Many believe that the Bilderbergers want to control the U.S. food supply. It's no secret that many of the eugenicists that want depopulation in the world are members of the Bilderberg Group. Some of the elite want healthy, organic food to be eliminated form the arms of independent farmers. On February 23, the Federal Times reported on HR 875, which is a bill that would grant the FDA sweeping new powers to regulate food. Rep. Rosa DeLauro introduced the bill and it was shrouded with hype. There was the hysteria aobut the recent salmonella outbreak that was linked to products from Peanut Corp. of America. There was the hype of last year's salmonella in imported peppers and a 2006 E. coli outbreak that was linked to fresh spinach. These occurences can set the stage to implement the FDA’s “food protection plan” requiring farmers and food producers to register with the government every two years. “If there’s any good that can come from this tragic outbreak, it is long-overdue changes that can help protect the American public from the food supply,” Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said in early February at a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on oversight and investigations. In other words, the government wants to further control our food supply and that will definitely strangle the power of small, independent farmers. Stephen Sundlof, director of FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, told the Federal Times the FDA needs full access to the records of individual food manufacturers. DeLauro's bill wants a power grab by the department of Health and Human Services (The FDA is an agency under HHS). Some believe that the bill will remove food safety functions and places them in a new agency within the HHS. This was said by Lisa Shames. She is the director of food safety and agricultural issues at the Government Accountability Office. “The new administration is pushing new farm controls through Congress as fast as possible and have coordinated the bills so there will be no debate and the committee meetings are closed,” explains Linn Cohen-Cole for the Natural Solutions Foundation. Bills like HR 875 and S. 425 wants to establish a Food Safety Administration within the Department of Health and Human Services. Some fear that such bills won't protect the existence of organic foods. The nominee of Kansas governor Katherine Sebelius to head up the HHS is a Bilderberg member. We know that Bilderberger Henry Kissinger called for depopulation or eugenics in the NSSM memo 200 (which was dated in April 24, 1974). NSSM stands for the National Security Study Memorandum 200. The memo was entitled “Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests,” calls for world depopulation, specifically in “developing countries.” In 1972, the Club of Rome published “The Limits to Growth,” a book arguing for Malthusian solutions to world population. The Club of Rome was created in the late 1960's. It is interlocked with the Bilderbergers, the CFR, RIIA, the Trilateralists, etc. These groups are headed by the Vatican and elite bloodlines. Even the Rockefellers have funded the modern radical eugenics and radical environmental movements for decades throughout the world. These movements want to monopolize wealth and food into fewer hands of argibusiness (and select multinational corporations). This was called the Green Revolution. Thomas Ferguson, who is the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs under Kissinger, was speaking bluntly yet honestly when he said: “Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it.” These sickos would love fascism if that would make depopulation more efficient. Now, some want these bills in Congress to be passed, which will create draconian powers for the FDA (that can drive organic food producers — out of business under the guise of protecting the public from salmonella and E. coli). The corporate media isn't reporting on this story. That's all the more reason to oppose S. 425 or H.R. 875.
In rural areas, the government wants to develop a smart grid system in order to spy on rural America. This is found in the stimulus bill. The term of Smart Grid is found on page 232 of "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009." What is Smart Grid? Smart Grid is related closely to the NAIS or the National Aminal Identification System. NAIS and Smart Grid are programs design to spy on Americans and animals. The real disturbing part of the situation is that these government-condoned instrusions in our lives are supported by the Barack Obama administration in hs stimulus package (which is supposed to be used for emergenices only). What is the real emergency then? Why does Smart Grid need to be implemented within 60 days of the bill passing? Smart Grid is a global initiative to manage all information in the world. That is why the Secretary of the Treasury can lend the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), a division of the Department of Energy, $3.25 billion to implement Smart Grid (as found in the bill). People justify this action as apart of energy efficiency and climate change. The grid gathers information about individual energy use via sensors embedded in the transmission lines and in homes and businesses. The government, via WAPA, will know what temperature you keep your home or business at. If you keep your domicile warmer or cooler than the temperature approved by the federal government, you pay more. To some, this is an acceptable arrangement, until they discover what else Smart Grid can do. Smart Grid according to some can allow the government to collect information about our habits, smoking, etc. One part of this goal deals with the increase of nanotechnology in our electronics to monitor people. There are similar smart grid technologies in South Bend, Indiana, and Florida and California. It's a Big Brother type policy that is being pushed down people's throats. A lot of folks don't even know about this technology at all. This is also apart of a big agenda to strip rural control from the people and centralize it into the land of Washington D.C. NAIS is apart of the Smart Grid agenda. NAIS is a plan to require farmers to implant a RFID tag into the body of all of their livestock–cows, pigs, goats, chickens, sheep, and all livestock. The NAIS threatens to destroy small-scale family farms. This Big Brother control grid runs deeper than I thought. The federal government is expanding its power to control the people and it's in the stimulus package via a sick way. President Barack Obama wants the Smart Grid to be fully implemented by 2011.
Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on March 6, 2009 outlines another disgraceful policy by Barack Obama. Barack Obama wants to force taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research today. By him signing an executive order on Monday shows his true disresepect for life. Embryonic stem cell research involves the destruction of human life. In August 2001, President George Bush created a policy of limited embryonic stem cell research. He also (to his credit) put millions of dollars behind studies that dealt with adult stem cells. Adult stem cells are the only kind that has been proven effective in helping patients with a variety of diseases and medical conditions. Obama campaigned on the promise of reversing the Bush policy but made some early indications he would rely on Congress to overturn the limits. Now today, Barack Obama did a sick White House ceremony of lifting the limits of ESCs. He will let the National Institutes of Health work out the details of how embryonic stem cell research will be funded. The Obama administration was secretive about this plan. Expecting the executive order, the National Institutes of Health officials indicated last month that they had already started working on the paperwork necessary to begin funneling public funds to projects involving the use of embryonic stem cells. Story Landis, who heads NIH's stem cell task force, says the paperwork is almost ready to go once Obama signs the executive order. Even more disgusting is how Story Landis is using the NIH to get some of the $10 billion from the economic stimulus bill to be used to fund embryonic stem cell research. Story heads the NIH. Congress can still revoke Obama's executive order after he goes forward with his policy. Democrat Diana DeGette apparently wants to overturn the perennial Dickey-Wicker amendment added to federal spending bills that prohibits federal funding of research using human embryos. That's sick. They want blood shed. The pro-life provision has been a part of annual spending bills since fiscal year 1996. It prohibits the creation of embryos for the purpose of research as well as any research that harms an embryo, a unique human being after conception (and forbids the federal government from using money to advance destroying embryos in research). You don't even need ESCs since iPS cells exist (or induced pluripotent stem cells, which are adult stem cells that have been reverted to an embryonic-like state through direct reprogramming. They don't have some of the same problems as embryonic stem cells such as the immune system rejecting the cells or causing tumors after injection). iPS cells can replace ESCs since you don't have to destroy embryos in the process. Barack Obama is the most pro-abortion President in American history. His policies make manifest that truth.
Paranoia about riots still is going on. The Republican Senator Jim DeMint said that there will be riots in response to the banker giveaway (remember that that stimulus law is sending billions of dollars to the bankers not the American people directly). The cost of the law is about $9.5 trillion. Mr. DeMint told Adam Bitely of Right Nation these riots will probably be small, although “I think there is a chance that we can see some large ones.” Rachel Oswald from Raw Story contrast DeMint's riot comments with the earlier statements he made. Oswald said that DeMint claimed that if “you send a kid to [public] school in D.C., chances are that they will end up in a gang rather than graduating.” In fact, the graduation rate for D.C. high school students is around 70 percent, according to the Washington Times. Oswald takes DeMint to task for other “controversial remarks,” including his claim there “are only 15 real conservatives in the Senate.” It's obvious that DeMint's comments were offensive. Rachel wants to protray DeMint as a loose cannon. This is in the rake of Rush Limbaugh's words of wanting liberals and Obama to fail. The U.S. Army War College's Strategic Institutes warns that riots in America could force the military to restore order in America. International Monetary Fund Managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said that social unrest may occur in many countries if the financial crisis wasn't adequately addressed by the government. Zbigniew Brzezinski said similar comments on MSNBC's Morning Joe. He wants the elite set-up a “National Solidarity Fund” for the poor and dispossessed to forestall the torching of banks and Wall Street. State and local police in Arizona admitted that they have “broad plans to deal with social unrest, including trouble resulting from economic distress,” according to the Phoenix Business Journal. The prospect of riots have made governments in America to have urban warfare training drills to prepare for riots in the summer. Last month, according to figures released by the government, 655,000 people lost their jobs. In December, that number was 681,000. It is expected the number will be close to a million next month. According to economist and financial planner Andy Sutton, when the number of unemployed is married with the number of under-employed, “you come up with almost 23 million Americans or nearly 15% of the workforce,” a figure drastically at odds with the official Bureau of Labor Statistics number of 8.1%. This information outlines that the present policies now aren't working for the economy. The only solution is the return to basics by ending the war on terror, saving our money, invest in building our manufacturing jobs, and reward American jobs.
Legal laws are being dealt by the Supreme Court in interesting ways. The USA Today reported that the Supreme Court dealt with the power of the President and the detaining of citizens. The Supreme Court dismissed a challenge by suspected al-Qaeda operative Ali Al-Marri. Last week, President Obama ordered al-Marri transferred from military to civilian custody to face federal charges of conspiracy and providing support to terrorists. For 5½ years he has been held as an enemy combatant in the Navy brig in Charleston, S.C. He can now be transferred to a civilian jail. This action granted the administration's request to end the case before any further development. The justices also dismissed a federal appeals court ruling that upheld presidential powers of detention. Barack Obama apparently hasn't rejected the use of preventive detention, which former President George W. Bush supported after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. Yet, Barack Obama believes that Al-Mari should be held in a federal court without having permanent enemy combatant status. Al-Marri is a legal U.S. resident from Qatar being under indictment in Peoria, Ill. He was studying at Bradley University when he was arrested in late 2001 as part of the investigation of the Sept. 11 attacks. The ACLU believes that U.S. citizens like Al-Marri shouldn't be called enemy combatants or detained without charges or a trial. They are right on this issue since citizens ought to possess some legal rights. In the UK, the police has a databank of thousands of innocent protestors. The Guardian revelaed that the police have monitored people for at least seven years. Photographs, names and video footage of people attending protests are routinely obtained by surveillance units and stored on an "intelligence system." This was found out via the FOIA, court testimony, an senior Met officer interview, etc. Some believe is this a violation of privacy rights from article 8 of the Human Rights Act. This is wrong of course since the government has no right to invade the privacy rights of innocent protestors at all.
State Sovereignity is important to perserve. Yet, we shouldn't accept the extreme view that the federal government or the state government should suppress citizens' rights either. The 10th Amendment is clear that powers that are not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the states (or to the people). Henry Lamb believes that Congress and the President apparently ignored this portion of the Constitution. This is why the federal government has no role in handling failing mortgage loan companies of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Nowhere is there authority for the federal government to be giving non-effective bailouts in the banking or insurance business as in Citibank and AIG. Nowhere is there authority for the federal government to be in the health care business, or the animal identification business, or in the energy business, or in most of the places where the federal government is now flexing its regulatory muscles . Many people like Rep. Ron Paul and others in Washington voiced their opposition to this trend. Some like Oklahoma Rep. Charles Key introduced a resolution in state legislature last year. He called on the federal government to not act in decrees that go beyond the scope of the enumerated powers of the Constitution. This year, State Sen. Randy Brogdon has joined the effort to insure that the resolution will get a hearing and a vote in the Oklahoma Senate. Fifteen other states have similar resolutions under consideration. The Democrat bailout bill, for example, mandates that states remove the time limit on welfare checks as a condition of receiving a portion of the bailout monies. It will be hard for politicians to refuse the funds, unless they know that their constituents want them to refuse the funds. Many Freedom 21 organizations (Freedom 21 oppose Agenda 21 when Agenda 21 is about stealing private lands to be controlled by UN related agencies) are supporting the 10th Amendment State Sovereignity movement. Therefore, states and the federal government ought to be limited in what they can and can't do. Neither of these levels of government should have dictatorial power nor abuse their powers when dealing with American citizens.
Some people want to know the Vatican connection to the Eye of the Phoenix movie. Some feel that some information is left out. Well, I thought of this for a while and here is my research on this issue. Franklin Delano Roosevelt worked with the Vatican to end the war. Their relationship was not always loving since he had to rely on Catholic voters to get elected and promote his New Deal. During World War II, he worked with Francis Cardinal Spellman as a liason between FDR and the Vatican. Rome and the Vatican network have funded both sides in WWII to control the outcome. One simple example is how SMOM Franz von Papen & Mgr. Pacelli aided Hitler (inculding the Vatican concordats supporting the Nazis and Mussolini. The Vatican also recognized the brutal dictator of Franco in Spain to kill pro-republican forces during the Spanish Civil War) and SMOM Myron Taylor aided the outcome (It's similar to a Hegelian Dialetic of the Allies Powers vs. the Axis Powers to form the United Nations). In the early 1930's money (in the millions of dollars in 1932 alone) came to aided the Nazi Empire temporary. Now, Cardinal Spellman would go across the work to send message to FDR (and chiefs of state in the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and Africa). WWII was a Crusade against Jewish people, the Orthodox, and others. WWII (including the New Deal, which was promoted by Catholic priest John Ryan of Catholic University of America) was a means in 32nd Degree Freemason FDR's own words to create the new world order. This novus ordo seclorum have been refered to as the Saturnian age. In July of 1788, the City Gazette of Charleston ran an article called The Tenth Pillar which announced the ratification of the Constitution. It announced the return of the golden age of Saturn. Now, this comes from the Roman god of Saturn. Saturn to esoterics have been a code name for Satan for eons. Saturanalia was the ancient Roman holiday during the Winter Solstice. According to Chris Pinto, there are Phoenix nests in the Jesuit world headquarters of Rome. The Phoenix was an inspiration for the Eagle of the Great Seal. The Phoenix represents resurrection and regeneration after the Phoenix bird was destroy in a 500-1,000 year cycle. Even the Bohemian Grove's patron saint is Papal Nepomuk. There are pictures of the Mass being in the Bohemian Grove (along with the Cremation of Care ritual where priests where mitres. Popes wear mitres and it refers to the fish false god Dagon). One connection among Freemasonry, the Vatican, and other Secret Societies is that these groups have connections to the ancient Mysteries of Babylon and Egypt. Even the Vatican obelisk in Vatican City, the mitre, the calling of Mary the Queen of Heaven, the symbol of the cross, the veneration of images, the claim of having God's authority on Earth, the doctrine of purgatory, repetitive prayers & chants, etc. come from the ancient Mystery Religions (of Babylon, Egypt, Greece, Rome, etc.) not form the Bible.
By Timothy
5 comments:
Tim,
Hey, interesting as always.
Got a question. Agree (although don't know as much as you) about all the origins of symbols etc, beoing from mystery religions, not from bible. My question is those mystery religions were around before before many events in the bible, especially new testament,and possibly many old testament. So, are there any 'christian' concepts, as referred to in the bible, that originated, either intentionally or accidentally, or otherwise, from mystery religions, that many christians are not aware of?
Lara
Many symbols existed before the New Testament. Yet, other symbols are recently created as plenty of examples exist of this. One recent symbol is of the UN log. As for symbols and the Old Testament is something different. Symbols are not older than the creation of man or the Universe of course. Yet, some do exist from thousands of years ago. The mystery religion is different from true monolithism for many reasons.
Simple reasons are that true belief in one God is apart of monolithism while the Mystery reject this tenet. Also, true belief in God is that God saves man by himself. All of the mysteries are about man saving himself and trying to be a god. Therefore, Christianity is antithetical to the basic concepts of the Mystery Religion.
It's as simple as that.
Tim,
Just how it is huh! :-) I ain't got any problem with that King James. None whatsoever. Just hope you don't wait forever.
Lara
Post a Comment