved in explosives), NORAD stood down, more polls show that most American reject the official story about 9/11, etc. It's impossible for jet fuel alone to pulverize the Twin Towers and especially Building Number Seven (when no plane hit the building and its fell symmetrically) into dust. Now, Corsi is being demonized constantly. Even some in the 9/11 Commission admit that lies existing in the 9/11 Commission's conclusions. Now, some say that Corsi is backtracking. Well, 9/11 Truth can never stop. I won't be intimidated by the media or their agents. We have a God-given right to question the official story of 9/11. Tons of smoking guns exist proving the official story to be a fraud from the hijackers being trained by the government to the government staging terror attacks for eons (even Seymour Hersh admitted that Cheney planned to stage a terror attack in Iran). So, these liars are on the won. McCan and Obama are people that don't get my support for the Presidency at all.


By Timothy