Sean Hannity, and Dick Morris agree that some people want a global currency in the world. FOX has video about their comments. Morris (who used to be a Clinton ally) said that the: "American economy under international regulation” and “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.” “Those conspiracy people,” Sean Hannity interjects, “had suggested that for years… you’re not wrong.” The U.N. isn't them most powerful group in the world, but they do want internationalism and globalism to reign worldwide. The IMF is a loan sharking group that was created under the Bretton Woods meeting via international banking. Their main scheme has been to get Third World nations into huge debt and submission under the IMF in order for their wealth to be controlled. Also, if our economic problems persist, something might exist called “global quantitative easing” by printing billions of dollars worth of a global “super-currency.” This currency is deceptively billed as a way to address the economic crisis manufactured by the global elite. “Alistair Darling and senior figures in the US Treasury have been encouraging the Fund to issue hundreds of billions of dollars worth of so-called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) in the coming months as part of its campaign to prevent the recession from turning into a global depression,” the Telegraph reported on March 16. SDRs are based now on 4 currencies. They arein the U.S. dollar, the Japanese yen, the euro and the British pound. They are used largely as a unit of account by the IMF and other international organizations. Zhou Xiaochuan, who is China’s central bank’s governor, called for the IMF to forge a new world reserve currency days ago. China wants this system, because they want to increase their financial transactions. Some in the international banks (which are based in Europe and Britian) want a push towards global goverance or global government. SDRs can create more fiat paper money to flood the world. Even globalist and Bilderberger George Soros wants Barack Obama to push onto the SDR agenda. He wants America to lose its dominant financial power to China in the future. China is a totalitarian state and is a model for the new world order (That is why elitists love the China system like David Rockefeller and Ted Turner). It's interesting to note that Morris and Hannity claim that world government is on the horizon when Barack Obama was President. The deal is that it's bigger than Obama and the new world order has infiltrated both of the major political parties in America. Dick Morris and Sean Hannity didn't such things when Bush was President or when Bush supported the banker bailout (except a little commentary by Hannity). We know that eugenicists and globalists like Prince Philip want massive depopulation. We know that David Rockefeller and even Walter Cronkite want an one world system. That's all the more reason to expose these extremists even harder. The financial crisis is terrible and was caused by the FED and Wall Street in order to make an international financial order more possible.
Stem cell research that's ethical has worked. Other forms of stem cells haven't worked at all to heal illnesses. One legislator in Texas wants to put forward a measure that could significantly limit future embryonic stem cell research in his state. His name is State Senator Steve Ogden (R-Bryan). He included into Texas Senate's budget bill of an amendment that would ban state funding from supporting research that involves the destruction of human embryos. As we know, President Barack Obama issued an executive order having federal funding of that controversial research. Yet, Ogden's amendment could cause scientists to think twice before experimenting on embryos in Texas. Odgen told the Dallas Morning News that: "There is a significant moral concern amongst many Texans that a human embryo really meets every scientific definition of human life that's out there and that we shouldn't be using human embryos for scientific experiments." Elizabeth Graham, director of Texas Right to Life, commended Ogden's efforts. Graham told WND, "Senator Ogden is moving in the right direction in protecting Texas taxpayers from paying for research that destroys human embryos." Some people that want death to occur in believing that it would damage Texas' reputation in the scientific community. That's a lie, because alternatives exist like IPCs that you don't need embryonic stem cells in order to have pluropotent cells in order to assist human beings with illnesses. Graham believes that Ogden's efforts could help make Texas (which was ranked the No. 2 pro-life state in the country by World Magazine in 2004) a draw for scientists who also have ethical concerns about human embryos. Odgen wants no state funds to destroy human embroys. Ogden's amendment to the state budget reads, "No funds appropriated under this act shall be used in conjunction with or to support research which involves the destruction of a human embryo." The 24-word budget rider narrowly passed the Texas Senate Finance Committee by a vote of 6-5 and will be included in the full budget bill to be debated in the Texas Senate Wednesday. The state's House is still developing its own budget bill. Embryonic stem cell research have not only been exposed as a lie. It has been exposed as unscientific and non-effective. Real adult stem cell research can help millions of people. They have already made people walk and treated dozens of diseases in the world over.
There is another anti-population bill that is in the Congress. The bill is trying to depopulate the Earth according to its crisis. This bil wants to force pregnant women to have mental health screening, and a pro-family believe that it could possibly lead to mediciations to be forced on anything diagnosed as depression. The plan was proposed last year in order to allow the government to test mothers for depression. This proposal thankfully died. However, officials with United Nonprofits and Individuals for Truth and Ethics say the bill is back, and it already has been approved by the U.S. House and assigned to a Senate committee under the designation S.324. This is wrong, because no human has a right to be forced by the government to express mental health screenings, especially if it's against their conscience. This is a draconian bill. Not to mention that depression can be ambigiously defined by doctors. People can be forced to have antidepressants like Prozac and Ritalin, which can make a child's brain worse off than before. Public schools shooters are known to have abused or experienced a dangerous reaction to antidepressants before they went on their murderous rampage. There are examples even of adults murdering innocent peple after taking dangerous antidepressants. In 2001, Andrea Yates was accused of drowning five children, ages 6 months to 7 years in the family bathtub. She had been taking anti-depressants Effexor and Remeron. In 2004, Emiri Padron stabbed herself in the chest after smothering her baby daughter. Zoloft was found in her apartment. The real agenda behind this policy is about the government trying to control mothers to the point of controlling how many children she is allowed to give birth. In other words, this plan is slick form of 21st century population control (along with mandatory universal mental screening. This bill wants drugging the society even if they don't need or want it). We should oppose the Melanie Blocker Stokes Mother's Act (which is supported of course by the United Nations and the New Age Movement).
Protests have gone on during the London G20 meetings. There has been violence. Most of those prepretrating this violence are probably agent provocateurs. Some of these anarchists are causing violence in London. These protestors have broken through police lines and came to the HSBC branch of the Queen Victoria Street according to Guardian reporter Paul Lewis. There was an anarchist flag that has been raised on an office block opposite the branch. A fight was broken up by the police. Smashing up banks and fighting people don't solve the problem of bankers looting billions of dollars of people's wealth at (and causing the collapse of the world economy in order to promote a super currency and world govenrment). The anarchists causing the violence are pictured by the corporate media. One lone "anarchist" takes out a bank window and the world watches. It's obviously that these events are apart of agitation to demonize the vast majority of peaceful protestors in London. Some people have protested the media for hyping up the G20 violence. These anarchists are slick and highly bused in. The cops “have a powerful interest in exaggerating threats and, perhaps, an interest in ensuring that sometimes these threats materialize,” writes Monbiot. “This could explain what I’ve seen at one protest after another, where peaceful demonstrations turn into ugly rucks only when the police attack. The wildly disproportionate and unnecessary violence I’ve sometimes seen the police deploy could scarcely be better designed to provoke a reaction.” The international bankers are using this event to discredit the protestors, while trying to centralize more wealth into international bodies. The Gladio Operation tried to blame violence on leftists, so Italy can be further controlled by their elisits. These violent anarchist can protest, yet a legitimate anti-poverty organization (called the The World Development Movement) has had its “accreditation” to protest at the G20 was removed on the orders of Downing Street. Also, violence in London can bring even more limits on civil liberties when Britian has too much liberty suppression as it is. Many protests are legitimately opposing the most audacious banker rip off in recorded history.
Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com March 31, 2009 made the point that Democratic Senators are telling Barack Obama not to rescind the abortion protections for doctors. There are only 2 Democratic Senators that want this policy of protecting doctors' freedom of conscience to resume. Their names are Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania. They sent Barack Obama a letter during this week telling him that the Provider Conscience Clause should remain. The Provider Conscience Cluase is a collection of new regulations the Bush administration put on the books to provide better enforcement of three federal laws making sure that medical staff and facilities are not forced to participate in abortions. The White House in February said that President Barack Obama is starting the process of overturning the protections and he will make a final decision after the public comment period expires in April. Pro-life advocates want the freedom of conscience to remain among doctors. The Democrats' letter says, "We urge you to preserve the conscience protection rule, which defends individual health care providers and entities with moral concerns regarding specific procedures." We believe it is very important that federally funded health care providers and entities not be discriminated against because they refuse to participate in procedures or activities which are a violation of their consciences," they add. Nelson's press secretary Clay Westrope told Baptist Press in an email that the letter "is largely referencing the Bush HHS regulations, but not only those regulations." The Casey and Nelson letter also asks President Obama to endorse the Pregnant Women Support Act (S. 270), which is a bill that Democrats for Life of America originated to try to reduce abortions by 95 percent over 10 years. The bill merges pro-life measure tht limit abortions (plus has support for pregnancy centers, prenatal care, child care, and other social programs that could reduce the financial pressures that prompt many women to have abortions). Federal laws refuse to force doctors and hospitals to be forced to perform abortions. The Bush administration to their credit added additional protections. Pro-abortion groups want the rules to be overturned. Three pro-life medical associations banded together to fight the lawsuit. Attorneys with the Christian Legal Society and the Alliance Defense Fund filed motions to intervene in that and two other lawsuits filed by top pro-abortion groups to overturn the Provider Conscience Clause. The freedom of conscience is one of the core components of American law. Without it, your rights will do down apparently. Therefore, it's key to never force a doctor or hospitals to conduct abortions if they have social or religious reservations about it.
Steven Duke from BBC on April 1, 2009 reported that a Clinton advisor said the lie that the Earth population is exceeding its limits. This person is named Nina Fedoroff. Nina Fedoroff told the BBC One Planet programme that humans had exceeded the Earth’s “limits of sustainability." She has been the science and technology advisor to the U.S. Secretary of State since 2007. She now advises Hillary Clinton in the new Obama administration. She is right that humans need to manage water supplies better and other lands. She is dead wrong that the population growth worldwide of human beings ought to be radically reduced. Her other error is that she wants GM foos to exist. See, genetically modified foods have known to be dangerous and carry huge negative side effects. This isn't just me writing this down. Mainstream scientists and organic food activists have opposed GM foods heavily. Also, she wants paranioa about climate change, when the Earth's CO2 is a natural chemical for the Earth's survival. Over 32,000 scientists have signed “The Petition Project” (over 9,000 of them with PhDs) proclaiming that man is not the chief cause of warming and that this warming will not be disastrous. True science isn't about creating some consensus, it's about careful analysis of evidence that is observed (along as the results being replicated to improve accuracy). However, doubling the amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere will not double the temperature rise. There is a definite limit, and that limit is determined not by the amount of greenhouse gases in the air, but by the amount of solar radiation “reflected” from the Earth. Once all the infrared rays have been “captured” by the greenhouse gases there can be no additional increase in temperature. Real environmental issues of clean water, pollution, diseases, and the rainforests should be addressed not paranoia about climate change at all. So, Nina is slick in supporting the neo-Malthusian lie that the Earth is overcrowded (when all humans can fit in the state of Texas given 1,000 sq. feet each). Not to mention that underpopulation crises are in Russia, North Korea, parts of Europe, and the Third World. Population growth gives must needed beauty and diversity to the human population.
Health freedom is under threat under the stimulus bill that was signed into law by Barack Obama. The law gives money to be earmarked for the creation of a National Health Care Database to be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. The database is to be formed in partnership with Microsoft. Money is to be awarded to several colleges and universities, which will recieved the software under charged. These universities will set the data up into fellowships to handle the information from students. This is of course wrong for many reasons. One major reason is that this provision is a violation of privacy rights and the Bill of Rights. Some of these sick ideals was the brainchild of Tom Daschle. He quit the Health and Human Services confirmation hearing because of his tax issues. This database so far has no opt out provision. There are no informed consent parts of this law and it is the unConstitutional abridgment of due process. Many Congress members are now saying that they didn't have time to witness all of the components of the bill. If that was the case, they would of easily refused to vote or warn others about time limits on reading the bill. As reported by WorldNet Daily and the Institute for Health Freedom, one of the many groups which discovered the provision hidden within all the provisions, the administration of this database will be overseen by an ominous sounding new bureaucratic agency, the "Federal Coordinating Counsel for Comparative Effectiveness Research." People predict that over 600,000 medical providers will have access to this database like public employees at the Department of Health and Human Services. Some fear that even lawyers, private insurers, etc. will have access with these public records without the permission of patients and other citizens. The justification for this plan is to handle treatments of citizens according to the cost/benefit ratios. In other words, as a CEO or insurer would for a life insurance policy with respect to the costs vs. benefits and projected life expectancy given weight prior to approval of any treatment or coverage under this proposed governmental plan. Clearly, Americans have the right to choose whatever health care they want. Some want socialism to reign in America where health care freedom is heavily diminished. Great Britian had to eliminated some of their health care costs/benefits provisions, because it lead to damage of health quality (and it made people to choose between treatments). So, hopefully, the courts will ban having a digital database of all Americans' health records (without our permission or consent even).
Secret Societies relates to various Knighthoods as well. Many Knights of Malta member were key leaders in the Second World War. Even today one Security Minister is named Lord Alan William John West. He's a Knight of the Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath (He has links to the Carlyle Group via QinetiQ). There is Hugh Bullock, who was the long time President of the Pilgrim Society. She is pictured with 2 women (Their names are Mrs. Nelson Rockefeller and Princess Margaret) and he is wearing a Knight of Malta cross. The picture is found in November 19, 1965. Ironically, the patron of the Pilgrim Society is Queen Elizabeth II. Cardinal Egan is a spiritual leader of the Knights of Malt. Rudy Giuliani is an award winner of the Order of Merit of Savoy. Rudy Giuliani is another member of the Phi Rho Pi Fraternity. Greek lettered Fraternities are known entry level organizations into the real elite of the world. These elitists are found in the Pilgrims, the Bilderbergers, high level Freemasonry, and the Vatican/Jesuit network. Tons of folks already realize the heresies of the Mormon Church. They falsely view that man can be a god, that Jesus and Lucifer are spirit brother, and that Jesus Christ appeared in ancient America. Freemason Heber C. Kimball was a member of the First Quorum of the Twelve under Joseph Smith & a counsellor to Brigham Young during his presidency. Even Freemason John Taylor succeeded Brigham Young to the Presidency of the LDS Church. He was an apostle under Joseph Smith. The lesson about the Mormons is that we ought to be careful not to be swayed by false religions or by cults. Joseph Smith not only had Masonic ties. He meet with the Jesuit De Smet as well. Many Jesuits have worked with and infiltrated religions in order to try to control them (along with promoting their causes).
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment