http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=42251
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=36791
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showforum=1&prune_day=100&sort_by=Z-A&sort_key=last_post&st=500
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=42167
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=40007
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=40792
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=41473
_______________
QUOTE
Hi Eric,
I thought you might find this interesting. Do you know why Dubai has such riches, and is its development significant to the NWO scheme of things. The level of development seems totally unnatural. Who is pumping all this money into the city, what are its origins, and WHY is the development on such a scale. It is estimated that 25% of all the cranes in the world are in Dubai!!!!! That is a staggering figure (actually someone involved in business there told me the figure was around 40%). The rate of development seems out of all proportions with what could reasonably be expected. Is it just a natural phenomon driven by business or is there more to it.
Regards
Dear Tom,
This is the beginning of the rebuilding of Babylon in the land of Chaldea. The Knights of Malta are completely backing the program with their brother Masonic Islamic Sunni Moslems made rich by the Black Pope's Oil Industry. Roman Catholic New York City magnate Donald Trump is another Knight of Malta with holdings in Dubai.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
_______________________________________________
Dear Robert,
Thank you for this.
Rumsfeld is a CFR magnate, the promoter of the neurotoxin aspartame, and the impetus behind the unnecessary killing of our finest troops in Iraq. He is a traitor and is untouchable thanks to his masters' power over the DOJ/FBI---the Jesuits of Georgetown University in DC.
Concerning "the Street," its master is Cardinal Egan, his Knights of Malta being in full control. Former heads of the SEC were Knights of Malta Joseph Kennedy and William Casey, both Roman Catholics and Jesuit trained and/or controlled. The purpose of Wall Street is to horde all the assets of the nation into the hands of the Jesuits and use the market to finance their secret purposes. One of those purposes is to rob American investors of their wealth. Knight of Malta John J. Raskob encouraged all Americans to invest in the market in the 1920s. When the balloon was ripe, the Order pulled the cord in 1929 with short-seller Joe Kennedy and two other assistants. Out of that disaster, Rome bought up the market for pennies on the dollar and used FDR to institute the pope's "New Deal" ("New World Order" on the dollar bill) backed by Father Charles Coughlin and other prominent priests at Catholic University of America in DC. That same year, in 1933, FDR recoginzed the USSR enabling Rome's American corporations (stolen from the market due to the crash) to give unlimited infrastructure to Jesuit-trained Freemason Stalin. That recognition of the USSR was done in the White House, Jesuit Edmund Walsh at the immediate right hand of FDR. And no wonder, it was Jesuit Walsh who, when in Moscow in 1922, enthroned Stalin as the Secretary of the Communist Party. Stalin would be overseen by an Assumptionist Priest in Moscow from 1934-1945. The Assumptionists are mere Jesuits under cover, as it was the Assumptionists who were backing the Order's Dreyfus Affair in the 1890s.
And if that was not enough, FDR plotted to get the US into WWII with the secret backing of the Jesuits of Georgetown. With the Congress' Declaration of War in 1941, Bonesman and Knight of Malta Averril Harriman signed the Lend-Lease Act which built the complete infrastructure of the USSR. The overseer was CFR Harry Hopkins who lived with FDR in the White House without an official title for some time. Hopkins was the Jesuit Coadjutor orchestrating the program, including the giving of US Treasury plates to Stalin for the printing of US dollars for Soviet troops in Germany during and after the war.
The economic plunder of this nation is outrageous. You see it plainly. And the Jesuits are the masters of it all.
Thanks for the great email.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
----- Original Message -----
To: Eric Phelps
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 10:24 PM
Subject: Rumsfeld connection
Dear Brother Eric
Thanks for the quick reply. I thought that you might find the following interesting....a little peek into my world with a familiar name at the starting point.
Here is a little information about Donald Rumsfeld and one of his connections into the dark cesspool of corruption on Wall Street.
Rumsfeld is/was one of the "partners" in notorious offshore hedge fund Rocker Partners, headed by politically-connected director David A Rocker. There are several items regarding Rocker that can be found on-line, most notably his interesting testimony before congress regarding an illegal trading scheme called "naked short selling". I was curious if you have ever run across Rocker's name while researching bad boy Rumsfeld. Rocker's two subsidiary offshore funds are called Compass Holdings and Helmsman Holdings (maritime names a coincidence?). All three hedgefunds cater to the ultra-rich and famous as well as suspected illegal drug money, money laundering and illicit arms sales to terrorist organizations. In the past year, Rocker has retired and replaced by Rocker's buddy, Marc Cohodes. Rocker partners has been re-named Copper River, but still the same notorious fund. Rocker remains in "advisory" capacity.
I don't know how much you know about naked short selling, but there is some good material produced by one of my heroes, Patrick Byrne, CEO of Overstock.com. Patrick and Robert O'Brien have been jointly sprearheading the drive to restore fairness to our capitol markets, but there are many other champions as well. I am just one of the footsoldiers in this crusade. O'Brien and Byrne have both received death threats for their efforts. Billionaire Byrne has a landmark mega-lawsuit pending aginst a host of crooked prime brokers, virtually all of the largest names on "The Street".
O'Brien can give you so much more detail if you are inclined to look/ask.
After more than five years of study, what strikes me is the utter callous and uncaring nature of these individuals, same sort of attitude as the Nazis who herded the Jews into the "showers", hollow bodies stacked like cordwood in a tidy row. The disgusting people who are running the show on Wall Street only care about themselves. The rest of us are only there to be slaughtered at their leisure. That's how badly rigged the game is - and the regulator (DOJ, FBI and SEC), supposedly the cop on the corner, completly captured, bought and paid for. Looking for help from your Congressman? Forget it. Is there a judge in this entire country who would render an honest verdict against the elitists? It doesn't appear so. How many retirements stolen and lives ruined? Wall Street is truly one of the deepest cesspools around.
That's what I have come to realize. All done with INTENT.
I am connecting to as many genuine spiritually-connected people as possible to grow a consciousness of love and brotherhood. I sense that we have arrived at a crucial turning point for this age that we live in.
Perhaps more later.
Regards,
Robert
__________________________________________________
Dear Ezra,
Thank you for contacting me.
VAIII covers much of what you seek.
Know this:
Bible-believing Czar Alexander I expelled the Jesuits from all the Russias in 1820 for their political meddling. In 1822 he closed all the Masonic lodges. In 1825 he was given "the poison cup" as was given to Peter the Great who also expelled the Jesuits from all the Russias in 1723.
The Jesuits in seeking to conquer Moscow (the Third Rome) and thus overthrow the anti-Jesuit leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church, used Grand Orient Freemasons Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin via the Bolshevik Revolution. Remember that Antony Sutton's Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution states that American cartel capitalists on Wall Street financed that revolution. Knight of Malta Joseph P. Grace, the son of Knight of Malta William R. Grace (the servant of James Cardinal Gibbons and master of Teddy Roosevelt and super banker J. P. Morgan) was one of them who set up the Grace Russian Trading Company which flourished after the revolution.
After the Order used its Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists backed by London's Fabian Socialists (Fabius being a Roman General, thus the FS were Jesuit controlled), all Jewish leaders were purged by Stalin during The Great Terror of the 30s. Every Jew was "purged" except Lazar Kaganovitch who lived into his 90s. According to Jim Shaw's The Deadly Deception, the big three at Yalta were all high Freemasons---Churchill, FDR and Stalin. That Stalin was a Grand Orient Freemason is confirmed by Walter Veith in one of his excellent documentaries. Thus, when we see "Dirty Harry" Truman and Stalin sitting together at Potsdam, they were both brothers in the Craft.
Now if Lenin and Stalin were both Grand Orient Freemasons, most assuredly Khrushchev was also a Freemason. His performance in the UN taking off his shoe and ranting that the USSR "will bury you," was all a Jesuit directed diatribe so as to further drive the typical American into right wing fascism---the true purpose of Communism in the first place. "Anti-communist" Georgetown Jesuit Edmund Walsh greatly benefitted from this tirade as did Walsh's student, Jesuit-trained Joseph McCarthy. For communism is nothing more than fascism in an atheist costume; all the rest is identical; indeed, "extremes meet."
According to Leo Zagami Putin is a Freemason and is under the charge of the Russian Branch of the Knights of Malta headquartered in St. Petersburg and Moscow.
I trust this is helpful.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
2 comments:
Hey Tim,
I think the information that Eric, you, and the other individuals sharing the accurate history of Jesuits, etc; is very interesting and very important.
Correct me if I am wrong, but should we seriously wish to do something about all this nefarious Jesuit activity, to restore some balance; it may help to look at the root causes, the psychological issues, etc.
To put it differently: The information is very important, because until people confront the reality of the 'Jesuit menace', and it's devastating consequences (not just on others, but it appears on individuals who become Jesuits); there ain't any possibility of even discussing the problem; because most deny it, or prefer to ignore it; etc.
So exposing the 'Jesuit menace' is a good thing. To put it simply: the consequences of the world geopolitics, and the maliciousness, deception, lies, greed particularly for hierarchical power etc.. etc.. are all fertilized by infinite amounts of 'Jesuit menace' psychology.
Now, I look at it all, and I see lies, deceipt, pretentiousness, malice, and people drowning in self-hate and deceipt; and the fostering of distrust; and all -- as usual -- behind masks of it's opposite; distrust hides behind the politically correct Jesuit mask of trust; hate hides behind the mask of love; deception hides behind the mask of sincerity..
People who have been hurt so much, and are so petrified of being hurt some more; they hide whom they are behind psychological and emotional walls, and 'me' is imprisoned in the darkest dungeon, where nobody can find them.
I sense allot of denied and repressed hate and anger, hiding behind two-faced -- what brad would call toxic and poisonous -- smiles.
If you managed to get a real honest answer: What is one of man or woman's most deepest desires; whether conscious or unconscious? What is the prime psychological desire that acts as the motivating psychological, emotional and intellectual meme, for I would imagine every being on this planet?
Love? What is Love? Who is Love? How is Love? When is Love?
Who has been defining what is generally considered 'love'? What accompanying memes have been generated by the elite religions, corporations etc's definition of 'love'?
How have they defined 'love'? Why have they defined 'love' that way? How do they benefit from their defintion of 'love'? Does their benefit appear to give them a sense of being loved?
Has their definition of love been 'accurate'? As in: is it working? Has their definition of 'love' enabled human beings to find the capacity for self-love first, and loving another secondarily?
“Whether life is worth living depends on whether there is love in life.”
How many are emotionally, psychologically, intellectually and physically interested in that idea?
For example: I am well aware that there are those whose definition of 'love' is interchangeable with physically 'fornicate another two-legged animal'. And if it works for them in their lives; I am happy for them; and support them doing what makes them happy or feeling and being loved. On a side note, it is interesting how they consider the word 'fuck' to be so 'vituperative' and offensive' and worthy of censorship.
I don't object to their definition of 'love', namely 'fucking' without any emotional or psychological intimacy, and I support them to enjoy it with others who support their definition and for whom it works.
I've been there, tried that experiment definition of 'love', and found -- for me -- I got no sense of loving from being and acting within that defintion of love. When I asked myself, do I feel like what I am doing is 'love'; is this defintion and my actions according to this defintion' helping me to experientially in my cell, in my guts, in my bones, in my soul, in my heart, in my deepest sense, know 'this is love' 'I am love'; and my answer was; HELL FUCKING NO.
And so, I confronted that I had not found the correct defintion for love, experientially, in my being.
There are lots of people who can endlessly talk about intellectual 'love', and when you ask them their experiential knowledge that they experimented to prove kinesthetically to themselves, that their intellectual assumption was correct; then they are stuck in intellectual la-la land.
Anyway, I could go on and on; but first want to know if it interests you; I ain't interested in domination preach BS; I prefer a discussion and dialogue of ideas, and sharing of people's experiential knowledge.
So, let me know, if you interested.
[PS: You ever licked chockmint off my toes? ;-)]
A faulty definition of love exists in today's love. Love without legitimate action and exposing evil is not true Love. It's a false love composing of stangnation and fantasy. I don't believe in living in fantasy. I do believe we should be doing something about these evils. You are right on that point. It's important to expose these criminals and doing something about it. These actions include educating people, helping, building up our communities, giving people the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and other solutions.
I do respect constructive action in our country and the world. There shouldn't be a real complex philosophical view on the definition of love. Love is simply the genuine care for your fellow human being. Love is a powerful emotion as we all realize. I think your last words are silly. I never licked nothing from your toes.
Post a Comment