Time is Moving Foward

Protesters are demonized all of the time. The establishment media is seriously paranoid and sick to obessess with a man for just carrying a gun at an Obamacare protest (in New Hamsphire). He isn't committing a crime or threatening anyone at all. This is proof that the media will demonize anyone as a violent extremist if they just disagree with the President's policies. Also, the fact is that open carry concealed weapons is completely legal in the state of New Hamsphire. According to Gary Franchi (who is the managing editor of Republic Magazine) said that the protester was a member of the Free State Project organization. MSNBC filmed the man with the weapon and a sign proclaiming: “It’s time to water the tree of liberty,” a reference to Thomas Jefferson’s “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” The Founding Fathers said similar comments about how liberty isn't granted easily all of the time. Sometimes, you will have to fight for it. The government has a long history of using agents provocateurs in order to delegitimize grassroots political movements (like opposing Barack Obama's health care plan). Yet, this person is just exercising his legal right to open carry. MSNBC and CNN have carried this story in fear that people might try to assault the President, which is ludicrious. The President is guarded by a myriad of Secret Service agents. The man with the gun said that he doesn't promote violence, but free speech. MSNBC's host Carlos Watson even said that people who disagreed with Obamacare by using the word socialist is a code for the N word. That's false because just because Obama is called a socialist (whether it's true or not) doesn't mean someone is a racist. Other MSNBC hosts like Chris Matthews went so far as to say opponents should be strapped down in gurneys and injected with sodium pentathol so they admit they are racists. Matthews talked with Cynthia Tucker of the Atlanta-Journal Constitution who said “45 to 65% of the people who appear at these groups are people who will never be comfortable with the idea of a black president.” Her comments are extreme to say the least. Carlos wants lawyers to overturn the legitimate right to carry law in New Hampshire, because of one single man having a gun. The big picture is that the media are using this incident as an excuse to promote the DHS report on demonizing people as extremists (and the SPLC saying the lie that there are no plans of FEMA Camps). This tactic was done in the 1990's when the patriot movement grew large until the military agent and the FBI-infiltrated Elohim City bombed the Alfred P. Murray building. This event caused Bill Clinton to demonize some of his opponents as dometic terrorists. There are legitimate criticism against this health care plan and the majority of these people are not terrorists or extremists at all.




Prof. Peter Dale Scott from Global Research on August 11, 2009 described about the real Grand Chessboard and the profiteers of war. He believed that the military industrial complex used wars in a secret agenda to crush nation-states like America. War mongering expansion can always lead into a debilitating negative reaction in the USA. The evil ideology of military dominance was expressed for British rulers by Sir Halfrod Mackinder in 1919. He said that he who rules East Europe, commands the Heartland, the World Island, and the world. Napoleon and Hitler failed at their attempts to create a world empire. Zbigniew Brzezinski was a person who wanted global dominance of the West in slick ways. He never regreted his role in his machinations in Afghanistan from 1978-1979, which produced the existence of al-Qaeda (and jihadi terrorism. He said that his actions weakened Russia and gave the USSR its Vietnam War. He said that funding agitated Muslims is better than not liberating Central Europe or ending the Cold War). That time was about the U.S. government funding Muslim radicals in Afghanistan in the late 1970's. He denied that Islamic fundamentalism was a world menance in a 1998 interview. He warned against the Gulf War in 1990 and oppose preemptive strikes against Iran. Yet, his 1997 book of "The Grand Chessboard" promoted the forced control of the Eurasian region of he world. In the book, he wants America to conquer Eurasia as a prize, and compared people to barbarians. He wants full dominance of that region, which is similar to the neo cons's PNAC 2000 "Rebuiling America's Defnses" document (that calls for genotype specific biological weapons and a new Pearl Harbor to attack nations in the Middle East), Bush-Cheney National Security Strategy of September 2002 (NSS 2002), and the JCS strategic document Joint Vision 2020 (seeking to have the military to have full spectrum dominance to defeat any adversary worldwide via a range of military operations). The war on terror prevented budget cuts in the defense department from going down indeed. China, Russia, and the U.S. are players in Central Asia. That is why Brzezinski wants to promote policies to restrain the power of China and Russia. He oppose a strike in Iran, while supporting a containment of Russia with a group of Western bases and pipelines. In 1995 Brzezinski (who seems to hate Russia with a passion) flew to Azerbaijan and helped negotiate the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline linking Azerbaijan to Turkey. He is pro-oil as his patrons the Rockefellers were. Many oil companies from Exxon Mobil, Chevron, to Conoco have worked in the Middle East in the 21st century to control the Middle Eastern resources. PMCs or private military contractors exist, because of budgetary constraints. They are ordered to kill in some instances. They have increased since the beginning of the Iraq War. Blackwater is one famous PMCs that killed Iraqi cvilians, committed other evils, etc. They changed their name into Xe Worldwide in 2009. Erik Prince is a Papal agent who found Blackwater. He had connections to the CNP (with ties to the Papacy, the Republicans, etc.) and Republicans. Diligence LLC. Diligence, a more powerful company, that unlike Blackwater interfaced heavily with Wall Street, “set up shop in Baghdad [in July 2003] to provide security for companies involved in Iraqi reconstruction. In December, it established a new subsidiary called Diligence Middle East, and expanded its services to include screening, vetting and training of local hires, and the provision of daily intelligence briefs for its corporate clients.” There are also fusion centers (among the military, the FBI, state police, etc. promoted by the US Army. The SAIC funded such surveillance programs in 2002) that spy in the population. Responding to such criticisms of privacy violations, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano stated in March 2009 that the mandate of fusion centers was not to launch independent domestic surveillance operations but connect the dots between lawfully obtained information already in fragmented “siloed” databases. Yet, Napolitano omitted that the information that these fusion centers recieve are from private or even anonymous sources. Therefore, the war on terror has a complex history.





Spencer S. Hsu and Cecilia Kang from The Washington Post on August 11, 2009 wrote about how the Obama administration is proposing to scale back a long standing ban on tracking how people use government internet sites with "cookies" and other technology. Privacy groups are criticizing this plan. A 2 week public comment period ended Monday on a proposal by the White House Office of Management and Budget to end a ban on federal Internet sites using such technologies and replace it with other privacy safeguards. This prohibition existed since 2000 can be waived if an agency head cities a "compelling need." People suprisingly support the change because they want social networking and similar services to allow the government to be more transparent and increase public involvement. Yet, what is the role of government to influence any private output of the Internet at all? Nothing. The ACLU criticized this policy as the government trying to mass collect personal information of every user of a federal government. Even groups supporting the plan question whether the administration is seeking changes at the request of private companies like online search giant Google (as the industry's economic clout and influence in Washington have grown rapidly). Two prominent technology policy advocacy groups, the Electronic Privacy Information Center and Electronic Frontier Foundation, cited the terms of a Feb. 19 contract with Google, in which a unnamed federal agency explicitly carved out an exemption from the ban so that the agency could use Google's YouTube video player. The contract terms have been negiotated through the GSA or the General Services Administration. It waves those rules as they may apply to Google. Some believe that the GSA failed to protect the privacy rights of U.S. citizens. Cindy Cohn (who is the legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation) believes that the government is being forced by corporations to lower the privacy protections of the American people. The episode recalls a dispute in January when critics complained that a redesigned White House Web site featured embedded Google YouTube videos -- depicting events such as the president's weekly address -- that used tracking cookies. The White House and Google later reassured users that they had stopped collecting data. The White House believes that ban on cookies apply to federal agencies and not third parties. Other people support it for efficiency purposes, but it may allow the government to monitor more of citizens' Internet activities.

Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on August 11, 2009 wrote about a Harris poll showing a strong shift to a pro-life position on abortion and Roe v. Wade. This new national Harris poll proved that a strong shift toward a pro-life position is real. This shift is seen in both major political parties of Republicans and Democrats. It finds that a majority of African Americans and Hispanic people oppose the Roe V. Wade decision that allowed virtually unlimited abortions. Harris' main polling question deals with the 1973 Supreme Court case that allowed abortion throughout the preganancy. However, Harris inaccurately describes the case as a "decision on whether a woman should have an abortion up to three months of pregnancy," even though it allowed abortions until birth unless limited in the late term of pregnancy by states. Still, Harris found a small majority of Americans back Roe as it described, on a 50-44 percentage point margin. That 6 percent majority is the third lowest in any Harris poll on abortion and Roe since 1973 and is a 10 percent drop from the 16 percent majority it found in 2007. Harris in his analysis said that support for Roe have declined somewhat since they've asked the questions in 2007. Therefore, the modest increase in support of Roe in 2007 have been reversed. The Harris Poll found that Republicans, Democrats, and independents are less likely to back Roe now than they did 2 years ago. Republicans moved from 51-45 percent against Roe in 2007 to 59-39 percent against it now, a 14 point shift in the pro-life direction. Democrats moved 9 points to the pro-life perspective from 63-33 for Roe to 57-36 favoring it. Independents shifted 6 points to the pro-life view from 61-36 percent for Roe to 57-38 this year. Harris found that adults who are 33-44 are most likely to oppose Roe along with seniors above the age of 64. Lower income voters are more pro life than higher income voters. Those from 18 to 32 are most likely to support Roe. Men and women equally oppose Roe at 44 percent. White Americans mostly support Roe, blacks oppose it by a 58 to 35 percent margin and Hispanics oppose it on a 58-40 percent margin. Still, 23 percent said abortions should be allowed in all cases, 53 percent in some cases, and 21 percent in no cases. As compared with the 2007 result, the Harris poll presented the reality of people having a more pro-life shift (with a two percent drop in the pro-abortion position and a 1 percent increase in those who favor no abortions; for a three percent overall shift in the pro-life perspective). The 23 percent of people wanting abortion for any reason is tied for the lowest figure in the category since 1985 (when 21 percent who opposed all abortions was tied for the highest figure since Harris has asked that question over the years). The poll found 41 percent of Americans want it to be more difficult to get an abortion while just 14 percent say they want the laws to make it easier. While the 41 percent figure was, historically, the second highest since 1992, Harris showed the 14 percent pro-abortion figure was its second lowest -- again marking a clear pro-life shift over the years. The Harris poll was done by telephone in America between July 7 and 14 among 1,010 adults. The pro-life truth is coming strong, but there is a long way to go.





There is a problem with some of the policies of government-forced Weight Control plans. The government uses health studies as an excuse to promote collective solutions, not necessarily on an individual basis. Obesity and diabetes are serious problems though. Thomas Friedan, who is the new director of the CDC or the Center for Disease Control) rejected individual solutions to solve obesity causes. So, the government in federal, state, and local levels are lusting after finding laws to make their control more apparent in America. The problem with these plans is that each individual's diabetes are different from another person. Lifestyles among individuals are different from each other, so unique approaches should be done to get at the root of each diabetic's problems. More people are becoming diabetic, because of fast foods, sugar laden foods, processed foods, and overindulgence in carbohydrates that continue to be strong in the American diet (and inactivity). Unique causes of diabetes makes collective solutions difficult. Big Pharma can have an excuse to even promote mandatory drugging of people in jos, etc. FOX news recently covered a story that is monstrous on all counts. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) just concluded a three-day conference in Washington, D.C. called "Weight of the Nation," which is described as an "inaugural conference on obesity and weight control." The CDC website said that they want a forum to have 4 intervention settings, and other means in trying to control obesity. The catch is according to FOX, the CDC recommend to force communities to restrict unhealthy foods and beverages, havie smaller portion sizes, limit advertisement of unhealty products, and discourage consumption of sugary drinks. This can restrict free choice in regards to food and beverages. It can also prevent states and local government from having nutritution solutions themselves. Many public schools have similar programs. Yet, home and communities are private for the most part. Public awareness about obesity is fine, but it's wrong when the government wants policies that violate individual liberty at the same time. The CDC wants Twenty local government representatives, including city managers, urban planners, and budget analysts, who participate in ICMA’s Center for Performance Measurement (which can make local government agents to force businesses to submit to health laws). The CDC promotes micromanagement of diet, nutrition, weight, etc. Special interests are bound to benefit from this policy. So, being healthier is fine, but the government shouldn't be a king in having too much micro managing the lifestyle of individual human beings at all. We should fight agianst obesity, diabetes, and other diseases though (in education, banning poisons in our water supply like flouride, PSAs, etc.).



Detainment of detainees is a serious foreign policy issue. People have accused President Barack Obama of following the same policy of George W. Bush in terms of handling detainees. Barack Obama in several ways is a continuation of the agenda of Bush. Tom Eley from Global Research on August 5, 2009 accused Obama of seeking to institutionalize indefinite imprisonment. Press reports show that the Obama administration is considering the creation of a prison and court complex in America to process and hold current and future terrorist suspects. The catch is that it would include a facility to indefinitely detain people held without a trial or any other constitutionally mandated due process rights. Sometimes, the ACLU go onward with filing lawsuits to promote the liberties of American citizens. Sometimes, they do the wrong thing is promoting anti-gun rights, and distorting what religious liberty is all about. Barack Obama utilized language to advance himself as the campaign of freedom for the average, downtrodden American citizen. He told his audience that he was change people can believe in. He made numerous campaign promises that he broken already. This is ironic since most of the mainstream media proclaim that Republicans are always trying to get rid of our personal liberties and freedom away, while the Democrats are protrayed as looking out for the interests of the individual citizen. Obama supports a prison system that could jail prisoners without charges or trial. This isn't transparancy. White House officials call this proposal as a courtroom within a detention facility. It will be jointly operated by the departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and Justice. It will merge civilian courts and military commissions. This violates the concept of habeas corpus or the right to challenge one's detention in a court of law. Administration sources indicate that the Obama administration may seek some form of congressional approval should it move the plan forward. The transparent aim being to lend a democratic veneer to profoundly antidemocratic policies that would establish the framework for the suppression of political dissent and repression on a massive scale. The implications of the state secrets claim are clear enough. “By giving the executive branch close to unilateral power to have lawsuits dismissed on national security grounds, the privilege can become a way to conceal government misconduct,” writes New York Times legal correspondent Adam Liptak. Barack Obama hasn't banned the policy of rendition either or allow allege terrorists are abducted by U.S. intelligence agencies to be transported to other countries for interrogation. You can't claim to be for change, when you advocate warrantless wiretapping, the concept of state secrets in order to stop the claims of German citizen, Khaled el-Masri, who was being tortured, have wealth transfered from working citizens to the financial elite, and use policies that violate our civil liberties. It's as simple as that.



Secret Societies are real in popular culture and otherwise. Sex magic is a common feature of the occult and secret societies. In the 21st century, they are promoted in music videos. Many music videos that are mainstream are very ritualistic and relate to the occult, Secret Societies, or an agenda of the establishment. In occult orders, there are groups that promote the mysteries covertly like Freemasonry and promote it overtly (like the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn). In these groups, spiritualism is promoted in symbolical form in their initiation rituals or in the supplemental study in the Golden Dawn. The higher levels of these groups are the operative orders. These group do special magical or alchemical operations. They claim that doing these things can help spiritual development, which it doesn't. A simple example of the occult influence in the mainstream music industry is how black magician Aleister Crowley was praised by the Beatles, Led Zepplin (who popularized backward messages in music which Crowley supported backward writing, etc.), and the Rolling Stone. Other musicians then and now are influenced by Crowley. L. Ron Hubbard supported Crowley, but Crowley considered Hubbard as an extremist. Hubbard founded the cult of Scientology. These Iluminists use these cults to brainwash the common man into control. Aleister Crowley back in the early 20th century wanted a breakdown of the nuclear family, wanted sexual licenseness to reign, and desired a hatred of Christianity. Today, we see all 3 goals being commonplace in America and the world. Crowley was in the highest levels of the Golden Dawn, he called himself a high level Freemason (in the European Lodges), and he supported Enochian magic. He wanted to do Enochian sex magic (like in his book entitled, "Enochian World of Aleister Crowley"). Crowley believed that the bridge between the material and spiritual worlds could be merged by intergrating Enochiana (or a powerful form of magic) with sex magic (which is common in kama sutra which some believe invoke demon spirits). Ciara has a song promoting love, sex, and magic. Ciara admits that she learn hypnosis from Disney's Justin Timberlake and how she like to use it to make herself more popular. Hypnosis is a Mystery Religion concept used by Masons, etc. for eons. Dr. Israel Regardie (a follower of Crowley) believed that certain sex magic techniques could be used by advanced students to incarnate spiritual energies on the physical plane, as well as making important shifts in the orientation of the psyche and the Universe. These extremists believe that you can make magical children and this is done by witches and wizards. Some of the followers of this stuff claim that they see angels, which they don't (since angles don't praticipate in sexual acts at all. They are independent of human endeavors). Handsigns are common in the Golden Dawn in claiming that you can open a portal in the air (They are shown in an elemental initiation ceremony). The sign of Philosophus in the Golden Dawn is very similar to the Roc handsign. The sign of Practicus is an upside down Roc sign placed in the waist of the human body. The sign of Zelator is similar to a sieg heil salute. The sign of Theoricus (of the Elemental grades) is hands lifted in the air. These signs are often for testing and greeting "entities" according to the Golden Dawn. There is an Enochian alphabet as well. The big picture is that the unbiblical occult groups used these things as a means of control. The occult means secret so they want to promote secrecy while throwing this nonesense in our faces. In this generation, we know what the real deal is.







By Timothy