December 2008 Updates

 

One of the major news occuring is about Barack Obama. Yesterday, Obama outlined the names of much of his proposed cabinet. Hillary Clinton was picked as the new Secretary of State. Typically, many liberals are just following Obama nearly unconditionally. They love the media adoration for the man. Yet, Hillary Clinton was apart of the reasons why we see the destructive war on terror in the first place. She will continue the war on terror under the guise of "humanitarian" justifications. Her husband, Bill Clinton, made Iraq to acquire immoral sanctions, which resulted in the murder of over 1 million Iraqis (including children) during the 1990's. She wrote for the CFR publication of Foreign Affairs in desiring to end the Iraq War, but she voted in 2002 for the Iraq war resolution. As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, she wants more war in Afghanistan to fight the CIA-funded Taliban and the CIA's creation of al-Qaeda. She wrote about having paranoia of Russia and China (when the leadership of both nations aren't perfect, yet that still isn't a justification to agitate war with these nations at all). Robert Gates is a loyal Bush 41 follower. He was complicit in the Iran Contra affair. The funds from the illegal weapons sales to Iran were also used to finance the CIA supported Islamic bridages during the Soviet-Afghan war (not only to help out the Contras). General James Jones was picked as Obama's National Security Advisor. He was apart of NATO and is cozy with Republicans like John McCain. Eric Holder is picked as the new Attorney General. If he's elected by the Senate, then he will be the first African American Attorney General in American history. Holder gave advise that help Bill Clinton to pardon Marc Rich (who colluded with Iran when Iran was holding U.S. hostages). He represented Merck and other companies. He supported the anti-gun view on the D.C. v. Heller case involving handguns. The case accurately commented that people have the individual right to own guns, but offered restrictions. Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano was chosen as the new head of Homeland Security. The DHS shouldn't of existed in the first place with its bad policies of militarization, the Patriot Act, etc. Napolitano blocked efforts to curb illegal immigration, she supported the Big Brother Real ID Act, and she's radically pro-abortion. Susan E. Rice was appointed as ambassador to the U.N. Susan was a Rhodes Scholar, and an ally of the Brookings Institute. This Institute is a think tank that is apart of the liberal mainstream establishment. Susan Rice is a CFR member. So, is this real change? It's actually apart of the musical chairs from the neo cons to more neo liberals in the Barack Obama cabinet. Barack Obama is appointed war hawks in his cabinet. Obama desire to model his administration after Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was unjustly assassinated by the Vatican/Jesuit network, but Lincoln wasn't perfect. Lincoln arrested newspaper owners, he arrested members of Congress, said racist comments about black Americans, etc. Abraham Lincoln was definitely right to oppose the influence of foreign nations trying to control Americans, and to oppose the central banking system. The Civil War allowed British elites and the Vatican to play the North and South against each other to divide Americans. It cost over 600,000 lives in a bloody configuration. One good thing out of the War was that overt slavery ended officially in America (Slavery was made illegal. Although covert slavery still exist here via sex slaves, IRS confisicatory tax laws, etc).





The Mumbai bombings were very sophisicated in their cosmology. As usual, there is more to the story than the mainstream media would let on. These attacks are making Pakistan the scapegoat for the justification of inacting more attacks by American forces when the ISI ironically is a CIA ally. That is why Washington pressured Pakistan's Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gillani cut a secret deal with the US (and India) to turn over to Delhi a number of residents of Pakistan wanted by India for terrorism. One such terrorist sent into India was CIA-sponsored asset Mumbai born Dawood Ibrahim (who was a veteran of the mujahedin war against the Soviets). Ibrahim was the son of a Mumbai police constable, who was involved in organized criminal actions. There still hasn't been conclusive evidence to blame al-Qaeda, Lashkar-e-Taiba (who denied responsibility in the attacks), or even the Deccan Mujahedin for the attacks. Witnesses have seen blond haired, Western looking men shooting people indiscriminately. Also, news reports described the tactics of the bombers as similar to the Chechen fighting of Europe. The Chechen fighting held hostages in places, bombed civilian targets, and targeted civilians indiscriminately. German intelligence was also caught bombing Kosovo to justify German occupation of that region in the 1990's. Even a Chabad House was bombed in Mumbai. Many Israelis support training Indians to fight in the region of Kashmir. Ibrahim is accused of using his troops to orchestrate bombing in India to make India aware that his forces are to be reckoned with. There are 172 people who died from the attacks including 6 Americans. Some of the Indian attacks were aided by Indian authorities. Some elements of the Indian security team refused to shoot back at terrorists when the terrorists fired their weapons (according to Mr. D'Souza). The CIA’s station chief in Delhi told Indian intelligence in September that terrorists were planning to arrive via the sea and attack the Taj Mahal hotel with small arms and/or bombs. This was just one of a “series of warnings of a possible attack on Mumbai by sea in the months leading up to last week’s devastating onslaught,” reports AFP. What benefit would Pakistan experience if they would be involved in such a devestating onslaught of violence and death? The answer is that there would be no benefit. CFR member Joe Biden said that Barack Obama would be tested even he was President. Could the India/Pakistan crisis become the test Biden was describing? It could be. In my opinion, either this attack was a group of independent terrorists or certain governments (or intelligence agencies) funded these terrorists to commit violence.

We have an economic crisis as well. One reason it occured was that Wall Street merged with commercial banks through the repeal of the Glass Stegal Act. Another reason is the policy of hyperinflation, overspending, and a costly war on terror draining our economic resources. A lack of transparency still exist in the bailout law. The bailout law was admittedly sent to select Wall Street banks, it had bonuses for CEOs, and Congresspeople were threatened with martial law if they voted against it. That's treason. Tom Fritzpatrick is Citibank's chief technical strategist. He wrote in a leaked Citibank internal memo that the world might see depression, civil disorder, and possibly wars as a product of the economic collapse that may be on the horizon. Having rebates and stimulus can work temporary, but long term, you need to do more than this. The trade system should be fair, the payroll tax should be cut, the corporate tax should be cut (since we have one of the top highest corporate tax rate in the world), we need to end the monopoly of the Federal Reserve, have competing currency, and do other solutions. People should know about all bad assets, so more trouble won't arise economically as well. There are anti-Fourth Amendment policies in Florida. Anne Lindberg from St. Petersburg Times on December 1, 2008 outlined that a neatness Ordinance Violates the Fourth Amendment in Florida. Council members caved in to the demands from an angry crwod and delayed approving a neatness ordinance. The crow wants every word of the 26 page document to Kenneth City residents. The proposal would railed at the proposal that would regulate the upkeep of both the exterior and interior of all property in the town. If the owner refuses to allow the official to enter, the town can go to a judge for an “administrative search warrant” to allow access to the interior of buildings. Violations would cost up to $250 a day. Critics says that this policy to being dictatorship-like which could make neighbors act like snitches toward neighbors. Silly laws like these exist all of the time. Philly 9/11 Truth have confronted Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. They asked him about the necessity of the Patriot Act and his confidence in the anthrax investigations. Notice that the Patriot Act in Section ambigiously define terrorism as almost any crime and delay warrants (including having sneak and peak provisions in it). The Patriot Act was proposed before 9/11 and it was passed swiftly after the Anthrax attacks. Steven Hatfill was falsely accused of being complicit in the anthrax attacks. Later, it's been found that the anthrax chemicals were from the Ft. Detrick medical center from Maryland. The FBI even utilized conflicting evident to accuse Bruce Ivins (who is dead now. He was a scientist) of being involved in the anthrax attacks. The FBI tried to bribe his son and family with millions of dollars to accuse Bruce of being involved (according to ABC News).







More News are coming out about the risk factors that abortion can undoubtedly bring. A New Zealand study found that women who have had abortion can increase their mental problems by up to 30%. This study was done by a professor. American researchers recently connected abortion with many negative aftereffects as well. The American study, released Friday, showed as much as 10 percent of all mental health problems in the U.S. result from abortions. The conditions that most associated with abortion included anxiety disorders and substance abuse disorders. Abortion increased the risk of severe depression and anxiety by a 1/3 accoridng to the New Zealand study. The authors concluded that anywhere from 1.5 to 5.5 percent of all mental health disorders seen in New Zealand result from women having abortions. Professor David Fergusson, John Horwood, and Dr. Joseph Boden headed up the study. They interviewed women on 6 different occasions between the ages of 15 and 30. The 500 surveyed women lived in the city of Christchurch. It included 284 women who had a total of 686 pregnancies and 117 women who had a total of 153 abortions. The women were asked whether the pregnancy was wanted or unwanted, and if this had caused them to be upset or distressed. They were also given a mental health assessment during each interview, to see if they met the diagnostic criteria for major depression, anxiety disorders, alcohol dependence and illicit drug dependence. The New Zealand team discovered that abortion adversely affects women's mental health. Childbirth and miscarriages don't according to the team. "For some women, abortion is likely to be a stressful and traumatic life event which places those exposed to it at a modestly increased risk of a range of common mental health problems," they added. Abortion can damage female hormones as well. The Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA) supports FOCA. That's shocking. YWCA once was a Christian group and then it was a political group sucking up to the far left. FOCA would invalidate all abortion restrictions and virtually end pro-life laws. The reason is that the bill would invalidate any restriction on the so-called right to an abortion (according to Denise M. Burke). This includes laws at every level of government not just at the federal level. Its broad reach can effects doctors who refuse to do an abortion in a hospital as well. The words in the bill are broad and even NARAL admits that FOCA will eliminate the partial birth abortion ban.


There are even more troops being proposed for "domestic security." The Washington Post reported that the Pentagon is planning to station 20,000 more U.S. troops inside America for Domestic security from September 2011. This is a growth of Northcom's already illegal militarization of America. This is done under the guise of preparation of civil unrest after a total economic collapse or a mass terror attack. The Pentagon wants the troops to help state and local officials to respond to a nuclear attack or other domestic catastrophes. The ACLU and the CATO Institute have criticized these tactics. Ann Christensen of the ACLU's National Security Project said that these domestic emergency deployments may be “just the first example of a series of expansions in presidential and military authority" or even the increase of domestic surveillance. Cato Vice President Gene Healy warned of “a creeping militarization” of homeland security.” Even in the 1990's, U.S. troops via drills were training to raid, arrest, and imprison U.S. citizens in detention camps. They use cities and petri dishes with foreign troops and real black helicopters. The Pentagon claims that these troops would solely be utilized for recovery efforts. This comes after the news from an Army Times article (in September 8th) comments that Northcom would put in place something. The Army Times exposed about how on October 1st at Fort Stewart and at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, the deployment of troops would be aimed at tackling “civil unrest and crowd control.” Northcom had backtracked from the plan, but admitted that both lethal and non-lethal weapons would still be used in the fiedl (This has been done in crowd control). The militarization of America (that has occured in NYC, the police stealing guns in Illinois, and the gun grabbing from New Orleans during the Hurricane Katrina aftermath) has been a long goal of some in the government to end true Constitutional rule (and form a military style government). The establishment claims that these troop deployment are going to aid in disaster relief efforts. Yet, these events mask the real goal of eliminating Posse Comitatus. The Pentagon admitted that U.S. troops will be involved in law enforcement operations as well using non-lethal weapons against American citizens is a pure violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. Even the Insurrection Act limits how the executive branch uses the military for law enforcment (as bounded under extreme circumstances). Even the old John Warner Defense Authorization Act was repealed. The reason is that it forces President to send the military above the authority of the state government to do so (yet Bush signed a statement disregarding the repeal. The repeal is called HR 4986: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008,). Not to mention that civil organizations, state organizations, and other groups are fully capable of hanlding terrible events without military troop deployments. The deployment of National Guard troops to assist law enforcement or for disaster relief purposes is legal under the authority of the governor (of a state). Yet, the usage of active duty U.S. Army in law enforcement operations inside America absent the conditions described in the Insurrection Act is completely illegal. Therefore, using the military domestically for law enforcement actions (except in extreme circumstances) is completely immoral and illegal. The military and the police should be seperated and not further merged by the policies of the government.


By Timothy