From http://www.prisonplanet.com/climate-denial-is-now-a-mental-disorder.html
Climate ‘denial’ is now a mental disorder
Christopher BookerLondon Telegraph
Sunday March 8, 2009
How odd that, last Monday, none of our media global warming groupies should have bothered to report what was billed to be “the largest ever demonstration for civil disobedience over climate change”. There was talk of hundreds of thousands of protestors converging on Washington to hear Jim Hansen, the scientist who talks of coal-fired power stations as “factories of death”, call yet again for all coal plants to be closed. Perhaps the lack of coverage was due to the fact that, before Hansen arrived to address a forlorn group of several hundred hippies, Washington was blanketed in nearly a foot of snow.
It was generally another bad week for the warmists. The Met Office, which has been one of the chief pushers of the global warming scare for 20 years, had to admit that this has been “Britain’s coldest winter for 13 years”, despite its prediction last September that the winter would be “milder than average”. This didn’t of course stop it predicting that 2009 will be one of “the top-five warmest years on record”.
US climate sceptics such as those on the Watts Up With That website, for whom the predictions of the UK Met Office have become a regular source of amusement, recalled its forecast that 2007 would be “the warmest year on record globally”, just before global temperatures dived by nearly a full degree Celsius, cancelling out the entire net warming of the past 100 years.
Ever wilder wax the beleaguered warmists in their rhetoric. Our science minister Lord Drayson said last week he was “shocked” to find how many of the captains of industry he meets are “climate deniers”. This was the same Lord Drayson who, as our defence procurement minister, assured Parliament in 2006 that Snatch Land Rovers afforded “the level of protection we need”. The continuing death toll of soldiers in these unprotected vehicles approaches 40.
Even Drayson is outbid, however, by the groupies in The Guardian, who now suggest that people like Christopher Booker should no longer be compared to “Holocaust deniers” but consigned to even more outer darkness by branding them as climate “Creationists”, the dirtiest word they know. Meanwhile at the University of the West of England in Bristol this weekend, a conference of “eco-psychologists”, led by a professor, are solemnly exploring the notion that “climate change denial” should be classified as a form of “mental disorder”.
I myself am off this weekend to New York, to join all the top “deniers”, “creationists” and victims of psychic disorder at a conference organised by the Heartland Institute. It is an honour to be asked to speak alongside such luminaries as Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT, Dr Fred Singer, founder of the US satellite weather forecasting service, and the Czech President, Vaclav Klaus (not to mention those two revered climate bloggers, Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit and Anthony Watts). I shall report on this historic event next week.
Research related articles:
Czech leader joins meeting of climate change deniers
NASA’s curious climate capers
Climate-change alarmism runs into a reality check
Deja Vu All Over Again: Blogger Again Finds Error in NASA Climate Data
Obama vows to end global warming ‘denial’ after Gore talks
EcoAmerica Poll: Climate skeptics are the majority, not the minority
Defend George Will and the right to question climate alarmism!
Climate Modelers Gone Wild
The world has never seen such freezing heat
Daily Kos whips up an email campaign against meteorologist who spoke candidly about climate change
Tipping point reached: UK Met Office makes blistering attack on those who make ‘Apocalyptic climate predictions’
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder? No, they’re just naughty, say experts
1 comment:
Sgt. Weather! ;-)
As far as I understood climate change; it wasn't just a matter of global warming, but of continually increasing extremes; in other words, hurricanes, and typhoons, and so on were getting stronger, and more extreme; droughts too; heat waves, as well as cold.
And well I don't know if changing climates are some kind of planetary thing over many years, like between ice ages, kind of thing; quite possible.
But what I do know is that man's activities have altered (perhaps not as the most significant cause, or perhaps as a large significant cause, difficult to tell) climates.
Anyone who doesn't think that man's activities have an effect on climate, should go to Beijing and see what those factories produce in terms of pollution and what your chances are of seeing a blue sky, for how many days of the year.
Anyway, in my view both sides of this debate, are just like the anti-abortion and pro-choice people; they could find a means to discuss what they do agree on, and what they don't, and then address the reasons, and find common ground; but they ain't interested in such bullshit; they just prefer hating each other, vilifiying each other, making fun of each other; and seeing who can find the most converts to their side of the hate blame game.
Anyway, that's why neither side gets my committed energy or attention; although I did think that Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth, was sincere; and that it really concerns him. Is it possible he may have made a few errors: sure its possible, doesn't mean all of what he says is lies.
Anyway, thats my four cents! ;-)
Lara
Post a Comment