Monday, September 22, 2008

The Future and the Past

 



 



 








New species are being discovered by biologists constantly. Kristen Gelineau from the AP on September 19, 2008 reported on such a story. Marine scientists discovered hundreds of new animal species on reefs in Australian waters. They include brillant soft corals and tiney crustaceans. This is according to the findings released on Thursday. These creatures were found during the expeditions run by the Australian chapter of CReefs. This is a global census of coral reefs that is one of the several projects of the Census of Marine Life, (which is an international effort to catalog all life in the oceans). Julian Caley, who is a scientist from the Australian Institute of Marine Science and is helping to lead the research, said something. Julian said that people have been working at these places for a long time. Additionally, Julian said that still hundreds of new species exist that no one has collected (or described). Many Australian museums have began the long process of using samples to collect the genetic barcoding and the taxonomy of the species. This work according to Caley may take years. There are 130 soft corals found also known as octocorals. They have 8 tentacles that fringe each polyp. This hasn't been found in scientific literature. Another species discovered is the world's smallest snake which is the size of a dime. It's named "Leptotyphlops carlae." Researchers want to study the lives and the biodiversity of these creatures in the Great Barrier Reef. They also want to figure out how many animal species live in Australia's coral reefs, how many are unique to the reefs and how they respond to human disturbance. This shows that learning never ceases among man.

Youtube has been increasingly censoring videos lately. NufffRespect from September 20, 2008 have described another disturbing trend. This activity appears to be a government sponsored op in order to take down any vidoes that legitimate expose the new world order or talk about real issues like Planned Parenthood's deception (or the lies found in the war on terror plus Secret Societies). The Defense Department or the Pentagon has a program called Information Operations Roadmap. This program blatantly states that the Internet is an "enemy weapons system" and they want to use warfare to control it. They also overtly say that they want to control the full electromagnetic spectrum of the world under the guise of "fighting terrorism." So, the military industrial complex is serious in denying people's rights and attacking the Internet for their control. Now, Nuff Respect is a Youtube user and account holder. He said that a person is cloning his and other truthseekers' accounts in Youtube. This person is doing this to intimidate and stop any anti-new world order speech in Youtube. He uses fake Youtube accounts to criticize Nuff Respect and other geniune individuals on Youtube. He also post racist and offensive messages on people's videos and in their inboxes. Nuff Respect and others want to report him for harrashment, copyright infringement, and identity theft for his sick activities. With these things going on, it's time more than ever that we shouldn't be ashamed our beliefs. This link offers more information and some solutions in stopping this man from causing Youtube from censoring more videos. This cloner has the right to free speech (so I don't think this cloner's account should be banned), but he has no right to force Youtube to cut down other individual's accounts. That's anti-free speech. Youtube should never ban innocent pro-9/11 Truth or innocent sites at all (despite what Lieberman wants). We should expose the new world order, talk about the issues, and inspire good solutions to our problems.



A 700 billion Dollar bailout proposal is made by George W. Bush. Notice that this bailout will make the taxpayers to pay for the bill of the errors of some big corporations. This is allowing Paulson, the FED, and the government to possess a huge amount of power. The government is already nationalizing much of the banking industry already. Some like John Steele Gordon said that Paulson is asking to be a financial dictator for a limited period of time (because of his recent power grabbing of banks made by Paulson). This power grab is so serious that investigative reporter Larisa Alexandrovna calls itthe final stages of the coup." Some have criticized these bailouts as not trying to have the bad debts accounted for. There has been the government takeover of AIG and the banning of interbank lending. Cramer doesn't like that move as inhibiting economic freedom. Shifting the burden over another 1 trillion dollars at least toward taxpayers will solve nothing. It will make interest rates go up, unemployment to increaase, and more foreign central banks to not use the dollar. Who caused this problem? There are plenty of blame to go around. One is Wall Street (with their irresponsibility in their economic affairs), both of the major parties, and the other is the government (when they controlled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to sell risky mortgage loans toward low income and other people without a real down payment). This isn't an indictment of true free market capitalism. It's the refutation of monopolies, fiscal irresponsibility, unbalanced budgets, and over spending. It's a problem of a unsound currency and our over reliance on debt (from mortgages, corporate debt, and consumer debt). We borrow money from overseas to pay for our lives now. One big solution is to end centralization banking under the FED with fiat currency. There needs to be a return to a value based money system, have better enforcement of laws preventing fraud, decentralize the banking system causing economic freedom, reign in corporate corruption, have free and fair trade deals so it will lower the chance of our jobs being shipped overseas, Congress have a right to have oversight in the economic sphere, and restructure our economy system period (with a focus on balanced budgets, infrastructure building, make sure our savings and pensions are perserved, and cut unnecessary spending in our nation. We need to find ways to get more revenues to build up our nation via cutting some of the military budget and ending the war on terror in general). There needs to be economic responsibility among all quarters as well. There needs to be in essence a multifaceted solution since a one size fits all answer never worked historically. That's true.



The Arctic Ice being gone by the end of the summer canard have been promoted by the mainstream media all over the place. Dan Gainor from The Boone Pickens Free Market Fellow at Business & Media Institute on Thursday, at September 18, 2008 described this story. Less than three months ago, NBC's Anne Thompson was warning of ominously ice loss from the Arctic. She said that: “But this summer, some scientists say that ice could retreat so dramatically that open water covers the North Pole, so much so that you could sail across it.” Yet, now the ice is still with us. The hype has been conclusively refuted along with the other lies from the global warming hysteria crowd. According to a September 16 National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) report, such predictions were off by 1.74 million square miles. NSIDC reported ice loss was less than in 2007. On September 12, 2008, sea ice extent dropped to 4.52 million square kilometers (1.74 million square miles). This appears to have been the lowest point of the year, as sea has now begun its annual cycle of growth in response to autumn cooling,” according to the organization. On July 30, 2008 ABC's Sam Champion told the "Good Morning America" audience that the Arctic ice loss was on a record pace. The NSIDC refutes the view of Champion completey. The NSIDC said that the above record minimum was set on September 16, 2007. This media hype is also refuted on record ice increases in the North and South Poles along with record winters globally (in the 2007-2008 winter season). Hype prevented by the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, and the Club of Rome about global warming paranoia isn't needed. What's needed is to protect our environment, but not yield our national sovereignity for the sake of submitting to a global tax.



One of the most despictable campaign ads that existed in a long time came along. This ad attaked Gianna Jessen, who survived a failed saline abortion in the late 1970's. Now, this new commerical is supported by Barack Obama. It called her and John McCain (I don't support McCain either) "sleazy despicable liars" for Obama's votes on infants who survive failed abortions. The fact is that Obama voted against bills repeatedly that would protect infants from being murdered if they survived an abortion. The Born Alive Infants Protection Act was passed in Illinois and federally. Even Hillary Clinton and John Kerry voted for a similar bill on the federal level. This ad says that killing unborn babies is fine for rape and incest, which is sick. The reality is that you don't murder an innocent baby for the crimes of a rapist or a person who done incest. You punish the rapist and the criminal with the law. Jessen responded to the ad and told LifeNews.com: "Obama is clearly blinded by political ambition given his attack on me this week...All I asked of him was to do the right thing: support medical care and protection for babies who survive abortion – as I did 31 years ago," she said. "He voted against such protection and care four times even though the U.S. Senate voted 98-0 in favor of a bill identical to the one Obama opposed." Jessen was also right to call the ad vile. Obama can't decide about whether life begins at conception being above his "pay grade." The ad has many lies. The ad says that it was supported by the McCain campaign when it wasn't. It was promoted by BornAliveTruth.org. It insinuated that journalists were calling BornAliveTruth.org's Gianna ad "one of the sleaziest ads... ever seen" and "truly vile" when close scrutiny of the dates in the Obama ad showed they were written September 10, 2008, 6 days before the Gianna ad began airing. Those complaints (as shown in the Obama ad) were actually leveled against McCain's ad about Obama's support of comprehensive sex ed for Kindergartners. Obama says that the earlier bill didn't outline a support of Roe v. Wade, but the later bill in the state and federal level were very similar. The Obama campaign said that a law exist to protect infants from infanticide in 1975. Yet, the 1975 law specifies medical care should be given to infants who, before being aborted, are considered viable - by the very doctor aborting them. It doesn't protect non-viable infants who survived abortions at all. Barack Obama may not support infanticide (since I take his word for it), but his support for Roe v. Wade is so deep that he would oppose tons of pro-life legislation for the sake of alliegance to the status quo on this issue. It is cowardly for Obama's supporters to attack a woman like Gianna Jessen. She's an abortion survivor and a role model for people from across the world.














Michael Hayden is the present CIA Director. He was the former Director of the NSA. He is a big player in the Bush administration's destruction of much of our Bill of Rights and Constitutional rights, especially during the aftermath of 9/11. Hayden was the person who didn't know what the Fourth Amendment says from 2006. Now during that time, a questioner said to Hayden that the 4th Amendment includes a provision requiring probable cause before issuing search of citizens. Michael Hayden denied this was apart of the Fourth Amendment. Hayden was wrong since the Fourth Amendment includes the requirement of probable cause as validated by its own words: "...The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized..." He came to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council. We Are Change LA decided to go and join the conversation. Stewart Howe used the civil approach when asking Hayden questions. He said that Hayden gave a speech to the CFR last year. He asked the Director whether in the post 9/11 United States of America, we were witnessing the controlled demolition of the Constitution (and Bill of Rights under the guise of a war on terror). Hayden started to answer the question. Then, Jeremey Rothe Kushel asked him a question on why Mossad agents could be celebrating and recording what happened in 9/11 minutes after it happened (while Hayden and almost the rest of the military industrial command structure learned about it from CNN). The truth is that Mossad, American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi Arabian intelligence, and other entities handled much of the logistics going on in the event of 9/11. For example, the hijackers were trained by the government and an FBI agent was one of their landlords. This is the official story. Hayden allegedly attributed the 1st attack to "pilot error." The truth is that people have a right to confront those in power of our government. The war on terror was utilized as a means to suppress the rights in our Republic and fight unjustified wars for strategic interests (which truly benefits a few oligarchs. These aims are definitely contrary to our national interests fully).



Israel elects a female Prime Minister for the first time since Golda Meir. She is apart of the Kadima party. Her name is Tzipi Livni. Tzipi won the ruling Kadima ruling primary. She will form a coalition to make her Israel's second Prime Minister. Her victory came at a very narrow margin. She clinched her primary by a mere margin of 431 votes. Over half of the some 74,000 registered Kadima members voted in the party's first-ever primary on Wednesday. She will grabble with the controversial and complex issues of a possible Palestinian state, Jerusalem's future, the right of return policy among Palestinians into Israel, Iran, and other issues. She was a 50 year old lawyer who declared victory to her supporters. She was born in Tel Aviv. She is the daughter of Eitan Livni (born in Poland) and Sara Rosenberg, who were both prominent former Irgun members. She worked as a lieutenant in the Israel Defense Forces and worked for the Mossad (for nearly 2 years during the early 1980's). So, she was a former low level Mossad agent (from the Kadima Party). Some believe that she has little experience to be Prime Minister. The future will tell what will happen in a Tzipi Livni term. In all Middle Eastern nations there are righteous people and bad people. So, we have to be careful not to utilize false generalizations about Jewish people or Arabic people (or any people) residing in that region of the world. We should hope for the best, but never acquire a neo conservative mindset toward the Middle East at all. We realize what that philosophy has gotten us.



Homeland Security is going into higher levels of privacy-violating policies. That's clearly evident all of the time. Homeland Security is now previewing physiological bio-screeners. These polygraph like machines are implemented to "spot terrorists" by scanning the general public for anxiety. The Department of Homeland Security has previewed this technology. Homeland Security endorse these instruments in their goal of attempting to get rid of so-called terrorists and dangerous people from public places. They want to covertly bio scan subjects as they walk past sets of cameras. The problem with this invention is that folks even with minor mental illness (who aren't threats to any human being) might be profiled, harrashed, singled out, and prevented from flying an airport. This is Orwellian to the nth degree because these corrupt actions will judge a human being without being charged at all (or without them committing a crime at all). USA Today reported on how the DHS showed an early version of physiological screeners that could spot so-called terrorists. These machines can measure body temperature, pulse, and breathing regularity. These devices aren't just projects to be placed in airports, but they will be portable and fast. They can scan people in train stations or arenas. People have called this invention a mandatory medical screening system which is dealing with the violation of citizens' civil rights. It does. This is similar to Homeland Security’s Project Hostile Intent (PHI) program (This could be the motivation of why the DHS to envisions the usage of the technology to monitor the bodily functions of humans by 2010 without them knowing about it). Other technology to be used for PHI include lasers, cameras, eye trackers, microphones and heart rate and breathing sensors. They are also biometric body scans, lie detector tests, facial analysis, spot team, and behavior analysis. This stuff inside of airports was unheard off even 10 years ago. In addition, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) started conducting random additional at-gate screening earlier this year of airline passengers who display “involuntary physical and physiological” actions indicating stress, fear or deception. So, this is the new generation of the government violating our rights indeed. The TSA has been caught in scandals from harrashing customers to engaging in other forms of corruption.






The Army dealing with Mind Control is a history that exists. MARK THOMPSON from TIME on Thursday, at September 18, 2008 made know about an Army mind control project. The U.S. Army awarded a $4 million contract to begin developing "thought helments." These helments can harness silent brain waves for secure communication among troops. The Army utlimately wants the project to lead into direct mental control of military systems by thought alone. It sounds wild, but this technology can be reality. Years ago, this wasn't the case. Computer power improvements and a better comprehension on how the brain works have made devices like this possible. One initial goal of the Army was to get brainwaves via a sophisticated software that can translate into audible radio messages for other troops in the field. Dr. Elmar Schmeisser is the Army neuroscientist overseeing the program. Dr. Elmar wants soldiers to think in a clean, clear, and formulaic format. In the summer of 2009, a San Francisco-based Emotiv Systems (in a video game) , wants to have a brain wave headshet technology costing 299 dollars. The Army may not release it publicly in a decade or 2. The five-year contract which was awarded last month to a coalition of scientists from the University of California at Irvine, Carnegie Mellon University, and the University of Maryland, seeks to “decode the activity in brain networks.” Therefore, a soldier could radio commands to one or many comrades by thinking of the message he wanted to relay and who should get it. Scientists want to have a system where commands are rendered to the speaker's voice and indicate the speaker's distance and direction from the listener. They want to have a computer to read each individual's EEGs, so they can find their unique mental patterns. It's one of the furturistic pieces of eqiupment that may be enacted in possible battlefields of the future.





Political News is going on strongly. Barack Obama, John McCain, and Third Parties candidates (like Chuck Baldwin, Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr, and others. Yet, it seems that Bob Barr, who is an ex-CIA agent is snubbing third party candidates) want to be the new President of the United States of America. Each have their policies and agendas. Now, the mainstream media is mostly focused on McCain and Obama. Barack Obama and John McCain have planned to have their first official Presidential debate on Friday. They will outline their opinions on foreign policy. The deal is that the Third party members aren't invited to debate Obama or McCain. Frankily, this is a product of the 2 party duopoly immorally controlling the debate process. Thereby, this policy will inhibit the influence of other choices from given a hearing unto the American people. The American people have a right to see any candidate outline their proposals and opinion on numerous subject matter regardless of their name. Now, this debate will be interesting. The reason is that Barack Obama is a great orator and debater. John McCain is also a good debater. Each man will have their hands full with each on their debating match up. To be honest, Obama is more correct on foreign policy affairs than McCain. Yet, each of them are very similar on this issue by wanting war on Afghanistan (with giving more money into the Afghanistan war), a possible war with Pakistan, taking Georgia's side in their conflict with Russia when Georgia murdered innocent Russian peacekeepers first, and promoting the contrived war on terrorism. The war on terrorism has caused a war on liberty, a unjustified war against the Middle East, and a war for the utopian vision of the new world order. This is why Barack Obama called for a new world whereby we break down barriers of religions (plus nations) from his well known Berlin speech and John McCain calls for a League of Democracies (when a true total majority-based democracy is about a mob rule suppressing the rights of the minority). It's time to read between the line and to see the truth. The truth is that the same people causing all of these problems in the world are funding the McCain and Obama campaigns. Back many years ago, I didn't realize this information. Now, with the FBI murdering innocent men, women, and children from Waco, the NATO bombing of civilian spots in Serbia, and the Bush Administration implementation of their policies (that violate our Constitution from NORTHCOM (that illegally signed an agreement with Canada to interfere with America during times of emergencies. This is apart of the Vision 2020 project that wants NORTHCOM to further control North America), warrantless wiretapping, illegal wars, the Patriot Act, some police going into homes with warrants to get guns, forced vaccinations, the epidemic of police using dangerous tasers along with some innocent folks dying from it, curfews against innocent people, etc.) these give more confirmation that much evil still reigns in our government. This doesn't mean we become violent. The government is more than willing to pass even more anti-liberty laws if we do act violent. This does mean we ought to peacefully protest, be active, expose the new world order, help people, educate our neighbors, stand up for liberty, and never back down from our belief system. We should never be afraid of anything except for God of course. The past and the future are important to know.


By Timothy

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Is Obama a true Christian or a Muslim?
Does he really believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ? Can Obama pass the Jesus Test?

Take the Jesus Test to find out if you are a true Christian at http://www.sentforlife.com/jesus.html

ryanshaunkelly said...

A sea change as citizens see their savings disappear.

nader paul kucinich gravel
Open the damn debates!
mckinney ventura
perot charts
RATM

Timothy said...

Obama is not a Muslim since he doesn't believe in Islam. Obama calls himself a Christian. He is a professing Christian, but I don't agree with all of his views at all.