There is the recent
Odessa slaughter. There was a vicious Neo-Nazi mob that burnt anti-government
activists alive. Dozens of people died in flames in Odessa. Radicals set ablaze
the local House of Trade Unions with anti-government protesters blocked inside.
Many had to jump out of windows. Some were suffocated in smoke and many died.
It started with about 1,500 supporters of the Kiev authorities, accompanied by
aggressive fans of the local football club called the Chernomorets tried to
march through the center of the city chanting, “Glory to Ukraine,” “Death to
enemies,” “Knife the Moskals [derogatory for Russians].” Some of the people in
the group were wearing ultra-nationalist Right Sector movement insignia, were
armed with chains, bats, and carried shields. There were several hundred
anti-government activists that eventually confronted the procession. There was
fighting and the members of the rival groups threw stones, Molotov cocktails
and smoke grenades at each other and at police. The pavements were spattered
with blood. The police failed to draw the rival groups apart. As a result, 4
people were killed and 37 wounded in the violence. Police were among the
injured. There are images of people covered in blood. Ukrainian police help an
injured colleague during clashes between pro-Russian activists and supporters
of the Kiev government in the streets of Odessa May 2, 2014. (Reuters/Yevgeny
Volokin). These street clashes are only the beginning of the Odessa Friday
nightmare as radicals started to drive anti-government activists back to their
tent camp in front of the local House of Trade Unions. Many anti-Kiev
protesters eventually hid inside of the building. “Women and children were
hiding in the Trade Union’s building,” an eye-witness told RT. “First the armed
men set fire to tents, then they started throwing Molotov cocktails and
grenades at the building. We heard shots fired and saw smoke,” she added. The
first floor of the Trade Unions building was soon engulfed in flames. The
people inside appeared to be trapped. Dozens eventually burnt alive or
suffocated to death. To escape the fire and smoke, people were hanging out of
windows and sitting on windowsills. In sheer desperation, some of them
eventually jumped to the ground. Some people had to wait to be rescued from the
second story ledge in the midst of the fire. Many of those who escaped the fire
were brutally beaten by armed men, believed to be from the ultra-nationalist
Right Sector group. As people were dying in the burning building, some of the
pro-Kiev activists jeered on Twitter that a total of 46 people died in Odessa’s
violence on Friday and almost 200 others sustained injuries, Odessa Region
prosecutor Igor Borshulyak told journalists on Saturday. A total of 46 people
died in Odessa’s violence on Friday and almost 200 others sustained injuries,
Odessa Region prosecutor Igor Borshulyak told journalists on Saturday. 39 of
the dead lost their lives in the fire at the Odessa Trade Unions House,
according to the Ukrainian emergencies agency, which released a statement
saying that “31 of the dead were found inside the building, eight more were
found outside by law enforcement officers.” Odessa accounted that on Saturday,
there is three day mourning for the victims of the tragedy. Many residents of
Odessa laid flowers outside of the burnt out Trade Union Building. Russians
have been bringing candles to the Ukrainian embassy in Moscow to commemorate
the dead in Odessa. So, we see that the US/NATO sponsored Kiev coalition
government is responsible for many of the killings in Odessa and in the
Ukraine. “Such actions are reminiscent of the crimes of the Nazis,” said
Russia’s Ambassador to the UN Vitaly Churkin. The international community is
not heavily mentioning the crimes in Odessa on May 2, 2014. There has been many
killings of civilians in Eastern and South Eastern Ukraine by Neo-Nazi mobs and
members of the civilian militia. This could expand the conflict in Ukraine. The
Pentagon supports the Kiev government. Dmytro Yarosh, Neo-Nazi leader of the
Right Sector delegation in the parliament, oversees the National Guard, a loyal
civilian militia created in March with the support of Western military
advisers. Paramilitary training of the National Guard have commenced in
mid-March at the north of Kiev. Meanwhile, NATO has scheduled military
exercises in Poland “as part of NATO reassurance measures in response to the
Ukraine crisis.” Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu has pointed to an
extensive and unprecedented buildup of NATO forces within proximity of Russia’s
borders.
It is kind of
ironic that some have mentioned information about the Dominican Republic,
because I did my own research on Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Henry Louis
Gates' Black in Latin America documentary blatantly proves that racism is a
serious problem in the Dominican Republic (with even some stores selling
caricature dolls of black people in offensive ways). Henry Louis Gates came
into the DR and Dominican professors in the country admitted that many
Dominicans considered themselves whiter Spaniard than black. The DR has a
statue of the imperialist Bartholomew Columbus (or the Brother of that criminal
Cristobal Colon). Many Dominicans deny outright their black heritage. Also, the
dictator Rafael Trujillo killed black Haitians via the Parsley Massacre of
1937. Anybody of dark skinned complexion was killed outright by Dominican
government forces in that massacre. Rafael was a sick man (and he promoted
racist anti-black Haitian propaganda in DR textbooks and in their media for
years) and ironically he had some black blood, but he was a stone cold overt
racist. Henry Louis Gates also documents the courageous actions of the Haitian
Revolution. Now, not all Dominicans are racists (as many Afro-Dominicans and
black Haitians have protested DR's recent xenophobic court ruling), but many of
them are. I won't place all Hispanics into one box, but we have every right to
condemn racism and oppression. I do not agree totally with others on the issue of
immigration, but we do agree that racism is a serious issue in the Dominican
Republic like in the States. I am in solidarity with any person of black
African descent globally that wants liberty, justice, and freedom. Also, we
have to acknowledge heroes who fought for our liberty too. Afro-Brazilian
Sister Benedita Silva has fought for black liberation for years and decades.
There are Afro-Latino anti-racism organizations that legitimately want
liberation. Henry Louis Gates even interviewed an Afro-Cuban Brother who raps
and fights against the racism found in Cuba. Also, racism is a disgrace. I am
in unison with those who believe that there has to be a boycott of the DR if
they continue to do racist actions. In Israel, Ethiopic, Sephardic, and other
Jewish peoples have been mistreated. That is documented. At the end of the day,
the dignity of all human life has to be respected. All people born in the Earth
have equal value irrespective of their creed, their race, their gender, or
their nationality.
One fact that was when
Dr. King opposed the Vietnam, funding for his organization of the SCLC
decreased rapidly. Even some black leaders opposed him like some members from
the NAACP again. Yet, he stood up like a man and condemned the napalm harming
civilians in Vietnam and the massive death toll from the vicious Vietnam War.
Critics of the Vietnam War were even targeted by the NSA back in the 1960's.
Andrew Gavin Marshall created an excellent article on this issue entitled,
"The American Oligarchy, Civil Rights and the Murder of Martin Luther
King" about how the oligarchy tried to infiltrate the civil rights
movement. It is a great article. We have to express self-reflection in our
lives. That is a duty of ours. Too many people in general lust after fame,
money, and superficial recognition instead of respecting human dignity, love,
truth, and justice. Dr. Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Fannie Lou Hamer, and so
many other heroes did not want the celebrity life. They wanted to express the
fullness of the progressive, human life. They reached out to the poor and the
oppressed all over the world. They stood up for real principles and condemned
bigotry in strong terms. So, this incident is way for us to check ourselves and
to continue in this struggle. The National Security Agency back in the 1960’s
compiled a watch list of U.S. citizens whose phone call was wiretapped. By
1967, it did expand the list to include the names of U.S. citizens involved in
antiwar and civil rights activities. In April of 1967, Dr. Martin Luther King
gave a speech entitled, “Beyond Vietnam,” Dr. Martin Luther King spoke out
against not only the Vietnam War, but all war in general. He declared in the
Beyond Vietnam speech that he could not confront the evils of poverty without
confronting “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own
government.” King stated, “A nation that continues year after year to spend
more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching
spiritual death.” After he gave that speech, he was condemned by the national
media and even from some bourgeoisie, establishment black leaders. Life
Magazine calling the speech, “demagogic slander that sounded like a script for
Radio Hanoi,” and the Washington Post saying that, “King has diminished his
usefulness to his cause, his country, his people.” Government ought to expand
and strengthen the democratic nature of society. It should not be used to
advance war and empire at all.
The interview was
strange and odd. V. Stiviano is clearly naïve in my opinion. She wants to
defend Sterling. She should not ally with a person that has degraded her and
doesn't respect her dignity at all. Sterling made racist remarks before and she
admitted to it. Just because someone shows “good actions” and express “good
deeds” doesn’t mean that someone is not a racist. Many racists don’t say slurs
at all. Many racists are suit and tie wearers not just Klan members or
neo-Nazis. Also, Sterling has expressed racism includes sexism since he wants
to dictate to her who can she associate with in an authoritarian fashion. Any
form of racism whether subtle or more overt ought to be condemned outright by
anyone. This is the 21st century and there is no excuse for Sterling’s comments
at all. We can't force the racists change their minds. That is true. We can use
the law and other methods to punish them if do illegal behavior. We can do our
part, so future generations won't suffer what we have suffered. Also, someone
else's racism is not our fault and I never mentioned that nor do I believe
that. Many black players knew that he was a racist and allied with him
financially, socially, or otherwise, because of many reasons. One reason is the
obvious one. We know the reason and it starts with the letter M. The other
reason is that many people have been afraid to confront subtle or even overt
racism executed by those in power like Sterling. Anybody can condemn words from
a Ted Nugent type or a poor white racist. Yet, a strong Black Man (in
uncompromising terms in public view without fear) can condemn wealthy
businessmen who spew evil, racist commentaries too like Sterling from the very
beginning. Some human beings have made great points on this issue. Sterling is
responsible for his actions. V. Stiviano is not perfect, but some want to use
her as a scapegoat (for his actions. Not to mention that he had to pay money in
a settlement that dealt with an accusation of housing discrimination). I
believe that Donald Sterling is a disgraceful man. Folks should not be
surprised at his commentaries since such views have been made by white
privileged males for a very long time (even by poor white people too). The
powers that be acted fast in this situation since they wanted to give the
appearance of PROGRESS when we are caught up in the same struggle for freedom
and justice. When our median income as a community in the States is lower than
years ago, when we still have massive violence in our communities, and when we
have massive poverty in areas of our communities, then we have a long way to go.
Also, since black people make up a huge fan base of the NBA, they had to give a
token response for financial exploitation (and to maintain a strong black
backing of the league).V. Stiviano should not do interviews at this point in my
view. She should just live her life. Also, we should also use our anger not
only against racism, but we should use righteous indignation as a means to
fight against violence in our communities, to assist our families, and to
mentor the youth as well.
There obelisk in London
is called the London Cleopatra needle too. The ruler of Egypt and Sudan named
Muhammad Ali presented the obelisk to the United Kingdom in 1819. It was about
the commemoration of the victories of Lord Nelson at the Battle of the Nile and
Sir Ralph Abercomby at the Battle of Alexandria in 1801. So, this situation is
about the evil celebrating of imperialist conquests, which is disgraceful. The
obelisk was in Alexandria until 1877. Sir William James Erasmus Wilson (an anatomist
and dermatologist) sponsored its transportation to London at a cost of some
£10,000 (a very considerable sum in those days). It was dug out of the sand in
which it had been buried for nearly 2,000 years and was encased in a great iron
cylinder, 92 feet (28 m) long and 16 feet (4.9 m) in diameter, designed by the
engineer John Dixon and dubbed Cleopatra, to be commanded by Captain Carter.
Many people have died in the voyage of the obelisk from Egypt to London. The
obelisk is found in relation to the Mystery Schools for thousands of years. The Ancient
Egyptians called the obelisk “tekhenu.” During the 19th century to the present,
ancient Egyptian culture (including the obelisk) influenced architecture and
cemetery art globally from Europe to the States. This truth is documented in
the book entitled, “The revival Styles in American Memorial Art” by McDowell
and Meyer. To the ancients, the obelisk represented the sun god Ra (some view
it as related from the natural phenomena associated with the sun too).
According to the scholar James Henry Breasted in his “Development of Religion
and Thought in Ancient Egypt” from 1912: “…The pyramid form may be explained by
an examination of the familiar obelisk form. The obelisk, as is commonly known,
is a symbol sacred to the Sun-god. So far as I am aware, however, little
significance has heretofore been attached to the fact that the especially
sacred portion of the obelisk is the pyramidal apex with which it is
surmounted…” Today, Cleopatra’s Needle is flanked by two Egyptian looking sphinxes
cast from bronze. The hieroglyphic inscriptions on the sphinxes are netjer
nefer men-kheper-re di ankh (the good god, Thuthmosis III given life). These
Sphinxes appear to be looking at the Needle rather than guarding it. This is
due to the Sphinxes' improper or backwards installation. The Embankment has
other Egyptian flourishes, such as buxom winged sphinxes on the armrests of
benches. The sphinx in this context represents guards. According to the LA
Central Library website, it shows an interesting view of the meaning of their
sphinxes as the hidden mysteries of knowledge and guard civilization. There are
other interpretations of the meaning of the sphinx too. Symbols and images can
have multiple meanings among the human family.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment