Pro-God, Pro-Human Life, anti-New World Order, Anti-Nefarious Secret Societies, Pro-Civil Liberties, anti-Torture, anti-National ID Card, Pro-Family, Anti-Neo Conservativism, Pro-Net Neutrality, Pro-Home Schooling, Anti-Voting Fraud, Pro-Good Israelis & Pro-Good Palestinians, Anti-Human Trafficking, Pro-Health Freedom, Anti-Codex Alimentarius, Pro-Action, Anti-Bigotry, Pro-9/11 Justice, Anti-Genocide, and Pro-Gun Control. My name is Timothy and I'm from the state of Virginia.
Such an alleged genius and yet such a fragile ego fear of transparency.
It amazes me how people think they can join an organisation that practices secrecy, and then be amazed when they find it is corrupt. Don't they have any brains?
I refuse to join any organisation that practices secrecy. Any individual who wants to practice secrecy, must keep their secrets to themselves; if they don't have the courage to be honest honourable people and be who they really are; and stand for values of honour and accountability.
But don't expect me to include the word 'trust' in any relationship with any individual who wants to keep their secrets, so as to practice dirty trickery and deception.
If Michael Martin -- an assassin -- has the courage to be honest, to my face; and tell me what he has done, how many people he killed, how and why, I don't see why I should consider the shit anyone wants to say, who is not willing to practice transparency.
So, I think Masonry is one fuck up. It may have had good intentions, and many join with good intentions; but when they find out the corruption, most just want to make sure they are beneficiaries thereof, instead of exposing it.
There are not many instances, if any that I can recall, that justify secrecy in the long term. In the short term maybe, such as when we have a radical honesty workshop, we provide the individuals participating a safe space wherein they get used to being fully transparent. But by the time they end the workshop, they fully have no problems with sharing their experiences in the workshop. That kind of thing.
Of course there are also people who have such fucked up fragile shallow pathetic lives, that all they want to do is, put their noses into other people's business. That is just a bunch of crap. Sort of like the sex lives of famous people. I don't give a shit about that crap. If its a politician, or official person, then of course its relevant if it affects their duties; but if not. I don't care about such stuff, about other people's private sex lives.
Long term. I ain't heard any arguments therefore. There may be, but I don't know of any, that I consider worthy of long term secrecy. But thats just me.
I was amazed at his ability to read and write 16 languages. Wow. Really amazing. I also think that its possible the different time period may have contributed towards such individuals attachment to secrecy. They lived in an extremely ignorant fascistic period of time, prior to such concepts as 'freedom of speech' and so on.
For example: In South Africa, I dont use the k word to someone direclty, cause the SA goverment demands that the K word be a secret, in someones head. They don't want anyone who may be a K, to hear the word, and to be told it; cause they are K-secrecy obsessed. So if I think anyone is a K, then the goverment demands that I keep that a secret to myself. Stupid, but that is what fragile ego goverments and lawyer parasites do.
For example: If someone in SA tells me, they respect my culture of Radical Honesty and want me to be 100% honest with them. Then I practice 100% honesty with them.
Most hate me and can't stand me, so I keep my opinions about them to myself; but its not a 'secret'. I have no problem telling them my honest opinion about what I think of them, and why; but they just don't like hearing honest opinions. They prefer public relations two faced arsekissing crap. So a conversation with such people is fucking pointless. They are not giving you honest sincere feedback.
3 comments:
Such an alleged genius and yet such a fragile ego fear of transparency.
It amazes me how people think they can join an organisation that practices secrecy, and then be amazed when they find it is corrupt. Don't they have any brains?
I refuse to join any organisation that practices secrecy. Any individual who wants to practice secrecy, must keep their secrets to themselves; if they don't have the courage to be honest honourable people and be who they really are; and stand for values of honour and accountability.
But don't expect me to include the word 'trust' in any relationship with any individual who wants to keep their secrets, so as to practice dirty trickery and deception.
If Michael Martin -- an assassin -- has the courage to be honest, to my face; and tell me what he has done, how many people he killed, how and why, I don't see why I should consider the shit anyone wants to say, who is not willing to practice transparency.
So, I think Masonry is one fuck up. It may have had good intentions, and many join with good intentions; but when they find out the corruption, most just want to make sure they are beneficiaries thereof, instead of exposing it.
There are not many instances, if any that I can recall, that justify secrecy in the long term. In the short term maybe, such as when we have a radical honesty workshop, we provide the individuals participating a safe space wherein they get used to being fully transparent. But by the time they end the workshop, they fully have no problems with sharing their experiences in the workshop. That kind of thing.
Of course there are also people who have such fucked up fragile shallow pathetic lives, that all they want to do is, put their noses into other people's business. That is just a bunch of crap. Sort of like the sex lives of famous people. I don't give a shit about that crap. If its a politician, or official person, then of course its relevant if it affects their duties; but if not. I don't care about such stuff, about other people's private sex lives.
Long term. I ain't heard any arguments therefore. There may be, but I don't know of any, that I consider worthy of long term secrecy. But thats just me.
I was amazed at his ability to read and write 16 languages. Wow. Really amazing. I also think that its possible the different time period may have contributed towards such individuals attachment to secrecy. They lived in an extremely ignorant fascistic period of time, prior to such concepts as 'freedom of speech' and so on.
For example: In South Africa, I dont use the k word to someone direclty, cause the SA goverment demands that the K word be a secret, in someones head. They don't want anyone who may be a K, to hear the word, and to be told it; cause they are K-secrecy obsessed. So if I think anyone is a K, then the goverment demands that I keep that a secret to myself. Stupid, but that is what fragile ego goverments and lawyer parasites do.
For example: If someone in SA tells me, they respect my culture of Radical Honesty and want me to be 100% honest with them. Then I practice 100% honesty with them.
Most hate me and can't stand me, so I keep my opinions about them to myself; but its not a 'secret'. I have no problem telling them my honest opinion about what I think of them, and why; but they just don't like hearing honest opinions. They prefer public relations two faced arsekissing crap. So a conversation with such people is fucking pointless. They are not giving you honest sincere feedback.
Post a Comment