Gun Rights are threatened in America still. There is another draconian bill that can violate 2nd Amendment privacy rights. This new gun control law was introduced in Albany County. It has been called the most anti-gun legislation ever created. The law requires buyers of all ammunition, (even shotgun pellets), to provide their drivers license, state their purpose for buying the ammunition, and have the information retained (and accessible by law enforcement for no less than 10 years). That's fascism, because what happens if you lose a bullet license. Anyone buying rounds or shells, even .22s, for hunting or target shooting in Albany State, New York, would have to provide ID, declare the gun and have its serial number registered with the seller. Based on the information provided by the buyer as to the purpose of buying the ammunition, the seller could block the purchase. The bill is called "Local Number A for 2009." It was introduced in the Albany State Legislature on March 3rd. Gun rights groups oppose it as the first step toward backdoor registration of rifles and shotguns. It can create a database of very detailed information on gun orders. Some believe that people can be targeted with this list. Even Fred Lebrum writing for the Times Union said that this bill is an unreasonable assault against lawful gun owners. It's about harassment. This bill violate the privacy rights of gun owners blatantly. This is just the beginning. The reason is that this apart of a wider trend of draconian gun control legislation that has been introduced in Congress. There is H.R. 45. This bill would require a federal license for all guns even those already owned by gunowners. It can: “Require handgun and semi-auto owners to be thumbprinted at the police station and to sign a certificate that, effectively, the firearm will not be kept in a place where it would be available for the defense of the gun owner’s family,” according to the Gun Owners of America website. So, this is bad and the Barack Obama had been anti-Second Amendment all along (even his Attorney General Eric Holder is more anti-gun than Obama is).
The American dollar have been devalued for decades. Some want the IMF to use an one world currency system after the new G-20 meeting in London. There is the idea for the IMF to issue at least $250 billion in Special Drawing Rights or SDRs to each IMF member states as a method to place a safety net under developing countries (that might otherwise have to declare bankruptcy). The idea is gaining more momentum. Last Tuesday, the Moscow Times published an article about how the Russian government wants to utilize the G-20 meeting (which begins to starts on April 2) to push for the IMF to utilize the SDRs as a super reserve currency (which can be accepted by the whole of the international community." There you have plans for an international currency. This is nothing new. SDRs or Special Drawing Rights were originally created in 1907 by the IMF. They were called paper gold. SDRs were created to supplement the reserves of gold and convertible currenceis (or hard currencies). This was done in order to maintain the stability of the foreign exchange market. One example is that if the U.S. Treasury sees that the British pound's value have fallen in relation to the dollar greatly, it can use the store of SDRs to buy excess pound on the foreign exchange market. This can raise the value of the remaining supply of pounds. A super reserve currency can be a prelude to a global currency. Globalists have wanted this for a long time. That is why SEATO, ASEAN, and other regional unions have existed to facilitate the new world order. Some in the United Nations, like Currency specialist Avinash Persaud, even want to ditch the dollar (in favor of shared currencies). Global currencies are getting more popularity, because of the problems of the economic crisis. We should be careful of these developments indeed.
The Army have been dispatched in response to peaceful "End the Fed" protests. The Liberty Restoration Project blog has posted an advisory which was released on last November by the United States Army Reserve. “The United States Army Reserve Command is publishing this Force Protection Advisory to advise all Army Reserve personnel of the planned protests at all Federal Reserve Banks and office locations within the United States on 22 November 2008,” the document reads. “This message provides situational awareness and recommended mitigation measures.” So, the folks just gathered to outline their First Amendment rights in exposing the Federal Reserve's loan sharking operations are equated to terrorists by the Army Reserve. The Army “established relationships” with local law enforcement and the FBI and encouraged them to “update alert rosters,” according to the document. Jim Garamone in 2003 wrote for the American Forces Press Service. He noted that Northern Command cooperated with other unified commands and shares intelligence with them (Northcom also had ties with local, state, and federal agencies). In 2008, Air Force Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr., who is the commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command and NorthCom, told attendees of the National Homeland Defense Foundation symposium in Colorado Springs, Colorado that, “that effectively defending the homeland and responding to natural or man-made disasters requires an integrated approach that involves federal, state and local governments, and even international and private organizations,” (the latter was a reference to InfraGard, the private sector Gestapo with shoot to kill orders issued by the FBI). So, Northcom is working illegally even with local law enforcement in monitoring legal plus peaceful demonstrators. We do know realize about the recent MIAC document that equated Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, Ron Paul, and others to terrorists. In 2005, NBC obtained a secret 400-page Defense Department document listing more than 1,500 “suspicious incidents” across the country related to peaceful anti-war demonstrations. The Pentagon have illegally monitored peaceful protestors for decades as many have already realized. The MIAC document considers those that oppose the Fed as threats. So, some factions in the government have gone into so much extremists that they equate peaceful protestors as terrorists, which is false.
Iran and the Obama administration have taken an interesting turn. President Barack Obama have offered a very concilitatory speech toward Iran. His speech signifies that an U.S. attack on Iran is doubtful. Barack Obama urged Iran to opt for peace over terror or arms (despite of the fact that the West funded Iran's military for decades historically). An adviser to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad responded that America should lift its sanctions on their country. 'We have serious differences that have grown over time', Obama told Iran’s leaders in a video message released by the administration today. 'My administration is now committed to diplomacy that addresses the full range of issues before us, and to pursuing constructive ties among the United States, Iran and the international community'.” This is certainly better than the policy of numerous neo cons wishing to attack Iran even with preemptive military force. Ezekiel 38-39 talks about Russia and Iran attacking Israel in the end times. So, Barack Obama wants negiotations to handle Iran's nuclear issue. The European Union have also praised Obama's overtune. European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana (where he is attending a summit of EU leader) told reporters in Brussels that: “ 'I hope that will open a new chapter in relations with Tehran' and 'The offer is a very good offer'.” Javier Solona supports the new world order agenda and is aligned with the Vatican. It seems that the CFR with members like Defense Secretary Gates don't want an immediate war with Iran at all. It's obvious that both Barack Obama and the previous President George W. Bush are more moderate on the Middle East than what Israel would expect. Barack Obama's views pertaining to Middle Eastern policy are similar to Jimmy Cater and Zbigniew Brzezinksi, who are both Trilateralists. Some go as far as saying that America's support may be shifting away from Israel, but this isn't the case. I believe the West is trying to force Israel, the PLO, Hamas, and others to submit into concessions in order to internationalize Jerusalem, so the new world order can be created concretly in the Middle East. These policies threaten the sovereignity of Middle Eastern nations indeed.
Unfair Profiling is occuring against people of color and those that disagree with the present policies of the American government. There is the recent MIAC report that everybody is talking about. It compares conservative Christians, conservatives, libertarians, and other freedom loving people to terrorists basically. It's a disgrace. The report wants the government to monitor or even target people like us. The drafters of this report want law enforcement to demonize people with whom they disagree with. People like me oppose gun control, the United Nations, the Feds, the income tax, illegal immigration, and abortion. Yet, we're aligned with Neo-Nazi bigots and racists. The report is about 8 pages and it's named the “The Modern Militia Movement.” It lists Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, and others by name. The report imply that people that promote certain bumper stickers are threats. Chuck Baldwin says that if the Missouri State Police don't revoke the report or condemn it, that he and others will consider legal action. Missouri State Representative Jim Guest finds the MIAC report “very disturbing” and has requested a meeting with the agency. Rep. Guest is the author of a bill in the Missouri state legislature to oppose the Federal Real ID Act, which establishes a national drivers license and an enormously invasive national database. So, the unfair profiling is going on. This isn't new. Blacks have been unfairly profiled in America, the Japanese people have been interned, and conservatives have been equated to terrorists during the Clinton Presidency (via the 1999 Project Megiddo report). Rick Shinn was unfairly detained for just have anti-UN bumper stickers. According to Shinn, they detained him for about 45 minutes while they searched his van (which was without probable cause, without his permission, and without a search warrant). Injustices like these occur nationwide constantly. The MIAC Militia report specifically mentions the SPLC twice, but the report reads like a copy-and-paste job from the SPLC’s infamous Intelligence Report. The SPLC's Intelligence Report compared constitutionalists, pro-lifers, Christians, and conservatives to Neo-Nazis and the Klan. For example, Christian groups such as Chalcedon Foundation, Traditional Values Coalition, Abiding Truth Ministries are equated to Neo-Nazis. The SPLC use a token disclaimer about Patriot Groups not promoting violence, the SPLC is a far left political group. There are still questions on who created the MIAC report since those who did that ought to be held accountable for their sick actions.
Lifenews is coming forward. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on March 20, 2009 wrote about the Barack Obama administration reversing Bush's ban on sending birth control to an pro-abortion business. This business is based in Britian. The name of this abortion organization is called Marie Stopes International, which does abortions around the world. Marie Stopes ironically was an eugenicist, racist, and extremist. In September 2003, President Bush took action to block sending taxpayer-funded contraceptive supplies to Marie Stopes International through the USAID (or the United States Agency for International Development). The Bush administration didn't want a relationship with the MSI, because it supports the China population control program (that only allows couples to have one child). If people have more than one child, parents can face imprisonment or jail time. Chinese authorities have failed to stop forced abortions, involuntarily sterilizations, and other human rights abuses. Ironically, MSI has a role as a partner to the UNFPA (or the United Nations Population Fund) in China. Under Obama's direction, USAID reversed the policy, which abortion advocates claimed prevented women from getting contraception and exposed them to unsafe abortions and death. Jodi Jacobson supports the reversal of the policy, but omits that deaths in the Third World can be prevented by giving those citizens quality health care (that can drive down maternal mortality including banning abortions). According to figures from the United Nations Populations Division, nations with laws legalizing abortion have not seen a corresponding drop in the rate of maternal deaths. The "World Mortality Report: 2005" shows Russia, where abortion has long been considered a form of birth control, has a maternal mortality rate of 67 deaths for every 100,000 births. On the other hand, pro-life Ireland and Poland have lower rates. Ireland has the lowest maternal mortality rate with just 5 deaths for every 100,000 births. Poland's is also lower than Russia with 13 deaths for every 100,000 births. Even Malaysia's strict anti-abortion policies have caused great improvement in the area of maternal health. Planned Parenthood and Marie Stops International both profited from Obama overturning the Mexico City Policy. The Mexico City Party banned taxpayers from funding abortions overseas. Although some abortion advocates have tried to cast the Mexico City Policy as one that has nothing to do with abortion, MSI admits that it prevents funding of groups that lobby countries to reverse their pro-life laws. Therefore, President Barack Obama is easily the most pro-abortion President in American history. I still want to see Obama enact one single policy promoting common ground on the issue of abortion. I'm waiting.
Many folks are talking about the preacher James Manning from Atlah Ministries. Is he real or fake? I really took the time to think about this question. Here's my take on him. Manning is similar to Sean Hannity. Both are Ecumenical and both criticize Barack Obama on many legitimate points like his radical abortion agenda and his other policies. Yet, Manning like Hannity won't cross that link and expose the bigger picture. The bigger picture is Barack Obama is a puppet of the establishment (i.e. He was funded by Wall Street corporation during his Presidential campaign, he supports both banker takeover bailouts, and he has many Bilderbergers, Trilateralists, & lobbyist in his own cabinet) in order to con people to accept imperalism in a slick fashion. It's giving the new world order or imperalism a slick "face lift" when the policies of the war on terror, rendition, the Patriot Act, and other evil policies will continue forward. Also, Manning used silly, racially charged rhetoric against his own people to stir up the neo cons, but a lot of his statements are false. Regardless of what Manning says, Barack Obama isn't a pimp and Obama didn't support a commercial with a woman loving Obama in a lustful manner. Also, James Manning omits how many in the black community have made great contributions in their area (that is why he constantly uses negative connotations to black Americans, because he wants to omit the strong, God-fearing heritage of tons of black people throughout history). He also supports Bill Clinton when he was a pro-new world order puppet himself (James certainly didn't know that Bill Clinton supported NAFTA, was complicit in the Waco genocide, demonized real Patriots after the OKC bombing, lied under oath, was complicit in Chinagate, he passed the anti-civil liberty anti-Crime Bill plus the Anti-Terrorism Bill, and Clinton veteod the partial birth abortion ban. These wicked policies harmed America). Now, James Manning supports the unbiblical concept of purgatory. Purgatory is not in a word of the Scriptures, but it's found in various pagan religions. God's word is clear that humans after death face the Judgment of God not purgatory. So, James Manning is support the paganism of purgatory. Also, James Manning is known to have Catholic clothing and Catholic symbolism. James Manning attended Union Theological and was taught by Cornell West and James Forbes among others. He holds both in esteeem (according to Tom Freiss). James Forbes succeeded a Bonesman named Rev. William Sloane Coffin Jr. Collin was a liberal activists who opposed the Vietnam War, opposed the Iraq war, wanted nuclear disarmament, and recently died in 2006. Sloane Coffine was of course a CIA agent. He worked as a case officer in 1950 (his brother-in-law Frank Lindsay had been head of the OSS's Office of Policy Coordination which was one of the predecessors of the CIA. James Manning is a controlled opposition to have constant agitation, but never proposes real solutions or expose the bigger picture in our world. Real solutions are promoting a liberty based culture in our society, end the war on terror, end the Federal Reserve, learn real history without bigoted stereotypes about people, and go out and help people of all backgrounds.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment