Early August 2009 Developments

A Soros funded blog is attempting to malign opposition to Obamacare. This blog is named Think Progress who is trying to demonize people who disagree with the health care plan. They have interviewed Senator Dick Durbin (the Illinois Democrat from the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies). Think progress claims to be a progressive blog, but they are run by the establishment fellow named John Podesta and the Center for American Progress. Podesta worked for the Clinton administration. The CAP has globalist Democrats like health care czar Tom Daschle, the wife of John Edwards, etc. They are funded by the globalist CFR member, Bilderberger George Soros. John Podesta believes that Barack Obama's plan can create quality, affordable health care. He wants a public option when the government can't even broker used cars. Lee Fang falsely believes that anyone disagreeing with the health care bill is an extremist that harasses Democrats. Think Progress's collaborator Jonathan Corn believes the same thing (Durbin believes that people like us are funded by insurance companies to express our free speech rights). That's a lie of course since intelligent people don't scream socialism and people have a right to express their views. The people opposing Obamacare are citizens not insurance company operatives or necessarily only Republicans. The health care bill as it is is a totalitarian health care system or possible abortion funding, medical rationing, monitoring of your private records, etc. operated by much of the government. Protestors said no to Texas Rep. Democrat Lloyd Doggett at a grocery store. No was in reference to the health care plan. The protestors comes from all over the political spectrum. Even the tea party people were originated from Libertarians. People have screamed at Sen. Arlen Specter and Bilderberger Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. This occured in a Philadelphia town hall meeting. People said that they should read the bill before voting on it. Also, a women said that: “I look at this health care plan and I see nothing that is about health or about care. What I see is a bureaucratic nightmare, senator. Medicaid is broke, Medicare is broke, Social Security is broke and you want us to believe that a government that can’t even run a cash for clunkers program is going to run one-seventh of our U.S. economy? No sir, no.” Arlen Specter wants to make judgements very fast, but taking your time on a bill is better than rushing something you haven't totally read yet. Think Progress promotes the libel that the Tea Party movement is linked to lobbyist run groups like Americans for Prosperity (who is run by an associate of Jack Abramoff) and Freedom Works (run by lobbyist and former Republican leader Dick Armey). The truth is the tea Party movement was created by Libertarians (like the Libertarian Party of Illinois got the the idea to hold an April 15, 2009 anti-tax “Boston Tea Party” in Chicago way back in December of 2008. On February 10, 2009 they started a Facebook page and began promoting the website throughout the Illinois media,” writes Donny Ferguson of the Libertarian National Committee). It was hijacked to a degree by Republicans, yet Tea Party Patriots' National Coordinator Amy Kremer said to Newsmax on May 14 that this is a non-partisan movement. A slight majority of people according to a Washington Post poll oppose the present health care bill. The White House is using the White House Director of New Media Macon Philllips to criticize people who disagree with the plan as promoting disinformation, etc. in the Internet. The strategy of Think Progess is to strife dissent in order to get the health care plan passed that has some bad provisions in it (that could restrict treatments and procedures to seniors and others with serious medical conditions). There should be health care reform but not in this fashion.

Global Warming that's man made has been refuted and discredited on many levels. Now, the scientists from the ACS (or the American Chemical Society) are against Al Gore's deception. Now, these scientists want an editor to be removed from the Society, because this editor demonized people who reject anthropogenic climate change. The American Chemical Society is the world's largest scientific society. The person who wants the scientists from the ACS to be demonized is an editor from Chemical and Engineering named Rudy Baum from his June 22, 2009 editorial. Baum lied and said that people like us are wrong. Soon, letters have catisgate Baum since he compared people who reject man made climate change to Holocaust deniers, disgusting, filled with misinformation. etc. That's slander of of course. ACS member Thomas E. D'Ambra wrote that it's time to find a new editor. Geochemist R. Everett Langford believes that Rudy Baum, Al Gore, Barack Obama and others are condescending to presume that the climate change issue is resolved completely. Other scientists have criticized Baum's words like Atmospheric chemist Roger L. Tanner, Willaim Tolley, Edward H. Gleason, etc. To “prove” his assertion that the science was “becoming increasingly well established,” Baum cited the Obama Administration's U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) study as evidence that the science was settled. The problem is that report have many poor research skills in it. Also, scientists and professors reject the report as promoting the worst case sceanario, it ignores peer reviewed works, and its distorts scientific inquiry. The This comes in the promotion of the climate bill. The climate bill promotes polluters as long as they have a carbon credit and it faces an extreme economic strain on the American people (the policies of the climate bill are shown toward India or China, which are worst polluters than us). On May 1, 2009, the American Physical Society (APS) Council decided to review its current climate statement via a high-level subcommittee of respected senior scientists. The decision was prompted after a group of 54 prominent physicists petitioned the APS revise its global warming position. The 54 physicists wrote to APS governing board: “Measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th - 21st century changes are neither exceptional nor persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today.” Physicists signed it like Princeton University scholar Dr. Will Happer. He conducted 200 peer-reviewed scientific studies. The editors of the APS said more scientific skeptics are coming forward. In addition, in April 2009, the Polish National Academy of Science reportedly “published a document that expresses skepticism over the concept of man-made global warming.” Over 700 internationals scientists dissent over man-made global warming claims. That is why global temperature have cooled .74 degrees F since Gore released his "An Incovenient Truth" propaganda film. India Issued a report challenging global warming fears, a canvass of more than 51,000 Canadian scientists revealed 68% disagree that global warming science is “settled”, and a Japan Geoscience Union symposium survey in 2008 reportedly “showed 90 per cent of the participants do not believe the IPCC report.” This proves that creditable scientists reject man made global warming not just regularly citizens in the world. The truth is coming out.

Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on August 4, 2009 wrote than a Barack Obama advisor and health care architect has been criticized as backing rationing for the disabled. This person is named Ezekiel Emanuel. He is the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Ezekiel is the chief architect of the Congressional health care plan. He's the health policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget. He's also a member of Federal Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research. One respected pro-life advocate believes that Americans should be worried, because Emanuel appeared to support rationing health care for disabled Americans. This can lead into euthanasia. Bradley Mattes is the director of Life Issues Institute. Mattes said that Emanuel is quoted back in 1996 that saying medical benefits of a government-controlled healthcare plan would not be given to “individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens.” Emanuel clarified his stance by adding, “An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.” As Mattes says, "If you don't think the healthcare plan of Barack Obama and the leaders in Congress will result in widespread rationing of medical services," then he urges Americans to pay attention to Emanuel. Mattes believes that this health care plan could neglect people with Down syndrome, Parkinson's disease, and other debilitating illnesses. Of course, the Barack Obama administration would disagree with that opinion of pro-life's criticisms of his health care bill.. Emanuel have said more controversial comments. These comments have him defending discrimination against senior citizens in an article that appeared in the January 31, 2009 issue of the medical journal Lancet. “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious [offensive] discrimination," Emanuel wrote. This is shocking. Mattes wrote an email to Lifenews.com that this allocation refers to healthcare services. Some of these services were critical to sustaining life or at the very least, a better quality of life. These services are about everything from life saving bypass surgery to joint replacements. Chuck Colson (the pro-life Vatican agent) said that Emanuel's comments are similar to the justification the Nazis did to extreminate the physically and mentally handicapped. Colson believes that Emanuel forgotten about the worth and dignity of human beings. He worries Emanuel's vision of health care allows "every decision about the allocation of health care-and indeed about any area of life" to become "an occasion for the young and strong to impose their will on the old and weak." Betsy McCaughery is a former Lt. Governor of New York State. She is a patient advocate and said that Emaneul admits that cuts in rationing of health care will not be pain free. She believes that Emanuel wrote that health care cost saving will require changing how doctors think about their patients (i.e. Emanuel reject the Hippocratic Oath's part of trying to help the patient regardless of cost). "Yes, that's what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else," McCaughey says in an editorial. "Many doctors are horrified by this notion; they'll tell you that a doctor's job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time." So, shady characters are behind this health care reform bill.

Joseph Stalin have had Vatican/Jesuit ties for decades. His total name was Иосиф Сталин (or Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili). He was born in Gori, Georgia within the confines of the Russian Empire in 1878. He was the 2nd most bloodiest dictator in the 20th century under Mao of course. He was the General Secruity of the Communist Party (of the Soviet Union's Central Committee) in the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1953. He died in March 5, 1953. He was born to both Orthodox parents. Their names were Vissarion "Beso" Dzhugashvili and Ekaterina "Keke" Geladze. Beso was a wealthy and successful businessman. Yet, he became a violent alcoholic according to later biographers. Josef was in the Catholic Cappuchin run school in Gori. He graduated first in his class from 1892 and then went into the Orthodox Simary of Tiflis (or Tbilisi, Georgia). Stalin admits that Jesuits were at this Seminary and he was taught Jesuitical methods. So, Joseph Stalin was Jesuit trained. This is when he became a Marxist and a revolutionary Communist. Stalin said that the Jesuits would spy on people and pry into the personal affairs of individuals' souls. Some accuse Stalin as acting as a Jesuit agent. He was accused of violent, exiled to Siberia in 1903 for 3 years. Yet, months later, Stalin was freed. He worked with Lenin in December of 1905 to fight and promote Communism against the Romanov monarchy in Russia. In February 1906, to prove his credentials to the Bolsheviks, Stalin arranged for the assassination of General Fyodo Griiazanov. He also continued to stage bank robberies and extortions, sending the money through to the Bolsheviks as proof of his trustworthiness. Stalin failed to make a reconciliation with the Mensheviks (or moderates) that Lenin opposed. The 1917 RUssian Revolution was successful. Stalin head the movement by the 1920's when he ordered the murder of Trotsky. Trotsky was murder by an axe attack in Mexico. Lenin died. Stalin banned churches and did other evil policies. In WWII, his agents committed atrocities and Stalin allied with Catholic Cardinal Agagianian. Stalin in WWII once allied with the Nazis and then fought them by the 1940's. Just before he died, Stalin had a fallign out with the Catholic Church. He suppressed their orders, and executed Lubyanka General Alexander Poskrebyshev---who oversaw the hanging of Vlasov in the Lubyanka---and NKVD General Nicolai Vlasik. Then, he died soon after in 1953 via rat poison. He was murdered, but the culprits are unknown to this day. The lesson here is that a dictator is always immoral. Stalin is one easy example to see that point 100%.

The government can fine and harass people who refuse to answer intrusive survey questions. 3 million Americans are being forced to answer intrusive questions about their private lives. This comes under the treat of home visits and fines by the government under the guise of The American Community Survey. All of these things are occuring now. This survey is sent into 3 million random home per year. This census demands more invasive information from citizens. This information includes how many times people have been married, if they have a toilet that flushes and how much is left outstanding on their mortgage. According to one North Texas resident, “The questionnaire also wants answers about where she works, how much money she makes, and what time she leaves for work each day – the hour and minute! “I thought it was intrusive. I don’t have a high regard for the federal government collecting this information anyway,” the woman told CBS 11 News. “You don’t know what they’re going to do with it.” The woman questions why the federal government should know about this information. This is very intrusive against people indeed, because what does toilet fushing or the minute and time we work have to do with benefiting the government or our community in a radical way. The U.S. Census Bureau claims that the survey is necessary to discovery about locating services and allocating resources. If a person doesn't respond to the survey or skips on question, the Census Bureau promises something. They promise that they will be fined and harassed until they do. This process includes telephone calls and home visits. This is very fascistic to say the least. No one has ever been charged with a crime in refusing to answer the ACS survey though. Even members of Congress have denounced the invasive question as a violation of the Right to Financial Privacy Act. This is also a violation of the Fourth Amendment on its face. A census form that goes beyond asking how many people live in a residence is definitely against the 5th Amendment. Courts have established this fact, although the census have become more and more invasive each time. Despite the fact that refusal to respond to the survey carries no ultimate penalty, the vast majority of the millions who receive it will doubtless comply in the face of threats of harassment and fines. Objections to this invasive information being demanded by the government in the form of a survey arrive on the concerns of the 2010 census itself. This new 2010 census will have census workers using GPS to electronically tag every hom in America. Back in February, the Obama adminstration moved control of the census out of the Department of Commerce and into the White House. This tactic was slammed as a trick by Democrats who want to keep their majorities in Congress. So, the government shouldn't go too far in discussing or finding out personal information about any American citizen.

The UK government is already going too far in violating citizens' civil liberties in UK. Now, they promote the evil policy of installing surveillance cameras in private homes. The UK government want to spend about $700 dollars in installing surveillance cameras inside the private homes of citizens to ensure that children to go to bed in time, attend school, and eat proper meals. This isn't a passage from George Orwell's 1984 or Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. This is a true historical occurence in 2009 in Britain. Britain already has more surveillance cameras watching its population than the whole of Europe put together. The government wants the scheme called "Family Intervention Projects." This will create a nanny state on steroids with social services goons and private security guards. These people will be given the authority to make regular "home checks" to ensure parents are raising their children correctly. Telescreens will be installed so the government spies can keep an eye on whether parents are mistreating kids and whether the kids are fulfilling their obligations under a pre-signed contract. About 2,000 families are being targeted in this program so far. The government wants to get 20,000 more families in it within the next 2 years. The taxpayers will pay for this tab and these interventions will be funded via local council authorities. The program will see parents deemed "responsible" by the government to to handed the power to report "bad" parents who allow children to engage in bad behavior. Such "bad" families will then recieve interventions. The parents and the children are forced to sign a behavior contract with the government. It's called the Home School Agreements before the start of every year. The state will dictate obligations that it expects to met. The opposition Conservative Party, who are clear favorites to win the next British election, commented that the program does not go far enough and is “too little, too late.” That's hard to be believed. People have responded to the Daily express article about the new program and they say that they are shock at the totalitarian implications of what's occuring in the UK under the guise of social service initiatives. Some ask why people in the UK aren't up in arms about this since it's a violate of human privacy. The state doesn't own kids and parental rights ought to be respected (as long as parents aren't harming their kids). This is a violation of British rights. Another respondent said that this policy is a violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights or the Human Rights Act of 1998. This agenda is going on in America too. In February 2006, Houston Chief of Police Harold Hurtt said cameras should be placed inside apartments and homes (Andy Teas of the Houston Apartment Association supports this evil proposal saying that privacy concerns are not important in this arena) in order to “fight crime” due to there being a shortage of police officers. That's wrong since that is a violation of people's rights and it promotes a Big Brother society. If such programs are fully activitated, then it fulfills George Orwell's depiction of a totalitarian society in his novel of 1984 (which talks about a telescreen monitoring people, the Thought Police, and other things immorally scruntizing the lives of human beings). We should have our rights and our freedoms without this Big Brother threat in our lives.

Secret Societies are among us. Freemasons are everywhere. Now, Bill Bratton, who is the L.A. Police chief admitted that he's a Freemason. This is found in a NY Times article from 2006 entitled "A Secret Society, Spilling a Few Secrets." The story says that former vice President Hubert H. Humphrey was once a Freemason. As many know, Freemasonry have been involved in subterfuge, murder, occultism, deception, etc. Human secrecy is apart of Freemasonry. Even recently, Fiji Freemasons were accused of doing occult activity with a human skulls (which ex-Mason Ed Decker claims that high level Freemasons drink wine out of a human skull). In 1998, workmen restoring Franklin's London home dug up the remains of six children and four adults hidden below the home. The London Times reported on February 11, 1998: "...Initial estimates are that the bones are about 200 years old and were buried at the time Franklin was living in the house, which was his home from 1757 to 1762, and from 1764 to 1775...." Skulls and bones look like they have been dissected, sawn, or cut. One skull have been drilled with several holes. Crimes could of been done here. Strange things go on in the secret society world. That is why the 10 bodies were found at the home of Freemason & possible Rosicrucian Benjamin Franklin. It's interesting to note that Franklin was apart of the Hellfire Club (which is the 18th century version of the Bohemian Grove). The Hellfire Club had black masses, orgies, and Devil worship like the Bohemian Grove have sex orgies plus mock human sacrifice. Bratton was arrogant that he didn't want to uphold the law dealing with immigration. He said if you don't like it, leave the state. That's silly since we have a right to enforce the law. Some use the evils in Freemasonry to bash every single early American or slander all of American culture. The truth is that many Founding Fathers were Freemasons, yet some rejected Secret Societies. Ordinary citizens opposed Masonry and the Illuminati in America way back in the 1700's and early 1800's. Even President John F. Kennedy opposed the influence of secret societies as being unwarranted in the conduct of the American government. Some Freemasons have been known to being anti-liberty, anti-gun, pro-abortion, etc. from Arlen Specter on down. John Quincy Adams, The Sixth President of The United States opposed Freemasonry and said that: "I am prepared to complete the demonstration before God and man, that the Masonic oaths, obligations and penalties, cannot, by any possibility, be reconciled to the laws of morality, of Christianity, or of the land." J.Q. Adam's letter to Ed. Livingston. Hence, the deal is that dynamic American heroes exist back then and today.

By Timothy