Leaving 2008 in a Bang Part 2

tr

Saul Alinksy


This isn't really just about the new President Barack Obama. This is about information describing who Alinksy is and what his agenda is all about. Saul Alinksy is a controversial figure. He is one of the key figures in the radical movements of America. Of course in the mainstream media and other quarters of the public lust in admiration of Barack Obama's version of "CHANGE." Change is a heavy mantra spoken about by Obama. We need change, but is Obama promoting the right kind of change. One aspect of this change is that Obama spoke of a national civilian force to be larger than the military. Also, he want people of all ages to serve in the government (including a goal for all American middle and high school students to perform 50 hours of service a year, and for all college students to perform 100 hours of service a year). Debates on both sides claiming that this proposal is either voluntary or mandatory. There is nothing wrong with citizens having voluntary, service to help the poor and the needy. Even Christian missionaries spread the Gospel globally, helped the poor, sent food to the starving, and did great things in history. This love is a reflection of God's love toward all human beings. If Obama's plans are mandatory, then that is of course wrong. Even if his plans were voluntary, why is a government-run national volunteer corp necessary at all. Some believe that Obama's change is a departure from legitimate traditional values into a more socialist type of society. Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" is a book dictating a Marxist way in order to enact a false change in America. It's interesting to note that Obama advocates servicing learning (which exists in America. Obama plans to have national guidelines where all middle school and high school students do 50 hours of community a year. He wants ways to document student experience). The problem with this is that what if students don't want to have service learning and why are national guidelines (i.e. via computer systems possibly) utilized for this. This is similar to mandatory service since the goal is to have all students in middle and high schools to finish the program. There aren't even words to describe the right of people to deviate from the new guidelines (and this information is available to the government). Barack Obama wants to expand AmeriCorps and have a wicked Homeland Security Corps to help communities plan for "emergencies." Frankily, Barack Obama (like McCain) is a puppet of the same foundations and corporate interests he publicly rails against. Even the controversial poet Frank Marshall Davis influenced Obama to a degree. When Barack Obama was a community organizer, the Woods Fund (a left wing foundation) supported him. I don't believe Obama agreed with the Weatherman terrorist William Ayers, but both men served as board members of the Woods Fund from 1999 to 2002. The Woods Fund advanced the activities of ACORN (the FBI is investigating this group for possible voter registration fraud). Now, in 1992, Obama help the creation of the radical group of Public Allies. Public Allies accoridng to the Investor's Business Daily described Public Allies' real agenda. Public Allies wanted to radicalize American youths, bring social change, and use tactics done by Saul Alinksy. Saul Alinsky is considered the father of community organizing according to the Investor Business Daily article.


Alinksy was prominent in the 1960's. He believed in viewing the community in the prism of issues. Typically, people like Alinksy thrived on conflict, crisis, manipulation, and compromise to get their Marxist agenda rolling. Ironically, one of the first words in Saul Alinksy's "Rules for Radicals" book praised Lucifer: "Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."


33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemason Albert Pike in his Morals and Dogma book wrote that "...The mason is familiar with the doctrine that the Supreme Being is a center of Light." What is this Light Pike praises? On pg. 321 of the same book: Pike writes that: "...Lucifer the lightbearer, Lucifer, the son of morning. Is it He who bears the light? Doubt it not!" So, Albert Pike is praising Lucifer or Satan. Morals and Dogma at page 324 mentions that: "A Devil the fallen Lucifer or Lightbearer." So, the Bible and even Pike admits that Lucifer is a fallen being, it's evil, and it's the Devil. The Bible in 2 Corinthians 11:14 mentions that: "...And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light." So, Saul advocates similar beliefs as Freemasonry (even Manly P. Hall praised Lucifer from pg. 48 in his The Lost Keys of Freemasonry book) and other New Agers in their praise of Lucifer. In the Royal Arch Degree of the York Rite, a Mason says I am that I am (using God's name in ritual according to ex-Mason Jim McKinney). The Royal Arch degree called God JAH-BUL-ON. Abaddon or the demon from is one password or sacred Word in the 17th Degree of Freemasonry. The 19th Degree is called the Grand Pontiff have Masons anoint a person's head with oil and says "Be thou a priest forever after the Order of Melchisedech." This is blasphemy of course. The 20th degree of the Scottish Rite Masonic Lodge has these words which denies absolute truth by saying that: "...No man has the right to dictate to another in matters of faith or belief, no one can say that he has possession of the truth." That is why Masonic preachers like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and Robert Schuller believe that even Muslims, Buddhists, etc. worship the same God as Christians (since Freemasonry teaches religious, theistic Universalism). The 28th Degree of Sun and the 25th Degree of the Brazen Serpent is ironically encorporates the serpent eating its own tail as apart of its iconography. This is blasphemy of course. The 30th Degree called the Knight Kadosh, the rituals says "Imitate Me," stabs skulls, etc. Ex-Freemason Ed Decker said that he as a Mason drunk wine out of a human skull. Ordo Ab Chao is a logo of the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry. Famous Freemasons are Alan Simpson (of the 33rd Degree), Senator Grassley of Iowa, Trent Lott, Bob Dole, Jack Kemp, Robert Bryd, Arlen Spector, Barry Goldwater, John Glenn, Jesse Helms, Sam Nunn, Andrew Young, etc. Saul Alinksy lived from 1909 to 1972. Saul Alinksy earned his doctorate from the University in Chicago in 1930. He worked for a time in the state pentitentirary. He believed that collectivizing the working class poor would solve problems.

That is why in 1939, Saul Alinsky developed the Industrial Areas Foundation. According to a book writtern by reporter David Freddoso, Alinksy believed that in war, the ends justify almost any means (Alinksy also wrote that we can enact decisions that contradict our individual conscience and the good of mankind. These principles are oultined in Alinksy's book). Saul wanted ridicule to intimidate people. Alinksy also reject dogma and absolute truth for his supporters: "[A community] organizer... does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing. ... To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations...." (from Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky). This information isn't shown in the mainstream media since most of them (including the real elite) support Obama's fundamental principles. Contrary voices are maligned. Simple jestures and platitudes are shown by Obama venerators like Chris Matthews. That's why the mainstream media was a tool in manipulating the behavior of citizens in forcing most of them into voting for the 2 choices of Republicans and Democrats. The bashing of even sincere dogma is apart of the globalist agenda. Even Julian Huxley (who is Aldous's brother) believe that UNESCO is the means to promote a single world culture (and to uncrystallize our dogma). Julian was once head of UNESCO. Today, this dialetic process of destroy our present value system is evident on the promotion of Universalism, globalism, an extreme form of secularism, and the war on terror. It's an advancement of collectivism even beyond moral judgments. Ironically, UNESCO was a major participant in Youth Service conferences. Hillary Clinton wrote a paper on Saul Alinsky. Hillary even described Saul as a great seducer of young minds. This battle for individual freedom or collective control by a centralized elite is bigger than an earthly battle. It's a spiritual battle. In essence, we should give our 100% trust in God not to any group or organization at all. The truth is that Saul Alinksy advanced radical views. Barack Obama doesn't support all of these views, but he's isn't perfect either.

A critique of Some in the "Alternative Media"




I wanted to get this off of my chest. This all started with Alex Jones mocked anyone who was a strong Vatican exposer. He later called people like us mentally ill. Soon, he has given token exposes about the Vatican. Now, Texe has taken Jones' side and is attacking Eric Jon Phelps. Frankily, I don't agree with Phelps on every issue including race. People should live where they want irrespective of their race, creed, or skin color. I reject racism 100%. Canaan was cursed as mentioned in Genesis, but Ham wasn't cursed at all. In fact, the book of Genesis says that God blessed Noah and his sons including Ham. There is no evidence that blacks are totally direct descendants from Canaan at all. Additionally, Jesus Christ redeemed people from the curse of the law (Galatians 3:10-14). All humans are equal in sin and can be equally saved under God. All believers in God are one in Jesus Christ. Many racists and some misguided theologians have advanced that "Canaan being black people and hence black people are cursed" lie for centuries. There isn't even a Biblical reference at all proving that black people are under a curse at all from Canaan. No one can convince me otherwise. Race explicilty is not even mentioned in the Bible. Acts 17:26 even admits that God made from one blood all nations to dwell in the Earth. Of course, there is nothing wrong with mere preference in some instances. There is a problem with unfair dehumanization of people based upon their skin color (or hatred of humans personally because of their ethnic group). God certainly is no respector of persons. We should be too. We should judge folks by their character and actions not by their skin color. Many scientists hold that because the physical variations that are used to catagorize people into different races (skin color, eye shape, etc.) are trivial (only .012 percent of human biological variation) and that genetically all humans are fundamentally the same, racial distinctions based upon physical appearance are not founded on biological reality but are in fact a social construct. Professor of Epidemiology Raj Bhopal, who is the head of the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the University of Newcastle, stated in the British Medical Journal: "Humans are one species: races are not biologically distinct, there's little variation in genetic composition between geographically separate groups, and the physical characteristics distinguishing races result from a small number of genes that do not relate closely to either behaviors or disease." The Bible says that we should never judge someone's appearance anyway, but use righteous judgment from John 7:24. Also, education and intervention can radically improve the intelligence and capacities of all people irrespective of their race.



Eric is correct to expose the sinister and wicked history of the Vatican/Jesuit network though. In October of 2008, Texe Marrs and Alex Jones attacked Eric John Phelps with many false accusations and they mentioned a site called www.zionistchampions.com. Each of them didn't cite Eric Jon Phelps' name at all in their whole conversation. They should at least say his name like men. Texe Marrs slanders Esther a whore. Texe Marrs also believe that Haman was the good guy even though he was a dictator of the Persian Empire. If I were criticizing a person, especially on air or in the Internet, I will say their name like a man. Alex Jones (this is the same one who used profane language to describe Geraldo Rivera then appears on the Rivera show to discuss Palfety's death. He's a hypocrite. Jones is good friends with the racist Hutton Gibson and Knight of Malta Patrick Buchanan) said that Eric Jon Phelps believes that the Earth is held on a string. Eric doesn't believe in that. Eric believes in geocentricity (or the view that Earth is the center of the universe and does not move). You can disagree with that view, but that's hardly believing that the Earth in on a string. Alex also said that Eric believes in black magic rituals to do nuclear explosions. Eric Jon Phelps doesn't believe in that since he said that ground detonations caused the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (along with magnesium flash bombs with uranium in them. You can disagree with this, but that's hardly black magic rituals). Jesuits were there in Japan like Pedro Arrupe. Arrupe would soon become the Jesuit General. Jesuit Edmund Walsh was a key figure in ending the contrived WWII. That's why Walsh is pictured walking side by side with 33rd Degree General Douglas MacArthur (and Walsh was involved in the Nuremberg trial that acquitted key pro-Nazi Knights of Malta. High Level Freemason Robert Jackson was apart of heading up the Nuremberg Trials during the 1940's).





Now, in their discussion, they've accused Eric of being an agent who wants to cover up Israeli involvement in the new world order since he's involved in a diamond business. Texe Marrs said these accusations specifically. Texe Marrs is in error to say that Eric Jon Phelps doesn't criticize Zionism because he criticized Labor Zionism and many other forms of Zionism for years (since Zionism isn't monolithic. There are also the extremist Likudnite form of Zionism. There are other Zionists that want peace in the Middle East). I wish they would say Eric Jon Phelps' name like men. Also, we have exposed how many elite members of religions, governments, economic giants, etc. are controlled by the Elite. This site of zionistchampions are right on many issues. They are right that the Talmud ought to be rejected since it's extrabiblical material that is unscriptural on many of its words. Hal Turner is a bigot and agitates conflict (along with the great probability that he is a FBI informant). It also rejects the Kabbala, which I do. This site is wrong on many issues. It accuses Eric John Phelps of being a New Age Movement promoter, because a New Age company funded his book Vatican Assassins. Eric John Phelps publicly said that he rejects the New Age Movement and this company was the only group that would interview him. Also, Jesuit Theilard de Chardin was considered the father of the New Age Movement. The Jesuit ties to New Age Movement is found easily. Also, the Vatican follows many Mystery religion teachings similar to the New Age Movement such as the prayer to the dead is fine, statues ought to be venerated, embrace of Rosary beads, repititious prayers are fine (in contradiction to the Bible), and the praise of Mary as the Queen of Heaven (Many New Agers readily worship the Goddess). These connections among the Mystery Schools, the Vatican, and the New Age Movement are clear cut and easy to understand. This site lies that Eric believes in the hollow Earth theory, which he has now rejected. GCN advertises for the "the Most Holy Family Monastery." That group (with people like Peter Dimond an James Wardner. Some of their ilk still desires to justify the evil Inquisition) promotes the radical Traditionalist sect of Roman Catholicism. These people believe in the lie of Papal Infallibility, the false view that the Pope has the divine right to rule the world, and promote the tenets of the intolerant Council of Trent. I look at this site of www.zionistchampions.com , it's a mix of half truth and intimidation. The site doesn't even talk about Ecumencialism. The modern Ecumencial Movement came about via Vatican II in order to promote compromise among Bible Believing Christians (so they can align themselves under the arm of the Roman Catholic Church). That's why the Archbsihop of Canterbury, who is the acting head of the Church of England & his predecessor are both members of the Papal-loyal Royal Order of Francis I. Rowan Williams has been in league with the Papacy for decades. The Pope and the Jesuits have talked about this. Not all Catholics are involved with all evils in the world. Yet, I have every right to disagree with the doctrines of the Vatican. This site lies that Unhived Mind Forum (and Craig Oxley) doesn't expose Zionists when it has a section that does it. Even Antisionist have exposed this issue in great depth. This website lies and says that Eric absolves Jewish people of any evil in the world. The truth is that many Jewish people in the ADL, B'nai B'rith, etc. are blamed for much evils in society.

Yet, this isn't all Jews, but a select few involve in serious global evil subordinate under more powerful interests (Numerous of these people are the crypto Frankist Sabbatean Labor Zionists. They are ally of the Papacy and hate Torah Judaism. A lof of their organization comes from the Babylonian Mystery Religion. False Messiahs was promoted from this clique like Shabtai Tzvi and Jacob Frank). Therefore these apostate Jewish people are not pro-Jewish at all. Additionally, this site omits how the Vatican was key in the creation of the Vietnam War (for example, Diem was a Catholic trained in America who butchered the Buddhists. Cardinal Spellman was a leading supporter of the Vietnam, and the Pope met with Ho Chi Minh, and Diem. Avro Manhattan's book about Vietnam uses sources to document this truth). The woman in the picture is Madama Ngo Dinh Nhu. She met then Vice President Lyndon Baines Johnson in May of 1961. Ngo Dinh Nhu mock the 1963 protest of Thich Quang Duc. Duc burned himself on fire, because Diem's government suppressed the religious liberty rights of the Buddhists living in South Vietnam. Madame Nhu called it a "barbecue" and stating "let them burn and we shall clap our hands." Her words were wrong of course. She was the wife of Ngo Dinh Nhu, brother and chief adviser to President Ngo Dinh Diem. Not to mention that Knights of Malta, the Rockefellers, and other groups fund the activities of the ADL to accomplish much wickedness in the world. This site lies and says that Eric has unconditional support for the government of Israel (this is in distinction with the many God fearing Israelis living in Israel, so I want to make that clear). The truth is that Eric Jon Phelps feels that the government of Israel is wicked (which it is. Eric John Phelps exposed the evils in the Israeli government for years), yet Jewish people have a right to live in Israel. Also, Eric has exposed George Bush, the CFR neo cons, and Dick Cheney despite what the site says. Eric Jon Phelps has said that 9/11 is an inside job. The zionistchampions site said that Phelps is a tax dodger. What? The IRS is an illegal group meant to steal wealth. You have to be careful when dealing with taxes, but it isn't evil to refuse to pay money to the IRS at all. That's why real Patriots advocate the repeal of the IRS. So, this zionistchampions site wants to shill for the IRS possibly? Maybe. On the diamond issue, Eric said that his wife is a geomologist. She has a simple jewelry store. She sells diamond to jewelers. Eric isn't a diamond merchant, but buys diamonds in Israel and other resources from Iran, etc. Eric Jon Phelps says that has only one jewelry store (which isn't a blood diamond store at all). The store purchases a stone once in a while.


The biggest lie of this site (called www.zionistchampions.com) is its support of Ron Paul. It's a fact that Ron Paul sucks up to the pro-NWO 33rd Degree Freemason and Vatican supporter Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan signed an agreement with the Vatican in 1984, he signed a pro-abortion law in 1967 as Governor of California, he advanced the anti-gun Mulford Act in 1967, he expanded our debt, Papal Knights of Malta were in his cabinet (along with CFR members, etc.), and he did other anti-freedom policies. Ronald Reagan was a member of the Bohemian Grove and is pictured with Richard Nixon. Ronald Reagan was the quintessential fake conservative in America. It's a fact that Paul is apart of a Greek fraternity named Lambda Chi Alpha. It's a fact that Ron Paul has expressed support for the John Birch Society. The John Birch Society has keys to Masons (Robert D. Love and T. Coleman Andrews, and other JBS members were Freemasons) in its earlier years. Now, the JBS has very strong ties to the Vatican, the Council on National Policy (filled with pro-Dominionists), and Jesuit trained people. John F. McManus is Jesuit trained and the head of the JBS. The John Birch Society promoted the Cold War hoax. Many in it are sincere, but their leadership are controlled by the establishment. For example, John Birch Society member William J. Grede was the director of the 7th Federal Reserve Bank, which is a vital branch of the Federal Reserve. JBS member Louis Ruthenberg was also tied to the JBS. It's a fact that Ron Paul has given Masonic handshakes. It's a fact that Ron Paul supports and praises the unbiblical John Paul II. John Paul II explicitly called for a new world order before he died. It's a fact that Ron Paul is allied with SMOM Lehman of the PNAC crew. It's a fact that Ron Paul refuses to expose 9/11 as an inside job. Dissenting with Catholic doctrine in a strong way isn't bashing Catholics as Alex Jones say. I'm glad Kelly McGinley from South Carolina exposed more information about Ron Paul. Ron Paul said that he can't decide whether homosexuality as a sin or not. According to Kelly McGinley, "Ron Paul claims to be pro life yet as a doctor he knowingly hands out pills that he knows have an abortive side effect plus most probably will give the women breast cancer...Ron Paul does hand them out, I asked him personally on my show. He answered the same as any normal brainwashed doctor would answer today. Ron Paul should expose the reasons why these dangerous drugs are given, not act as if it is normal and good to give them out to women." Ron Paul supports the evil policy of banning babies who are born here in America (whose parents are illegal immigrants) from being citizens immediately. George W. Bush has repeatedly bowed in submission to Pope Benedict XVI (who called for a new world order. Many. Knights of Malta own many corporations, etc.). Even Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush have been awarded the The Order of Merit pro Merito Melitensi of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. Only Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the world, not Ron Paul. We should place our real faith in God not the voting process.


Also, Custance Cumbey is right to expose the New Age Movement. She even came up to comment on my blog a while ago. Yet, Cumbey believes in Ecumencialism and her own old book says that New Agers can go into Heaven (as found in "The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow: The New Age Movement and Our Coming Age of Barbarism" form pages 186-187). Cumbey falsely called Eric Jon Phelps as a person who promotes the New Age Movement. Notice that Alex and Texe didn't refute the long expose Eric Jon Phelps made against Cumbey (the expose include the Vatican link to the New Age Movement, Cumbey's Ecumencialism, and Cumbey's false accusations including called Custance calling Catholicism as apart of Christianity). Although, both of them used ad-hominem attacks against Eric on that issue. It's ironic that Texe Marrs is trying to justify Cumbey, but Custance Cumbey has criticized Texe Marrs before. Cumbey accused Texe Marrs of being a racist. Now, Alex Jones and Texe Marrs claim to expose the evil in the Vatican, which is true in limited cases. Yet, they demonize anyone who even show strong dissent with the Vatican. It's Orwellian doublethink, because they outline crumbs about exposing the Vatican, but demonize anyone who classifies the Vatican as a wicked, murderous, and lying organization since their origin (which it is. Not to mention exposing Opus Dei, the Knights of Malta, the Constantian Order, the Pilgrim Society, etc. is important to expose as well). I'm wrong act like Alex Jones in cursing people out in a radio show just because I disagree with someone's views. Also, people like me have exposed Labor Zionists for years, but we don't view all Jewish people as monolithic. Evil exists in many circles and it's a lie to assume that we only expose the Vatican/Jesuit network. We expose the FED, the NAU, illegal immigration, flouride, the war on terror, and the list goes on an on. Eric is right to expose the Vatican though. I guess this is the new level of attacks from these people. If we were so weak, they would have nothing to say about us. Since, we are growing in our influence, certain people are scared. These skeptics have to do better than that if they want to intimidate us. These liars say we want to fight each other in an non-productive way. No, we want to back up our views and defend it. Also, some of these skeptics want to equate standing up for our views to agitation or infighting. That's a false connection. The Jesuit information is spreading fast and some can't stand it. This isn't slander. This is reality.

Here's my take on Alfred Lambremont Webre. He has been on my blog plenty of times to attempt defend his positions on issues. He has disagreed with Eric's characterization of him as a shill. He is obsessed with answering any charge that Eric Jon Phelps makes about him. Here are the facts of the situation. He seems to be sincere about he believes, but has made plenty of errors in his views. In 1996, he was an elected delegate to the Texas Democratic Presidential Convention in Dallas, Texas. He believes in the existence of intelligent, extraterrestial life in the Universe. Webre also joined Stanford Research Institute. Here's other examples of his life. Now, Webre is a futuristic and is from Canada. He is an environmental activist and there is nothing wrong with trying to help the environment at all. He is the member of the United Nations' NGO from NYC during the 1980's. Why would Webre align with the U.N. in the first place? The United Nations was developed by the establishment (since its headquarters are upon Rockefeller-owned land) for the establishement (since the United Nations advance the globalist ideologies of abortion, population control, globalism, and global warming hysteria agenda). The UN has always been a organization to disrupt national sovereignity the world over. The UN has been murderous for years and was supported by 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemason Harry Truman. Webre once worked for the Ford Foundation and the Standford Research Institute during the 1970's. The Ford Foundation was crucial in funding left gatekeeping organization for decades. Webre claims that Zionism came from Lucifer's rebellion occuring at least 200,000 years ago. Webre believes that Lucifer and Satan are seperate beings as taught by many New Agers. The truth is that Zionism isn't that long. Also, Lucifer (who existed before his fall into the Earth) and Satan are the same being. Alfred Webre was famous for meeting in a 9/11 truth conference in Vancouver, British Columbia at June of 2007. So, Webre is wrong on these points. Also, if Webre wants to challenge me on these points, he surely can respond to these points (as he has done on plenty of occasions on my blog). In other words, the floor is yours Webre, Custance, and others. Bring it on.

Virginia is still my home. Hence, I don't agree with in fighting or agitation, but we have every right to defend our positions against lies and deception. No real man is trying to undermine any human being in a sinister way. I wonder if people like Alex Jones would present conclusive evidence that we are agents. He doesn't have that evidence because we are not agents at all. Also, I follow no man in this world. I follow God alone. These skeptics I believe are placed here to force the Patriot Movement to only expose evil Zionists (Zionism isn't monolithic, so not all Zionists want to rule the world in an evil way at all). Readily, Jewish people are utilized as scapegoats for our ills, because that can ignore the real power elite (as found in the Vatican/Jesuit network and its subordinate arms). Some of the anti-Semites believe that the Rothschilds rule the world when the Rothschilds are Guardians of the Vatican's Treasury. Also, the Pilgrim Society, the Constantian Order, Opus Dei, the Knights of Malta, the Jesuits, and various high powered Papal knighthoods are much more powerful than the Rothschilds. Notice how these anti-Semitic liars (like Curt Maynard, joeblowman, Mike Delaney or prothink, Hal Turner, Joe, Ongir, Daryl Bradford Smith, Frank Furter, and others) refuse to expose these groups in an indepth way. It's been found that joeblowman went into a Jesuit High School (He might be a Muslim. He respects his Jesuit teachers when the Jesuits promote the destruction of the Protestant Reformation). Yet hypocritically accuse people like us of covering up information, while the Vatican is left off the hook. Hal Turner is a big shill. Turner not only advocates violence against Hispanic people, and African Americans (He hates people because of their ethnic group, which is a sin). He has also threatened violence to promote a civil war in America, which is a sign of disinformationalist activity. Hal Turner is a racist. Tom Heneghan and Stew Webb was on the Hal Turner show recently.I wouldn't be caught dead on a show of racist bigot like Hal at all. As usual, Hal Turner is a Roman Catholic and is Jesuit-trained. Hal Turner is a liar and a pro-Neo Nazi liar. Even Eric Hufschmid is the nephew of Papal Knight of St. Gregory member Rupert Murdoch. I don't agree with Eric Jon Phelps on all issues, but this slander against him (and anyone exposing the Vatican/Jesuit network in a strong way) is despictable. We will not be afraid of exposing the Heirachy of the Vatican. I will not quit. I will not be intimidated either.

Mike Smercorish exposed



Mike Smerconish is the pure represenation of a compromiser, a Neo Con, and not a real conservative. His radio talk show junctures spread across America. He claims to be for liberty, but some of his views manifestation of a complete disregard from some of the liberties that are ingrained in the Bill of Rights (including the Constitution). One of his famous sick acts was that he literally supported the starvation-murder of Terri Schiavo. Even Jesse Jackson opposed her death, because you don't starve innocent human beings to death for the sake of "end of life issues" (especially when she didn't express her wishes at all on about how would she die). Mike lives around the Philadephia area. He said that Terri's husband had the best interest in mind for Terri Schiavo. That's a lie. If he did had the best interests for Terri, he would do all he could to save that women's life. Also, Terri Schiavo's husband wouldn't commit adultery. Researchers have said that nurses had given testimony about possible abuse against Terri Schiavo. The act of starving her to death is a violation of the Geneva Convention. Pro-euthanasia doctors were chosen to inspect her. Some doctors commented that Terri could eat with mouth. There are numerous cases of those with PVS to awaken out of their comas and execute their bodily faculities greatly. Smerconish is known during his radio show for giving softball questions unto liberals (when a true interviewer should be fair among all points of view). He also has big government beliefs like supporting the evil War on Drugs and agrees with the anti-freedom policy of mandatory minimums for criminals.


Mike Smerconish regularly calls on the GOP to be pro-abortion (which is already is one some levels). The Republican Party compromised true conservative values on many cases a long time ago. That's why Mike supported the candidacy of the anti-gun, pro-abortion Senator of Pennslyvania Arlen Spector. His anti-civil liberty agenda is extending by him for advancing the wicked war on terror and supporting racial profiling (which is immoral since it violates the principles of using probable cause plus due process. We should never utilize a color of a man's skin as a means to judge a criminal). I do thank God that I'm pro-gun rights, pro-life, I'm for religious liberty, I'm pro-individual rights, and I'm anti-Patriot Act. Mike Smerconish even met with the Jesuit-trained dictator Fidel Castro. Mike asked Castro a silly question about Frank Rizzo. Michael Smerconish also agreed with jailing the innocent protestors of the Philadephia 11 (who just preached the Gospel peacefully without violence at all). He agreed with pro-ADL woman Lynne Abraham. The Philadephia 11 (some of these Christains faced 47 years in prison for a felony) refuted the argument that innocent Christians can't be oppressed in America as it has occured in Canada, Britian, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, etc. REPENT AMERICA came to the Philadephia 11's defense. The Philadephia 11 was soon acquitted of all charges. Mike was hostile to the Christian callers who promoted the free speech rights of the Christian protestors. He wrote in the Philadephia Daily News about the Christians getting what they deserved, which is sick. This was so wrong that the judge in Philadephia threw the case out of the court. Well, Mike Smerconish supports Barack Obama. He has a right to do this and he has a right to say what he wants on his radio show. I don't believe in censorship. Yet, I have every right to disagree with him strongly. One reason he support Obama ironically is because of Obama's radical view of possibly invading Pakistan (even without their permission) to get "al-Qaeda." That's extreme. That's just as immoral and advocating an invasion of Iran and it's a violation of Pakistani sovereignity. Another reason why Mike supported Obama was because John McCain refused to make a Rockefeller Republican like Tom Ridge to be his Vice President nominee. Ridge is a member of the Knights of Columbus, is pro-abortion, and was once the head of Homeland Security. Mike Smerconish is on TV in MSNBC and CNN, sucking up to the establishment yet again. He's looking out for himself. The good news is that millions of Patriots endorse real liberty and are looking out for God plus all of humanity.

Here's a side note about Kaltheleen Parker. Parker is another person who is more slick than Smerconish. Katheleen Parker is an establishment person who wants conservatives to compromise their values to just adjust to the establishment. It's a shame. She claims to be a conservative, yet her true colors came out during the Obama/McCain Presidential race. Katheleen Parker supported the campaign of Barack Obama, who is the most liberal Presidential candidate in American history. Now, Parker recently wrote an article bashing conservative Christians. She written that religious expression in the public square that was being promoted by Republicans was a crucial reason their defeat. No, Republicans lost the Presidency because they forgotten their principles. The Republicans tried to be like the Democrats by advancing CFR member John McCain to the Presidency. John McCain made a weaker campaign than Barack Obama. Also, McCain tried to be more liberal and still lost since people realize that being fake doesn't work. Now, Katheleen Parker mocked Evangelicals (in her Washington Post column entitled "Giving Up on God." This is total disrespect to God). Parker feels that the Republicans giving up on religion can yield more votes. Yet, that hasn't worked at all. She lied in claiming that leaving religion privately alone is fine. Yet, Parker didn't express one iota of criticism toward Barack Obama or the Democrats for using religious statements in churches, speeches, etc. to justify their campaigns (involving the environment, health care, etc.) at all. Barack Obama sent flyers to pastors, he talked with congregations, and he is quoted as taking direction from Jesus Christ. No word is mentioned from Parker about that, so she's a hypocrite. Not to mention that John McCain didn't use too much overt religious connotations in his campaign at all. Frankily, I have no problem with any party using religion as apart of their free speech rights. Parker stereotyped religious voters as carrying wooden crates on street corners. That's a lie since for centuries, real Christians have been in more places that street corners. Also, private and public worship is protected by the Constitution. Religion is more than apart of one's heart. It's an expression of your being and it has a right to be expressed publicly or privately among a society. Parker expresses an elitist tone by using false examples and stereotypes to justify her (and other elite's) suspicions about any form of public religious expression (which is Constitutional I might add). She lied and claimed that strongly expressing your faith is armbanding religion. Sorry, the Constitution cites the right of the free expression of religion. She mocked Evangelical Christians as oogedy-boogedy, but without them, the Obama victory would be much greater than a couple of percentage points (It would possibly be in the double digits).



There is nothing wrong with religious people from across the political spectrum to express their faith views publicly at all. Also, people should never be ashamed of expressing their religious faith at all. She mocked Sarah Palin for just asking God for help in her future. Parker also made a column lying by comparing conservatives to Stalinists. Though Palin isn't perfect, this is silly by Parker. The few things Parker is right is that America is a diverse nation. There is nothing wrong with being a diverse nation. Kathaleen Parker has been going on MSNBC and the anti-gun, pro-abortion Chris Matthews show to express her views. Kathleen is sucking up to MSNBC to get some credibility with numerous liberals. She is bashing conservatives while pretending to be conservative. This is very ironic and hypocritical all at the same time. Katheleen Parker is acting as a faux conservative sellout.



By Timothy





December 13, 2008