Eric Jon Phelps on many topics

http://www.mediafire.com/?kdnziwnfllt


December 11, 2008

JFK Assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald, Victor Herman, Hitler-Stalin connection.


Note by Me: I don't agree with all of Eric's views.


By Timothy



____________________




First, the royal House of Loyola was not racially Jewish. Spain's Holy Office of the Inquisition kept track of all racial Jews via "limpieza." This was Rome's blood-purity doctrine that was tracked and kept on record with the Inquisitors. No man with Jewish or Moorish blood to the great-great-grandparents could hold office, marry a Roman Catholic or even leave the country. (I cover this in my completed Power Point.) Loyola was a page in the court of Ferdinand and Isabella who had expelled the Jews from Spain in 1492. Surely, Morranos or partially racial Jews would ever have been permitted into that Court. Like "the Jew Room" at the National Secruity Agency, all Jews were forbidden entrance or position.

Coningsby is a work of fiction; it is neither non-fiction nor history. Therefore, the claims should be read in that context as well as true history. Now, for true history. Disraeli was a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor himself, evidenced by his policies that I have reviewed previously. Queen Victoria was completely at the beck and call of the Order as I show throughout my book, VAIII. She protected Esterhazy, that wicked French Roman Catholic traitor, whose crimes were blamed on a Jew, Captain Alfred Dreyfus, thus birthing the horrible Jesuit injustice called "The Dreyfus Affair." Further, she would not allow the Italian patriots any quarter when they fled to British Malta in resisting the tyranny of Pope Pius IX, the governor being an English Roman Catholic loyal to the Temporal Power of "the Vicar of Christ." That diabolical, Queen-witch even opened up talks with the Vatican without any support from the Parliament. If Victoria was of this caliber, Prime Minister Disraeli was just as bad.

Since Coningsby is calculating fiction, Disraeli described the first Jesuits as being Jews. That claim however is a bold-faced lie, to the exclusion of one Jesuit, Diego Laynez. I have shown that the Order banned the Jews from ever entering the Order via a statute passed in 1593 as a result of the discovery that Laynez was a racial Jew. In 1946, thanks to the obedience of the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists aiding Rome in her Communist and Nazi inquisitions, that statute was lifted and Jews were admitted into the Order. French communist Jean Lacourture covers this in his Jesuits: A Multibiography.

Now why would Disraeli weave the fiction that Jews were the first Jesuits thus inferring that the Jews ran the Jesuit Order? It is because the Jesuits were hated in England at this time, and formally expelled as of 1829, though the act was not really enforced. Germany had expelled the Jesuits in 1872 and France in 1880. Europe was again waking to the great Jesuit threat and taking action, so much so that the Order calls the Nineteenth Century "the Century of Disaster." Disraeli was cunningly shifting the blame from the White Gentile European Jesuit-ruled papacy to the Jews by participating in the rising anti-Jewish fury to be preached throughout Europe in preparation for the coming Eurasian Jewish Holocaust, a "burnt offering" of Protestant "heretics, Roman Catholic "liberals" and Jewish "infidels" deemed necessary if Europe was ever to be returned to the rule of the Pope as per the Dark Ages. I can think of no leading Jesuits during the life of Disraeli or in Germany during the Bavarian Jesuit-spauned Third Reich who were racial Jews. The following are the words of ex-Jesuit Dr. E. Boyd Barrett on the Jews relating to the Order. In Rome Stoops to Conquer (New York: Julian Messner, Inc., 1935), pages 180-181, 187 we read:

"Owing to an early experience of a painful kind, which was all but disastrous to the Order, and which was due to a group of Spanish Jesuits of Jewish descent, who threatened to dismember the Order, the Jesuits as a body have conceived and fostered an intense animosity against the Jews. Never since the days of 'the great storm,' as the Cardinal Toletus revolt was called, has anyone of Jewish blood or descent been admitted into the Order. Never since that day has the Order ceased to pursue vindictively the Jews. The spirit of the Order can be gleaned from the extraordinary prayer of the greatest of Jesuit saints, Francis Xavier: 'Put me some place where there are no Jews or Moslems,' cried Francis. The present writer, who spent twenty years in the Jesuit Order, can recall no single occasion on which a word of sympathy for Jewish suffering was uttered by a Jesuit.
When Pius IX, who was liberally disposed until he fell under the influence of the Jesuits, relaxed something of the severity of the laws of the Papal States, the Jesuits were disgusted. Writing later, Father Hammerstein S.J. declared: 'We consider it a misfortune that in the delirium for freedom in 1848 and the following years complete civil rights were bestowed upon the Jews.' When the Order was suppressed by Clement XIV it was believed among the Jesuits that the suppression was largely engineered by Masons and Jews working on the weaknesses and fears of the Bourbons. This suspicion did not tend to lessen their obsessional phobia of Judaism.
The Jesuits, in the days when they controlled every Catholic court in Europe, and when as an Order they were swollen with pride, were challenged by a like pride and a like intellectual intolerance by the Jew. They could not break or bend the Jew. They could convert, or seemingly convert, every type of human from Japanese to profligate Parisian, but they could make no headway in leading Israel into the fold of Mother Church. The ceased to look upon the Jew as 'a lost sheep,' and identified him with an incarnate devil, the sworn enemy of the Catholic. They hated the Jews because the Jews did not bow in homage before them.
This tradition of hate and ill-will has lasted through three centuries. In great part the Catholic ill-will against the Jew in Catholic European countries is due to Jesuit education. Every movement against the Church, every development of Freemaosnry, and Socialism, every doctrine of heretical philosophy that has weaned intellectual Catholics from the true Faith has been ascribed to Jewish machinations. . . . The mind of the Jesuit Order will never open or soften into brotherly feeling for the Jew."

Disraeli's treason to his own Jewish race is only equaled by Marx in his utter condemnation of all Jews advocating their death as per the quote I have in VAIII and my most recent Jesuit Power Point of 606 slides. In conclusion, Loyola was no racial Jew; Jews were barred from the Order until 1946; and the Jews do not control the Jesuit Order as it is "the times of the Gentiles," the Gentile nations being "the head," the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelitic nation being "the tail" according to Deut. 28 and Luke 21:24.

I trust the above is helpful in refuting this clever diversion of Jesuit Coadjutor Benjamin Disraeli who pretended to be a Protestant so he could hold public office.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric