An Account

Henry Kissinger is a huge proponent of the new world order. Recently, he has promoted Barack Obama as the person who could herald the new world order. Kissinger is a known ally of the Rockefeller family and has been complicit in war crimes from across the world. Henry Kissinger has been exploiting the present global economic downturn as an excuse to promote his aim of globalization. Kissinger said that the economic depression gives an unique opportunity for creative diplomacy to usher in a world financial order (and force sovereign nations to face the reality that its dilemmas can be mastered only by common action). Henry Kissinger supported George W. Bush and John McCain during his Presidential election as well. Henry Kissinger wants Barack Obama to be given the precise avenue in shaping the new world order. Ironically, Henry Kissiner is a member of the CFR (ever since the late 1920's, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation funded the CFR), the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group. “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” explained Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member. Hence, these organizations' agenda are apparently clear. Even H.G. Wells advanced a socialist style one world government future via his book. One way these globalists try to achieve their goals is by the strategy of problem, reaction, and solution. The economic crisis is a perfect example of this strategy in action. For example, the international bankers and the elite enginnering the economic crisis (via hyperinflation, busts, overspending, etc.), then the reaction is a global recession, and their solution is an international economic system to handle world economy (and the establishment of a new world order). It's as simple as that.




Genetic Engineering that is utilized for evil purposes is a real threat in the 21st century. Mike Adams from NaturalNews on Monday, at January 12, 2008 described about the breast cancer gene free baby might herald new era of eugenics (plus genetic class wars). This is a new era of pre-birth genetic screening of babies. Doctors from the University College in London proclaimed that they have created the “world’s first breast cancer gene-free baby” by screening a baby for the BRCA1 gene, which they claim causes breast cancer. Adams outlined that this piece of news is containing numerous medical myths. He said that the idea that BRCA1 gene causes cancer isn't true. He believes that there is no such gene that causes cancer by itself. Mike Adams believes that the expression of the cancer gene is caused by environmental factors. These factors include exposure to cancer-causing chemicals in foods, medicines, personal care products, pesticides or other industrial chemicals. Without the toxic chemical exposure, the gene will never be expressed in the first place. You can eat raw broccoli sprouts or other cruciferous vegetables and suppress the BRCA1 gene so that you never grow cancer tumors at all. In other words, the patient does have control over the expression of the genes that can be controlled via diet and the environment. Hundreds of foods do have an anti-cancer effect. They are garlic, green tea, raw cacao, omega 3 oils, etc. Vitmain D and exercise can suppress cancer as well. Some in modern medicine falsley believe that women have no control over breast cancer and it comes from your genes alone not your choices. Mike Adams fears that people will promote the false idea that babies born with the BRCA1 gene are defective while those babies without the gene are superior. This is the essence of eugenics and a mindset that could create second class citizens. It's certainly wrong to discriminate against a person based on his or her genetics indeed. Some doctors do want to use technology to manipulate the genes of the fetus. Genes do have an influence on a person's health, but the environment places a more important factor on human health. Gene screening of babies is very Orwellian to say the least. Genetic selection can lead to more destruction of innocent embryos as well.


The government claims that it has found the DNA of the alleged 9/11 hijackers. The government claimed to have discovered flesh and bone from 13 of the 19 Al Qeada hijackers (who were in the planes that hit the Twin Towers in New York and the Pentagon in Northern Virginia). The FBI spent millions of dollars to make this claim that they found many of the hijackers. This is inspite of the fact some of the hijackers could be still alive. Still, there is no conclusive evidence that all of the alleged hijackers were on the fatal flights. Many 9/11 researchers believe that names of the putative terrorists don't appear on the flight manifests (or no Arab names appeared on the lists). In fact, as NowPublic notes, “the U.S. Government withheld the actual passenger lists for years” and the “lists are not passenger manifests, but lists of victims… By not releasing these documents, the U.S. Government actually encouraged speculation that the hijackers names did not show up on the passenger lists.” Many people who are victims of 9/11 have yet to be identified. “No trace has been identified of 1,151 of the 2,749 people who died at the Trade Center,” USA Today reported on April 20, 2006. “In February 2005, the medical examiner’s office announced that attempts to identify remains had exhausted current DNA-matching technology.” So, it's wild that the FBI now has DNA technology to identify terrorists. Even Eve Conant admits that the fragments of the body are too small and ruined to be restored in their entirely. About 2,780 people died form the attacks. It's obvious that the government is lying about certain aspects of 9/11. For example, at least three of the hijackers — Ahmed Alnami, Ahmed Alghamdi, and Saeed Alghamdi were trained at Pensacola Naval Air Station. The supposed 9/11 ringleader, Mohamed Atta, once attended the International Officer’s School at Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama, according to Air Force spokesman Colonel Ken McClellan. Atta was funded by the ISI head Ahmed. An FBI informat was a landlord to one of the hijackers. Therefore, the hijackers were definitely aided by the government acting as government agents. The CFR-ruled 9/11 Commission didn't reveal anything about the strange collaspe of Building Seven (which fell without a plane hitting it at all. It fell in its own footprint). The FBI is releasing this information in order to try to discredit the 9/11 truth movement. Yet, this will never happen since too many smoking guns exist refuting the official story about 9/11. These smoking guns include the wargames, explosives, W199I, and other evidence.



Richard Moore from the Lakeland Times on January 9, 2009 wrote about the Second Amendment. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources are trying to steal firearms from innocent hunters. They are doing this under the guise of a DNR warden. The DNR warns says that law enforcement officers should make people follow their orders under any circumstances. That's a lie since we have a right to resist law enforcement if they force people to do anything contrary to the Constitution or our God-ordained moral code. In other words, if the government says do abortions (or murder innocent people), we have a right to reject that order. One former hunter education instructior for the department said that the DNR is wrong since their actions are unconstitutional (i.e. citizens have no right to hand over their firearms without due process). This person's name is Mark Palan. He is the owner of Palan's Outpost Sporting Goods in Iowa, County. The DNR cast him out after 14 years as a volunteer instructor. Palan was eliminated because he refuse to teach un-Constitutional concepts about the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms. It doesn't say that police can steal arms from innocent citizens without due process or without probable cause at all. Ironically, Wisconsin is an open carry state. Allowing the police to steal legal firearms on demand is fascist not only illegal. Even in West Allis, the police arrested Bruce Krause. Bruce hold a holstered legal pistol while planting trees on his own property. This case will deal with police authority to seize firearms and Wisconsin's state's open carry law. Krause is fighting back and a landmark U.S. Court of Appeals decision could be decisive in the outcome. If the police can steal legal firearms from people, they can steal other objects from the citizens. It's a slipperly slope indeed if the police are allowed to steal guns from citizens. The Second Amendment ought to be protected.


Bobby Rush is now escaping the pro-gun ideology of his previous Black Panther past. He proposes an illegal bill called H.R. 45 or the “Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009." This bill will make it illegal to have a firearm that takes an ammunition clip without a license. This is unbelievable, but true. If passed, the law will amend the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act and prohibit a person from possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license. Also, the bill will create a firearm injury information clearinghouse with the Attorney General. Ironically, Eric Holder, who is Barack Obama's proposed Attorney General, is a notorious gun grabber. Mr. Rush and numerous Democrat don't appreciate the Second Amendment at all. Blair Holt was killed in May 10, 2007 in Chicago (on a public bus riding home from school). Holt used his body to shield a girl that was caught in the line of fire. This was during the time when a young man boarded the bus and started shooting. Gun grabbers say that the government suppressing gun ownership is a means to stop gun violence. The problem is that Chicago has some of the strictest anti-gun laws in the nations with record violence crime. That tells me that criminals will steal use guns to commit crime irrespective of what law is passed. As Drew Zahn notes, “H.R. 45 is a resurfacing of 2007’s H.R. 2666, which contained much of the same language and was co-sponsored by 15 other representatives and Barack Obama’s current chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel. H.R. 2666 was assigned to the House Judiciary committee, where no action was taken.” Barack Obama from 2000 supported a bill to limit gun ownership to one gun a month. Obama even opposes the right to carry. Thomas Jefferson said that laws forbidding the carrying of arms only encourage assailants to commit more homicides in society. The reality is that civilians owning guns along with education, moral reform, etc. are real solutions to decrease gun crime. All citizens have a right of speech, conscience, and the right to peacefully own arms if they want to.



There has been some good news in the pro-life front. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on January 12, 2009 wrote about how Pennslyvania abortion alternatives program have helped nearly 20,000 women (or 19,747 women to be exact) last year. This program is called Real Alternatives. It's the nation's first and largest state funded program providing women with alternatives to abortion. The women are given comprehensive counseling, mentoring, and support throughout their entire pregnancy. This assistance is done for one year following the birth of their baby. They recieved its highest funding the fiscal year of 2007 to 2008. The amount was $6.5 million per year from the state welfare department. Most of the money goes directly for the programs helping women, with just 8.5 percent funding administrative costs. Kevin Baggatta heads the program and he's a lawyer. He tells Lifenews.com about the program's sucess over the years. Kevin that that his organization has helped reduce abortions in Pennslyvania to historic lows. "We have seen a steady decrease in annual abortions since the start of the program 13 years ago," he said. Overall, Bagatta says the state has spent $59 million to help 150,000 women experiencing an unplanned or crisis pregnancy avoid abortion. "We are striving for the day when no woman in the Commonwealth feels that she must have an abortion -– that is what the program is about," he said. Real Alternatives fund other groups from across the state as well. Bagatta says Real Alternatives is the only state-funded program in Pennsylvania dedicated to lowering abortions after there is a crisis pregnancy. "It continues to work because of the approximately 500 counselors and mentors statewide meeting the needs of women in unplanned and crisis pregnancies," he said. "An alternative to abortion is not a pamphlet, it is another person," he said. "It is one woman seeing another woman in crisis and loving her and supporting her like she is her own daughter. This program represents the best in America." Alternatives to the murder of abortion is certainly working in the state of Pennslyvania.



Roland Burris is now the new replacement of Barack Obama's Senate seat in Illinois. Congress people who were Democrats gave in since it distracted from the controversy of the Illinois Governor. Burris said that his family, friends, and colleagues inspired him to go forward. Hillary Clinton had hearing about her job possibly as the new Secretary of State. Hillary said that she wants a smart power strategy in the Middle East. In other words, Hillary desires to have arms control in dealing with the Middle East. Typically in these hearings, the questions given unto her were non-contentious in their nature. The session lasted a little over 3 hours. Dick Lugar advised Hillary Clinton to not take foreign contributions for the Clinton Foundation as her time as the Secretary of State. Hillary Clinton is apart of the Clinton Foundation that handle global affairs in many different ways. Some want to investigate who funds this Foundation. Hillary is a women with many elite connections and controversies. She told a pro-life person that it's apart of God's Law to kill babies, which is sick and satanic. She is a member of the CFR and she is dedicated to the agenda of the new world order. That is why she supports Walter Cronkite, who want global government to exist in the world.





So, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Ann Coulter has caused a lot of controversy in her new book. She was on the View and they yellled about motherhood. Coulter is right that children with single mothers have a higher risk of crime and other negative indicators of life. Coulter is wrong in painting most single mothers in one broad brush and ignoring many of the circumstances on why single mothers exist. Some single mothers exist not because of selfishness, but because a cowardly father refuse to take care of their children. Also, tons of single mothers are great parents who raise their children in an exceptional manner. That is the point that Janine Turner wanted to make. She is pro-life and single motherhood is accepted more, because some women made the right choice in not aborting their children. I have more respect for Turner than Coulter for many reasons. One is that Janine Turner is a prime example that numerous single mothers have raised excellent children and being a single mother isn't a death sentence at all. Also, Ann Coulter isn't a real conservative at all. Ann is allowed to spew her invective to make real conservatives look bad and continue the false left/right paradigm in society. Ann Coulter promoted Hillary Clinton for President once, she supports the Patriot Act, and she is a neo conservative on most issues. That isn't acting as a real conservative at all. Battles are going on in Gaza. Both Hamas and the Isreali government have done terrorism and other errors in this affair. Kucinich said that 50 Percent of Gaza Population are Under 14 Years Old. He wanted to convey the point that the civilian deaths in Gaza are in fact immoral.



Robert P. Murphy wrote an article about a serious economic debate going on the world. Murphy believes that a depression doesn't mean we escape the stable economic rules of the days. Of course, recent Nobel laureate Paul Krugman agrees with changing the rules during a Depression since he's a Keynesian. That is why Paul advocates the government to pour trillions of dollars even into the economy. He feels that this will create jobs even if huge debt will result by this action. Krugman believes that the government pumping money can work since employed workers will produce mpre than unemployed workers. Murphy believes that standard rules still apply since the government overspending money will just strip resources from the private sector during a recession (which can complicate matters even more). Now, Krugman feels that in a depression the government is the most efficient means to build roads and bridges immediately (while not stagnating the quality of labor at all). He feels that the private sector may be complicated in such measures, but not entirely eliminate the existence of the private sector. Murphy has a different view. He believes that the government will get more than just umemployed resources. He feels that getting resources for bridges will be diverted away form private sector uses. Not to mention you have to find the money to fund such projects. Murphy writes that our capital structure was put into a unstable condition, because of the deficits and other issues. Bridge building doesn't solve all economic problems. The reality is that government over spending regularly strips resources away form the private sectors. Real economic solutions involve cutting spending, cut taxes, have fair trade, and stop inflating our money supply. These solutions are not readily occuring, because most of the politicans in Washington, D.C. want the military industrial complex to continue (with the war on terror, the violation of our civil liberties, etc.).



By Timothy