The Nor'easter effected greatly in Virginia where I live at. Very strong flooding existed in the locations of Ocean View and Downtown Norfolk. The Lynnahven pier was damaged as well. It was the worse nor'easter in a couple of year. Power went out where I lived for a couple of hours. We're luckly since I live in a higher elevated location. The storm killed at least 4 people. The U.N. is trying to redefine the pandemic in order to heighten alarm over the H1N1 virus. The WHO is quietly changed qualification of term of the swine flu. The WHO raised its influenza pandemic alert to its second highest level in May. This change in definition is about some thing they are omitting the deaths and illness before making its declaration. The WHO is a specialized of the U.N. It issued its pandemic declaration in the first in 40 years. 74 countries have reported on 144 deaht from the H1N1 infection. Pharmaceuticals are working to develop vaccines. Dr. Thomas Frieden is the leader of the CDC and he wants to aggressively respond to the virus. "There has been excellent global cooperation with the World Health Organization, with countries around the world," Frieden said. "This is one of the many conditions that reminds us that we are all connected and many of our decisions in the U.S. will rely on good information from countries in Latin America, in Africa, in Asia, Australia and elsewhere. It's very important that we confront this jointly." The current WHO phase of pandemic alert level is at 6, which indicates a full blown global pandemic. According to CNN, WHO had the "enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses" definition on its website until May 6 when a reporter pointed it out. WHO spokesperson Natalie Boudou said the definition was in error, according to the report. "It was a mistake, and we apologize for the confusion," she said. "(That definition) was put up a while ago and paints a rather bleak picture and could be very scary." Money is being made by viriologists, health officials, and the pharmaceutical companies in this circumstance. Epidemiologist Tom Jefferson, formerly a general practitioner in the British Army, has worked for the Cochrane Collaboration for 15 years. He evaluates all published flu-related studies. He believes that he saw no difference in the definition between the swine flu and a normal flu epidemic. Jefferson told the magazine that there are hundreds of other viruses that can be deadly, but researchers aren't as interested in those because the money isn't as readily available. That's certainly accurate. Even Ph.D. and physican noted that the high infection rate of the H1N1 doesn't equate to a larger mortality rate than the annual flu virus. But during an average U.S. winter, normal seasonal flu strains result in an average of 200,000 hospitalizations and 36,000 deaths – about 10 times the current swine-flu death rate reported by the CDC. As of Nov. 1, WHO reported the global H1N1 death toll at more than 6,000. The government is overexaggeration the H1N1 to promote their dangerous vaccines in America, yet German elites are gained a non-mercury vaccine.
Lou Dobbs resigned recently from TV. The foundation liberal establishment have gotten their wish. On Novemeber 11, Lou Dobbs accounced his resignation. Dobbs is a gentlement. That is why he didn't mention the gunfire directed at his home with his Hispanic wife. Fascist nations have these events a lot. His viewpoint was only opposed, but marganalized in an unfair way by Presente, the National Council of La Raza, and other pro-illegal immigration groups to get him thrown off the air. Lou Dobbs isn't perfect, but his immigration policies is far more tolerant than extremists on either side of the immigration debate. Media Matters, MoveOn.org, and the Southern Poverty Law Center want Dobbs removed for years. The left gatekeepers have leaders like George Soros praising the decision obviously. Dobbs legitimately exposed the broken border and the elite wanting it to be wide open. They don't want this to improve immigrants. They wanted to do this to promote globalization, drive down wages, and destroy the middle class living standards in American society. Lou Dobbs was a bulwark against some of the tyrannies in America. Lou Dobbs can be independent as an activist. He can even go into FOX News, but FOX News is the right hand of the establishment (whose leader is Papal Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch supported the political campaign of Hillary Clinton, they support the murderous war on terror, and push the man-made global warming agenda). FOX is just one coin of the liberal coin of CNN and MSNBC. Even Andrew Napolitano shows some truth when he subs for Glenn Beck. Andrew is an libertarian. Glen Beck is a Mormon shill trying to destroy and infiltrate the legitimate Liberatarian and constitutional elements in the Republican Party. These mainstream news networks facilitate the left/right paradigm in the USA. Dobbs worked in CNN for decades. He is independence and fearless in his views. He acted as a watchdog for the government and asked tough questions for people. I think the illegal immigration issue and the Barack Obama constitutional eligibility controversy (when Dobbs does actually believe that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii) led the left establishment to end his job. Lou Dobbs may be one of the last truly major independent journalists and commentators with a multiple year show in mainstream television. The lesson here is that we should be inspired than ever to promote our views and don't let the establishment intimidate us.
Chuck Norris believes that the United Nations Climate Change conference in Copenhagen is wrong. This meeting starts in December 7, 2009. He believes this is an attempt to further an agenda is trying to create the one world order at the expense of national sovereignity. There is no question that many leaders in the U.N. and other globalist institutions want an one world order. “I really think he is going over there to try to create a one world order.” Norris said of president Obama during an appearance on the Fox News show Your World with Neil Cavuto. “My big worry is the fact is that we as a nation, if we start having to be obligated to other countries,” Norris said. “In this conference, they’re going to try to take our money and send it to third-world countries because of, since we spend so much oil and these other countries have suffered, then we’re going to give our money to these third-world countries.” he continued. “Neil, we have people here starving in our own country,” Norris said. “You know, my foundation, I have families, who are making $9,000 a year – the kids I’m teaching. Why aren’t we trying to help the poverty in our own country?” I have no problem with sending aid and money to help people in the Third World, but it should be by private organizations for the most part. Norris echoes similar concerns among British government's former science adviser named Lord Christopher Monckton. Monckton recently stated that the real purpose of the conference is to use global warming hype as a pretect to lay the foundation for an one world government. Chuck Norris continued to say that the conference wasn't about saving the planet, but financially benefiting globalist elites (which is true since Al Gore and his allies have corporations standing to make billions of dollar if the cap and trade system is passed by Congress). “I don’t believe that,” Norris commented. “First of all, I don’t think China is going to go for this. I don’t believe India is going to go for this. … [China] is not going to change. The thing is, for them to say, ‘United States, you change, but we’re not going to change, so you clean up your country, but we’re going to, you know, keep polluting our part of the country. You know, it’s ludicrous. It really is.” “You know Al Gore became a hundred million dollar millionaire, you know, from the global bomboggle. I don’t really, I don’t believe it for a second. I think it’s a big con game that they’re doing.” Norris said. Chuck Norris is known for being an independent conservative by speaking out on issues of Obamacare and the Federal Reserve.
Lou Dobbs resigned recently from TV. The foundation liberal establishment have gotten their wish. On Novemeber 11, Lou Dobbs accounced his resignation. Dobbs is a gentlement. That is why he didn't mention the gunfire directed at his home with his Hispanic wife. Fascist nations have these events a lot. His viewpoint was only opposed, but marganalized in an unfair way by Presente, the National Council of La Raza, and other pro-illegal immigration groups to get him thrown off the air. Lou Dobbs isn't perfect, but his immigration policies is far more tolerant than extremists on either side of the immigration debate. Media Matters, MoveOn.org, and the Southern Poverty Law Center want Dobbs removed for years. The left gatekeepers have leaders like George Soros praising the decision obviously. Dobbs legitimately exposed the broken border and the elite wanting it to be wide open. They don't want this to improve immigrants. They wanted to do this to promote globalization, drive down wages, and destroy the middle class living standards in American society. Lou Dobbs was a bulwark against some of the tyrannies in America. Lou Dobbs can be independent as an activist. He can even go into FOX News, but FOX News is the right hand of the establishment (whose leader is Papal Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch supported the political campaign of Hillary Clinton, they support the murderous war on terror, and push the man-made global warming agenda). FOX is just one coin of the liberal coin of CNN and MSNBC. Even Andrew Napolitano shows some truth when he subs for Glenn Beck. Andrew is an libertarian. Glen Beck is a Mormon shill trying to destroy and infiltrate the legitimate Liberatarian and constitutional elements in the Republican Party. These mainstream news networks facilitate the left/right paradigm in the USA. Dobbs worked in CNN for decades. He is independence and fearless in his views. He acted as a watchdog for the government and asked tough questions for people. I think the illegal immigration issue and the Barack Obama constitutional eligibility controversy (when Dobbs does actually believe that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii) led the left establishment to end his job. Lou Dobbs may be one of the last truly major independent journalists and commentators with a multiple year show in mainstream television. The lesson here is that we should be inspired than ever to promote our views and don't let the establishment intimidate us.
Chuck Norris believes that the United Nations Climate Change conference in Copenhagen is wrong. This meeting starts in December 7, 2009. He believes this is an attempt to further an agenda is trying to create the one world order at the expense of national sovereignity. There is no question that many leaders in the U.N. and other globalist institutions want an one world order. “I really think he is going over there to try to create a one world order.” Norris said of president Obama during an appearance on the Fox News show Your World with Neil Cavuto. “My big worry is the fact is that we as a nation, if we start having to be obligated to other countries,” Norris said. “In this conference, they’re going to try to take our money and send it to third-world countries because of, since we spend so much oil and these other countries have suffered, then we’re going to give our money to these third-world countries.” he continued. “Neil, we have people here starving in our own country,” Norris said. “You know, my foundation, I have families, who are making $9,000 a year – the kids I’m teaching. Why aren’t we trying to help the poverty in our own country?” I have no problem with sending aid and money to help people in the Third World, but it should be by private organizations for the most part. Norris echoes similar concerns among British government's former science adviser named Lord Christopher Monckton. Monckton recently stated that the real purpose of the conference is to use global warming hype as a pretect to lay the foundation for an one world government. Chuck Norris continued to say that the conference wasn't about saving the planet, but financially benefiting globalist elites (which is true since Al Gore and his allies have corporations standing to make billions of dollar if the cap and trade system is passed by Congress). “I don’t believe that,” Norris commented. “First of all, I don’t think China is going to go for this. I don’t believe India is going to go for this. … [China] is not going to change. The thing is, for them to say, ‘United States, you change, but we’re not going to change, so you clean up your country, but we’re going to, you know, keep polluting our part of the country. You know, it’s ludicrous. It really is.” “You know Al Gore became a hundred million dollar millionaire, you know, from the global bomboggle. I don’t really, I don’t believe it for a second. I think it’s a big con game that they’re doing.” Norris said. Chuck Norris is known for being an independent conservative by speaking out on issues of Obamacare and the Federal Reserve.
Pro-Life news are here. Research proves that women in China see a 17% higher breast cancer risk from abortion. Chinese researchers found this out. Their study found that women who have had abortion face a 17 percent chance of contracting breast cancer than women who carried their pregnancy to them. One leading American scientis believes that the increased risk is even higher. Peng Xing and his colleagues conducted a case control study in northeast China. They examined reproduction factors associated with subtypes of breast cancer. The discovered that a statistically significant overall adds ratio of 1.17 (or 17% increased breast cancer risk for all subtypes combined) among women who had induced abortions. The study excludes the possibility of a flaw called "report bias' because abortion isn't stigmatized in China. Communist officials require women a lot who violate the one-child family planning policy there to have abortion. This is done so Chinese women are considered reliable reporters of their abortion histories. Xing and his colleagues also found an increased risk of breast cancer for women who delayed their first full term pregnancy. This is a frequent phenomenon among women who have an abortion of their first baby. Professor Joel Brind of Baruch College believes that the Chinese study underscores the risk of abortion because of its high prevalence in China. In his review of 10 prospective studies on the ABC link for the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons in December, 2005, Professor Brind explained that it's hard to do an epidemiological study accurately in communist countries where exposure to abortion affects most of the study population. Brind said that abortion in China is as high as 56% of its population. According to him since abortion is so common in China, women in the small unexposed population (or the comparison group) are a minority group and don't represent a typical population. Brind commented that this group is atypical since they represent a high risk subgroup. "Women without abortions in China are more likely to be childless or to have late first full-term pregnancies, which are accepted risk factors for breast cancer," Brind added. A Turkish study found earlier this year that a statistically significant 66% increased risk for women contracting breast cancer after having an abortion. Karen Malec is the President of the Coalition on Abortion/Breat Cancer. She said that these 2 studies (if they are conducted outside the control of the U.S. National Cancer Institute and other Western governmental agencies or organizations) proves that abortion increase the risk of breast cancer. "The Chinese and the Turkish studies are relevant considering the debate over government-funded abortion through healthcare reform," she told LifeNews.com. "Government-funded abortion means more dead American women from breast cancer." Malec says studies reporting no abortion- breast cancer link have been proven in medical journals to be stupendously flawed. So, it's easy to prove that abortion has tons of risk factors among women.
Secret Societies are real. Occult symbolism among secret societies are utilized by popular culture puppet. One such puppet is a pop artist named Lady Gaga. The Internet have shown tons of this symbolism for months now. Her new video is called "Bad Romance." Some call her video as her most disturbing and revealing one yet. She pushes the boundaries than her older video. She lies in bed with a skeleton and dances in a bath. The director of the video is Francis Lawrence (where he directs the weird customes, and other visual effects). Lady Gaga wears a bizarre hate in the video with sunglasses (to outline in her mind the tough female spirit). The video was about promoting the tough female spirit as she told MTV. She compares fame to a monster. She uses this female spirit as her weapon and shield (as she experiences her inner hell in her life). Some believe that Lady Gaga is a mind control victim and I wouldn't be suprised if this is true since this video shows burned corpses and she wears a metal Madonna-styled bra that shoots out sparks. This is weird scenery indeed. The supermodels are masked in the video to kidnap her (when Lady Gaga isn't masked while showing a hand sign near her right eye). She dances in an outfit around a spiral device. Lady Gaga says that: "...'There's this one shot in the video where I get kidnapped by supermodels. I'm washing away my sins and they shove vodka down my throat to drug me up before they sell me off to the Russian mafia..." What sins is she talking about. It's a known fact that mind control ivctims like in MK Ultra, etc. are used as sex kittens and are sexual abused (plus passed around to others). This video definitely outlines the wickedness of fame and the mind control atmosphere of popular culture's puppets like Lady Gaga.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment