Saturday, January 24, 2009

A New Day




A New Day



So long is the time that human beings have waited for this day. I'ts a new year now. Extra challenges are a permanent constant in our lives. These complications give us strength and perseverance. The Inauguration of Barack Obama is over. It's now a new era in American society. 2009 describes the composition of many facets of the United States of America, which are sometimes imperfect. This new generation like every other generation yeans for truth and justice. This isn't unusual since an enumerable amount of people possess the unquenchable desire for a better world. Hopefully, the world will ascend into greater depths of tranquility. Yet, like in the cycle of life, times will get wrose before time will get better (things will get completely more stable by the return of God on Earth). I will never lose hope though. Irrespective of the savage winds of evil, my hope will forever overshadow the deceptive winds of the distraction plus nihilism. I will hope for greater accuracy in my writing, more honesty in my speech, and more meekness in my conduct. The same Spirit of the Lord in the Universe, which surely has compassion is still the same God that inspires people to do good and fight for the truth. I will neither yield toward evil. I will win at the end. President Barack Obama has chosen Rick Warren to be the preacher of the invocation during his Inguaration. An invocation is a ceremony where people pray for guidance and strength among those holding a position of office, especially among the office of the Presidency. It seems that this pick has been criticized by those from across the political spectrum. The critics include those of the gay community (who said that Warren supported Proposition 8 that says that marriage is between a man and a woman), pro-lifers, and even some Evangelicals. Rick Warren has been a friend of the establishment for years. Warren's Saddleback Church love the choice. This can give their church even more publicity. Barack Obama defended his choice. He said that dialogue is need to bring people with whom you disagree with into common ground. Obama said that many viewpoints will be represented in the inaugural ceremonies (That is why Rev. Joseph Lowery spoke there in D.C.). The reality is that both Barack Obama and Pastor Rick Warren are dedicated ecumencialists who want globalism merged with religion in order to advance their respective causes. Ironically, Warren criticized the social gospel as Marxism, when Warren for years have promoted his globalist social gospel of P.E.A.C.E. (which in some cases help people minus the Gospel of Jesus Christ). Paul Proctor is one Christian with tons of articles exposing Rick Warren. Warren is the same man who lied and equated conservative Christians to Muslim Jihadists. Rick Warren also diminished the existence of religious liberty oppression of Christians and Jewish people in Syria.


Rick Warren is also a dedicated member of the Council on Foreign Relations. That should tell you something. The CFR has been dedicated to establishment of the new world order since its inception. The new world order has been overtly promoted by George H. W. Bush, Henry Kissinger, Gordon Brown, and other human beings. Henry Kissinger recently stated even that Barack Obama is one person that can lead America into creating the new world order. Rick Warren once led a march on his local courthouse for the SDS (or the Students for a Democratic Society. That group was notoriously infiltrated by the FBI as proven by Kurt Nimmo, Z Magazine from February 2001, and even from TIME Magazine). The CFR is one of the many groups desiring for this one world government obviously. Rick Warren has ties to the United Nations (He said that humans can stop terrorism and human suffering, which is impossible of course). The United Nations accepts the false New Age teachings of Alice Bailey (Alice wanted global government and the Mysteries to govern the world). It's also important to point out that Obama's cabinet is filled with CFR members including at one Bilderberger. Barack Obama and Rick Warren aren't pandering to centrists. They are pandering to the elite globalists that want their utopian vision of a new international order.



There has been plenty of documents outlining possible futures in the world. The United States' National Intelligence Council released a report. It is entitled, "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World." The declassified document is the fourth report of the Global Trends 2025: The National Intelligence Council's 2025 Project. These reports make known about the paths that current geopolitical and economic trends may be reached by the year of 2025. The government wants to guide strategic thinking over the next few decades. The National Intelligence Council calls themselves the U.S. Intelligence Community's “center for midterm and long-term strategic thinking.” They possess the tasks of supporting the Director of National Intelligence, and reaching out to non-governmental experts in academia including the private sector. It leads in the effort of providing National Intelligence Estimates. The report relied on many interests. Those who actively participated in the report include the Atlantic Council of the United States, the Wilson Center, the RAND Corporation, the Brookings Institution, American Enterprise Institute, Texas A&M University, the Council on Foreign Relations and Chatham House in London, which is the British equivalent of the CFR. In essence, think tanks, academics, the government, and hundreds of experts were involved in the report. The report says that a global multipolar international system might exist by 2025. The report predicts that mercentalism will exist, instability will continue in Africa, and a threat of nuclear world will exist. The report lied and said that population growth will increase in the Third World when birthrates have declined worldwide since 1960. The article claims that regionalism will be the order of the day as U.S. power declines (including the American dollar). This report is obviously a blueprint of the elite. One reason is that it calls for a Bretton Woods like meeting to handle our financial crisis (which will affect developing nations and even nations with cash reserves like South Korea and Russia). It predicts that Russia will take a more proactive approach in foreign affairs like the Middle East, Europe, or otherwise. Russia can develop into a major superpower or go downward in their power. The crux of this weird report is that global governance could be reached by 2025. Global Governance is nothing more than a code name for global government. Even a French leader has admitted to as such. In discussing the structure and nature of a new international system, the report states that: “By 2025, nation-states will no longer be the only – and often not the most important – actors on the world stage and the ‘international system’ will have morphed to accommodate the new reality. But the transformation will be incomplete and uneven.” The report also interestingly points out that, “Most of the pressing transnational problems – including climate change, regulation of globalized financial markets, migration, failing states, crime networks, etc. – are unlikely to be effectively resolved by the actions of individual nation-states. The need for effective global governance will increase faster than existing mechanisms can respond [Emphasis added]." This global governance will be a merging of NGOs, social movements, international organizations, companies, and philanthropic foundations. The deal is that the U.S. intelligence community is working closely with businesses, think tanks, and the political elite to attempt to shape the new world order. It lists basis scenarios of the future. It's a stunning report to say the least. Hopefully, all of its predictions don't come into past.


Akram al-Sattari from Global Research on January 6, 2009 made known about the battles going on in Israel and Gaza. Now, there is a cease fire between Israel and Hamas ending the major conflict for now. Akram wrote about an interview dealing with Dr. Mads Gilbert. Akram said that a report from Gilbert outlined information that the attacks in Gaza are deliberately directed against the civilians using new unconventional weapons. Israeli leaders would disagree with that, but it is apparent that civilians are dying in an immoral fashion within the borders of Gaza. This is a humanitarian catastrophe. Dr. Mads Gilbert is a Norwegian doctor who is trying to help the victims of Gaza. Gilbert said that the Israelis are using the DIME weapon. DIME is short for the Dense Inert Metal Explosive weapon that is made out of a tungsten alloy. They have an enormous power to explode. These weapons can cause cancer as Mads suspect. This is occuring in Gaza and the doctor says that this is against international law. Even if you exclude international law, it's wrong to use DIME weapons in harming people in Gaza. There are patients in hospitals within Gaza that have experienced severe amputations, they experienced burns, etc. as a product of experiencing DIME. Half of the population in Palestine are below 15 years and 80 percent of the people in Gaza live below the level of poverty defined by the UN. Dr. Gilbert commented that the Palestinian doctors are doing a great job in helping the victims. It's apparent that these bombings are immoral as conducted by Israel. The reason is that these strikes are into high densley populated areas. Even if you seek to murder Hamas memebers, civilians are likely to die. Likewise, Hamas bombing civilian targets in Israel is also immoral. Regardless of where you stand on issues pertaining to the Middle East, these actions should be condemned. Gaza has about 1.5 million people and depleted uranium has been utilized in the region as well. Certainly, the law abiding people in Israel should tell their government to stop these atrocities indeed. This isn't just occuring in one city like Shifa. It's occuring in many cities. So, we should never trust the government of Israel, Jordan, Egypt, the West Bank, Saudi Arabia, etc. 100% at all. Some believe that Israel is doing this since some of the centrists in Israel fear that Netanyahu will be even be more hawkish than the present government (therefore using these strikes against Gaza might prevent him from taking the Prime Minister spot while trying to control that region more). I respect the right of Jewish people and Arabic to live in where they want (in Israel, etc.), but not government terrorism like this from Israel or Hamas. Condoleeza Rice supports the France/Egypt plan for a cease fire in the conflict. Zionism isn't monolithic. There are different types of it. Some Zionists don't want the Arabic people to suffer oppression. The Likudnites and the Labor Zionist crowd are responsible for a lot of evil in the Middle East just like many Arabic leaders are as well. She calls for the UN to divide Jerusalem when the United Nations oppressed people for decades. The United Nations promotes population control, abortion, and they were founded by the military industrial complex. The reality is that many of the attacks in Gaza killing civilians and restricting water, etc. are wrong. Israel is wrong for bombing a Gaza University, bombing a mosque, restricting water plus electricity, etc. A sane man would realize that.













The IMF and the World Bank



The IMF and the World Bank are one of the reasons why the Third World is suffering in the manner that it is. These groups were created after the Bretton Woods conference of 1944. This conference was held in Bretton Woods, New Hamsphire. This meeting outlined the dollar as the international currency and restructured world markets. The IMF is short for the International Monetary Fund. This is an international organization that oversees global financial system. The IMF handle exchange rates and payments. Its headquarters are in Washington, D.C. ironically. They have a pool of money where countries can borrow form. It's made up of 185 nations. The IMF and World Bank combined represent the international economy of the world. The IMF was created by July 1944 in the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. Harry Dexter White was one of the inventors of the International Monetary Fund including the World Bank. White was involved in the Bretton Woods Agreement. FBI sources accuse White of working for the Soviet Union (yet, the Soviet Union was an invention of the Secret Societies and globalists). This was later confirmed by the testimony of Soviet defector Elizabeth Bentley and the release of the VENONA material by US Army Signal Intelligence. Of course, White's family deny this charge to this day. There is an IMF Board of Governors belonging mostly to the 24 member Executive Board. The IMF was formally organized on December 27, 1945, when the first 29 countries signed its Articles of Agreement. Now, the IMF has huge influence in the world economy.


The World Bank has a similar origin to the IMF. The World Bank is an internationally supported bank that provides financial help and technical assistance to developing nations. They do this under the guise of reducing poverty, although this group is highly controversial. The World Bank was formally established on December 27, 1945, following the ratification of the Bretton Woods agreement. In 1946, the World Bank loaned 250 million dollars to France for post-war reconstruction. Today they are doing the Millennium Development Goals (or MDGs) to try to eliminate poverty and promote sustainable development. Sustainable development is a code name for the globalists to control as much private property as possible. This plan is very similar to Agenda 21 where the United Nations gets land deemed inactive for humans to live at all (which can force people to live in more urban locations). That is why numerous private citizens and organizations have expressed opposition to Agenda 21. The World Bank give loans and grants to the Third World. The President of the World Bank today is Robert B. Zoellick. They have a Board of Directors as well. Their group works worldwide. Critics of the World Bank believe that the World Bank is an agent of the West (in order to advance US and Western business interests). Also, the World Bank have made errors in executing their policies that are deterimental to the environment, public health, and cultural diversity. This agenda according to the World Bank's critics is apart of neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism is an economic philosophy that subscribes to total free trade in how they conduct themselves in international trade (with a mix of health reform, pro-growth policies, and other liberal sounding tenets). From the beginning, the World Bank supported the Brazilian Castello Branco’s authoritarian-rightist government. It was supplying Branco with a $80 million loan for power projects. Johann Hari from the Global Research on May 3, 2007 wrote about the World Bank killing thousands of some of the poorest people in the world. There is a person named Hawa Amadu. She is 70 something years old. She lives in the slums of Accra, which is the capital of Ghana. She wants to raise her grandkids as best as she can. There is a problem here. She can't afford electricity and water anymore. The reason is that the World Bank threatened to refuse to lend any more more to her government. The World Bank doesn't want sudsidies to electricity and water. The subsidies stopped and she is suffering. There is mother named Maxima Cari from Bolivia. There, she said that the World Bank took away her right to clean water. In 1997, the World Bank demanded that the Bolivian government to privatise the country's water supply. Now, Pravatization is not about true individual ownership of private property at all. It's about select corporations ruling most of the resources of a location (not the people or individuals at all). Later, Maxima had to use dirty water since she couldn't afford the water any more. Evo Morales (who is Bolivia's leader) has been threatened by the World Bank for trying to get the water back. Muracin Claircin is a Haitian rice farmer. He can't grow rice any more. Since 1995, the World Bank wanted Haiti to drop all restrictions on imports. That made the US to flood Haiti with rice. Haiti can't offer rival subsidies making their economy suffering (along with other reasons). In essence, much of the World Bank's policies are damaging the poor. According to Johann Hari:


"...The World Bank's own Independent Evaluation Group just found that barely one in ten of its borrowers experienced persistent growth between 1995 and 2005 - a much smaller proportion than those who stagnated or slid deeper into poverty. The bank's own former chief economist, Nobel Prize-winner Joseph Stiglitz, says this approach "has condemned people to death... They don't care if people live or die."...Why? Why would a body that claims to help the poor actually thrash them? Because its mission to end poverty has always been mythical. As George Monbiot explains in his book The Age of Consent, the World Bank was created in the 1940s by US economist Henry Dexter White to be a further projection of US power. The bank's head is invariably American, the bank is based in Washington, and the US has a permanent veto on policies. It does not promote a sensible mix of markets and state action - the real path to development. No: the World Bank pursues the interests of US corporations over the poor, every time..."



*There has been other bombshells from the World Bank. According to F. William Engdahl, a secret World Bank report confirms that Biofeuls are a major cause of the world food crisis. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are key instruments that endorse globalization and the new world order. Oldthinkernews.com exposed about the Technocracy (or the scientific control of society at the expense of liberty). Technocracy is about social engineering by the state. The ruling class who support technocracy believe that the common person can't rule themselves and an elite class of people must control the masses. Throughout human elite, this conflict of control have existed. In other words, one part of the technocracy is allowing the state to use social scientists to manipulate and control societies (via using Foundations to control our educational systems). The General Education Board which is a pro-Rockefeller Foundation), Fred Gates admitted in 1904 that his agenda was to maintain a docile population not improve society. Fred Gates said that: "...In our dreams, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility ot our molding hands. The present educational conventions fade form oru minds, and unhampered by traditions, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk! We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into Philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up form among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicans, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply." These foundations admit that certain social engineers are intentionally dumbing down the education of Americans (Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt wrote a book about this issue). Unfortunately, some view public education as a means to indoctrinate children to the state's perspective with the claim they should control their lives instead of a child's parents. John Taylor Gatto is an expert and he saw the problems in the mainstream educational system. "The Underground History of American Education" is the sum of Gatto's research. The Behavioral Science Teach Education Study was created in 1969 (and it was funded by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare). It describes much of what is happening now in 2009. It says that in the future, political choices will be limited, people in America will be more hedonistic (who are conditioned to to get bread and circuses to keep social dissension and disruption to a minimum), and a small elite will pretty much dictate the lives of American society. The study predicted that in the future, few individuals will be able to maintain control over their opinion. Most will be pawns of competing opinion molders according to the 1969 study as well. Ironically, wealthy elitists (especially the Rockefeller family using foundations to fund social scientists as early as the 1920's) have used social scientists to get that study's predictions fulfilled. That is that the Reece Committee (Norman Dodd was apart of this Committee in 1953 as a researcher) exposed how tax-exempt foundations influence propaganda, international affairs, and education in the world.

By Timothy



January 24, 2009

1 comment:

Unknown said...

This is a good reference site.
We like to stay away from the conspiracy theories in our advocacy and rather stick to the effects and let the readers work back to the causes.

Since the work day affects us all universally and human dignity , we start there.

Explore the lost worlds in the globalist free trade flatworld at
http://tapsearch.com/flatworld

Chronicals of events behind the global economic crisis at
http://tapsearch.com/tapartnews/
reviews The World is Flat by Thomas Friedman.

For untold stories behind the news, see http://www.bizarrepolitics.com for a review of The Age of Turbulence by Alan Greenspan and Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins - a must read.