Jim Carmer is the famous economist commentator of CNBC's "Mad Money" show. He recently said that he wants to praise Bernanke for his economic policies. Cramer recently supports the economic status quo without populism. He supported Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner despite the controversy he had with the AIG money deal. He supports the Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, and the Queen of England. There is certainly legitimate strong dissent over the bailout, corrupt politicans, and the Federal Reserve. The establishment has been caught promoting lies and deceptions. People aren't standing for it. The elite want a financial coup d'etat to promote a globalized economic system. “I don’t know who is left. It’s like, if you’re involved in anything that touches money, or anything that touches Washington, it’s like your a bad person,” his co-host responds. “I mean the regional governors are feeling bad.” “I don’t even care,” Cramer continues. “Call me suicidal. I think Geithner’s doing a great job. I was a very big critic of Geithner. I am embarrassed by the way that they treated him today. This is a man who, along with Ben Bernanke, saved Western capitalism. Do they forget what it was like, when Paulson, who also got religion, pushed for TARP…do they not know that we were almost in a barter economy?” Cramer ignores the reality that the banksters have assailed corruption. Paulson was reported by numerous members of Congress (like Inhofe, Sherman, DeFazio, and Lincoln) that they have been threatend with martial law in America if they didn't pass the TARP bailout provisions. This has been specifically said by Congressman Brad Sherman (D-CA). If a finanical elite threate someone with a blank check with martial law, then you've got a problem with the functions of government. Paulson, Goldman Sachs, and Wall Street are tied together. Even Bernanke said that the Federal Reserve audit (which is tame) would undermine its independence on monetary policy. It would interfere on the part of Congress (who alone have Constitutional authority over money) and it would trigger a further implosion of the economy. Bernanke's threat is more veiled than Paulson's action. Cramer said that: “Can’t I just come out here as a commentator and say, ‘I’m impressed by Geithner.’ I feel strongly that Geithner– this is AIG, AIG-Goldman, Goldman. And you know what, the Bavarian Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, Goldman Sachs and the Queen of England are not all bad.” Some view his words as mocking people who expose the FED and the new world order. Regardless, these groups that he mentioned certainly have a nefarious, evil history. Cramer seems to think that exposing these group can damage the economy. Yet, we have a right to expose the Federal Reserve giveaways, gunpoint-bailouts, bullying Congress, dark-of-night pension looting, missing trillions from government budgets, unlimited narco-dollars, overpriced bids for partner firms, and whatever else has been done, whether proven or indicated, behind the curtain.
Some believe that Barack Obama is surrending the Internet to foreign powers. American minds and ingeunity helped to form the Internet with U.S. taxpayer dolalrs. The Obama administration have moved quietly to cede control of the Web from the U.S. to foreing powers. The Internet came about by Americans by Dr. Robert E. Kahan and Dr. Vinton G. Cerf. They worked for the Department of Defense in the Defense Advanced Research Proejcts Agency in the early 1970's or DARPA. In the early 1970's, they concieved, designed, and implemented the idea of "open-architecture networking." The breakthrought in connectively and networking was the birth of the Internet. These 2 people used their brainpower to create Internet communications network. A person with an unique identifier or TCP/IP can be recognized and interact with a network of serves would allow users to communicate in it. Servers can use giant recievers to recognize the identifier and connect networks to networks. It passed on information from computer to computer in a seamless real time exchange of information. This new process of communication became known as the information super highway. The managment of the DNS or Domain Name System and the giant servers service the Net. The U.S. Department of Commerce manage the Net. Domain names are managed through an entity named IANA, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. The IANA, which operates on behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is responsible for the global coordination of the DNS, IP addressing, and other Internet protocol resources. Without an IP address or essential Internet protocols, a person or entity wouldn't have access to the Internet. The internatinal community wants America for years to have an international body like the U.N. or the International Telecommunications Union to manage all aspects of the Internet on behalf of all nations. The Obama administration recently via the Department of Commerce agreed to give up some control over the IANA and their goverance. The administration wants more representation to foreign companies and countries on IANA. This step toward internationalism can give up American sovereignity on the Internet. Internet censorship by the government doesn't promote freedom. China even censors their Internet with their alliance of Google. Loosing management of the Internet to others like the U.N. can make certain websites censored by those criticizing internationalism. We should protect creativity, inguenity, and the Internet. Not to mention that the U.N. have been involved in abortion, population control, and other evils.
Christians doctors in a group abstinence study believe it confrirms what parents want. They are applauding the new study showing how abstinence education is more effective than either comprehenisve sexual education or teaching only about contraception. They say the results coincide with polling data showing parents favor teaching their children abstinence. Dr. David Steven is head of the 16,000 member Christian Medical Association. He said that he appreciated the new study that was published in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. Science. "Science has finally caught up with logic and what parents have known for centuries by empirically demonstrating that equipping teens to abstain from sexual activity is an effective way to prevent teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases," he said. Stevens told LifeNews.com: "It is notable that John B. Jemmott III, the University of Pennsylvania professor who led the federally funded study, candidly admitted, 'I think we've written off abstinence-only education without looking closely at the nature of the evidence.'" "What we should learn from this experience is that while science itself is objective, scientists themselves can be biased and can mislead the public and policy makers," he said. Stevens pointed out that a survey from Zogby International shows that when parents become aware of what abstinence education versus comprehensive sex education actually teaches, support for abstinence programs jumps from 40 to 60 percent while support for comprehensive programs drops from 50 to 30 percent. Soem 59 percent of parents said that more funding should go to abstinence education, 22 % said that more should go to comprehensive sex education. "Many groups and individuals up until yesterday had relentlessly railed against abstinence programs as totally ineffective, even counterproductive," he said. "They had used their own studies to convince many legislators, including President Obama, to eliminate federal funding for abstinence programs altogether, in the process depriving teens and their parents from a potent resource that can mean a lifesaving difference." He concluded: "It turns out that when it comes to educating their children on matters of sex, Mom and Dad really do know best."
The Obama administration wants a further $215 million dollars will be spent on installing virtual strip search naked boyd scanners. That means that devices will be in no less than half of the nation's airports by next year. The historical records proves that scanners are a complete illegal violation of human rights. “The $215 million proposal to acquire 500 scanners next year, combined with the 450 to be bought this year, marks the largest addition of airport-security equipment since immediately after the 9/11 attacks. There are only 40 body scanners in a total of 19 airports now,” reports USA Today. Marc Rotenberg is a privacy adovcate. He pointed out that scanners were yet another expensive instrument of the war on terror being used against the American people. He is the executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center. He said that we will have another Homeland Security Department program for the war o nterror used almost exclusively on Americans. The naked scanners are a boon for the military-industrial complex and people like the former Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff promoted its use in the aftermath of the staged underwear bombing. They have a big financial stake in seeing these scanners rolled out nationwide. Some people are less enthusiastic in supporting this policy. Durham Tees Valley Airport in the UK refuse to instal scanners despite the British government ordering all airports to adopt them before the summer season. The scanners are nothign more than a virtual strip search that has been played down by the government and the media (dur to the potential for legal fights) that could see the devices banned as a breach of human rights. Officials deny the graphic nature of scanners, but they do show private parts of males and females. Indeed, as we have previously highlighted, when the scanners were first introduced at Australian airports in 2008 it was admitted that the X-ray backscatter devices don’t work properly unless the genitals of people going through them are visible. “It will show the private parts of people, but what we’ve decided is that we’re not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities,” said Melbourne Airport’s Office of Transport Security manager Cheryl Johnson. People are trying to this reality secret by lying about these images. Civil lawsuits where an individual has been strip searched by a member of the opposite sex once have been successful in North America. Courts have consistently found that strip searches are only legal when performed on a person who has already been found guilty of a crime or on arrestees pending trial where a reasonable suspicion has to exist that they are carrying a weapon. Subjecting masses of people to blanket strip searches in airports reverses the very notion of innocent until proven guilty. It's apart of the violation of the basic human right of movement to bar people from flying and essentially treating them like terrorists (for refusing to be humilitated by the virtual strip seach). The legal foundation of the naked body scanners needs to be undermined and eroded by lawsuits before they are rolled out on the streets, as has already been proposed by major western governments.
There is the Census coming up. “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers. . . ,” says Article I, Section 2 of the United States’ Constitution. “The actual Enumeration shall be made. . . within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.” So, the government is used to outline a representation of its states. The Constitution supports a census system, forming post offices, and post road, and Congress coining money. These powers can be abused, but they aren't mistakes as said by Austrian Economic extremists, because there needs to be some stability in government. Some have abused the census to make it a gargantuan, decennial taks. Some extremists want no taxation whatsoever, which can cause little resources sent to the poor in society. The rich can survive with little to no taxation whatsoever, but others will struggle. There is nothing wrong with individualism, but individualism ought to be met with a measure of personal compassion as well. The Austrian Economist crowd are correct though to mention that the Census shouldn't be used as a Peeping Tom system. The first first was created in 1790 by Secretary of State Thmas Jefferson. That census wanted to see how many free men existed. Later, sex, age, and occupation came out in the census calculation during the 1800's. The Feds have done bad policies of FISA's warrantless wiretaps, pen and trap devices, black boxes at compliant ISPs, and other bureaucracies that complicate matters. Some believe that the Census can force government policies in the communities of state and local governments. “The money the Census allocates to our communities is more than which country’s gross domestic product?” its website coyly asks. “Papua New Guinea, Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates, All of the above?” Clicking the obvious elicits these boastful congratulations: “You are correct! The GDP for Papua New Guinea is $12.05 billion. The GDP for Switzerland is $303.2 billion. And the GDP for The United Arab Emirates is $164.4 billion. The Census Bureau allocates over $400 billion to our communities every year.” Some of the government have used Census data like the DHS to monitor Arabic American populations by city and ZIP code. This is of course wrong causing thousands of Arabic Americans to be rounded up and deported. Some of the question on the Census about how many people live in a place and others are very personal. The Census Bureau’s budget for 2009 amounted to something like $238,740, 000 — but apparently that just turned on the lights at headquarters. Any actions the bureaucrats actually take require “appropriations.” The “Periodic Censuses and Programs” rooked us of another $2,365,882,000. A couple of additional expenses brought the total for 2009 to a whopping $2,634,622,000 — and that wasn’t a decennial year. Taxes are paid for the census system (interrelated to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act). We should have improvements in world, but the census shouldn't be exploited to act as a spy mechanism in society.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment