Pro-God, Pro-Human Life, anti-New World Order, Anti-Nefarious Secret Societies, Pro-Civil Liberties, anti-Torture, anti-National ID Card, Pro-Family, Anti-Neo Conservativism, Pro-Net Neutrality, Pro-Home Schooling, Anti-Voting Fraud, Pro-Good Israelis & Pro-Good Palestinians, Anti-Human Trafficking, Pro-Health Freedom, Anti-Codex Alimentarius, Pro-Action, Anti-Bigotry, Pro-9/11 Justice, Anti-Genocide, and Pro-Gun Control. My name is Timothy and I'm from the state of Virginia.
I agree with all these academic and think tank, lawyer and what not 'leaders' who 'criticised' the Bush Administration, as much as they appear to be criticising the Obama Administration.
I just got a few very simple questions:
1. How many of them were wide awake enough, to spend all their 'criticism' time and efforts, prior to the elections, to support and endorse, individuals such as Ron Paul (who has proved his moral authority, as someone who cannot be bought by Fortune 500 K Str. lobbyists to shred the constitution), or Chuck Baldwin, or Ralph Nader, or Cynthia McKinney?
2. How many demanded these alterantive candidates with alternative messages, be allowed to participate in the Presidential Debates; so that ignoramus sheeple voting Americanus moron imbecile, can actually be informed there are more than 'two' (sic) political parties available for their voting consideration?
3. How many voted for a Third Party Candidate; because they were willing to put their criticism of the DemoPublican Party (the two-headed hydra 'party' of crony corrupt corporations, by crony corrupt corporations and for crony corrupt corporations) money where their mouths were, to walk their talk, to practice what they preach?
4. For those who did neither of aforementioned; how much of their criticism in this article is nothing more than their 'good cop' role in the 'good cop vs. bad cop' CONTROLLED OPPOSITION, FAKE 'LEFT' VS FAKE 'RIGHT' GLAME GAME?
5. How much of their criticism is nothing more than financially motivated two faced hypocrisy? A covert endorsement of the aforementioned crony corrupt corporate fraud ponzi scheme system, whereby their particular entrenched crony fake 'moral authority critic' role is solidly enshrined, by the status quo, they so ardenly criticise?
1 comment:
Lara Braveheart said:
Just a few very simply questions:
I agree with all these academic and think tank, lawyer and what not 'leaders' who 'criticised' the Bush Administration, as much as they appear to be criticising the Obama Administration.
I just got a few very simple questions:
1. How many of them were wide awake enough, to spend all their 'criticism' time and efforts, prior to the elections, to support and endorse, individuals such as Ron Paul (who has proved his moral authority, as someone who cannot be bought by Fortune 500 K Str. lobbyists to shred the constitution), or Chuck Baldwin, or Ralph Nader, or Cynthia McKinney?
2. How many demanded these alterantive candidates with alternative messages, be allowed to participate in the Presidential Debates; so that ignoramus sheeple voting Americanus moron imbecile, can actually be informed there are more than 'two' (sic) political parties available for their voting consideration?
3. How many voted for a Third Party Candidate; because they were willing to put their criticism of the DemoPublican Party (the two-headed hydra 'party' of crony corrupt corporations, by crony corrupt corporations and for crony corrupt corporations) money where their mouths were, to walk their talk, to practice what they preach?
4. For those who did neither of aforementioned; how much of their criticism in this article is nothing more than their 'good cop' role in the 'good cop vs. bad cop' CONTROLLED OPPOSITION, FAKE 'LEFT' VS FAKE 'RIGHT' GLAME GAME?
5. How much of their criticism is nothing more than financially motivated two faced hypocrisy? A covert endorsement of the aforementioned crony corrupt corporate fraud ponzi scheme system, whereby their particular entrenched crony fake 'moral authority critic' role is solidly enshrined, by the status quo, they so ardenly criticise?
Lara JMCSwan
March 20, 2009
Post a Comment