There is the former NATO Secretary General admitting that the Bilderberg sets global policy. His name is Willy Claes. He was interviewed by skeptics who believe that the Bilderbergers in Sitges, Spain don't set policy. He admitted to a Belgian radio interview that the Bilderberg attendees are mandated to implement decisions that are formulated during the annual conference of power brokers. This radio interview was reported on the the Belgian news website www.zonnewind.be. He told the host Koen Fillet that the Bilderbergers do indeed decide policy for the coming year. He was a 2 time Bilderberg attendee as well as the 8th Secretary General of NATO from 1994 to 1995. Caes mentioned that Bilderberg guests are typically sent to speak for 10 minutes and then a report is complied of their presentation. “The participants are then obviously considered to use this report in setting their policies in the environments in which they affect,” stated Claes, according to the translated text. He admitted that no 2 guests are allowed to sit next to each other more than once at Bilderberg, so the maximum exchange of views comes on important subjects. This is one solid confirmation that the Bilderberg agenda sets global policy. This is illegal and totally undemocratic. Caes personally attended the 1994 Bilderberg meeting in Helsinksi when he was Belgium's Minister for Foreign Affiars. Skeptics still exist that deny this truth. Iain Hollingshead of the London Telegraph believe that the Bilderberg is a silly group with no power. This is false sicne active Presidents and Prime Minsters are in the group. Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero attended the place this year. Real journalists and activists have exposed the Bilderbergers. The left gatekeeper and shill Chip Berlet doesn't believe in the Bilderberg's evil agenda. Chip works for the Political Research Associates. It's funded in part by the Ford Foundation. This foundation was created by the son of Henry Ford Edsel Ford. Henry Ford was a 33rd Degree Freemason, funded the Nazi war machine with slave labor, was anti-Semitic, and recieved an award from the Nazis. Now, the Ford Foundation promotes corporate control under the guise of benevolent help to society. The PRA demonize anyone who presents legitimate conspiracies as an extremist. Berlet doesn't agree with anyone exposing legitimate conspiracies himself. Little surprise therefore that towards the end of Berlet’s appearance on Russia Today, in which he stumbles through a broken record of excuses claiming Bilderberg has no power, he invokes the tired old cliche that anyone who expresses concern about 200 powerful men gathering in secret with no democratic oversight whatsoever behind a wall of security is probably a closet racist. Yet, Berlet is funded by the Ford Foundation and Henry Ford was a Hitler supporter. Berlet ignores the facts that powerful people go into the Bilderberg Group. Many of them are Prime Minister, corporate heads, and intelligence fellows. Top CEO’s like Bill Gates of Microsoft and Eric Schmidt of Google, top bankers like Marcus Agius of Barclays and Peter Sutherland of Goldman Sachs, don’t meet with national Presidents, Prime Ministers, big newspaper owners, members of the European Parliament and officials in the U.S. government to talk about tiddlywinks. Also, the Bilderberg and liek groups have deal with policies and other things. One example is how the Bilderbergers promoted an European currency like an euro for decades. The summary report of the 1955 Bilderberg meeting which took place from September 23-25 1955 at the Grand Hotel Sonnenbichl in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, West Germany, talks of the “Pressing need to bring the German people, together with the other peoples of Europe, into a common market.” The euro as confirmed by documents was a brianchild of the Bilderbergers since 1955. Indeed, Bilderberg chairman Étienne Davignon last year bragged about how the Euro single currency was a brainchild of the Bilderberg Group. The EEC or the European Economic Community was born in 1957. The Euro came about in January of 2002. This was after the European Union was created. Even the European Union President Herman Van Rompuy came to that position days after he attended a Bilderberg Group dinner meeting. Jim Tucker and others believed that the Bilderberg delayed an attack in Iraq in 2002. Even in 2006, journalists leaked information that the Bilderberg predicted that the U.S. housing market will be allowed to soar before the bubble was popped. This happened in 2007. Jim Tucker believed that the Bilderbergers in large measure want an attack in Iran. Now, we have the President supporting new sanctions against Iran today.
The BP oil spill is a strange incident. There were sales of shared and stocks in days and weeks beforehand. A BP report cites undocumented tampering with well sealing equipment. Now, the government is trying to push for a carbon tax. The government wants more regulations, which can be a good thing if done in the right way of course. On April 12th, just over one week before the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, Halliburton, the world’s second largest oilfield services corporation, surprised some by acquiring Boots & Coots, a relatively small but vastly experienced oil well control companies. This company dealt with fires and blowouts on oil rigs and oil wells. It was responsible for putting out roughly one third of the more than 700 oil well fires set in Kuwait by retreating Iraqi soldiers during the Gulf War. The deal is still under scrutnity with Boots and Coots facing an ongoing investigation into "possible breaches of fiducirary duty and other violations of state law." Halliburton is named in the majority of some 2 dozen lawsuits that had been filed since the explosion by Gulf Coast people and businesses who claim that the company is to blame for the disaster. Halliburton was forced to admit in testimony at a congressional hearing last month that it carried out a cementing operation 20 hours before the Gulf of Mexico rig went up in flames. The lawsuits claim that 4 Halliburton workers stationed on the rig improperly capped the well. The New York times noted on May 26th that: "...BP officials chose, partly for financial reasons, to use a type of casing for the well that the company knew was the riskier of two options..." Workers from the rig and company officials have said hours before the exposion, gases were leaking through the cement. This has been set in place by the oil services contractor called Halliburton. Some investigation believe that these leaks were the likely cause of the explosion. According to a 2007 study by Minerals Management Service, cementing was a factor in 18 of 39 rig blowouts in the gulf between 1992 and 2006. There is another intriguing connection Boots and Coots has to the Deepwater Horizon explosion via Pat Campbell. Pat is the man who employed to cap the well beneath the ruined rig. Campbell worked for Boots and Coots as general manager for many years. BP admitted to buying Yahoo and Google keywood in trying to control publicly avaliable information in the wake of the catastrophe. It seems that the company is taking all of the flack for the spill. Yet, the Halliburton link is being ignored. BP’s prepared testimony briefing, which has since leaked online, also intriguingly notes that the Hydraulic Control System on equipment designed to automatically seal the well in an emergency was modified without their knowledge sometime before the explosion. One section of the report mentions that: “the extent of these modifications is unknown at this time” states the report on page 37. BP isn't innocent in this affair, but it's bigger than just BP. There was the dumping of stocks and shares in the weks and days prior to the incident. Some believe this is an example of prior knowledge of the explosion. Goldman Sachs dumped 44% of its shares in BP Oil during the first quarter. These shares that later lost 36 percent of their value equating $96 million. Other asset management firms also sold huge blocks of BP stock in the first quarter. Though the amounts pale in comparison to Goldman’s holdings, Wachovia, owned by Wells Fargo, sold 98% of its shares in BP and Swiss bank UBS sold 97% of its BP shares. The London Telegraph on June 5th, have Tony Hayward (the chief executive of BP sold 1.4 million of his shares in the fuel giant weeks before the spill. In the days before the Deepwater explosion, Obama had announced a new effort to explore for and lease new drilling locations in the deep Gulf and in Alaska. In the wake of the disaster, these plans have been cancelled and BP is taking a PR bashing. This has called some to want a reinvigoration of the carbon tax talk and some want to nationalize oil (taht some in the Democratic leadership have desire). The full story of the Gulf of Mexico disaster isn't totally out yet. There is an ongoing coverup and rumors of more spills. The site deals with $2.2 trillion source of wealth and power. These suspicious events should lead into more investigations about the BP spill.
There are suspected Rosicrucians in the world. One person is Benjamin Franklin. He's a Freemason, an author, a statesman, a scientists, and a philosopher. He was born in Boston, Massachusettes. He organized a club then known as the Juno, which a little later became the American Philosophical Society. He was a member of the Royal Society of London. The Royal Society was created under the inspiration of Sir Francis Bacon. Bacon wanted America to be the new Atlantis and Freemason Benjamin Franklin was heavily involved in the American Revolution. Some don't believe that Franklin was one though. Another famous Rosicrucian was Paschal Beverly Randolph accoridng to A.E. Waite. He lived from October 8, 1825 to July 29, 1875 He was one of the first people to introduce the doctrines of sex magic to North America. He founded the Rosicrucian group called Fraternitas Rosae Crucis. Aleister Crowley and Theodor Reuss (both occultists and Freemasons) were influenced by Randolph. He was a friend of Abraham Lincoln. He wrote books on magic and medicine. After he died in the age of 49 years old. The secessor of the Supreme Grand Master of the Fraternitas is Freeman B. Dowd. R. Swinburne Clymer is another famous Rosicrucian too.
The neo-conservative movement isn't new. It's a representation of the same old philosophies of the aristocrats. They believe in accepting privatization, banning any attempt of the government to finance internal improvements, eliminate protections of our liberty, and a radical form of law and order doctrine (that includes abolishing parole, eliminate amenities for prisoners, prison exploitation, etc. There are even prisoner chain gangs in Alabama). They embrace a contradictory stance. They say that we have too much government, but they huge government involved in our prison system, the military, and other parameters in our lives. They feel like that government can't be trusted to run a post office, a railroad, etc. but they can run our criminal justice system. Many people in that movement follow a script. So, they hate welfare to assist the people, but they love a police state that oppresses the people. Some of them think that some people should fend for themselves and starve to death. We shouldn't follow the path of oligarchy or the ways of Lycurgus (in his Spartan state wanted to harm industry and science). Today, Austrian proponent Llewellyn Rockwell (of the Ludwig von Mises Institute) believe in the Confederate Constitution. He doesn't even believe in the general welfare clause of the U.S. Constitution. The late U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist followed in the neo cons's footsteps. He promotes states rights even if the state contradicts federal law. He sympathises with the racist Justice Roger Taney. Taney deprived human rights protection from a black man, who was runaway slave. The states have rights, but they can't do what they want whenever they want without federal legal protections. The federal judiciary, and especially the Supreme Court, were established by the Constitution as instruments for enforcing the federal Constitution over the states. Marshall put this ``federal supremacy'' into practice, and Taney tried to destroy it. He didn't believe in the interference in state administrative procedures even if federal constitutional rights are at stake. William Rehnquist opposed school desegregation cases like the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education. He was a clerk for Justice and Freemason Robert Jackson at the time. He a memorandum for Jackson stating that "Plessy v. Ferguson," the 1896 case which established the Jim Crow ``separate but equal'' principle, was correct, and should be reaffirmed. Even Thurgood Marshall (once head of the NAACP legal defense fund) accurately pointed out the the majority can't deprive a minority of its constitutional rights. Later, Rehnquist claimed that he was expressing Jackson's views and not his won. However, the views expressed in the Rehnquist memoranda were not consistent with Jackson's views, but they were consistent with Rehnquist's own known views. A secretary to Justice Jackson accused Rehnquist of smearing Jackson's reputation. Other clerks said that Rehnquist held onto pro-segregationist views in the lunchroom table. Rehnquist back in 1964 opposed a proposed public accommodations ordinance in Phoenix barring discrimination on the basis of race, color, or creed. In 1967, Rehnquist wrote a letter to the "Phoenix Republic," saying that ``we are no more dedicated to an `integrated' society than we are to a `segregated' society.'' Rehnquist has never dissociated himself from this statement. Senator Edward Kennedy, who opposed Rehnquist's confirmation as Chief Justice in 1986, said that ``he [Rehnquist] denied that he harassed and intimidated voters in Arizona in the early 1960s, but the evidence is substantial that he did.'' Another eyewitness, Dr. Sidney Smith, testified that he had seen Rehnquist confront two black men at a polling place, and tell them; ``You have no business being in this line trying to vote. I ask you to leave.'' So, he was a racist and how did he get in the Court. The deal is that the Senate Judiciary Committee back in those days of the 1970's and 1980's were dominated by pro-segregationists or remnants of the Confederates. In 1971, when he was confirmed the arch segregationist James O. Eastland of Mississippi headed the Senate Judiciary Committee from 1958 to 1978. The old Dixiecrat turned Republican Strom Thurmond supported Rehnquist back in 1986 when he became Chief Justice. Like many neo cons, he isn't a real conservative. He follows the doctrines of Thomas Hobbes (that even the Founding Fathers rejected). Rehnquist classified Hobbes' views as a realist. Hobbess believe that in the state of nature man is at war with every other person. So, men must give their rights to the sovereign (which is given unquestioning obedience. This is totalitarianism). In truth, man is created in the image of God with creative spark and true reason to advance civilization. The government shouldn't oppress people, but it should foster progress in science and technological development. Hobbes' views violate the principal that natural law is superior to the power of the state. No government could usurp these inalienable rights. We aren't founded on majority rule since majority rule is the mob rule. This can violate the rights of the minority. Rehnquist voted in the Court in favor of opposing Miranda and other civil liberties.
The Tea party is a big part of American political life now. From an objective point of view, some Tea Party members are extremists (these extremists use race baiting and anti-poor rhetoric in getting their points across. So, some of the Tea Party people are racists). Some sincerely have legitimate grievances about governmental policies. Although, an overarching theme in it is distortion of what government is and what it should do to the people. Some of them say to take back the country. Some of their candidate won recent primaries like Angle from Nevada. They scream about being against big government, but this never includes defense, prisons, domestic law enforcement, etc. Now, the Tea Party Movement therefore oppose government providing assistance to those that are super wealthy and even minorities (like public schools, publicly supported colleges, tax breaks for homeowners, etc.). Yet, some of them would hypocritically say don't touch my Medicare. It's as simple as that. The extremism in the world proves the neo-conservatives wrong in saying that we live in a totally post-racialism society. Even neo-con John McWhorter (a pundit from the Manhattan Institute. This Institute aided Murray's Bell Curve lie) said that segregration is a good thing. They live in a fanstasy land. They ignore the lending discrimination against homeburyers and homeowners of color. They claim that those who live in environmentally toxic areas should just take advantage of higher paying private sector jobs that would spring from out of their neighborhoods. These lies are nothing new. The difference today is that promoting imperialism, laissez faire capitalism is getting a face lift since the financial crisis destroyed the lie of laissez faire capitalism once and for all. Even the Root.com is owned by the corporate Washington Post. They tried to compared Black Panthers to the Tea Party Movement, which is historically inaccurate. People don't have to agree with the Black Panthers on every issue, but the Black Panthers are different than Tea Party people. The BPP tackled police brutality, economic exploitation, and imperialism. These are some issues that the Tea Party mostly aren't tackling at all. The Black Panthers rejected the establishment , which is why the FBI had an open policy of killing them. The Tea Party is openly funded by the establishment and in some cases given favorable press by the CFR dominated corporate media. A real movement always exposes imperialism and other forms of neo-colonial injustices. Communism like vulture capitalism have caused genocide, war, starvation, eugenics, violations of human rights, economic exploitation, racism, sexism, fascism, apartheid, and other evils for centuries. That's historical. Some of the Tea Party Movement isn't just funded by Freedom Works. They are funded by the secretive oil billionares of the Koch family. This family aided the Soviet Union. In 1929, after hosting a delegation of Soviet planners in Wichita, Kansas, Winkler and Koch signed a $5 million contract to build 15 refineries in the Soviet Union. According to Oil of Russia, a Russian oil industry trade magazine, the deal made Winkler-Koch into Comrade Stalin’s number-one refinery builder. It provided equipment and oversaw construction. So, a communist aiding family is aiding Tea Party people. They can talk about personal responsibility all they want (I do believe in personal responsibility though), but a corrupt system still exist. The media won't report on the tent cities nationwide and other real issues.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment