Many Tea Party candidates won primaries for the Republican Party. Some of them are right on some issues and wrong on others. People have talked about the Delaware candidate Christie O'Donnel. Yet, the real extremist is the New York Republican candidate for Governor named Carl Paladino. His bigotry nows no boundaries. He called the current Governor David Patterson a drug addict when he is not. He agrees that people who wants people on welfare to go into prison doms and take hygiene classes. He wants prisons to be used for these activities. His end game is to force those on welfare to work in state-sponsored jobs. He claims that the porgram is voluntarily, but using those on welfare for scapegoats and proposing that they are treated as criminals is a disgrace. Most people on welfare aren't minorities in America at all. Like a reactionary, Paladino doens't like social services to help human beings. Also, tons of people on welfare has good personal hygiene. Not to mention that federal law already requires welfare recipeients to do some form of work to recieve benefits. So, welfare is not some free handout. Ketny Jean-Francois, a former welfare recipient and a New York City advocate for low-income people, said Paladino's idea shocked her. "Being poor is not a crime," she said. "People are on welfare for many reasons ... Is he saying people are poor because they don't have any hygiene or any skills?" This proposed concentration camp for poor people is exploitative and nefarious. Paladino also sent sexist, racist, and pro-bestaility emails. He's a hypocrite by claiming to be pro-family values, but showing these emails are the opposite of true morality. The Tea Party movement supports the man. Some of the video compares Obama to dancing tribesmen, picking President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as a pimp and a prositute, etc. There is nothing wrong with being politically incorrect, but showing bigotry in an email (and trying to be a Governor) is wrong. That is why I can't be a Republican. Their party is filled with deception and some of them have explicit hatred of my people. The Democrats have issues too, so I want to make that clear.
Bill Gates promotes death panels. Some people have exposed this, but there is a big agenda behind this action. Gates is a pure eugenicist, who is dedicated to lower the global population via vaccines. His foundation funds stuff to the tune of billions. Bill Gates' "death panel" comments were actually made over 2 months ago at the Apsen Ideas Festiaval in Aspen, Colorado. The Apsen Ideas Festival is a project of the Aspen Institute. The Aspen Institute is mainly funded by certain foundations. They include the Carnegie Corporation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Ford Foundation. The Rockefellers in 1952 established the Population Council, which is a pro-eugenics operation. Many researchers like Jurriaan Maessen found that the Rockefeller Foundation popularized anti-fertility vaccine. They have worked with the UN Population Fund, World Bank, and the World Health Organization to reduce world population. “Just four years after the Rockefeller Foundation launched massive funding-operations into anti-fertility vaccines, the Task Force was created under auspices of the World Health Organization, World Bank and UN Population Fund,” writes Maessen. Back in 1904, the Cernegie Institute created a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island in 1904 that stockpiled millions of index cards on ordinary Americans. They or eugenicists wanted to remove families, bloodlines, and whole peoples. “From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as the nation’s social service agencies and associations,” Edwin Black wrote for the San Francisco Chronicle in 2003. Various families like the Rockefellers, Harrimans, and the Carnegie families funded key eugenic organizations like the American Eugenics Society (and its sister organizaiton called the American Society of Human Genetics. It was created in 1947). Other groups came about like the Harbor Experimental Station for the Study of Evolution, the Eugenic Record Office, and the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. During a question and answer session at the Aspen Ideas Festival, Gates implied that elderly patients undergoing expernsive health care treatments should be killed and the money spent elsewhere. “But that’s called the death panel and you’re not supposed to have that discussion,” added Gates. The Microsoft's owner evil advocacy for killing a grandmother in the name of spending money is sick. That is why people oppose death panels. Some believe there is a cost/benefit board that can refuse care to elderly patients in Obamacare and others disagree with this assumption. Regardless of that, death panels existed before Obamacare was enacted. The Recovery and Reinvestment Act, commonly known as the Stimulus Bill, provided more than a billion dollars to fund the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. The Council was devised by former Health and Human Services Secretary Nominee Tom Daschle. “Daschle’s stated purpose (and therefore President Obama’s purpose) for creating the Council is to empower an unelected bureaucracy to make the hard decisions about health care rationing that elected politicians are politically unable to make,” writes Ashby. It's no secret that Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel is the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel is on the Council. He believes in denying medical care to patients who are no longer "participating citizens" or people considered useless eaters by the state. Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination,” writes Emanuel, “every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years.” Denying medical care to patients based on age is wrong of course. Wesley J. Smith has exposed this agenda. Smith is an award winning author and a Senior Fellow in Human Rights and Bioethics at the Discovery Institute. He wrote about some bioethicists and other in the medical intelligentsia that try to rationalize denying medical care to dependent and elderly people. Wesley Smith exposed how some in the "bioethics movements" has successfully changed the classification for human care to medical care in the process has paved the way for denial of health care (and the establishment of death panels). Smith accuses Obamacare of cutting costs and having perks to cut the vulenerable people of life itself. Hospitals have denied care to citizens all of the time. Hospitals provide emergency to anyone whether they are legal of illegal immigrants. I have no problem with this. Bill Gates people in man-made global warming. So, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funds the production and distribution of vaccines to the Third World. Back in February 2010, the TED Conference have Gates saying that vaccines will be used to reduce the global population including to lower CO2 emissions. Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.” Bill Gates is a real extremist. Real health care reform isn't about promoting sterilizing vaccines or other evils that John P. Holdren's 1977 textbook called "Ecoscience" (this book calls for the planetary regime to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via oppressive acts like sterilization). Indeed, As Natural News’ Mike Adams revealed, one of the Gates Foundation’s current projects revolves around the funding of a “sterilization program that would use sharp blasts of ultrasound directed against a man’s scrotum to render him infertile for six months.” “Now, the foundation has funded a new “sweat-triggered vaccine delivery” program based on nanoparticles penetrating human skin,” writes Adams. “The technology is describes as a way to “…develop nanoparticles that penetrate the skin through hair follicles and burst upon contact with human sweat to release vaccines.” Bill Gates wanting death panels is bad enough. What's worse is when Gates and other billionaires have worked to discuss population reduction efforts that have publiclly stated their goal of using billions of dollars worth of vaccines to lower world populations (in the Third World especially). These elitists support sterilization and forced abortions too. That is why I will never support the population control agenda since it's an anti-human rights agenda.
Dwight D. Eisenhower was a Republican and even he would be rejected by the Tea Party Movement. That is how extreme some of the Tea Party people are. This doesn't mean I support the establishment. The establishment supports war mongering, austerity, violations on individual liberty, abortion on demands, anti-national sovereignity policies, and an anti-gun agenda. I oppose vehemently all of that stuff. My intension is to prove that Dwight D. Eisenhower believed in the free enterprise system, but even he didn't want to get rid of all social services completely. Glen Beck and Sarah Palin hate taxes, big government, and want to turn this country back into the days of decades ago. To some Tea Party activist, Dwight would be a near socialist. For example, he named Earl Warren and Harry Blackmun to the federal brench. He condemned the military industrial complex. Back in 1956, he passed the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956. This used taxpayer dollars (on gas, diesel, etc.) fund an enormous public works project. This is cost an equivalent of $197 billion today. This is much more than the small $50 billion infrastructure plan that President Barack Obama desire today. Eisenhower didn't want to reduce taxes under the income was balanced. The rich paid much higher taxes back then than today. Back then, the top income tax paid by the wealthiest Americans was 91% and now it's jsut 35%. That is why taxation utilized in the right way can be boon or blessing for the American people. FOX News won't report this information sense they want a reactionary, revisionist version of history to spread worldwide. I don't support Ike on every issue, but this proves that the Republicans were much more moderate even then on some issues than today. You can't say I love to build up our nation and then don't want to fund to build up our public services from fire stations to bridges. I wonder what Sharron Angle, Joe Miller, and Rand Paul view Dwight D. Eisenhower if they knew his real policies.
Other plans exist by the government in trying to control or shut down the Internet. There are 2 cybersecurity bills that gives President Barack Obama the power to shut down parts of the Internet during times of a national emergency. Now, Democrats have unified these proposals into one single piece of legislation. Democrats want this bill passed by the end of the year. If this bill becomes laws, then the Department of Homeland Security will have a larger role in policing the world wide web. The new draft is a mix of 2 version that were orginally created by Senators Joe Lieberman and Jay Rockefeller. Janet Napolitano's DHS will be handed broader authority to determine how to handle potential cybersecurity threats. “DHS will get expanded authorities. I think that’s clear,” said James Lewis, a cybersecurity expert with think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, who has studied the new bill. This expanded role for Homeland Security would be somehat ironic given the fact that the DHS itself recently failed an extensive cybersecurity audit conducted by the agency's own Inspector General. The DHS US-CERT office is currently plagued by at least 600 vulenerabilities that could compromise sensitive data including 202. That has been called as high risk according ot the TG Daily. Homeland Security's failure to adequately secure its own internal network will lead to questions about why the agency should be given vast new authority to secure America's cyber assets and the public Internet. Democrats want to get the bill passed within the next 4 weeks. This is the sticking points could delay the legislation according to a Senate aide familiar with the bill. Lawmakers want to put the package up for a vote before the end of the year. Harry Reid said that the measure is on his list of top priority bills to get through the Senate this year. Lieberman's version of the original bill has language that would hand President Obama the power to shut down parts of the world wide web for 4 months with no congressional oversight. The combined version shifts the responsibility to DHS. Under the pretext of a national emergency could block all Internet traffic to the U.S. from certain countries and close down specific hubs and networks. This creates an ominous precedent for government regulation and control over the Internet. Cybersecurity legislation is being promoted as a vital tool to defend the nation's criticial infrastructure against cyber terrorism. The threat from cyber terrorists to the U.S. power grid or water supply is minimal. The perpetrators of an attack on such infrastructure would have direct physical access to the systems that operate these plants to cause any damage. Any perceived threat from the public Internet to these systems is therefore completely contrived and strips bare what many fear is the real agenda behind cybersecurity – to enable the government to regulate free speech on the Internet. The Obama administration's release of the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative. That is a government plan to secure or control the nation's public and private sector computer networks. This coincided with Democrats attempting to claim that the website The Drudge Report was serving malware. Senator Jim Inhofe claimed that this was a ploy to discourage people form using Druge. Senator Lieberman told CNN's Candy Crowley that the cybersecurity legislation is meants to mimic the Communist Chinese system of Internet policing. “Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” said Lieberman. That's a disgrace since China contantly censors the Internet all of the time. It tries to oppress and silence victims of government abuse and atrocities. You can't strange dissent against the state and be a free society. This agenda is spreading into America under the guise of a cybersecurity legislation.
Many real religious people have exposed the Jesuit Order. The Jesuit Order is a nefarious group desiring domination not only of the Protestant Reformation, but of the world. Authors of numerous backgrounds and even ex-Jesuits have exposed the Jesuits before. The Jesuits have tried to infiltrate world societies in China and Japan as well. WWII was the evident where nuclear weapons were immorally used in 2 Japanese cities. The cities' names are Hiroshima and Nagasaki. German Jesuit Wilhelm Kleinsorge was "miraclously" saved from the detonation in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. 7 other Jesuits survived as well like Johannes Siemes. August 7, 1814 ironically believed that the restored the Society of the Jesuits by Pope Pius VII. It also the Jesuits to come into Japan.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment