NORTHCOM, etc.

There are U.S. troops with a contential insignia bearing U.N. colors. This shows the advancement of the plan to integrate North America according to Jerome R. Corsi. So, there are troops in the U.S.'s NORTHCOM ranks showing this shoulder patch. It has the North American contential design with U.N. colors. The patch showing the continent of North America in orange and blue colors is typical of the U.N. It carries the 5th Army "Quadrangle" and has been seen at Ft. Sam Houston in San Antonio, TX. That is the headquarters of the 5th Army. The insignia patch is found on the 5th Army. The insignia patch also is displayed on the 5th Army website, the home of U.S. Army North, USARNORTH, the Joint Force Land Component Command and the Army Service Component Command of USNORTHCOM. The design of the patch with the U.S. eagle image superimposed a hierachy which the U.S. 5th Army exerts its military command under the authority of USNORTHCOM. Its domain defined as all of North America (which including U.S., Mexico, and Canada for the United Nations as implied in the orange and blue motif). NORTHCOM is an U.S. military combatant command created to respond to national emergencies in North America. On February 14, 2009, America and Canada signed an agreement to support one of each other's national armed foced in case of a domestic civil emergency (even one that doesn't involve a cross-border crisis, which is illegal). The USNORTHCOM logo similarly displays a continental design, but without the U.N. colors, as is clear from the emblem displayed in the upper left hand corner of the USNORTHCOM Internet homepage. North American integration has of course been promoted by the Council on Foreign Relations, the SPP. This agenda was admitted by Thomas D'Aqunio recently. A close reading of an interview with d'Aquino published by the Metropolitan Corporate Counsel Oct. 4, confirms that the creation of the SPP was not a "conspiracy theory" but a well thought-out North American integration plan launched by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Council of Foreign Relations in the United States. This plan is trying to be fulfilleed by political and economic intergration programs in North America. So, the agenda is here and it's admitted by a fellow supporter of this policy by the name of Thomas D'Aquino.



One place in the UK want parents to be fined if they take their children out of sex lessons. The person involved is a 15 year old children. The government wants children to become part of the national curriculum for the first time. Lessons in relationships and sex will began at five with prescribed content for each age group. Parents have the right to withdraw children on moral and religious grounds, but this right which extends until students are 19 will be lost at 15. Mothers and fathers risk being fined and prosecuted under anti-truancy laws. Now, secondary schools must teach sex education, but can choose the content. Primary schools don't have to offer it at all. This change as described by Children's Secretary Ed Balls will affect 600,000 children from September 2011. Protests immediately came about because of this policy. Campaigners said that sex education in the last year of secondary school is very explicit (including pupils being taught on how to use a condom and access to contraception plus abortion). Religious leaders said that parents would vote with their feet (or go to other school institutions). The government said that only a minority of parents exercise their right to pull their children out of sex education. It doesn't matter since parents have the right to pull their children out of sex education if they wish regardless of the number doing it. Mr Balls said it would not make sense to keep the age limit of 19, because teenagers can vote at 18 and the age of consent is 16. In a Government-backed poll nearly a third of parents wanted to retain the right regardless of age. But another third said it should end at 11 and 20 per cent said there should be no opt-out at all. Mr. Balls wanted all children to have at least 1 year of sex education. He wants to tackle teenage pregnancies. The critics of this policy believe that handling out contraceptives and spreading sex education is already failing. Tahir Alam, education spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, said: 'It is not for the state to become a parent. He believes that parents have the right to withdraw their children from sex education (as said by the Catholic Education Service). Some parents view the material as morally objectionable and corrupting. Certainly, parents have the right to have their children opt out of sex education if they desire to. You don't use compulsory education on people without parental consent.


The health care bill was passed by the House. People are taking about the Stupak amendment. The House voted 220 to 215 with 39 Democrats joining 176 republicans to oppose it (or the Stupak Amendment) and 219 Democrats and one Republican in favor.The measure appears to contain strong conscience protection regarding abortion for medical professionals; however, "Section 304(d) protects abortion practitioners from “discrimination” by pro-life insurance plans who want to participate in the exchange, but do not want to contract with abortionists," says Americans United for Life. The bill HR 3926 has end of life concerns. It has these end of life panels. There is Medicare reimbursement for optional end of life planning consultation. States like Washington and Oregon (possibly Montana soon) have legal assisted suicide. The Senate is known for rejecting pro-life amendments in the health care bill. The legal process isn't over. The bill vote must go into the Senate and then both houses of Congress will make a bill that both must vote on it again. The Senate Finance Committee voted 14-9 last month to send a pro-abortion health care reform bill to the Senate floor. The Baucus bill, named for the chairman of the panel who is its main sponsor, would fund abortions with massive subsidies. Lawmakers voted mostly along party lines with pro-abortion Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine joining the committee's pro-abortion Democrats to pass the bill. After rejecting pro-life amendments that would have ensured the Baucus health care bill does not fund abortions and to protect the conscience rights of medical professionals, pro-life groups urged opposition to the bill. Steve Lefemine from Columbia Christians for Life believe that the Stupak amendment doesn't stop abortion funding totally. He made an interesting view on this issue. He writes that the Hyde Amendment (in Medicaid in the federal HHS Appropriations Bill) still funds abortion in rape, incest, and to save the life of the mother. The bill has over 2,000 pages in it. Some accuse like Andrew Napolitanothe bill of violating privacy, rationing care, rising taxes, etc. Freedom is the right for people to do actions according to their own conscience. The truth is that we do need health care reform, because our health care system has issues. Yet, we should do it in the right way in allowing coverage, while perserving health freedom at the same time.


More News are here. There is a victim dying of an Islamic honor killing who died in Arizona. Noor Faleh Almaleki was run over by her father in Arizona 2 weeks ago. She died on November 2, 2009. The murderer father fleed to England, he was arrested, and brought back to America to face trial. County Stephanie Low told the media that: "...his own admission, this was an intentional act and the reason was that his daughter had brought shame on him and his family. This was an attempt at an honor killing” (“‘Westernized Woman’ Allegedly Hit by Dad’s Car Dies,” AP, Nov. 3, 2009).The Human Rights Watch defines honor killings as acts of violent (usually murder) committed by a male family members (or members) against female family members. The victims are claimed to have brought dishonor to their murderer's family. This is very common in the Middle East and Turkey. According to the U.N., 5,000 females were murdered every year. Some of the prepretrators get off scot free or have a light sentence. Islamic apologist believe that honor killings are cultural and aren't a product of Islam. Yet, Jihad Watch reports that in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down ON ISLAMIC GROUNDS a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings, and Al-Jazeera reported that “Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values” (“Muslim Ran Down Daughter,” Jihad Watch, Oct. 22, 2009). Honor killings are increasing in America and that's wrong. Adullam Films have recorded about the Emerging Movement. The Emerging is a new phase of the Vatican's Ecumenical Movement. They realize that they can't overtly say I want to control Christian believers, so the Vaticans uses new terminology to get compromise more accesible in Christianity. Even Adrian Hitlon wrote that the Pope wants a big European Union and he was driven out of European politics for his strong stand against the Vatican. These globalist policies come out of the Counter Reformation.


Assisted Suicide is a serious issue in the world. The global elite loves euthanasia. Back in 1985, the RWJF or the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation called for a meeting to discuss about the dying in America. This led to recommendations from Dr. Joanne Lynne, who is a proponent of withdrawal of nutrition and hyrdation would recieve at least $6 million from RWJF. In Dr. Lynn’s Handbook for Mortals, she wrote: “…The courts have ruled, over and over, that using artificial nutrition or hydration is a treatment decision just like chemotherapy or surgery, and that families and doctors can choose to use or to forego this kind of treatment.” This is sick stuff promoted by the neo-Malthusian Dr. Joanne Lynne. Terri Schiavo has been in the debate of nutrition and hydration. She died in March 31, 2005. She was the first person killed by dehydration. Back in 1987, a 32 year old woman named Nancy Ellen Jobes died of dehydration. This was done by her parents' request. Even though 2 neurologists agreed that she was aware, responsive, and purposeful.This is because the New Jersey Supreme Court upheld lower court decisions that family members could refuse medical care even without clear evidence of a patient’s wish. Three years after Nancy Jobes’ death, the Association for Death Education and Counseling in its May/June 1990 edition of The Forum wrote that “old and new issues are demanding our attention and action: euthanasia, abortion,… rationing of health care and more.” The Forum appearred in the year that Prince Philip said that he wanted to be reincarnated as a virus to kill human population levels. Bertrand Russell's comment in the 1953 "The Impact of Science on Society that he wanted a Black Death-like bacteriological war to decrease human population levels (per generation then the survivors could procreate without making in his mind the world too full. He's wrong for promoting such evil like that). Even Jacques Cousteu wanted to kill 350,000 human beings per day. His comments in an interview detailing this information is found in the UNESCO Courier in November 1991. This is similar to the statement made by Ted Turner in the Audubon magazine in 1996 when he indicated a 95% reduction in the human population would be ideal. Dr. Jack Kevorkian was famous for killing almost 100 people in sucides from 1990 and 1998. The next year, on September 1, 1999, the Texas Advance Directives Act was passed with Governor George Bush’s signature allowing health care facilities to pull the plug on critically ill patients even over the objections of family members. Even on August 26, 2004, the Kentucky Supreme Court gave the State of Kentucky the authority to end the life of a citizen even though it was contrary to the wishes of the person's guardian at litem. Professor Eric Pianka wanted about 90 percent of he world's population to die. Eric told this to an audience of over 400 Texas Academy of Science members. He was awarded a league as a distinguished Texas scientist in 2006. In 2007, Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich delievered an address at UC Berkeley in which he wanted to use technology to allow people to die if they are very old. Some like Besty McCaughey claimed that the health care bill will strip over 500 billion dollars over the next decade of Medicare (or elderly assistance). Dr. David McKalip, a Florida neurosurgeon and a board member of the Florida Medical Association, predicts: “The only doctors left in Medicare will be those willing to ration care and practice cookbook medicine…. The health-reformers’ plan to cut spending on patients 65 and older won’t simply reduce end-of-life care, it will also eliminate care for patients who are perfectly capable of surviving their illness and going on with life.” Even regulatory Czar Sunstein (who agrees with removing organs from people even if the don't show permission to do so. This is found in his 2008 co-authored book called ("Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health") in his 1993 book called "The Partial Constitution" complained that restrictions on abortion, surrogracy, and free availability of pornograph ywas troublesome. ABC’s “Nightline” on September 29, 2009 aired a segment on “Dr. Death” Philip Nitschke (an Australian) who instructs the elderly on how to commit suicide. So, anyone saying that euthanasia isn't a threat now in 2009 is kidding.


By Timothy