Jeremy Bentham, John Locke, and Adam Smith were 3 agents of the British East Indian Company policies of radical free markets and free trade policies. Locke has been accused of being an agent of Shelburne or the leader of the British Empire’s East India Company. Locke didn’t want America to develop independent industrial societal structures beyond just an agrarian society. Locke attacked the protectionist views of Jean Baptiste Colbert or the finance minister for France’s Louis XIV. Bentham was more extreme than Smith and Locke put together. At least, Locke and Smith embraced some legitimate concepts though 2 men weren’t perfect. Bentham criticized the defense of human rights in America’s July 4, 1776 Declaration of Independence. In1785, Bentham wrote an essay to defend pedophia among men and children. Bentham was a deprived sick individual. He wanted a jail slave labor camp for children, the criminals, and other people to be place in it. In his or Bentham’s 1787 pamphlet entitled, “In Defense of Usury,” attacking all restrictions on the lenders' right to take the highest interest rates they could get away with. The architecture of the beginning of the modern British Secret Intelligence service began with Dr. John Dee & later with the Shelburne-Bentham collaboration. The British Empire lost to America in the War of 1812 (after the British burned the Capitol to the ground). There is nothing wrong with a post office, transportation, fire departments, and other public modes of infrastructure existing in the world regardless of what Austrian Economists proclaim. Some of these people would liable any government intervention falsely as socialism.
The bin Laden death story as shown by the mainstream media has many holes. We do know that Osama bin Laden is dead now. Fundamentally, the corporate financier oligarchs are using this event to justify the war on terror. The CIA believes that facial recognition and other DNA evidence proves that they have killed bin Laden. A London Guardian report said that the CIA compared the DNA of the man shot dead in Pakistan with a Bin Laden family member (not bin Laden himself in another sample). The CIA is saying that the results are only 95% sure. CIA Director Leon Panetta gave an interview to PBS. He stated that the CIA had no evidence and were entirely uncertain Osama bin Laden was even in the compound to begin with. The Washington Post article claims to have had a nearby safe house where they have observed the alleged compound for months. They admitted that there was no picture of Bin Laden from the surveillance mission of the compound. Many government officials believe that bin Laden has been dead for a number of years. Domestically, people are being falsely ostracized if they question the government’s official story about bin Laden’s death. Some want to demonize anyone exposing real conspiracies in the world. The Jessica Lynch story has been totally fabricated. Even Pat Tillman was murdered by his own government and the government treacherously covered it up. Tillman began to question the war on terror before he died. He tried to stand up against the system and Pat Tillman’s brother issued a rebuttal against Reg Henry’s lies about Pat Tillman. Cindy Sheehan questions the official government statements about the Pakistan incident. The government has a notorious history of promoting lies and propaganda in the world that bashes skepticism and independent, critical thinking. Even Jim Corr (of The Corrs fame) has been criticized by pundits like Reg Henry for him disagreeing with the emerging global government (like the inconsistencies on the official story of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center). We have the right to execute a sense of vigilance and skepticism about certain supposed facts. Jim Coor is form Ireland. Declan O’Shea is criticizing the Bin Laden in Pakistan so-called incident too. We respect legitimate government, but we don’t place unconditional faith in government. We place unconditional faith in God alone. We will not shut up when a police state and murder of men, women, and children are a reality in the 21st century. Some people believe that this incident could inspire the West’s goal of trying to control China more (under the guise of democracy). Now, there are tensions between Pakistan and America. Pakistan is China’s ally. There is the 2006 Strategic Studies Institute’s report called “String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power across the Asian Littoral.” Throughout the report, it says that China’s efforts to secure its oil lifeline from the Middle East to its shores in the South China Sea are examined as are means to maintain American hegemony throughout the Indian and Pacific Ocean. The premise in the report is that, should Western policy wonks and paper-pushers fail to entice China into participating in the “international system” as “responsible stakeholders,” an increasingly confrontational posture must be taken to contain the rising nation. New drone attacks are occurring in Pakistan even after Pakistan warned America to not violate its airspace. There is a convergence of battling between Iran, India, America, China, and Pakistan. We have the right to scrutinize our government as a part of the First Amendment. We don’t need a confrontation among Pakistan, China, and Russia at all.
It’s been found that plastics chemical in packaged foods contribute to asthma in babies. This reality is found in BPA or bisphenol-A. BPA is the chemical compound that is commonly found in a large variety of plastics. Public criticism has occurred against the widespread use of BPA has come under public scrutiny due to known connection to many health problems. These problems include heart complications, cancer, neurological issues, diabetes, fertility, and sexual issues. The chemical BPA is found in water bottles, dental filling, plastic containers, canned food linings, paper receipts, CD/DVD packaging, etc. Tons of studies have found that BPA acts as an endocrine system disrupter, negatively affecting our bodies’ hormone production. Exposure is almost a certainly a 2004 study by the CDC found BPA in 93% of the over 200 urine samples tested. There is new information proving that linked BPA to breathing issues in babies. An article found in Mail Online discussed the results of a recent study by Penn State College of Medicine. The results found that pregnant mothers with high levels of BPA in their blood during the 16th week of pregnancy. The increased levels of BPA are twice as likely to have infants with wheezing problems in the 1st 6 months of life. What is really scary is that 99% of all the mothers in this study had various levels of bisphenol-A in their systems. The uses of BPA are used in food and drinking containers should be banned. No country has done this policy so afar. Denmark is the first country in the EU to ban the chemical in containers that target children under 3. The entire EU has banned BPA from use of it in the production of baby bottles. North America is a little show on this policy. Yet, Canada and some states in America have begun taking steps to control the use of bisphenol-A in consumer products. 6 baby manufacturers removed the chemical from their U.S. bottle production after widespread public outcry. The plastics industry prefers to spend money to procure studies that attempts to cast doubt on the dangers of BPA (instead of implementing safe alternatives to BPA). Consumers should take the steps to enhance their personal health. Expectant mothers and women planning to conceive should avoid the usage of bisphenol-A contaminated products (in order to promote the well being of themselves and their infants).
The Bilderberg’s history has a long journey. It was created in the Netherlands in 1954. They met each year with over 125 people per year. Their members are made up of the political, financial, military, academic and media elite worldwide (primarily from North America, Western Europe, and Japan). Researchers have found that CEOs or Chairman of some the largest corporations on Earth (like from Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, and Total SA) are members of the Bilderberg Group. European monarchs, international bankers, and David Rockefeller (including major politicians, President, Prime Ministers, and central bankers of the world) are in the club. Joseph Retinger was one of the architects of the European Common Market and a leading intellectual supporter of European integration. He wanted a federal union for Europeans countries to relinquish part of their sovereignty (among European nations) in 1946. The CFR and the Rockefellers funded Retinger’s efforts to institute the European integration agenda. The CFR has been heavily founded by the Carnegie Corporation, Ford Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation. The Bilderbergers are heavily influenced by the Vatican and the Pilgrim Society. This global think tank wants to link the governments and economics of North and Europe. The Bilderbergers desired the EU for a long time. Newly released documents from the 1955 Bilderberg meeting show that a main topic of discussion was “European Unity,” and that “The discussion affirmed complete support for the idea of integration and unification from the representatives of all the six nations of the Coal and Steel Community present at the conference.” Further, “A European speaker expressed concern about the need to achieve a common currency, and indicated that in his view this necessarily implied the creation of a central political authority.” Interestingly, “A United States participant confirmed that the United States had not weakened in its enthusiastic support for the idea of integration, although there was considerable diffidence in America as to how this enthusiasm should be manifested. Another United States participant urged his European friends to go ahead with the unification of Europe with less emphasis upon ideological considerations and, above all, to be practical and work fast.” Thus, at the 1955 Bilderberg Group meeting, they set as a primary agenda, the creation of a European common market.
The oil crisis has a long history. The Yom Kippur war contributed to the extensive oil price rises. The May 1973 Bilderberg Group meeting was famous. The meeting mentioned a 400% increase in the price of oil was discussed and meeting participants were creating a plan about how to manage the about to be created flood of oil dollars. Oil isn’t foreign issue of the Bilderberg since the 1973 participants were CEOs of the Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum or BP, S.A. ENI, Exxon, and other individuals to Baron Edmond de Rothschild and David Rockefeller (plus the U.S. Secretary of State at the time who was Henry Kissinger). In the Yom Kippur War, Nixon was in the middle of the domestic issue of Watergate. Kissinger had huge power in the White House. Rogers resigned and Nixon allowed Kissinger to be both National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. Kissinger didn’t tell Nixon about the seriousness of King Faisal of Saudi Arabia’s intension of cutting back oil supplies over U.S. policies in the Middle East. An oil embargo soon came about. In 1972, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia had “insisted that oil should not be used as a political weapon.” However, “in 1973, Faisal announced that he was changing his mind about an oil embargo.” Faisal held a meeting with western oil executives, warning them. Sadat told Faisal of the plan to attack Israel, and Faisal agreed to help both financially and with the “oil weapon.” Days later, the Saudi oil minister, Sheik Ahmed Yamani, “began dropping hints to the oil companies about a cutback in production that would affect the United States.” The Yom Kippur war occurred, America gave Israel arms. This allowed the Arabic OPEC countries to have a 70 percent increase in the price of oil on October 16th, 1973 and an oil embargo against the U.S. on the 17th. The Bilderbergers 5 months before planned on how to manage the about to be created flood oil dollars. In 2001, the former Saudi representative to OPEC, Sheik Ahmed Yamani, said, “'I am 100 per cent sure that the Americans were behind the increase in the price of oil. The oil companies were in real trouble at that time, they had borrowed a lot of money and they needed a high oil price to save them.” When he was sent by King Faisal to the Shah of Iran in 1974, the Shah said that it was Henry Kissinger who wanted a higher price for oil. An article in Foreign Policy, the journal published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, concluded from exhaustive research, that, “Since 1971, the United States has encouraged Middle East oil-producing states to raise the price of oil and keep it up.” This conclusion was based upon State Department documents, congressional testimony and interviews with former policy-makers. The result of the oil crisis of 1973 caused Japanese financial system to be more deregulation and it increased inflation.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment