Deceptions Exposed

Global Warming that's man-made has been refuted on so many levels. Many scholars have talked about how global warming is simply no longer happening. The Club of Rome's Al Gore can't refute man-made global warming skeptism at all. The modest global warming trend might reversed itself. There has been record low temperatures which have been falling according to tracking performed by Roy Spencer (who is the climatologist formerly of NASA). It has been claimed that global warming would produce an epidemic of more, horrific hurricances according to paranoid scientists. Now, since 2005, only one major hurricane has struck North America. A new study by Florida State University researcher Ryan Maue shows that worldwide cyclone activity (including typhoons and hurricanes) have reached at least a 30 year low. Two more studies – (one by the Leibniz Institute of Marine Science and the Max Planck Institute of Meteorology in Germany and another by the University of Wisconsin) – predict a slowing, or even a reversal of warming, for at least the next 10 to 20 years. The Arctic sea ice have grown on more of a percentage basis this winter than it has since 1979. Polar bears have risen their population by 25 percent in the past decade. There are 15,000 of them in the Arctic now. Once, 10 years ago there were 12,000 polar bears in the region. "The most recent global warming that began in 1977 is over, and the Earth has entered a new phase of global cooling," says Don Easterbrook, professor of geology at Western Washington University in Bellingham, confidently. He believes that a switch in Pacific Ocean currents believe that there are 3 decades of global cooling. New solar data showing unusual absence of sun spots and changes in the sun's magnetic field might have a global cooling on Earth being more severe than the cooling from 1945 to 1975. Joe D'Aleo believes that cooling is in the Earth's future. This doesn't mean we shouldn't help the environment in terms of forest problems (or aspartame, flouride, and other real issues), but we should never embrace false hysteria at all.



Don Lehman from PostStar on March 23, 2009 wrote about the Department of Homeland Security investigating large ammunition purchases. There is a boon in gun sales, which is apart of the Second Amendment. George Nemec (who is the owner of Nemec’s Sport Shop & Farm & Garden Center in Warrensburg) said that gun sales started to increase about 2 years ago. This was during the time when then Senator Hillary Clinton announced her intent to run for President. Some people are concerned that a Democratic President might have a more hatred of Second Amendment rights than the previous administration. Nemec said that handguns, shotguns, and rifles are being sold. Some people are worried that the government is going to take away their guns or tax them. The good news is that the government can't take away our guns legally since there are over 100 million gun onwers now. The bad news is that legislation with draconian anti-gun laws are being considered in Congress (these bills can severely restrict the Second Amendment). In an economic downturn, more people seem to want to protect themselve. Requests for federal background chekcs for prospective gun buyers have surged in last fall as well. The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms reporting a nearly 50 percent increase after the election of President Barack Obama. Tom King, president of the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, said that gun and ammunition sales around the country have risen in recent months. King said that gun owners can be grandfathered if laws are changed. Ammunition sales have increased as well. Even New York State are having a high level of gun sales. The DHS or the Department of Homeland Security have investigated people about the sales driving up. The lesson here is that guns are a great tool to own. You don't have to own a gun if you don't want to. Yet, you shouldn't deprive citizens the right to bear arms if they desire them as well.


It's been discovered that a Serbian death squad leader was a top CIA agent. This isn't suprising since the Serbian people collectively have been scapegoats in the NATO 1999 illegal bombing of Belgrade in Serbia. This death squad leader was apart of the late President Milosevic's secret police chief. Independent Radio B92 called this man a top CIA agent that contributed to the disintegration of Yugoslavia. His name was Jovica Stanisic, who was head of Serbia's DB Secret Police. He informed his CIA handlers. Stanisic served his masters for 8 years. Now, he is facing war crime charges at the International Criminal Court in the Hague. According to the charges he faces, Stanisic was “part of a joint criminal enterprise that included former Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic and other Serbian politicians." This is funny sicne the ICC don't expose how the CIA-backed KLA (with connections to al-Qaeda) terrorists have murdered innocent Serbians. The truth is that the Croatians, the Bosnians, and the Serbia people were conned into battle agaisnt each other. He met the CIA handlers in safe houses, parks, and boats on the river Sava. He aided CIA operatives in their search for Muslim mass graves and helped the US set up secret bases in Bosnia to monitor the implementation of the 1995 Dayton peace accord. Stanisic is in his prison cell at the Hague. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, William Lofgren, his original CIA recruiter and handler, now retired, said: "Stanisic provided valuable information from Milosevic's inner circle. But he never took money from the CIA, worked with the agency on operations or took steps that he would have considered a blatant betrayal of his boss." The war butchered Serbs as well. Back in the 1940's, the Croatian Catholic Ante Pavelic organized the Ustasha to murder Serbs, Jewish people, and Gypsies. The Albanian KLA seperatists were known drugs/weapons smuggling terrorists for years in the 1990's. The KLA murdered innocent people also.



Catherine Austin Fitts from Global Research on March 23, 2009 believes that the FED caused the housing bubble. She rebutted Alan Greenspan's opinion that the Federal Reserve had nothing to do with the housing bubble. Greenspan claimed that lower interest rates from 2002 to 2005 caused the housing bubble. Catherine was the lead financial advisor to the Federal Housing Administration between 1994 and 1997. She said that she saw the Federal Reserve personally enact policies that engineered the housing bubble. Her online book called "Dillon Read & the Aristocracy of Stock Profits" described this situation. She said that during the Clinton administration, they promoted dangerous loans to lower and middle income people. One article says: "...Even in 1995, I could see that these plans would create unserviceable debt loads in communities struggling with the falling incomes expected from globalization. Homeowners would default on mortgages while losses on mortgage-backed securities would drain retirement savings from 401(k)s and pension plans. Taxpayers would ultimately be hit with a large bill . . . but insiders would make a bundle..." She said that narcotics trafficking and mortgage fraud are connected with each other in a plan to destroy minority and poor communities (via economic warfare). This is true and has been going on globally for thousands of years. It's even occuring in America. Even Congresswoman Maxime Walters exposed how the government via the CIA sponsored narcotic trafficking harmed minority communities. She tried to open Congressional hearing on this issue. Washington, D.C. ’s response was compatible with attracting the continued flow of an estimated $500 billion–$1 trillion a year of money laundering into the U.S. financial system. The Federal Reserve worked with the US Treasury to enact hyperinflation and other bad policies that crippled a significant part of the American economy. Commonsense proves this reality.




Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on March 23, 2009 exposed how a Texas bill targeted pregnancy centers, while Planned Parenthood is supported in a hypocritical manner. A Texas lawmaker wants a bill that wants pregnancy centers to be subject to licensing. This is done in order for them to qualify for state dollars. The bill won't subject Planned Parenthood to the same standards. Officials with the abortion business support the bill even though they reject similar licensing for their own work. Rep. Senfronia Thompson, a Houston Democrat, is behind the bill to target pregnancy centers that provide help for women and abortion alternatives. The state have provided pregnancy centers with $2.5 milion in public funds since 2005. Also, the money pays for counseling, parenting classes, and material assistance for women (and children ranging from baby food to maternity clothes). The bill forces such centers to have a licensed counselor and a licensed health care worker on staff (and subject them to other rules). Yet, Deborah McGregor, who is the director of the Care Net Pregnancy Center of Central Texas, in Waco, says the bill would require the center to pay for additional staff (whose salaries would cost more than the state grants the center currently receives). McGregor sas that new requirements don't make sense, because the grants do not cover any medical work (and that her center provides referrals to medica plus mental health professionals when the need arises). Planned Parenthood obviously supports the bill, because it puts more requirements on its competition. Also, Planned Parenthood oppose any licensing bills or health and safety regulations state officials desire concerning surgical abortions (or dangerous abortion drugs it distributes). So, Planned Parenthood are hypocrites for wanting big regulations on their competition, but no serious abortion regulation against their organization at all.



Some in the Chinese government want a new global currency to replace the dollar. This is similar to Russia want to hand the IMF the power to create a new supra-national global currency. This is in response to the economic crisis, so the U.S. dollar can be eliminated as a world reserve currency. The Kremlin wants this new global reserve currency to be apart of the global financial system. China wanted the initiative to go forward. This issue is ready to be discussed at the upcoming G20 meeting in London on April 2 as a new proposal. Hu Xiaolian, vice governor of the country’s Central Bank, said that China, which holds about $2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, was prepared to debate the issue as “the dollar’s dominance and U.S. economic woes could entail considerable currency fluctuations and affect the world financial situation,” reports RIA Novosti. The destruction of the dollar for the first time in history is a real possibility in the coming years. This could lead to a complete fall of the greenback. Trillions of dollars of greenbacks are held in foreign exchange reserves by foreign countries like China and Japan. The elite have exploited the economic system to centralize wealth into select bankers, have more regulation of the world economic system, and have a single financial empire. Some predict that a global currency is on the horizon. Earlier this month, Ben Bernanke told an elite gathering at the Council on Foreign Relations that a new overarching financial authority should be created and empowered with sweeping new regulatory responsibilities. Even British Prime Minister Gordon Brwon and EU head Joaquin Almunia wants a new world economic order. UK Business Secretary and top Bilderberg member Peter Mandelson has also pushed for a “Bretton Woods for this century,” to help build the “machinery of global economic governance." German Chancellor Angela Merkel wanted to have a new global economic body under the UN as well (to judge govenrment policy like the U.N.'s Security Council). Sarkozy wants a new world order where there is no room from the state. Therefore, numerous globalists desire a centralized global economic order to increase their own power. Global monopoly and feudalism are key goals of the new world order. Real solutions are decentralization of power unto the people and individual citizens. The people have a right to control their own money not multinational corporations or big international bodies at all.


Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher recently showed themselves as how much of left gatekeeping shills that they are. They call Glen Beck crazy for exposing plans for FEMA camps. Beck is wrong on many issues, but FEMA camps do exist now. Both Maher and Olbermann say that only crazy people would talk about these issues. They are no different than the neo-cons. The only difference is that they try to pretend to be for the people, but both are corporate media pundits that rarely if ever expose any real issues going on. Both just promote the left/right paradigm in dividing the American people further via political lines. Not to mention that many real conservatives support civil liberty, love the environment, abhor the evil War on Drugs, and want liberty for all human beings. Maher is the one that denies 9/11 Truth even when the collapse of Building Number Seven was mysterious. Maher doesn't expose Ptech, NORAD's standdown, and other important issues the destroys the official story of 9/11. Bill Maher says that there is no evidence that Barack Obama wants our guns. Yet, Obama does want concealed weapons banned. Obama doesn't want all of our guns, but he does want the Second Amendment to be so severely curtailed that only a handful of citizens will own a gun legally. The 2 major parties are controlled by the global elite (as found in the Vatican/Jesuit network, the Pilgrims, the Bilderbergers, the Trilateralists, the CFR, etc.) and they seem to omit that. Both lied and said that Glen Beck could incite a Timothy McViegh like reaction in society (when McVeigh was a military soldier with connections with the FBI-infiltrated Elohim City. Informants from the feds agitated the OKC Bombing to take place with videos of their crimes not being revealed totally to this day). This is to imply that anyone exposing FEMA Camps are equivalent to terrorists. These liars like the neo cons instead of demonizing Muslims, demonize Patriots and many conservatives (including true libertarians). Not to mention that Rex 84 was a real program in the 1980's that wanted to develop detention camps in case of emergencies. In early 2006 Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root was awarded a $385 million dollar contract by Homeland Security to construct detention and processing facilities in the event of a national emergency. HR 645 or the National Emergency Centers Act authorizes military bases to house American citizens (in cases of "emergency") in camps. The Pentagon’s Civilian Inmate Labor Program, was more recently updated and the revision details a “template for developing agreements” between the Army and corrections facilities for the use of civilian inmate labor on Army installations.” Keith and Maher omit that Barack Obama is an intelligent puppet. You can look at his policies to witness that. Barack claimed to be against lobbyists in his Cabinet, yet they are in his cabinet. He claimed to be for common ground on the issue of abortion, but he passed policies that are radically pro-abortion (including many of his cabinet members are pro-abortion). His cabinet are made up of Bilderbergers and Trilateralists (including CFR members). Keith Olbermann wants to quote CFR member Madeline Albright when she was the one that supported the evil Iraqi sanctions that murder over 1 million innocent Iraqis (including children) in the 1990's. She said that the sanctions were worth it in a sick manner. See, Maher and Olbermann criticized George W. Bush on an intense level, but both of them genuflect toward Barack Obama like he is a Saviour. Bill Maher and Keith Olbermann are frauds and hypocrites unless they change.



By Timothy