______________________________________________
Dear Brother James,
Freemason Soros and Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch are both in Archbishop Egan's CFR. Soro's Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists helped kill nearly 800,000 Hungarian Jews and now run the pope's Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem.
Freemason LaRouche is the right/fascist side of the Order's dialectic. Freemason Soros is on the left/communist side of the dialectic. Both sides are friends working together under direction of the Black Pope. Jesuit Communism is always the stepping stone to bring non-Roman Catholic countries into Jesuit fascism (Protestant America, Protestant England, Buddhist Vietnam and China, Orthodox Russia, Orthodox Ukraine, etc.).
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
________________________________________________________________
You write about Walter Veith:
QUOTE |
Walter J Veith PROVES that Rome is the harlot. |
Yet Veith champions Romanist doctrine even while exposing Rome. Thus mirroring your own championing of Romanist aims. This email (not from myself) outlines this matter:
QUOTE |
A few nights ago, my wife and I watched a video by Walter Veith which was on Secret Societies and the Jesuits, and we thought he was excellent. Then, last night we watched a lecture on the anti-Christ (Roman Catholic Church). Another excellent lecture. Then, tonight we started watching a lecture entitled Two Beasts Become Friends. When asked whether he believes that only one select group will be in heaven, he states, and I quote, "I believe that God reads the heart, and God judges the person by the heart, and I believe there will be people in heaven from every single nation, tribe, and even religion, because God reads the heart and He judges people according to the light that they had and their intentions and relationships. So there will be people in heaven, I believe, that do not know even about the Lord Jesus Christ, and they will ask Him, 'Excuse me, where did you get those marks in your hands and He will explain to them what happened ." Wow. What's up with him? How could this guy, who quotes the Reformers over and over, and who has such a seemingly vast knowledge of the Word, and someone who is so dead on accurate about the Roman system and the Jesuits, be so ecumenical? What do you know about Veith? |
To which Eric Phelps responded:
QUOTE |
Wow! I did not know that Walter Veith was such a heretic. His videos are great when it comes to the exposure of Rome and Islam. His facts support nearly all of my conclusions in VAIII. But if he really believes what he said below, then he is a flagrant denier of the most basic Bible doctrine concerning salvation. He deines John 3:18: "He that believeth on him is not condenmend: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God" And again he denies I John 5:12 "He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life." There will be nobody in heaven who does not know the Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ. Those who do not know Him will be commanded by Him to depart from His presence into the lake of fire. Only redeemed people will be before the the throne of the Father (Rev. 5:9), and only saved people are redeemed. No unsaved man is redeemed. All men have been purchased by Christ (ransomed), but only saved people have been both purchased (ransomed) and released (redeemed) by Jesus Christ. Thus Veith espouses the very doctrine that Rome champions in the building of the Black Pope's New, Dark Age, Feudal World Order. So I will recommend his videos exposing the secret societies and Islam, etc., but I must regard him as another unsaved heretic preaching a false gospel. Thanks for the heads up. Sincerely in faith, Brother Eric |
Just for the record like.
So, we now turn our attention to your dismissal of your championing Freeman & Prothink:
QUOTE |
Since you likely read all of my post, I'm going to assume you read that part where I noted my disagreements with them. So thus, writing as if I had no dis-similar ground with them will simply not do |
Actually, it will have to do. These are common distractionary, diversion tactics & I can't discount this. They are late additions to mitigate your endorsement of major parts of their Jesuitical ideologies. Your ProThink quote forms the entirety of what this thread is based around. Post number one on the first page. You then proceed to use Romanist-convert Ben Freedman as your main reference for your defence. So yes I am totally justified in focusing on your use of their pro-Romanist propaganda.
Your translations of the use of the word "Lucifer" in Isaiah - the only book where it appears - as "morning star" is Romanist propagandist translations, as used in the NIV, which has Jesuit Cardinal Martini on the board:
QUOTE |
How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! |
These are the subtle ways of Rome's continuing Counter-Reformation designed to corrupt Christianity & the Bible of the Reformation. The publication & distribution of which brought about the freedoms to discuss this matter even, which is well & good, but don't you think that trying to using Rome's weapons to fight Protestantism is actually shooting YOUR-self in the foot? I guess it depends what your agenda & rationale is.
Then you misquote me:
QUOTE |
So now you say, "Screw the lack of geneaology charts linking Jesus to Judah, he's the of David anyway." Believing something despite lack of evidence for it. Blind faith. That's not evidence or an argument. |
That's not my point. My point is that you don't believe the AV1611 anyway & when you do use a preferred Bible to support you, its a pro-Rome Latin Vulgate-based translation. So why should genealogical charts bother you anyway, as you think that they are all bunkum? I state that those passages confirm what it says in Luke as can be discerned from the two differing, though not incompatible methods that I provide you with - both of which you reject, dismissing as "lame apologetics". That is not blind faith on my part - I have provided ample evidence to refute your ProThink Pro-Romanist quote that you launched this thread with. The secondary interpretation that I provided, which can be either be combined with the first or considered on its own, answers your extended "inerrantists" quote.
Consider also that ancient cultures all over the near & middle east had queens by birth as well as kings & that although due to Roman occupation Mary & her husband Joseph kept a low profile with their child & Jewish custom was based around the male line's importance in matters of lineage, that this was a discrete yet effective way of conveying this information in an age where there was no knowledge among the people of the woman's egg - or do you now deny your own quoted references? You clearly give the Bible no credit for subtlety. The AV1611 stands as the masterpiece that it is due to its preservation of such nuances that the profane scorn.
In your concusion you write:
QUOTE |
So because I disagree with you on the bible having Jesus as from Judah, that must mean I promote THE ENTIRE BODY of the Vatican denying work of Freedman and Mike prothink Delaney. |
What I am saying is that you are promoting one of the central, prime ambitions of the Jesuits & the Papacy: the Rome-created & sponsored distortions & fallacies that aim to subsume true Torah-faithful Judaism & true-Bible believing Christianity. Thus your goals are the one & the same. Whatever other doctrine of Freedman's or ProThink's you endorse is irrelevant & of little interest to me.
Thank you -
Troy
Thank you -
Troy
No comments:
Post a Comment